Lark bunting: Difference between revisions
State Bird |
|||
(37 intermediate revisions by 27 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Species of bird}} |
|||
{{speciesbox |
|||
{{Speciesbox |
|||
⚫ | |||
| image = Calamospiza melanocorys by Nick Varvel.jpg |
|||
⚫ | |||
| status_ref = <ref>{{IUCN|id=22721049 |title=''Calamospiza melanocorys'' |assessor=BirdLife International |assessor-link=BirdLife International |version=2013.2 |year=2012 |accessdate=26 November 2013}}</ref> |
|||
| image = File:NRCSCO01003(15150)(NRCS Photo Gallery).jpg |
|||
| image_caption = Male lark bunting |
| image_caption = Male lark bunting |
||
| image2 = IMG 7043 lark bunting.jpg |
| image2 = IMG 7043 lark bunting.jpg |
||
| image2_caption = Female lark bunting |
| image2_caption = Female lark bunting |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
| status_ref = <ref name="iucn status 11 November 2021">{{cite iucn |author=BirdLife International |date=2018 |title=''Calamospiza melanocorys'' |volume=2018 |page=e.T22721049A131332658 |doi=10.2305/IUCN.UK.2018-2.RLTS.T22721049A131332658.en |access-date=11 November 2021}}</ref> |
|||
| genus = Calamospiza |
| genus = Calamospiza |
||
| parent_authority = [[Charles Lucien Bonaparte|Bonaparte]], 1838 |
| parent_authority = [[Charles Lucien Bonaparte|Bonaparte]], 1838 |
||
Line 12: | Line 13: | ||
| authority = [[Leonhard Hess Stejneger|Stejneger]], 1885 |
| authority = [[Leonhard Hess Stejneger|Stejneger]], 1885 |
||
| synonyms = ''Fringilla bicolor'' <small>[[John Kirk Townsend|J. K. Townsend]], 1837</small> |
| synonyms = ''Fringilla bicolor'' <small>[[John Kirk Townsend|J. K. Townsend]], 1837</small> |
||
| range_map = Calamospiza melanocorys map.svg |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
The '''lark bunting''' (''Calamospiza melanocorys'') is a medium-sized [[American sparrow]] native to central and western North America. It |
The '''lark bunting''' ('''''Calamospiza melanocorys''''') is a medium-sized [[American sparrow]] native to central and western [[North America]]. It was designated the [[List of U.S. state birds|state bird]] of [[Colorado]] in 1931.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.meettheusa.com/usa-facts/colorado-facts |title=52 Colorado Facts |publisher=Meet The USA |date=2022}}</ref> |
||
==Taxonomy== |
==Taxonomy== |
||
Line 20: | Line 23: | ||
==Description== |
==Description== |
||
Lark buntings are small songbirds, with a short, thick, bluish [[beak|bill]]. There is a large patch of white on the wings and they have a relatively short tail with white tips at the end of the feathers. Breeding males have an all black body with a large white patch on the upper part of the wing. Nonbreeding males and females look similar and are grayish brown with white stripes.<ref name=cornell>{{cite web|title=Lark Bunting|url=http://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/Lark_Bunting/id|work=All About Birds|publisher=The Cornell Lab of Ornithology| |
Lark buntings are small songbirds, with a short, thick, bluish [[beak|bill]]. There is a large patch of white on the wings and they have a relatively short tail with white tips at the end of the feathers. Breeding males have an all black body with a large white patch on the upper part of the wing. Nonbreeding males and females look similar and are grayish brown with white stripes.<ref name=cornell>{{cite web|title=Lark Bunting|url=http://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/Lark_Bunting/id|work=All About Birds|publisher=The Cornell Lab of Ornithology|access-date=26 November 2012}}</ref> |
||
'''Measurements''':<ref>{{Cite web|title=Lark Bunting Identification, All About Birds, Cornell Lab of Ornithology|url=https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/Lark_Bunting/id|access-date=2020-09-29|website=www.allaboutbirds.org|language=en}}</ref> |
|||
* '''Length''': {{convert|5.5|–|7.1|in|abbr=on}} |
|||
* '''Weight''': {{convert|1.3|–|1.5|oz|abbr=on}} |
|||
* '''Wingspan''': {{convert|9.8|–|11.0|in|abbr=on}} |
|||
==Distribution and habitat== |
==Distribution and habitat== |
||
Line 31: | Line 40: | ||
The birds typically nest in dispersed colonies. Males fly up over their territory and sing while descending to declare ownership of a nesting territory. The song consists of a mix of whistles and trills. The call is a soft ''hoo''. |
The birds typically nest in dispersed colonies. Males fly up over their territory and sing while descending to declare ownership of a nesting territory. The song consists of a mix of whistles and trills. The call is a soft ''hoo''. |
||
The nest is an open [[cup nest|cup]] on the ground in a grassy area.<ref name=BNA>{{cite book|last=Shane|first= Thomas G.|year= 2000|chapter=Lark Bunting (''Calamospiza melanocorys'')|title=The Birds of North America Online|editor=Poole, A.|url=http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/542|location=Ithaca|publisher=Cornell Lab of Ornithology}}</ref> |
The nest is an open [[cup nest|cup]] on the ground in a grassy area.<ref name=BNA>{{cite book|last=Shane|first= Thomas G.|year= 2000|chapter=Lark Bunting (''Calamospiza melanocorys'')|title=The Birds of North America Online|editor=Poole, A.|chapter-url=http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/542|location=Ithaca|publisher=Cornell Lab of Ornithology}}</ref> |
||
While the lark buntings are socially [[monogamy|monogamous]], there is extensive extra-pair mating, observed through extra-pair paternity. In songbirds, it is suggested that social monogamy exists because of limited opportunities for [[polygyny]]. As expected, there is considerable aggression between males and between females, competing for mates. Many males are unable to find a social mate, which can be attributed to male-biased breeding sex ratio, social |
While the lark buntings are socially [[monogamy in animals|monogamous]], there is extensive extra-pair mating, observed through extra-pair paternity. In songbirds, it is suggested that social monogamy exists because of limited opportunities for [[Polygyny in animals|polygyny]]. As expected, there is considerable aggression between males and between females, competing for mates. Many males are unable to find a social mate, which can be attributed to male-biased breeding sex ratio, social monogamy, and the frequency of extra-pair paternity.<ref name="Davis"/> Acquisition of a social mate is an essential element of a male's fitness, thus social mating success plays a significant role in variable selection of male traits.<ref name="Bro-Jørgensen"/> |
||
Sexual selection in lark buntings is particularly interesting, as female mate choice is radically different from year to year. In different years, females show preference based on |
Sexual selection in lark buntings is particularly interesting, as female [[mate choice]] is radically different from year to year. In different years, females show preference based on males' black coloring, size of wing patch, size of beak, as well as other characteristics.<ref name =Davis>{{cite book|last=Davis|last2= Krebs|last3= West|first=Nicholas B.|first2= John R.|first3=Stuart A.|title=An Introduction to Behavioral Ecology|year=2012|publisher=Wiley-Blackwell|location=West Sussex, UK|isbn=978-1-4051-1416-5|pages=196|edition=4th}}</ref> The consequence of this extreme variation of female choice from year to year is the maintenance of genetic variation in several different male sexual ornaments. A study measures body color, proportion of black versus brown feathers on rump and rest of body, wing patch size, wing patch color, body size, beak size, and residual mass, in order to evaluate the multiple characteristics potentially selected on by females. Social pairing success was measured as well as total annual fitness, finding female choice as the primary factor. Plasticity in female choice is favored for adapting to changes in [[ecology|ecological]] and social environments.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Chaine|last2= Lyon|first=Alexis S.|first2= Bruce E.|title=Adaptive Plasticity in Female Mate Choice Dampens Sexual Selection on Male Ornaments in the Lark Bunting|journal=Science|date=25 January 2008|volume=319|issue= 5862|pages=459–462|doi=10.1126/science.1149167|pmid=18218896}}</ref> |
||
Temporal flexibility in female choice parallels the phenomenon seen in [[Darwin's finches]], with different beak sizes and shapes favored for changing food supply over years, defined as temporal selection in the context of natural selection. In lark buntings, a trait that is positively selected upon one year was likely negatively selected against in a previous year. These dramatic fluctuations highlight the importance of looking at sexual selection patterns over an extended period of time before drawing any conclusions. By looking at short time periods, however, it possible to identify female preference annually, however it is difficult to make any extrapolations for these assessments.<ref name="Bro-Jørgensen">{{cite journal|last=Bro-Jørgensen|first=Jakob|title=Dynamics of multiple signaling system: Animal communication in a world in flux|journal=Trends in Ecology and Evolution|date=May 2010|volume=25|issue=5|pages=292–300|pmid= 20022401|doi=10.1016/j.tree.2009.11.003}}</ref> An additional consequence of variation of female choice annually is the potential elimination of phenotypic selection for male trait exaggeration. |
Temporal flexibility in female choice parallels the phenomenon seen in [[Darwin's finches]], with different beak sizes and shapes favored for changing food supply over years, defined as temporal selection in the context of natural selection. In lark buntings, a trait that is positively selected upon one year was likely negatively selected against in a previous year. These dramatic fluctuations highlight the importance of looking at sexual selection patterns over an extended period of time before drawing any conclusions. By looking at short time periods, however, it possible to identify female preference annually, however it is difficult to make any extrapolations for these assessments.<ref name="Bro-Jørgensen">{{cite journal|last=Bro-Jørgensen|first=Jakob|title=Dynamics of multiple signaling system: Animal communication in a world in flux|journal=Trends in Ecology and Evolution|date=May 2010|volume=25|issue=5|pages=292–300|pmid= 20022401|doi=10.1016/j.tree.2009.11.003}}</ref> An additional consequence of variation of female choice annually is the potential elimination of phenotypic selection for male trait exaggeration. |
||
Males are characterized as weakly territorial prior to mating, however, there has been some evidence on territory features correlating with female settlement, thus female reproductive success. Studies have shown that shade is an important resource for female reproductive success.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Davis|first=Nicholas B.|title=Sexual conflict and the polygamy threshold|journal=Animal Behaviour|date=August 1989|volume=38|issue=2|pages=226–234|doi=10.1016/S0003-3472(89)80085-5}}</ref> As a fitness-limiting feature, it would be reasonable to expect this could account for any existing tendencies for males being territorial. However, levels of male aggression do not change, which lends to the conclusion that female choice corresponds with changes in fitness-indicator traits. Extra-pair mating has been corresponded with nesting site quality, adding further characterization to male aggression.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Lyon|last2= Montgomerie|first=Bruce E.|first2=Robert|title=Sexual Selection is a form of social selection |
Males are characterized as weakly territorial prior to mating, however, there has been some evidence on territory features correlating with female settlement, thus female reproductive success. Studies have shown that shade is an important resource for female reproductive success.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Davis|first=Nicholas B.|title=Sexual conflict and the polygamy threshold|journal=Animal Behaviour|date=August 1989|volume=38|issue=2|pages=226–234|doi=10.1016/S0003-3472(89)80085-5}}</ref> As a fitness-limiting feature, it would be reasonable to expect this could account for any existing tendencies for males being territorial. However, levels of male aggression do not change, which lends to the conclusion that female choice corresponds with changes in fitness-indicator traits. Extra-pair mating has been corresponded with nesting site quality, adding further characterization to male aggression.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Lyon|last2= Montgomerie|first=Bruce E.|first2=Robert|title=Sexual Selection is a form of social selection|journal=[[Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B]]|date=August 2012|volume=367|pages=2266–2273|doi=10.1098/rstb.2012.0012|pmid= 22777015|issue=1600|pmc=3391428}}</ref> Many studies have showed territory characteristics as important for mate acquisition, however a recent study shows evidence of its decreased role comparatively to female choice. |
||
===Feeding=== |
===Feeding=== |
||
Line 45: | Line 54: | ||
==State bird== |
==State bird== |
||
The lark bunting |
The lark bunting has been the [[List of U.S. state birds|state bird]] of [[Colorado]] since 1931. |
||
==Status== |
==Status== |
||
Line 103: | Line 112: | ||
* Wilbur SR, Carrier WD & McCaskie G. (1971). ''The Lark Bunting in California''. California Birds. vol '''2''', no 2. pp. 73–76. |
* Wilbur SR, Carrier WD & McCaskie G. (1971). ''The Lark Bunting in California''. California Birds. vol '''2''', no 2. pp. 73–76. |
||
* Williams E. (1968). ''Birds About Milbank South-Dakota USA Scarlet Tanager Avocets Lark Bunting and Redstarts''. South Dakota Bird Notes. vol '''22''', no 4. |
* Williams E. (1968). ''Birds About Milbank South-Dakota USA Scarlet Tanager Avocets Lark Bunting and Redstarts''. South Dakota Bird Notes. vol '''22''', no 4. |
||
* Winter SL, Cully JF |
* Winter SL, Cully JF Jr. & Pontius JS. (2003). ''Breeding season avifauna of prairie dog colonies and non-colonized areas in shortgrass prairie''. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science. vol '''106''', no 3-4. pp. 129–138. |
||
* Winterbottom JM. (1972). ''Status of the Lark-Like Bunting in the South-West Cape''. Ostrich. vol '''43''', no 2. |
* Winterbottom JM. (1972). ''Status of the Lark-Like Bunting in the South-West Cape''. Ostrich. vol '''43''', no 2. |
||
* With KA & Webb DR. (1993). ''Microclimate of ground nests: The relative importance of radiative cover and wind breaks for three grassland species''. Condor. vol '''95''', no 2. pp. 401–413. |
* With KA & Webb DR. (1993). ''Microclimate of ground nests: The relative importance of radiative cover and wind breaks for three grassland species''. Condor. vol '''95''', no 2. pp. 401–413. |
||
Line 112: | Line 121: | ||
==External links== |
==External links== |
||
{{ |
{{Commons category|Calamospiza melanocorys}} |
||
*[http://www.birds.cornell.edu/AllAboutBirds/BirdGuide/Lark_Bunting.html Lark bunting species account] - Cornell Lab of Ornithology |
*[http://www.birds.cornell.edu/AllAboutBirds/BirdGuide/Lark_Bunting.html Lark bunting species account] - Cornell Lab of Ornithology |
||
*[http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/id/framlst/i6050id.html Lark bunting - ''Calamospiza melanocorys''] - USGS Patuxent Bird Identification InfoCenter |
*[http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/id/framlst/i6050id.html Lark bunting - ''Calamospiza melanocorys''] - USGS Patuxent Bird Identification InfoCenter |
||
*[http://ibc.hbw.com/ibc/phtml/especie.phtml?idEspecie=9596 Lark bunting videos] on the Internet Bird Collection |
*[http://ibc.hbw.com/ibc/phtml/especie.phtml?idEspecie=9596 Lark bunting videos] on the Internet Bird Collection |
||
{{Passeroidea|E.|state=collapsed}} |
|||
<!-- a good RangeMap is at "www.natureserve.org"(then 'InfoNatura') --> |
|||
{{Taxonbar|from=Q1194261}} |
|||
{{Authority control}} |
|||
{{taxonbar}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:bunting, lark}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
[[Category:American sparrows|lark bunting]] |
[[Category:American sparrows|lark bunting]] |
||
[[Category:Symbols of Colorado]] |
[[Category:Symbols of Colorado]] |
||
Line 128: | Line 136: | ||
[[Category:Native birds of the Plains-Midwest (United States)]] |
[[Category:Native birds of the Plains-Midwest (United States)]] |
||
[[Category:Birds described in 1885|lark bunting]] |
[[Category:Birds described in 1885|lark bunting]] |
||
[[Category:Taxa named by Leonhard Stejneger|lark bunting]] |
Latest revision as of 15:14, 16 March 2024
Lark bunting | |
---|---|
Male lark bunting | |
Female lark bunting | |
Scientific classification | |
Domain: | Eukaryota |
Kingdom: | Animalia |
Phylum: | Chordata |
Class: | Aves |
Order: | Passeriformes |
Family: | Passerellidae |
Genus: | Calamospiza Bonaparte, 1838 |
Species: | C. melanocorys
|
Binomial name | |
Calamospiza melanocorys Stejneger, 1885
| |
Synonyms | |
Fringilla bicolor J. K. Townsend, 1837 |
The lark bunting (Calamospiza melanocorys) is a medium-sized American sparrow native to central and western North America. It was designated the state bird of Colorado in 1931.[2]
Taxonomy
[edit]The lark bunting is monotypic, the only member of the genus Calamospiza, and is not closely related to any other genera. It was first described by J. K. Townsend in 1837, from a specimen collected on a trip he took with Thomas Nuttall, under the name Fringilla bicolor. This is a preoccupied name, so Leonhard Hess Stejneger renamed the species in 1885 Calamospiza melanocorys. By then, the lark bunting had already been given its own genus, the one it is still placed in, by Charles Lucien Bonaparte in 1838.[3]
Description
[edit]Lark buntings are small songbirds, with a short, thick, bluish bill. There is a large patch of white on the wings and they have a relatively short tail with white tips at the end of the feathers. Breeding males have an all black body with a large white patch on the upper part of the wing. Nonbreeding males and females look similar and are grayish brown with white stripes.[4]
Measurements:[5]
- Length: 5.5–7.1 in (140–180 mm)
- Weight: 1.3–1.5 oz (37–43 g)
- Wingspan: 9.8–11.0 in (250–280 mm)
Distribution and habitat
[edit]The lark bunting is the most prevalent of the passerine species found in the grasslands of North America. Their breeding habitat is prairie regions in central Canada and the mid-western United States. These birds migrate in flocks to winter southern Texas, Arizona and the high plateau of northern Mexico in the fall.[3]
Behavior
[edit]Breeding
[edit]The birds typically nest in dispersed colonies. Males fly up over their territory and sing while descending to declare ownership of a nesting territory. The song consists of a mix of whistles and trills. The call is a soft hoo.
The nest is an open cup on the ground in a grassy area.[3]
While the lark buntings are socially monogamous, there is extensive extra-pair mating, observed through extra-pair paternity. In songbirds, it is suggested that social monogamy exists because of limited opportunities for polygyny. As expected, there is considerable aggression between males and between females, competing for mates. Many males are unable to find a social mate, which can be attributed to male-biased breeding sex ratio, social monogamy, and the frequency of extra-pair paternity.[6] Acquisition of a social mate is an essential element of a male's fitness, thus social mating success plays a significant role in variable selection of male traits.[7]
Sexual selection in lark buntings is particularly interesting, as female mate choice is radically different from year to year. In different years, females show preference based on males' black coloring, size of wing patch, size of beak, as well as other characteristics.[6] The consequence of this extreme variation of female choice from year to year is the maintenance of genetic variation in several different male sexual ornaments. A study measures body color, proportion of black versus brown feathers on rump and rest of body, wing patch size, wing patch color, body size, beak size, and residual mass, in order to evaluate the multiple characteristics potentially selected on by females. Social pairing success was measured as well as total annual fitness, finding female choice as the primary factor. Plasticity in female choice is favored for adapting to changes in ecological and social environments.[8]
Temporal flexibility in female choice parallels the phenomenon seen in Darwin's finches, with different beak sizes and shapes favored for changing food supply over years, defined as temporal selection in the context of natural selection. In lark buntings, a trait that is positively selected upon one year was likely negatively selected against in a previous year. These dramatic fluctuations highlight the importance of looking at sexual selection patterns over an extended period of time before drawing any conclusions. By looking at short time periods, however, it possible to identify female preference annually, however it is difficult to make any extrapolations for these assessments.[7] An additional consequence of variation of female choice annually is the potential elimination of phenotypic selection for male trait exaggeration.
Males are characterized as weakly territorial prior to mating, however, there has been some evidence on territory features correlating with female settlement, thus female reproductive success. Studies have shown that shade is an important resource for female reproductive success.[9] As a fitness-limiting feature, it would be reasonable to expect this could account for any existing tendencies for males being territorial. However, levels of male aggression do not change, which lends to the conclusion that female choice corresponds with changes in fitness-indicator traits. Extra-pair mating has been corresponded with nesting site quality, adding further characterization to male aggression.[10] Many studies have showed territory characteristics as important for mate acquisition, however a recent study shows evidence of its decreased role comparatively to female choice.
Feeding
[edit]Lark buntings primarily forage on the ground, mainly eating insects in summer and seeds in winter; they sometimes take short flights in pursuit of insects. Outside of the nesting season, they often feed in flocks.
State bird
[edit]The lark bunting has been the state bird of Colorado since 1931.
Status
[edit]There has been a decrease in population with the loss of natural prairie habitat.
References
[edit]- ^ BirdLife International (2018). "Calamospiza melanocorys". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2018: e.T22721049A131332658. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2018-2.RLTS.T22721049A131332658.en. Retrieved 11 November 2021.
- ^ "52 Colorado Facts". Meet The USA. 2022.
- ^ a b c Shane, Thomas G. (2000). "Lark Bunting (Calamospiza melanocorys)". In Poole, A. (ed.). The Birds of North America Online. Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology.
- ^ "Lark Bunting". All About Birds. The Cornell Lab of Ornithology. Retrieved 26 November 2012.
- ^ "Lark Bunting Identification, All About Birds, Cornell Lab of Ornithology". www.allaboutbirds.org. Retrieved 2020-09-29.
- ^ a b Davis, Nicholas B.; Krebs, John R.; West, Stuart A. (2012). An Introduction to Behavioral Ecology (4th ed.). West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. p. 196. ISBN 978-1-4051-1416-5.
- ^ a b Bro-Jørgensen, Jakob (May 2010). "Dynamics of multiple signaling system: Animal communication in a world in flux". Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 25 (5): 292–300. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.11.003. PMID 20022401.
- ^ Chaine, Alexis S.; Lyon, Bruce E. (25 January 2008). "Adaptive Plasticity in Female Mate Choice Dampens Sexual Selection on Male Ornaments in the Lark Bunting". Science. 319 (5862): 459–462. doi:10.1126/science.1149167. PMID 18218896.
- ^ Davis, Nicholas B. (August 1989). "Sexual conflict and the polygamy threshold". Animal Behaviour. 38 (2): 226–234. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(89)80085-5.
- ^ Lyon, Bruce E.; Montgomerie, Robert (August 2012). "Sexual Selection is a form of social selection". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 367 (1600): 2266–2273. doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0012. PMC 3391428. PMID 22777015.
External links
[edit]- Lark bunting species account - Cornell Lab of Ornithology
- Lark bunting - Calamospiza melanocorys - USGS Patuxent Bird Identification InfoCenter
- Lark bunting videos on the Internet Bird Collection