Talk:Mitsubishi F-15J

The modernization start of the F-15Js

As for the F-15J, it was written in the ja:F-15 that the modernization was planned (National Defense Program Guidelines for FY 2005) in 2004. I was not able to find the source by english. Do you know it? thanks.--Sabuell (talk) 18:17, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

I added in Japanese. But, I do not yet know the source by english which wrote the details of the Japanese MSIP. For example, the vector completely identified early production with a MSIP.--Sabuell (talk) 18:45, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Improvements to the English

I am working on some improvements to the writing of this article, as there are numerous grammar, syntax and discourse errors in the English. I appreciate whoever took the time to write in the content and mean no offense, but this is necessary for it to be a satisfactory article in my language. I have already completed the introductory text and the Development section. My edits are meant to change only the wording, not the meaning of the text. In some cases, it was difficult to make out what the meaning was precisely, so it's probably not perfect, but I think I've come close in most of it. This is my first time editing and I don't have any special attachment to the article, so if anyone else has any better ideas go ahead and revert/change as necessary. 67.183.71.73 (talk) 21:18, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. Because i was not native, this article was helped by you.--Sabuell (talk) 16:30, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

I second this. Some of the text makes no sense and it's impossible to make improvements without being able to read the original Japanese sources. If anyone knows Japanese and English, please help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by R5452 (talk • contribs) 19:18, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Not Capable of Ground Attack

"F-15J roles include combat and ground attacks."

The only F-15 model that is capable of carrying air-to-ground weapons and performing ground attacks is the F-15E, which Japan does not use. (144.91.49.79 (talk) 23:00, 22 July 2011 (UTC))

• Done Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 03:22, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

• • Well actually Israeli Air Force adapted their F-15 A/B models for improvised ground attack roles, so I guess C/D versions could be to, like japanese F-15 J/DJ are versions of former. But electronic and sensors are not fused to allow it to employ laser guided smart weapons, but they could be if modernised to such standards. F-15E is more adaptable for strike missions because of two crew members, but one pilot A/C versions could do it too, only less in heaviliy protected area denial airspaces where dual aircrew get the job done easier and less stressful with all electronic sensor which crew has to constantly look on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.122.55.236 (talk) 13:16, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Number built: 223

How is that so, if under variants there is writen:

"F-15J Single-seat fighter version for the JASDF. 139 built under license in Japan by Mitsubishi 1981–97; two built in St. Louis. F-15DJ Two-seat training version for the JASDF. 12 built in St. Louis, and 25 built under license in Japan by Mitsubishi during 1981–97."

If counted that summs total 178 airframes built. So which nummber is correct, 178 or 223? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.122.55.236 (talk) 13:25, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mitsubishi F-15J. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071102194744/http://www.lockheedmartin.com/news/press_releases/2007/LockheedMartinUpgradeRadarForReconn.html to http://www.lockheedmartin.com/news/press_releases/2007/LockheedMartinUpgradeRadarForReconn.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110611040216/http://www.mhi.co.jp/en/products/detail/f-15j_jet_fighter.html to http://www.mhi.co.jp/en/products/detail/f-15j_jet_fighter.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:44, 2 February 2018 (UTC)