Jump to content

User:Ameyabapat: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
PoccilScript (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
"I think wikipedia is way more west biased than initially appears."
== Ameya Bapat ==

{{User India}}
This is what I wrote 14 years ago, and stopped contributing to wikipedia as I finished graduation, joined the workforce and started a family.
{{User Minnesota}}

{{user degree/MS|Mechanical Engineering}}
Now after 14 years, I feel like may be I can find sometime for this?
{{User:The Raven's Apprentice/Userboxes/User Physics}}

{{user Scientist}}

{{user webmaster}}
Now after couple more years, I read article on Narendra Modi. Its not a wikipedia/encyclopedia type article. Its 100% anti-Hindu, anti-India propoganda. 100% utter lies and garbage.
{{user maps}}

{{User:Feureau/UserBox/LovesCoffee}}
The fact that this article is locked and in current state, points to what the frequent editor's are biased against.
{{user c-3}}

{{user perl}}
I used to donate 100s of dollars to wikipedia, but this article stops them.
{{user latex}}

{{user ipod}}
This article completely validated my statement from now like 23 years ago- that wikipedia is NOT neutral. It is extremely biased and does not publish neutral content.
{{user Metal}}
{{user bhangra}}
{{user comedian-3|Jerry Seinfeld}}
{{User:Rockthing/Userboxes/overuse}}

Latest revision as of 16:09, 15 March 2024

"I think wikipedia is way more west biased than initially appears."

This is what I wrote 14 years ago, and stopped contributing to wikipedia as I finished graduation, joined the workforce and started a family.

Now after 14 years, I feel like may be I can find sometime for this?


Now after couple more years, I read article on Narendra Modi. Its not a wikipedia/encyclopedia type article. Its 100% anti-Hindu, anti-India propoganda. 100% utter lies and garbage.

The fact that this article is locked and in current state, points to what the frequent editor's are biased against.

I used to donate 100s of dollars to wikipedia, but this article stops them.

This article completely validated my statement from now like 23 years ago- that wikipedia is NOT neutral. It is extremely biased and does not publish neutral content.