Talk:Safoora Zargar: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 20:02, 30 March 2024

This article was nominated for deletion on 21 May 2020. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

India Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in to an autoconfirmed or confirmed account (usually granted automatically to accounts with 10 edits and an age of 4 days)

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by when more than 2 sections are present.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Safoora Zargar.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:03, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TheChunky: If you want the file preserved, you need to take action on Commons.-- Toddy1 (talk) 18:56, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for informing me. I have provided "permission" proof many times in the commons, but I don't understand why the admins there don't understand that. They keep asking more and more. Last time, they asked me for permission of Masrat Zahra and Sagrika Kissu for using their pics. Both of them had uploaded the pic in public domain and they left those pics for 'free to use'. But I was still asked for permission and I contact them and motivated both of them to email that permission format, then later commons admin replied with another form and made it hard for getting permission after having permission from real owner.

In short, the above pic of Safoora Zargar is also uploaded with permission and I have added the link there too. But still they asked for permission. So I think instead of having the headache, I prefer they should delete it. That is better option for me. Thank You ❤️. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} — Preceding undated comment added 10:54, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gulfisha Fatima

@Aafi: Regarding this edit, the article entitled Gulfisha Fatima was deleted because it was a copyright violation. -- Toddy1 (talk) 19:14, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Toddy1: I did notice it. I removed it because nobody would be eventually seeing it. It could be mentioned elsewhere as a redlink in the body. But WP:SEEALSO doesn't permit it: "The "See also" section should not include red links." ─ Aafī (talk) 19:28, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{Notice|
-{{Old AfD multi |date=21 May 2020 |result='''keep''' |page=Safoora Zargar}}
-{{WikiProject India |class=B |importance=Mid}}
-{{WikiProject Biography |class=B |listas=Zargar, Safoora |living=yes}}
-{{info|
 '''Page views of this article over the last 365 days:'''<br />
 {{ PageViews graph |365|Safoora Zargar|en.wikipedia.org }}
 }}
+{{Old AfD multi|date=21 May 2020 |result='''keep''' |page=Safoora Zargar}}
+{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B| blp=yes|listas=Zargar, Safoora|
+{{WikiProject India|importance=Mid}}
+{{WikiProject Biography}}
+{{WikiProject Women}}
+}}
+{{contentious topics/page restriction talk notice|blp|protection=semi}}
 {{User:MiszaBot/config
 |archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}}
@@ Line 18: / Line 21: @@
 {{archives}}
+== A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion ==
+The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
+* [[commons:File:Safoora Zargar.jpg|Safoora Zargar.jpg]]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2021-03-16T10:03:51.531835 | Safoora Zargar.jpg -->
+Participate in the deletion discussion at the [[commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by TheChunky|nomination page]]. —[[User:Community Tech bot|Community Tech bot]] ([[User talk:Community Tech bot|talk]]) 10:03, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
+:{{ping|TheChunky}}  If you want the file preserved, you need to take action on Commons.<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:10pt;color:#000000">--[[User:Toddy1| Toddy1]] [[User talk:Toddy1|(talk)]]</span> 18:56, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
+:: Thanks for informing me. I have provided "permission" proof many times in the commons, but I don't understand why the admins there don't understand that. They keep asking more and more. Last time, they asked me for permission of [[Masrat Zahra]] and Sagrika Kissu for using their pics. Both of them had uploaded the pic in public domain and they left those pics for 'free to use'. But I was still asked for permission and I contact them and motivated both of them to email that permission format, then later commons admin replied with another form and made it hard for getting permission after having permission from real owner.
-== Requested move 8 September 2020 ==
-<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:RM top -->
-:''The following is a closed discussion of a [[Wikipedia:Requested moves|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a [[Wikipedia:move review|move review]] after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. ''
-The result of the move request was: '''not moved'''. <small>([[Wikipedia:Requested moves/Closing instructions#Closure by a page mover|closed by non-admin page mover]])</small>  [[User:Jerm|Jerm]] ([[User talk:Jerm|talk]]) 14:53, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
-----
-[[:Safoora Zargar]] → {{no redirect|Arrest of Safoora Zargar}} – subject is notable only for her arrest [[WP:1E]] hence the title should be moved During the afd discussion at least 2 editors wanted it renamed shown it below. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Girdlast888|Girdlast888]] ([[User talk:Girdlast888#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Girdlast888|contribs]]) 09:18, 8 September 2020 (UTC)</small>
-{{collapse top
-|title=The following comments have been pasted here by nominator from the AfD in question. —usernamekiran [[User talk:usernamekiran|(talk)]] 21:19, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
-|collapse=no
-}}
-*Keep but Rename to Arrest of Safoora Zargar to satisfy BLP1E. The event is notable, since it has received significant coverage over quite a long period of time, but the person at the centre of it is probably not. I am noting a lot of, shall we say politicised arguments brought up by Keep voters. Also User:Sturdyankit, you may only vote once, I have stricken your second Delete vote for you. Devonian Wombat (talk) 22:50, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
-*Keep - an alternative option could be renaming something like the Arrest of Kafeel Khan article. Also, I disagree with Numan765's view of the subject's attention-seeking approach. She was thrown behind the bars when the CAA issue as well as the protests took a backseat. --Hindustanilanguage (talk) 19:59, 24 May 2020 (UTC) [[User:Girdlast888|Girdlast888]] ([[User talk:Girdlast888|talk]]) 09:18, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
-{{collapse bottom}}
-*'''Oppose''' activists are usually arrested by the police, and hence renaming this to the '''Arrest of Safoora Zargar''' is redundant. [[Safoora Zargar#Political activism]] and [[Safoora Zargar#Online vilification]] sections indicates that the subject is notable and relevant to the current title. [[User:TheBirdsShedTears|TheBirdsShedTears]] ([[User talk:TheBirdsShedTears|talk]]) 09:36, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
-*'''Oppose''': She is an activist and despite arrests there are more information as activist is available. Like personal life section about her marriage is from a interview when she was not in the controversy and is from independent source. Remaining the thing the {{u|Girdlast888}} said, Kafeel Khan was a doctor. Safoora is activist and there is lot of info available out of her arrest. — [[User:TheChunky|<b><i><span style="text-shadow:3px 3px 4px darkgray;"><span style="color:#0000A0">The Chunky urf <i> Al Kashmiri</i></span></span></i></b>]] [[User talk:TheChunky|<sup><i><span style="color:green">(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)</span></i></sup>]]
-:*'''Comment''' Safoora Zargar was pregnant when she was arrested and she is solely notable for this and coverage was due to this.She fails [[WP:GNG]] as an activist and during the AFD the two editors who keep Devonian Wombat and Hindustanilanguage also wanted the name to be changed to Arrest of Safoora Zargar and this is a clear case of [[WP:1E]]. [[User:Girdlast888|Girdlast888]] ([[User talk:Girdlast888|talk]]) 10:06, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
-:*'''Reply:''' Reference number 12 is not from the after arrest. It is an independent source and is of 2018, when she was simply an activist. Thank You. There maybe more sources of her activism available in media coverages. — [[User:TheChunky|<b><i><span style="text-shadow:3px 3px 4px darkgray;"><span style="color:#0000A0">The Chunky urf <i> Al Kashmiri</i></span></span></i></b>]] [[User talk:TheChunky|<sup><i><span style="color:green">(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)</span></i></sup>]] 11:07, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
-*'''Oppose''': She is notable as an activist, which got her arrested. Not vise versa. ([[User:Ashique2020|Ashique2020]] ([[User talk:Ashique2020|talk]]) 19:10, 9 September 2020 (UTC))
-:*'''Comment''' Went through the references except Reference number 12 All others are after her arrest.She had no coverage before her arrest and this a case of [[WP:1E]].[[User:Girdlast888|Girdlast888]] ([[User talk:Girdlast888|talk]]) 11:35, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
-*'''Oppose''' There has been a lot of coverage of Zargar, and she is clearly notable.  Examples of coverage before her arrest include:
-**{{cite news |first1=Advitya |last1=Bahl |title=Delhi: In search of a home |url=https://www.dnaindia.com/delhi/report-delhi-in-search-of-a-home-2616587 |accessdate=21 May 2020 |work=[[DNA India]] |date=19 May 2018}}
-**{{cite news |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94yHwiOJ_xA |title=Exclusive interview of Safoora Zargar of Jamia Islamia Delhi with Prince Suhaib Raza |first1=Prince Suhaib |last1=Raza |work=The Gulbarga Mirror and Deccan Digest on YouTube |date=25 January 2020 |access-date=11 September 2020 |language=not English, except for a few words}}
-**{{cite news|url=https://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/delhi/2020/jan/28/bjp-mps-statement-shows-partys-fascist-ideology-protesters-at-shaheenbagh-2095609.html |title=BJP MP's statement shows party's fascist ideology: Protesters at Shaheenbagh |date=28 January 2020 |first1=Rahiba R |last1=Parveen |work=[[The New Indian Express]] |access-date=11 September 2020}}
-**{{cite news|url=https://thepolisproject.com/standing-up-to-repression-political-passion-animates-jamia-resistance/#.X1tqVy2ZMac |title=Standing up to Repression: Political Passion Animates Jamia Resistance |first1=Aaquib |last1=Khan |date=10 February 2020 |work=The Polis Project |access-date=11 September 2020}}
-**{{cite news |url=https://www.firstpost.com/india/anti-caa-nrc-its-not-the-pain-but-how-far-the-state-will-go-to-target-us-jamia-students-recount-treatment-at-the-hands-of-delhi-police-on-10-february-8033221.html |title='It's not the pain, but how far the State will go to target us': Jamia students recount treatment at the hands of Delhi Police on 10 Feb |first1=Ismat |last1=Ara |date=12 February 2020 |work=[[Firstpost]] |access-date=11 September 2020}}
-**{{cite news |url=https://clarionindia.net/police-tore-our-hijab-hit-on-private-parts-allege-jamia-students/ |title=Police Tore Our Hijab; Hit on Private Parts, Allege Jamia Students |date=13 February 2020 |first1=Mohd |last1=Aasif |work=Indian Clarion |access-date=11 September 2020}}
-**{{cite news |url=https://thewire.in/rights/jamia-millia-islamia-cctv-footage |title=Purported CCTV Footage Shows Police Attacking Students in Jamia Library on Dec 15 |date= 17 February 2020 |work=[[The Wire (India)]] |access-date=11 September 2020}}
-**{{cite news |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/jamia-fully-shut-students-asked-to-go-home/articleshow/74642890.cms |title=Coronavirus scare in Delhi: Jamia Millia Islamia fully shut, students asked to go home |date=16 March 2020 |work=[[The Times of India]] |access-date=11 September 2020}} [https://castudyweb.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/The-Times-of-India-2.pdf Alternative url, story on page 3]
-:An interview Zargar gave months before her arrest was also turned into two articles after her arrest - I do not know whether it formed the basis of an article in Hindi or some other Indian language before her arrest:
-:*{{cite |url=https://originals.storiesasia.org/Safoora-Zargar--The-Cost-of-Ideas/index.html |title=Safoora Zargar: The Cost of Ideas |first1=Gunjeet |last1=Sra |first2=Ruhani |last2=Kaur |work=StoriesAsia |date=6 June 2020 |access-date=11 September 2020}}
-:*{{cite |url=https://originals.storiesasia.org/A-Conversation-with-Safoora-Zargar/index.html |title=A Conversation with Safoora Zargar |first1=Ruhani |last1=Kaur |first2=Gunjeet |last2=Sra |work=StoriesAsia |date=12 June 2020 |access-date=11 September 2020}}
-:<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:10pt;color:#000000">--[[User:Toddy1| Toddy1]] [[User talk:Toddy1|(talk)]]</span> 13:28, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
-* '''Oppose''' per {{u|Ashique2020}}'s argument and coverage provided by {{u|Toddy1}}. <nowiki> ─ </nowiki> [[User:TheAafi|The Aafī]] (<sup>[[User talk:TheAafi|talk]]</sup>) 17:32, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
-----
-: ''The discussion above is closed.  <b style="color: #FF0000;">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.''<!-- from [[Template:Archive bottom]] -->
-</div><div style="clear:both;"></div>
-== lead section ==
+:: In short, the above pic of [[Safoora Zargar]] is also uploaded with permission and I have added the link there too. But still they asked for permission. So I think instead of having the headache, I prefer they should delete it. That is better option for me. Thank You ❤️. — [[User:TheChunky|<b><i><span style="text-shadow:3px 3px 4px darkgray;"><span style="color:#0000A0">The Chunky urf <i> Al Kashmiri</i></span></span></i></b>]] [[User talk:TheChunky|<sup><i><span style="color:green">(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)</span></i></sup>]] <!--Template:Undated--><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 10:54, 23 March 2021 (UTC)</small>
-Hi {{u|AafiOnMobile}}! A lead section should be short and convey the simplest aspects which is what I have done. I moved the remaining content to to next paragraph. Can you please explain a bit more your revert. Thanks  [[User:Vincentvikram|Vikram Vincent]]  13:47, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
-:I have tagged the article lead as too long. [[User:Vincentvikram|Vikram Vincent]]  13:50, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
-:: got a call while I was fixing it. Sorry for the trouble. Fixed it. ─ [[User:AafiOnMobile|<span style="color:SteelBlue">The Aafī on Mobile</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:AafiOnMobile|<span style="color:#80A0FF"><sup>(talk)</sup></span>]]</sup> 13:51, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
+== Gulfisha Fatima ==
-== UN rights panel slams detention of Safoora Zargar - should the article mention it? ==
+{{ping|Aafi}} Regarding [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Safoora_Zargar&curid=63892752&diff=1216394333&oldid=1216394277 this edit], the article entitled [[:Gulfisha Fatima]] was deleted because it was a copyright violation. <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:10pt;color:#000000">--[[User:Toddy1| Toddy1]] [[User talk:Toddy1|(talk)]]</span> 19:14, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
+:@[[User:Toddy1|Toddy1]]: I did notice it. I removed it because nobody would be eventually seeing it. It could be mentioned elsewhere as a redlink in the body. But [[WP:SEEALSO]] doesn't permit it: "The "See also" section should not include red links." ─ [[User:Aafi|<span style="color:SteelBlue">Aafī</span>]] [[User talk:Aafi|<span style="color:#80A0FF">(talk)</span>]] 19:28, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
-An article was published in The Hindu, on Saturday 13 March 2021, about how the United Nations Human Rights Council Working Group against Arbitrary Detentions has criticised the Indian government concerning the Zargar case.
-*{{Cite news |url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/un-rights-panel-slams-detention-of-safoora-zargar/article34061744.ece |title=UN rights panel slams detention of Safoora Zargar |work=[[The Hindu]] |date=13 March 2021 |first1=Suhasini |last1=Haidar |access-date=14 March 2021}}
-Should we include this in the article? Last year we had stuff in the article about the international reaction to the case and editors deleted it.<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:10pt;color:#000000">--[[User:Toddy1| Toddy1]] [[User talk:Toddy1|(talk)]]</span> 19:55, 14 March 2021 (UTC)