Talk:Mothman: Difference between revisions
→Batman/Mothman connection?: new section |
m →top: code typo |
||
(13 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header}} |
|||
{{Vital article|class=Start|level=5|topic=Religion}} |
|||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|vital=yes|1= |
|||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|||
{{WikiProject Folklore |
{{WikiProject Folklore|importance=Low}} |
||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Cryptozoology|importance=High}} |
||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Paranormal|importance=Mid}} |
||
{{WikiProject Skepticism}} |
|||
{{WikiProject United States|importance=Low|WV=Yes|WV-importance=High}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Visual arts|public-art=yes}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Religion|importance=Low}} |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_Rio_Grande/Intro_to_Information_Technology_(Fall) | assignments = [[User:Jdwatt90|Jdwatt90]] | reviewers = [[User:Kyra05z|Kyra05z]] | start_date = 2020-09-01 | end_date = 2020-12-11 }} |
|||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|||
| algo=old(90d) |
|||
| archive=Talk:Mothman/Archive %(counter)d |
|||
| counter=3 |
|||
| maxarchivesize=100K |
|||
| archiveheader={{tan}} |
|||
| minthreadsleft=1 |
|||
| minthreadstoarchive=1 |
|||
}} |
|||
{{Archives|age=90|bot=lowercase sigmabot III}} |
|||
__TOC__ |
|||
== Killer Moth == |
|||
{{ping|LuckyLouie}} As a non-native English speaker, I am always glad when my grammar is improved. However, your [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Mothman&type=revision&diff=1000080182&oldid=1000035686 edit] does not make me totally lucky, for the following reasons: The name ''Mothman'' was used in the local media quite from the very beginning, see for example [https://themothman.fandom.com/wiki/Mason_Countians_Hunt_%27Moth_Man%27 here] and [http://www.wvculture.org/history/notewv/mothman3.jpg here] in [[The Herald-Dispatch]]. So, when there is a source claiming "As the story spread beyond West Virginia, other newspapers coined new names... One Midwest editor apparently decided to name it after one of the villains - "Killer Moth" - from the then popular Batman TV show", we know from the facts that this is not to be taken at face value. Further, it remains a fact that also [https://books.google.at/books?id=5soL2qxSBDgC&pg=PA207&dq=batman&hl=de&sa=X&ei=baU6U6XNIOmF4ATY-IGQAg&ved=0CDsQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=batman&f=false Batman himself] is credited as an influence. Overall, I think it is legit to tell the readers of the many names used for the creature in an explicit way. So, I would like to restore the section, with some adaptions, but in principle as it was. --[[User:KnightMove|KnightMove]] ([[User talk:KnightMove|talk]]) 18:32, 13 January 2021 (UTC) |
|||
: Thanks for starting a Talk page discussion. Since the newspaper clipping from November 17 uses the name “mothman”, I’m OK with saying something like “newspapers soon coined the term “Mothman”...” and referencing the fictional enemy of Batman. The text you had previously inserted mistakenly gave the impression that the name was coined by the first claimants (Roger and Linda Carberry) on the day of the first report, which is simply not the case. - [[User:LuckyLouie|LuckyLouie]] ([[User talk:LuckyLouie|talk]]) 20:07, 13 January 2021 (UTC) |
|||
: I've copyedited the text to reflect that the name was coined by newspapers soon after the first reports. {{tq|"Further, it remains a fact that also Batman himself is credited as an influence".}} The book ''The Encyclopedia of Vampires, Werewolves, and Other Monsters'' does say it was named after Batman, however this is likely a truncated summary of the Batman enemy Killer Moth, and is conflicted by other, more reliable sources. Note that author [[Rosemary Ellen Guiley]] is a well known [[WP:FRINGE]] proponent and not considered an authoritative source by Wikipedia. Best regards, - [[User:LuckyLouie|LuckyLouie]] ([[User talk:LuckyLouie|talk]]) 20:34, 13 January 2021 (UTC) |
|||
::Thanks for the extensive answer, I have let it sink in. My opinion about the situation the following: |
|||
::# If [[Rosemary Ellen Guiley]] is not a citable source, well then, [https://cassandraeason.com Cassandra Eason] certainly is even less and also to be taken out. You have added Richard Moreno as a source for Killer Moth, who is certainly a much more serious author. But then, he only says that ''apparently'' one editor decided to name it after Killer Moth and is not sure about it. |
|||
::# Much more important: The [http://www.wvculture.org/history/notewv/mothman3.jpg report of Ralph Turner] from 19 November 1966 clearly states "Since Tuesday more than 10 people have spotted what they described as a "birdman" or "mothman"..." - Roger and Linda Carberry may have been the first, but not the only ones. We have a source stating that the term was used by eye-witnesses, and thus, the claim of later coinage by the newspapers contradicts the evidence. |
|||
::# There are many more, and more serious, sources only mentioning Batman resp. the popularity of the Batman series, without mentioning Killer Moth ([https://books.google.at/books?id=6ueIDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT119&hl=de&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjQvMrEp5_uAhXC-yoKHaoGDcQQ6AEwAnoECAUQAg#v=onepage&q&f=false example]); and then, there is quite a distance between ''Killer Moth'' and ''Mothman'', isn't there? A loose inspiration by Batman and Killer Moth is more plausible than a direct takeover from the latter. And not forgetting... Killer Moth [[Killer_Moth#Television|did not even screen]] in that cited, popular televison series! |
|||
::As a summary, I think my former section was - apart from necessary improvements in language and formatting - the most accurate way possible to summarize the connetion: ''Mothman'' was one of many terms used by the eye-witnesses and prevailed as the only name still in use. Sources cite an influence of the Batman franchise, some explicitly of Killer Moth. But as the claim of those sources of an only-later coinage of the term is proven wrong, it is not to be taken over - and the Batman/Mothman/Killer Moth connection only to be added with care in this regard. --[[User:KnightMove|KnightMove]] ([[User talk:KnightMove|talk]]) 01:40, 16 January 2021 (UTC) |
|||
:::Regarding #2, especially for a [[WP:FRINGE]] topic, we prefer the arms-length analysis of reliable secondary sources over contemporaneous news reports that are indulging in [[WP:SENSATIONAL]], often tongue-in-cheek reporting. A WP editor combing through old news reports to select details that are at odds with secondary sources in order to create a unique narrative section about the mothman name is doing [[WP:OR]], and we should avoid that. |
|||
:::As for the mothman name being influenced by Batman, I’d have to take a closer look at the sourcing, but perhaps we could include both Batman and Killer Moth as possible influences, rather than definitively declare it was either one or the other. In any case, it would be helpful to hear opinions from other editors, since there is [[WP:NODEADLINE]]. Best regards, - [[User:LuckyLouie|LuckyLouie]] ([[User talk:LuckyLouie|talk]]) 21:15, 16 January 2021 (UTC) |
|||
::::"perhaps we could include both Batman and Killer Moth as possible influences, rather than definitively declare it was either one or the other" - this is exactly what I had done in the previous section. |
|||
::::As of [[WP:SENSATIONAL]], well, even reporting the incident could be valued as such (some quality newspapers probably would have rejected that) - but I don't see a logic to disregard the journalist's wording "... what they described as a "birdman" or "mothman" as possibly non-truthful due to sensationalism. Without those reports, ''Mothman'' would not be a topic for a Wikipedia article. Any the term was used in the early reports [https://themothman.fandom.com/wiki/Could_the_%27Moth_Man%27_Be_Balloon%3F across the newspapers, here in the Huntington Advertiser]. |
|||
::::About [[WP:OR]], I think it is a misuse of the rules to blindly follow secondary sources, if their claims are incompatbile with facts proven by primary sources. When a secondary source says ''"As the stories spread beyond West Virginia, other newspapers coined new names... Thus "Mothman" was born"'', although the name was evidentially and extensively used already <u>in</u> the very first reports in local newspapers, the claim is proven wrong and can't be taken over. Are we interested in facts or formalized rules (like trusting secondary sources) as a fetish? --[[User:KnightMove|KnightMove]] ([[User talk:KnightMove|talk]]) 22:13, 16 January 2021 (UTC) |
|||
== Batman/Mothman connection? == |
|||
For the benefit of anyone who wants to edit this article (I won't be signing on as an editor myself because the behaviour of some of your more obsessive and less pleasant long-time editors makes trying to edit articles on topics like this a pointless waste of time for anyone who isn't truly passionate about the subject, and/or at least borderline autistic), the connection between Batman and Mothman seems to be this. |
|||
Batman's comic-book adversary Killer Moth has been around under various aliases since 1951, but he was always one of the many obscure Batman baddies most people have never heard of, and his only connection with the sixties TV series was to appear in a 15-minute pilot shot as test footage for new character Batgirl that was never aired. His costume does include wings, but otherwise its bright colours are a very poor fit with the reported appearance of the dark, shadowy Point Pleasant bogeyman. And he was never actually called Mothman, so he isn't very likely to have been the direct inspiration for the nickname. |
|||
On the other hand, here's a quote from Chapter 12 of Gray Barker's 1970 book "The Silver Bridge", which, though far less well-known than John Keel's "The Mothman Prophecies", predates it by 5 years and was the first book-length treatment of these events. Although marketed as non-fiction, it includes numerous passages that are clearly very fictional indeed, so it's hardly the most reliable of sources. But I think it's reasonable to assume he's telling the truth about not particularly fantastical details such as this: |
|||
==Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment== |
|||
"The phone rang. It was Channel 13, Huntington, whose news editor had already seen the brief AP item, and was trying to get the whole story. They carried the “Batman” TV show, and had coined a name for the bird-like creature, as a promo for the series. They thought “Mothman” might be a good appellation." |
|||
[[File:Sciences humaines.svg|40px]] This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between <span class="mw-formatted-date" title="2020-09-01">1 September 2020</span> and <span class="mw-formatted-date" title="2020-12-11">11 December 2020</span>. Further details are available [[Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_Rio_Grande/Intro_to_Information_Technology_(Fall)|on the course page]]. Student editor(s): [[User:Jdwatt90|Jdwatt90]]. Peer reviewers: [[User:Kyra05z|Kyra05z]]. |
|||
{{small|Above undated message substituted from [[Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment]] by [[User:PrimeBOT|PrimeBOT]] ([[User talk:PrimeBOT|talk]]) 04:30, 17 January 2022 (UTC)}} |
|||
So there you go: it was a catchy nickname directly inspired by the Batman TV show, and not at all by the D-list Batman supporting character Killer Moth, whose vague similarity to Mothman appears to be purely coincidental. I hope this will be helpful to anyone who fancies having an edit-war with those nasty little boys who have successfully dissuaded people like me from wasting our time trying to improve Wikipedia. |
|||
== "Leurozancla" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] == |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|30px]] |
|||
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect [[:Leurozancla]] and has thus listed it [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|for discussion]]. This discussion will occur at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 16#Leurozancla]] until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> [[User:TNstingray|TNstingray]] ([[User talk:TNstingray|talk]]) 16:31, 16 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
== "Winged Draco" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] == |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|30px]] |
|||
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect [[:Winged Draco]] and has thus listed it [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|for discussion]]. This discussion will occur at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 16#Winged Draco]] until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> [[User:TNstingray|TNstingray]] ([[User talk:TNstingray|talk]]) 16:33, 16 September 2022 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 05:44, 25 March 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mothman article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3 |
This level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 September 2020 and 11 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jdwatt90. Peer reviewers: Kyra05z.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:30, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
"Leurozancla" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Leurozancla and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 16#Leurozancla until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. TNstingray (talk) 16:31, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
"Winged Draco" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Winged Draco and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 16#Winged Draco until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. TNstingray (talk) 16:33, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
- Start-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Philosophy and religion
- Start-Class vital articles in Philosophy and religion
- Start-Class Folklore articles
- Low-importance Folklore articles
- WikiProject Folklore articles
- Start-Class Cryptids articles
- High-importance Cryptids articles
- WikiProject Cryptozoology articles
- Start-Class paranormal articles
- Mid-importance paranormal articles
- WikiProject Paranormal articles
- Start-Class Skepticism articles
- Unknown-importance Skepticism articles
- WikiProject Skepticism articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class West Virginia articles
- High-importance West Virginia articles
- WikiProject West Virginia articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Start-Class visual arts articles
- Start-Class public art articles
- Public art articles
- WikiProject Visual arts articles
- Start-Class Religion articles
- Low-importance Religion articles
- WikiProject Religion articles