Material handling: Difference between revisions
Fixed typo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Reverted 2 edits by 59.103.119.78 (talk): Spam |
||
(42 intermediate revisions by 33 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Sub-discipline of mechanical engineering}} |
|||
[[File:US Navy 050831-N-3725R-004 Fork trucks from the amphibious assault ship USS Iwo Jima (LHD 7) load stores from the pier to the ship prior to getting underway from Naval Station Norfolk.jpg|thumb|Lift trucks provisioning a navy ship]] |
[[File:US Navy 050831-N-3725R-004 Fork trucks from the amphibious assault ship USS Iwo Jima (LHD 7) load stores from the pier to the ship prior to getting underway from Naval Station Norfolk.jpg|thumb|Lift trucks provisioning a navy ship]] |
||
[[File:Airbus A380-800 of Lufthansa in Frankfurt Germany - Aircraft ground handling at FRA EDDF.jpg|thumb| Loading and removing cargo from a [[Lufthansa]] [[Airbus A380]] at [[Frankfurt Airport]].]] |
|||
'''Material handling''' involves short-distance movement within the confines of a building or between a building and a transportation vehicle.<ref>{{Cite book|title = Management of Business Logistics|last = Coyle|first = J.J.|publisher = South-Western|year = 1992|location = Mason, OH|pages = 308}}</ref> It uses a wide range of manual, semi-automated, and automated equipment and includes consideration of the protection, storage, and control of materials throughout their manufacturing, warehousing, distribution, consumption, and disposal.<ref>{{Cite web|url = http://www.mhi.org/fundamentals/material-handling|title = Material handling | |
'''Material handling''' involves short-distance movement within the confines of a building or between a building and a transportation vehicle.<ref>{{Cite book|title = Management of Business Logistics|last = Coyle|first = J.J.|publisher = South-Western|year = 1992|location = Mason, OH|pages = 308}}</ref> It uses a wide range of manual, semi-automated, and automated equipment and includes consideration of the protection, storage, and control of materials throughout their manufacturing, warehousing, distribution, consumption, and disposal.<ref>{{Cite web|url = http://www.mhi.org/fundamentals/material-handling|title = Material handling |access-date = 2014-10-02|publisher = MHI}}</ref> Material handling can be used to create ''time and place utility'' through the handling, storage, and control of waste, as distinct from manufacturing, which creates ''form utility'' by changing the shape, form, and makeup of material.<ref>{{Cite book|title = Material Handling System Design|last = Apple|first = J.M.|publisher = Ronald|year = 1972|location = New York}}</ref> |
||
== Role |
== Role == |
||
⚫ | Material handling plays an important role in manufacturing and logistics. Almost every item of physical commerce has been transported on a conveyor or lift truck or another type of material handling equipment in manufacturing plants, warehouses, and retail stores. While material handling is usually required as part of every production worker's job, over 650,000 people in the U.S. work as dedicated "material moving machine operators" and have a median annual wage of $31,530 (May 2012).<ref>{{Cite web|url = http://www.bls.gov/ooh/transportation-and-material-moving/material-moving-machine-operators.htm|title = Occupational Outlook Handbook|access-date = 2015-05-14|publisher = BLS}}</ref> These operators use material handling equipment to transport various goods in a variety of industrial settings including moving construction materials around building sites or moving goods onto ships. |
||
Material handling plays an important role in manufacturing and logistics, which together represent over 20% of the U.S. economy.<ref>Manufacturing |
|||
12.0% in 2014 ({{Cite web|url = http://www.nam.org/Newsroom/Facts-About-Manufacturing/|title = Facts About Manufacturing|date = |accessdate = 2015-05-05 |publisher = Nat. Assoc. of Mfg. }}) and logistics |
|||
⚫ | |||
== Design of material handling systems == |
== Design of material handling systems == |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
[[File:Unit Load Size.png|thumb|Production batch can be split into a smaller transfer batch containing several unit loads, each of which can contain multiple parts]] |
[[File:Unit Load Size.png|thumb|Production batch can be split into a smaller transfer batch containing several unit loads, each of which can contain multiple parts]] |
||
A unit load is either a single unit of an item, or multiple units so arranged or restricted that they can be handled as a single unit and maintain their integrity. Although granular, liquid, and gaseous materials can be transported in bulk, they can also be contained into unit loads using bags, drums, and cylinders.<ref>{{Cite book|title = Basics of Material Handling|last = Kulwiec|first = R.A.|publisher = MHI|year = 1981|location = Charlotte, NC|pages = 10}}</ref> Advantages of unit loads are that more items can be handled at the same time (thereby reducing the number of trips required, and potentially reducing handling costs, loading and unloading times, and product damage) and that it enables the use of standardized material handling equipment. Disadvantages of unit loads include the negative impact of batching on production system performance, and the cost of returning empty containers/pallets to their point of origin.<ref>{{Cite book|title = Manufacturing Facilities: Location, Planning, and Design|last = Sule|first = D.R.|publisher = PWS|year = 1994|location = Boston|pages = 249}}</ref> |
A [[unit load]] is either a single unit of an item, or multiple units so arranged or restricted that they can be handled as a single unit and maintain their integrity. Although granular, liquid, and gaseous materials can be transported in bulk, they can also be contained into unit loads using bags, drums, and cylinders.<ref>{{Cite book|title = Basics of Material Handling|last = Kulwiec|first = R.A.|publisher = MHI|year = 1981|location = Charlotte, NC|pages = 10}}</ref> Advantages of unit loads are that more items can be handled at the same time (thereby reducing the number of trips required, and potentially reducing handling costs, loading and unloading times, and product damage) and that it enables the use of standardized material handling equipment. Disadvantages of unit loads include the negative impact of batching on production system performance, and the cost of returning empty containers/pallets to their point of origin.<ref>{{Cite book|title = Manufacturing Facilities: Location, Planning, and Design|last = Sule|first = D.R.|publisher = PWS|year = 1994|location = Boston|pages = 249}}</ref> |
||
[[File:Pallet wrapper.jpg|thumb|Stretch-wrapping machine used to form a unit load]] |
[[File:Pallet wrapper.jpg|thumb|Stretch-wrapping machine used to form a unit load]] |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
=== Distribution === |
=== Distribution === |
||
[[File:ALMACEN CAYCO carpetilla.jpg|thumb|Narrow-aisle lift truck used in distribution]] |
[[File:ALMACEN CAYCO carpetilla.jpg|thumb|Narrow-aisle lift truck used in distribution]] |
||
Selecting a unit load size for distribution can be difficult because containers/pallets are usually available only in standard sizes and configurations; truck trailers, rail boxcars, and airplane cargo bays are limited in width, length, and height; and the number of feasible container/pallet sizes for a load may be limited due to the existing warehouse layout and storage rack configurations and customer package/carton size and retail store shelf restrictions. Also, the practical size of a unit load may be limited by the equipment and aisle space available and the need for safe material handling.<ref>{{Cite web|url = http://www.ise.ncsu.edu/kay/Material_Handling_Equipment.pdf|title = Material Handling Equipment|date = 2012| |
Selecting a unit load size for distribution can be difficult because containers/pallets are usually available only in standard sizes and configurations; truck trailers, rail boxcars, and airplane cargo bays are limited in width, length, and height; and the number of feasible container/pallet sizes for a load may be limited due to the existing warehouse layout and storage rack configurations and customer package/carton size and retail store shelf restrictions. Also, the practical size of a unit load may be limited by the equipment and aisle space available and the need for safe material handling.<ref>{{Cite web|url = http://www.ise.ncsu.edu/kay/Material_Handling_Equipment.pdf|title = Material Handling Equipment|date = 2012|access-date = 2014-10-02|last = Kay|first = M.G.|pages = 5–6}}</ref> |
||
== |
== Health and safety == |
||
{{Main|Ergonomics for manual material handling}} |
|||
Manual material handling work contributes to a large percentage of the over half a million cases of musculoskeletal disorders reported annually in the [[United States]]. Musculoskeletal disorders often involve strains and sprains to the lower back, shoulders, and upper limbs. They can result in protracted pain, disability, medical treatment, and financial stress for those afflicted with them, and employers often find themselves paying the bill, either directly or through workers’ compensation insurance, at the same time they must cope with the loss of the full capacity of their workers.<ref name="NIOSH Lifting Equation">{{cite web|date=2017-08-09|title=NIOSH Lifting Equation App: NLE Calc|url=https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/ergonomics/nlecalc.html|access-date=6 February 2019|website=U.S. [[National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health]]}}</ref><ref name=":1">{{Cite journal|date=1994-01-01|title=Applications manual for the revised NIOSH lifting equation.|url=https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/94-110/default.html|website=U.S. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health|language=en-us|doi=10.26616/NIOSHPUB94110|doi-access=free}}</ref> |
|||
Scientific evidence shows that effective ergonomic interventions can lower the physical demands of MMH work tasks, thereby lowering the incidence and severity of the musculoskeletal injuries they can cause. Their potential for reducing injury related costs alone make ergonomic interventions a useful tool for improving a company’s productivity, product quality, and overall business competitiveness. But very often productivity gets an additional and solid shot in the arm when managers and workers take a fresh look at how best to use energy, equipment, and exertion to get the job done in the most efficient, effective, and effortless way possible. Planning that applies these principles can result in big wins for all concerned.<ref name="NIOSH Lifting Equation" /><ref name=":1" /> |
|||
== Types == |
|||
=== Manual handling === |
=== Manual handling === |
||
[[File:Niosh-lifting-equation-illustration.gif|thumb|NIOSH Lifting Equation applied to loading punch press stock task]] |
[[File:Niosh-lifting-equation-illustration.gif|thumb|NIOSH Lifting Equation applied to loading punch press stock task]] |
||
{{main|Manual handling of loads}} |
|||
Manual handling refers to the use of a worker’s hands to move individual containers by lifting, lowering, filling, emptying, or carrying them. It can expose workers to physical dangers that can lead to injuries: a large percentage of the over half a million cases of musculoskeletal disorders reported in the U.S. each year arise from manual handling, and often involve strains and sprains to a person's lower back, shoulders and upper limbs.<ref>{{Cite web|url = https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2007-131/pdfs/2007-131.pdf|title = Ergonomic Guidelines for Manual Material Handling|date = 2007|access-date = 2015-05-15|publisher = California Department of Industrial Relations}}</ref> |
|||
Ergonomic improvements can be used to modify manual handling tasks to reduce injury. These improvements can include reconfiguring the task and using positioning equipment like lift/tilt/turn tables, hoists, balancers, and manipulators to reduce reaching and bending.<ref>{{Cite web|title=HSE: Making the best use of lifting and handling aids|url=https://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg398.pdf|publisher=Health and Safety Executive}}</ref> The NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health) 1991 Revised Lifting Equation<ref>{{Cite book|title = Applications Manual for the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation|last = Waters|first = T.R.|publisher = Centers for Disease Control and Prevention|year = 1994|location = Cincinnati, OH}}</ref> can be used to evaluate manual lifting tasks. Under ideal circumstances, the maximum recommended weight for manual lifting to avoid back injuries is 51 lb (23.13 kg). Using the exact conditions of the lift (height, distance lifted, weight, position of weight relative to body, asymmetrical lifts, and objects that are difficult to grasp), six multipliers are used to reduce the maximum recommended weight for less than ideal lifting tasks. |
|||
=== Automated handling === |
=== Automated handling === |
||
[[File:FANUC R2000iB AtWork.jpg|thumb|Industrial robot]] |
[[File:FANUC R2000iB AtWork.jpg|thumb|Industrial robot]] |
||
Whenever technically and economically feasible, equipment can be used to reduce and sometimes replace the need to manually handle material. Most existing material handling equipment is only ''semi-automated'' because a human operator is needed for tasks like loading/unloading and driving that are difficult and/or too costly to fully automate. However, ongoing advances in sensing, machine intelligence, and robotics have made it possible to fully automate an increasing number of handling tasks.<ref name=":0" /> A rough guide to determine how much can be spent for automated equipment that would replace one material handler is to consider that, with benefits, the median moving machine operator costs a company $45,432 per year.<ref>$31,530 median wage divided by 0.694, where wages represent 69.4% and benefits 30.6% of total labor cost ({{Cite web|url = http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.nr0.htm|title = Employer Costs for Employee Compensation|date = December 2014| |
Whenever technically and economically feasible, equipment can be used to reduce and sometimes replace the need to manually handle material. Most existing material handling equipment is only ''semi-automated'' because a human operator is needed for tasks like loading/unloading and driving that are difficult and/or too costly to fully automate. However, ongoing advances in sensing, machine intelligence, and robotics have made it possible to fully automate an increasing number of handling tasks.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|url = http://www.mhlroadmap.org/downloads/mhl_roadmap.pdf|title = Material Handling and Logistics U.S. Roadmap|date = January 2014|access-date = 2015-05-08|publisher = MHI|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20150912012105/http://www.mhlroadmap.org/downloads/mhl_roadmap.pdf|archive-date = 2015-09-12|url-status = dead}}</ref> A rough guide to determine how much can be spent for automated equipment that would replace one material handler is to consider that, with benefits, the median moving machine operator costs a company $45,432 per year.<ref>$31,530 median wage divided by 0.694, where wages represent 69.4% and benefits 30.6% of total labor cost ({{Cite web|url = http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.nr0.htm|title = Employer Costs for Employee Compensation|date = December 2014|access-date = 2015-05-15|publisher = BLS}}).</ref> Assuming a real interest rate of 1.7%<ref>Average U.S. rate from 2005-2009 ({{Cite web|url = http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/FR.INR.RINR|title = Real interest rate|access-date = 2015-05-15|publisher = The World Bank}}).</ref> and a service life of 5 years<ref>Average service life of Custom Software ({{Cite web|url = https://www.bea.gov/national/FA2004/Tablecandtext.pdf|title = BEA Depreciation Estimates|date = 2004|access-date = 2015-05-15|publisher = BEA}}), conservative assumption since software is a major component of automated equipment and has the shortest service life compared to other components.</ref> with no adoption/adaptation cost, no learning cost, no training cost, and no operating cost for equipment with no salvage value,<ref>Conservative assumption that simplifies the analysis since any positive salvage value would |
||
increase the purchase cost estimate.</ref> a company should be willing to pay up to |
increase the purchase cost estimate.</ref> a company should be willing to pay up to |
||
Line 41: | Line 50: | ||
to purchase automated equipment to replace one worker.<ref>Amount willing to pay is the present value of an [[Present value|annuity immediate]].</ref> In many cases, automated equipment is not as flexible as a human operator, both with respect to not being able to do a particular task as well as a human and not being able to be as easily redeployed to do other tasks as needs change. |
to purchase automated equipment to replace one worker.<ref>Amount willing to pay is the present value of an [[Present value|annuity immediate]].</ref> In many cases, automated equipment is not as flexible as a human operator, both with respect to not being able to do a particular task as well as a human and not being able to be as easily redeployed to do other tasks as needs change. |
||
== Benefits of materials handling == |
|||
* '''Better efficiency''': Material handling equipment helps streamline the movement of products. Compared to manual handling, materials handling equipment greatly saves time and effort.<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Arora |first1=Keshava Chanda |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0P2uqbHLxfkC&dq=advantages+of+material+handling+equipment&pg=PA2 |title=Aspects of Materials Handling |last2=Shinde |first2=Vikas V. |date=2007 |publisher=Firewall Media |isbn=978-81-318-0251-9 |language=en}}</ref> |
|||
* '''Improved safety''': When manually handling goods, there are a lot of risks of injuries experienced e.g fall from heights. When unit load formation equipment is factored in, all these risks are reduced to almost zero.<ref>{{Cite web |last=DLSM |first=Syed Muhamad Faizal |date=2018-06-22 |title=The Five Essential Methods for an Efficient Warehouse Operation - SIPMM Publications |url=https://publication.sipmm.edu.sg/five-essential-methods-efficient-warehouse-operation/#4_Material_Handling_Equipment |access-date=2023-03-14 |website=publication.sipmm.edu.sg |language=en-US}}</ref> |
|||
* '''Cost savings''': Materials handling equipment is designed to handle materials and products in a specific way, minimizing the risk of damage, therefore, saving costs that could have been spent on damaged goods. |
|||
* '''Flexibility''': Materials handling is customizable to meet the specific needs of different industries and operations, therefore offering a high degree of flexibility and versatility. |
|||
== See also == |
== See also == |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
*[[Automation]] |
*[[Automation]] |
||
*[[Bulk material handling]] |
|||
⚫ | |||
*[[Conveyor system]] |
*[[Conveyor system]] |
||
⚫ | |||
*[[Industrial robot]] |
*[[Industrial robot]] |
||
*[[ |
*[[Material handling equipment]] |
||
*[[Warehouse]] |
*[[Warehouse]] |
||
*[[Unit load]] |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
== Notes and references== |
== Notes and references== |
||
Line 64: | Line 81: | ||
* Mulcahy, D.E., 1999, ''Materials Handling Handbook'', New York: McGraw-Hill. |
* Mulcahy, D.E., 1999, ''Materials Handling Handbook'', New York: McGraw-Hill. |
||
== |
==External links== |
||
{{Wiktionary}} |
{{Wiktionary}} |
||
⚫ | |||
*[http://www.mhi.org/cicmhe College Industry Council on Material Handling Education (CICMHE)] |
*[http://www.mhi.org/cicmhe College Industry Council on Material Handling Education (CICMHE)] |
||
*[http://www.fem-eur.com/ European Federation of Materials Handling] |
*[http://www.fem-eur.com/ European Federation of Materials Handling] |
||
*[http://www.mhlroadmap.org/downloads/mhl_roadmap.pdf Material Handling and Logistics U.S. Roadmap] |
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20150912012105/http://www.mhlroadmap.org/downloads/mhl_roadmap.pdf Material Handling and Logistics U.S. Roadmap] |
||
*[http://www.mheda.org Material Handling Equipment Distributors Association] |
*[http://www.mheda.org Material Handling Equipment Distributors Association] |
||
*[http://mhwebportal.org/taxonomy Material Handling Equipment Taxonomy] |
*[http://mhwebportal.org/taxonomy Material Handling Equipment Taxonomy] |
||
Line 75: | Line 93: | ||
{{IE 7 Tools}} |
{{IE 7 Tools}} |
||
{{Authority control}} |
|||
[[Category:Material handling| ]] |
[[Category:Material handling| ]] |
||
[[Category:Material-handling equipment|*]] |
Latest revision as of 12:01, 12 March 2024
Material handling involves short-distance movement within the confines of a building or between a building and a transportation vehicle.[1] It uses a wide range of manual, semi-automated, and automated equipment and includes consideration of the protection, storage, and control of materials throughout their manufacturing, warehousing, distribution, consumption, and disposal.[2] Material handling can be used to create time and place utility through the handling, storage, and control of waste, as distinct from manufacturing, which creates form utility by changing the shape, form, and makeup of material.[3]
Role
[edit]Material handling plays an important role in manufacturing and logistics. Almost every item of physical commerce has been transported on a conveyor or lift truck or another type of material handling equipment in manufacturing plants, warehouses, and retail stores. While material handling is usually required as part of every production worker's job, over 650,000 people in the U.S. work as dedicated "material moving machine operators" and have a median annual wage of $31,530 (May 2012).[4] These operators use material handling equipment to transport various goods in a variety of industrial settings including moving construction materials around building sites or moving goods onto ships.
Design of material handling systems
[edit]Material handling is integral to the design of most production systems since the efficient flow of material between the activities of a production system is heavily dependent on the arrangement (or layout) of the activities. If two activities are adjacent to each other, then material might easily be handed from one activity to another. If activities are in sequence, a conveyor can move the material at low cost. If activities are separated, more expensive industrial trucks or overhead conveyors are required for transport. The high cost of using an industrial truck for material transport is due to both the labor costs of the operator and the negative impact on the performance of a production system (e.g., increased work in process) when multiple units of material are combined into a single transfer batch in order to reduce the number of trips required for transport.[5]
The unit load concept
[edit]A unit load is either a single unit of an item, or multiple units so arranged or restricted that they can be handled as a single unit and maintain their integrity. Although granular, liquid, and gaseous materials can be transported in bulk, they can also be contained into unit loads using bags, drums, and cylinders.[6] Advantages of unit loads are that more items can be handled at the same time (thereby reducing the number of trips required, and potentially reducing handling costs, loading and unloading times, and product damage) and that it enables the use of standardized material handling equipment. Disadvantages of unit loads include the negative impact of batching on production system performance, and the cost of returning empty containers/pallets to their point of origin.[7]
In-process handling
[edit]Unit loads can be used both for in-process handling and for distribution (receiving, storing, and shipping). Unit load design involves determining the type, size, weight, and configuration of the load; the equipment and method used to handle the load; and the methods of forming (or building) and breaking down the load. For in-process handling, unit loads should not be larger than the production batch size of parts in process. Large production batches (used to increase the utilization of bottleneck activities) can be split into smaller transfer batches for handling purposes, where each transfer batch contains one or more unit loads, and small unit loads can be combined into a larger transfer batch to allow more efficient transport.[8]
Distribution
[edit]Selecting a unit load size for distribution can be difficult because containers/pallets are usually available only in standard sizes and configurations; truck trailers, rail boxcars, and airplane cargo bays are limited in width, length, and height; and the number of feasible container/pallet sizes for a load may be limited due to the existing warehouse layout and storage rack configurations and customer package/carton size and retail store shelf restrictions. Also, the practical size of a unit load may be limited by the equipment and aisle space available and the need for safe material handling.[9]
Health and safety
[edit]Manual material handling work contributes to a large percentage of the over half a million cases of musculoskeletal disorders reported annually in the United States. Musculoskeletal disorders often involve strains and sprains to the lower back, shoulders, and upper limbs. They can result in protracted pain, disability, medical treatment, and financial stress for those afflicted with them, and employers often find themselves paying the bill, either directly or through workers’ compensation insurance, at the same time they must cope with the loss of the full capacity of their workers.[10][11]
Scientific evidence shows that effective ergonomic interventions can lower the physical demands of MMH work tasks, thereby lowering the incidence and severity of the musculoskeletal injuries they can cause. Their potential for reducing injury related costs alone make ergonomic interventions a useful tool for improving a company’s productivity, product quality, and overall business competitiveness. But very often productivity gets an additional and solid shot in the arm when managers and workers take a fresh look at how best to use energy, equipment, and exertion to get the job done in the most efficient, effective, and effortless way possible. Planning that applies these principles can result in big wins for all concerned.[10][11]
Types
[edit]Manual handling
[edit]Manual handling refers to the use of a worker’s hands to move individual containers by lifting, lowering, filling, emptying, or carrying them. It can expose workers to physical dangers that can lead to injuries: a large percentage of the over half a million cases of musculoskeletal disorders reported in the U.S. each year arise from manual handling, and often involve strains and sprains to a person's lower back, shoulders and upper limbs.[12]
Ergonomic improvements can be used to modify manual handling tasks to reduce injury. These improvements can include reconfiguring the task and using positioning equipment like lift/tilt/turn tables, hoists, balancers, and manipulators to reduce reaching and bending.[13] The NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health) 1991 Revised Lifting Equation[14] can be used to evaluate manual lifting tasks. Under ideal circumstances, the maximum recommended weight for manual lifting to avoid back injuries is 51 lb (23.13 kg). Using the exact conditions of the lift (height, distance lifted, weight, position of weight relative to body, asymmetrical lifts, and objects that are difficult to grasp), six multipliers are used to reduce the maximum recommended weight for less than ideal lifting tasks.
Automated handling
[edit]Whenever technically and economically feasible, equipment can be used to reduce and sometimes replace the need to manually handle material. Most existing material handling equipment is only semi-automated because a human operator is needed for tasks like loading/unloading and driving that are difficult and/or too costly to fully automate. However, ongoing advances in sensing, machine intelligence, and robotics have made it possible to fully automate an increasing number of handling tasks.[15] A rough guide to determine how much can be spent for automated equipment that would replace one material handler is to consider that, with benefits, the median moving machine operator costs a company $45,432 per year.[16] Assuming a real interest rate of 1.7%[17] and a service life of 5 years[18] with no adoption/adaptation cost, no learning cost, no training cost, and no operating cost for equipment with no salvage value,[19] a company should be willing to pay up to
to purchase automated equipment to replace one worker.[20] In many cases, automated equipment is not as flexible as a human operator, both with respect to not being able to do a particular task as well as a human and not being able to be as easily redeployed to do other tasks as needs change.
Benefits of materials handling
[edit]- Better efficiency: Material handling equipment helps streamline the movement of products. Compared to manual handling, materials handling equipment greatly saves time and effort.[21]
- Improved safety: When manually handling goods, there are a lot of risks of injuries experienced e.g fall from heights. When unit load formation equipment is factored in, all these risks are reduced to almost zero.[22]
- Cost savings: Materials handling equipment is designed to handle materials and products in a specific way, minimizing the risk of damage, therefore, saving costs that could have been spent on damaged goods.
- Flexibility: Materials handling is customizable to meet the specific needs of different industries and operations, therefore offering a high degree of flexibility and versatility.
See also
[edit]- Automated storage and retrieval system
- Automation
- Bulk material handling
- College-Industry Council on Material Handling Education
- Conveyor system
- Human factors and ergonomics
- Industrial robot
- Material handling equipment
- Warehouse
- Unit load
Notes and references
[edit]- ^ Coyle, J.J. (1992). Management of Business Logistics. Mason, OH: South-Western. p. 308.
- ^ "Material handling". MHI. Retrieved 2014-10-02.
- ^ Apple, J.M. (1972). Material Handling System Design. New York: Ronald.
- ^ "Occupational Outlook Handbook". BLS. Retrieved 2015-05-14.
- ^ Hopp, W.J. (2011). Factory Physics. Long Grove, IL: Waveland. pp. 318–327.
- ^ Kulwiec, R.A. (1981). Basics of Material Handling. Charlotte, NC: MHI. p. 10.
- ^ Sule, D.R. (1994). Manufacturing Facilities: Location, Planning, and Design. Boston: PWS. p. 249.
- ^ Askin, R.G. (1993). Modeling and Analysis of Manufacturing Systems. New York: Wiley. p. 292.
- ^ Kay, M.G. (2012). "Material Handling Equipment" (PDF). pp. 5–6. Retrieved 2014-10-02.
- ^ a b "NIOSH Lifting Equation App: NLE Calc". U.S. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. 2017-08-09. Retrieved 6 February 2019.
- ^ a b "Applications manual for the revised NIOSH lifting equation". U.S. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. 1994-01-01. doi:10.26616/NIOSHPUB94110.
- ^ "Ergonomic Guidelines for Manual Material Handling" (PDF). California Department of Industrial Relations. 2007. Retrieved 2015-05-15.
- ^ "HSE: Making the best use of lifting and handling aids" (PDF). Health and Safety Executive.
- ^ Waters, T.R. (1994). Applications Manual for the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation. Cincinnati, OH: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
- ^ "Material Handling and Logistics U.S. Roadmap" (PDF). MHI. January 2014. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-09-12. Retrieved 2015-05-08.
- ^ $31,530 median wage divided by 0.694, where wages represent 69.4% and benefits 30.6% of total labor cost ("Employer Costs for Employee Compensation". BLS. December 2014. Retrieved 2015-05-15.).
- ^ Average U.S. rate from 2005-2009 ("Real interest rate". The World Bank. Retrieved 2015-05-15.).
- ^ Average service life of Custom Software ("BEA Depreciation Estimates" (PDF). BEA. 2004. Retrieved 2015-05-15.), conservative assumption since software is a major component of automated equipment and has the shortest service life compared to other components.
- ^ Conservative assumption that simplifies the analysis since any positive salvage value would increase the purchase cost estimate.
- ^ Amount willing to pay is the present value of an annuity immediate.
- ^ Arora, Keshava Chanda; Shinde, Vikas V. (2007). Aspects of Materials Handling. Firewall Media. ISBN 978-81-318-0251-9.
- ^ DLSM, Syed Muhamad Faizal (2018-06-22). "The Five Essential Methods for an Efficient Warehouse Operation - SIPMM Publications". publication.sipmm.edu.sg. Retrieved 2023-03-14.
Further reading
[edit]- Apple, J.M., 1972, Material Handling System Design, New York: Ronald.
- Bartholdi, J.J., III, and Hackman, S.T., 2014, Warehouse & Distribution Science, Release 0.96.
- Frazelle, E., 2002, World-Class Warehousing and Material Handling, New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Heragu, S.S., 2008, Facilities Design, 3rd Ed., CRC Press.
- Kulwiec, R.A., Ed., 1985, Materials Handling Handbook, 2nd Ed., New York: Wiley.
- Mulcahy, D.E., 1999, Materials Handling Handbook, New York: McGraw-Hill.