User:Ameyabapat: Difference between revisions
Ameyabapat (talk | contribs) |
Ameyabapat (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think wikipedia is way more west biased than initially appears. |
"I think wikipedia is way more west biased than initially appears." |
||
This is what I wrote 14 years ago, and stopped contributing to wikipedia as I finished graduation, joined the workforce and started a family. |
|||
Now after 14 years, I feel like may be I can find sometime for this? |
|||
Now after couple more years, I read article on Narendra Modi. Its not a wikipedia/encyclopedia type article. Its 100% anti-Hindu, anti-India propoganda. 100% utter lies and garbage. |
|||
The fact that this article is locked and in current state, points to what the frequent editor's are biased against. |
|||
I used to donate 100s of dollars to wikipedia, but this article stops them. |
|||
This article completely validated my statement from now like 23 years ago- that wikipedia is NOT neutral. It is extremely biased and does not publish neutral content. |
|||
Latest revision as of 16:09, 15 March 2024
"I think wikipedia is way more west biased than initially appears."
This is what I wrote 14 years ago, and stopped contributing to wikipedia as I finished graduation, joined the workforce and started a family.
Now after 14 years, I feel like may be I can find sometime for this?
Now after couple more years, I read article on Narendra Modi. Its not a wikipedia/encyclopedia type article. Its 100% anti-Hindu, anti-India propoganda. 100% utter lies and garbage.
The fact that this article is locked and in current state, points to what the frequent editor's are biased against.
I used to donate 100s of dollars to wikipedia, but this article stops them.
This article completely validated my statement from now like 23 years ago- that wikipedia is NOT neutral. It is extremely biased and does not publish neutral content.