Jump to content

Talk:Neighbours: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
MOS:DATETOPRES: new section
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Neighbours/Archive 6) (bot
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DISPLAYTITLE:Talk:''Neighbours''}}
{{DISPLAYTITLE:Talk:''Neighbours''}}
{{Talk header}}
{{Talk header}}
{{Vital article|topic=Society|level=5|class=GA}}
{{Australian English|date=September 2010}}
{{Australian English|date=September 2010}}
{{Article history
{{Article history
Line 18: Line 17:
|otd6date=2023-03-18|otd6oldid=1145325682
|otd6date=2023-03-18|otd6oldid=1145325682
}}
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Australia |class=GA |importance=high |Melbourne=yes |Melbourne-importance=Top |television=yes |tv-importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Australia|importance=high |Melbourne=yes |Melbourne-importance=Top |television=yes |tv-importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Soap Operas| class=GA}}
{{WikiProject Soap Operas}}
{{WikiProject Television|class=GA|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Television|importance=Mid}}
{{WPKylie|class=GA|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Kylie Minogue|importance=mid}}
}}
}}


Line 45: Line 44:
}}
}}


== Mackenzie article ==
== [[MOS:DATETOPRES]] ==


Per this policy, {{!xt|2023–present}} is false, as 2023 is the present. And stating "no other soap does this" is false, and it also continues to set a negative presedence on soap articles that they do not follow MOS policies, which they ''should''. MOS is a must follow. This has also been established at several other articles within the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Soap Operas]] and ignoring the MOS is violating Wikipedia's policies. {{!xt|2023–present}} infers we are not in 2023, when in fact, we are. Many like to [[Wikipedia:IGNORE|ignore the MOS]], when it '''must''' be followed. Needing to discuss whether to follow MOS, which '''must''' be followed, seems futile, and would also classify as a [[WP:LOCALCONSENSUS]], which soap groups, or ''Neighbours''-related articles cannot senselessly do, especially in order to avoid adhering to an established MOS policy. If one so chooses, {{xt|since 2023}} would be more appropriate, as it establishes an on-going establishment of time. '''<span style="font-size:95%;">[[User:livelikemusic|<span style="color:#2980b9">livelikemusic</span>]]</span>''' <span style="font-size:95%;">([[User talk:livelikemusic|<span style="color:#8e44ad">TALK!</span>]])</span> 01:16, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello Neighbours fans, I'm continually ashamed at the lack of a page for arguably the show's most important character in the last few years, so I've started a draft at [[Draft:Mackenzie Hargreaves]]. Mostly information culled from elsewhere currently, with a skeleton for structure and a few bare links to incorporate. Feel free to jump in and contribute! [[User:U-Mos|U-Mos]] ([[User talk:U-Mos|talk]]) 14:58, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
:We need to be clear on what DATETOPRES actually says. It does ''not'' forbid using –present for date ranges; it quotes [[WP:DATED]] to say this should "usually be avoided". DATED is discussing prose writing, whereas DATETOPRES also considers tables and infoboxes, which is where this range is being used in Neighbours articles. DATETOPRES also makes no distinction for ongoing circumstances that begin in the current year, so please stop claiming it does. It does, however, give us the clear alternative of "Since 2023" (or any other year), which I don't have any objection to. I would be happy to switch to that in infoboxes, although probably not at [[List of Neighbours characters]]. [[User:U-Mos|U-Mos]] ([[User talk:U-Mos|talk]]) 08:38, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
:Article is now [[Mackenzie Hargreaves|in the mainspace]]. [[User:U-Mos|U-Mos]] ([[User talk:U-Mos|talk]]) 16:30, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
:::Thank you, [[User:U-Mos]]. I was about to comment this myself. - [[User:Therealscorp1an|Therealscorp1an]] ([[User talk:Therealscorp1an|talk]]) 10:41, 23 September 2023 (UTC)


== Episode 8904 incoming ==
== Network vs Channel ==

[[Draft:Episode 8904]] is begun, containing a skeleton and reference links to be filled in. Also useful for links to add new content to certain [[Terese Willis]] and [[Toadie Rebecchi]] pages... [[User:U-Mos|U-Mos]] ([[User talk:U-Mos|talk]]) 19:50, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

== [[MOS:DATETOPRES]] ==


Under 'Original release', Networks are noted as Seven Network, Network 10, 10 Peach and Amazon Freevee. Both the wholesale network swap of 1986 and the switch to 10 Peach in 2011 are covered within the article. However I feel that it's erroneous to refer to 10 Peach in this section, as it's not a Network in and of itself, it's just one of several Network 10 digital multichannels. I would argue that this section need only reference Network 10 once for the period January 20, 1986 to July 28, 2022, and that the standalone reference to 10 Peach airdates be removed. Is this too granular or semantics? I've never proposed a change or posed a question like this before, so not sure if this is an appropriate level of detail. [[User:Tinascousin|Tinascousin]] ([[User talk:Tinascousin|talk]]) 04:50, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Per this policy, {{!xt|2023–present}} is false, as 2023 is the present. And stating "no other soap does this" is false, and it also continues to set a negative presedence on soap articles that they do not follow MOS policies, which they ''should''. MOS is a must follow. This has also been established at several other articles within the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Soap Operas]] and ignoring the MOS is violating Wikipedia's policies. {{!xt|2023–present}} infers we are not in 2023, when in fact, we are. Many like to [[Wikipedia:IGNORE|ignore the MOS]], when it '''must''' be followed. Needing to discuss whether to follow MOS, which '''must''' be followed, seems futile, and would also classify as a [[WP:LOCALCONSENSUS]], which soap groups, or ''Neighbours''-related articles cannot senselessly do, especially in order to avoid adhering to an established MOS policy. '''<span style="font-size:95%;">[[User:livelikemusic|<span style="color:#2980b9">livelikemusic</span>]]</span>''' <span style="font-size:95%;">([[User talk:livelikemusic|<span style="color:#8e44ad">TALK!</span>]])</span> 01:16, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
:You're absolutely right, according to [[Template:Infobox television]] (which uses [[Fox Broadcasting Company]] as an exemplar). I'll make the change. [[User:U-Mos|U-Mos]] ([[User talk:U-Mos|talk]]) 09:59, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 07:02, 17 March 2024

Good articleNeighbours has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 30, 2009Good article nomineeListed
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on March 18, 2010, March 18, 2013, March 18, 2015, March 18, 2017, March 18, 2022, and March 18, 2023.


Per this policy, 2023–present is false, as 2023 is the present. And stating "no other soap does this" is false, and it also continues to set a negative presedence on soap articles that they do not follow MOS policies, which they should. MOS is a must follow. This has also been established at several other articles within the Wikipedia:WikiProject Soap Operas and ignoring the MOS is violating Wikipedia's policies. 2023–present infers we are not in 2023, when in fact, we are. Many like to ignore the MOS, when it must be followed. Needing to discuss whether to follow MOS, which must be followed, seems futile, and would also classify as a WP:LOCALCONSENSUS, which soap groups, or Neighbours-related articles cannot senselessly do, especially in order to avoid adhering to an established MOS policy. If one so chooses, since 2023 would be more appropriate, as it establishes an on-going establishment of time. livelikemusic (TALK!) 01:16, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We need to be clear on what DATETOPRES actually says. It does not forbid using –present for date ranges; it quotes WP:DATED to say this should "usually be avoided". DATED is discussing prose writing, whereas DATETOPRES also considers tables and infoboxes, which is where this range is being used in Neighbours articles. DATETOPRES also makes no distinction for ongoing circumstances that begin in the current year, so please stop claiming it does. It does, however, give us the clear alternative of "Since 2023" (or any other year), which I don't have any objection to. I would be happy to switch to that in infoboxes, although probably not at List of Neighbours characters. U-Mos (talk) 08:38, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, User:U-Mos. I was about to comment this myself. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 10:41, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Network vs Channel

[edit]

Under 'Original release', Networks are noted as Seven Network, Network 10, 10 Peach and Amazon Freevee. Both the wholesale network swap of 1986 and the switch to 10 Peach in 2011 are covered within the article. However I feel that it's erroneous to refer to 10 Peach in this section, as it's not a Network in and of itself, it's just one of several Network 10 digital multichannels. I would argue that this section need only reference Network 10 once for the period January 20, 1986 to July 28, 2022, and that the standalone reference to 10 Peach airdates be removed. Is this too granular or semantics? I've never proposed a change or posed a question like this before, so not sure if this is an appropriate level of detail. Tinascousin (talk) 04:50, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're absolutely right, according to Template:Infobox television (which uses Fox Broadcasting Company as an exemplar). I'll make the change. U-Mos (talk) 09:59, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]