Jump to content

Soft water path: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
SmackBot (talk | contribs)
3,734,324 edits
m →See also: FIx up portal template and general fixes
/* ehrhejk
 
(28 intermediate revisions by 26 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The concept of the soft path was first used for energy resource management and was developed by [[Amory Lovins]] shortly after the shock of the [[1973 energy crisis]] in the United States.<ref>"Energy Strategy: The Road Not Taken?" published in Foreign Affairs, in October 1976</ref> The soft path is often framed as an alternative to supply-side resource management. Supply-side water management focuses on problem solving with physical infrastructure by constructing bigger dams and drilling deeper wells with the goal of producing more water to meet the demands of consumers. Demand-side management focuses on managing demand and making current practices more efficient. The soft path differs from both approaches. Soft path water planning takes a step back from the problem and rethinks if water is actually necessary to accomplish a given task at hand. If water is necessary, it then considers what quality of water is required to deliver the service desired and how that water can be used most efficiently.<ref>Page 4. The Soft Path for Water in a Nutshell. 2005. Oliver M Brandes and David B Brooks. Friends of the Earth and POLIS Project on Ecological Governance. University of Victoria, Victoria, BC.</ref> Soft path water planning has been described as "unleashing the full potential of demand-side management."<ref>[Quote]http://www.poliswaterproject.org/softpath [Oliver M Brandes water expert]http://www.cbc.ca/blueprintalberta/experts/oliver-brandes.html</ref> The difference between demand-side management and the soft path is crucial but subtle; it can be likened to the difference between efficiency and conservation.<ref>Page 4. Thinking Beyond Pipes and Pumps. (2006) Oliver M Brandes, Tony Maas and Ellen Reynolds. POLIS Project on Ecological Governance. University of Victoria, Victoria, BC.</ref>
The concept of the soft path was first used for energy resource management and was developed by Amory Lovins shortly after the shock of the 1973 energy crisis in the United States.<ref>"Energy Strategy: The Road Not Taken?" published in Foreign Affairs, in October 1976</ref> This concept has now been refined and applied to water, most notably by water experts Peter Gleick<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.pacinst.org/topics/water_and_sustainability/soft_path/nature_07252002.pdf|title=P.H. Gleick, 2002. Nature, Volume 418, pg. 373, July 25, 2002|publisher=}}</ref> and David Brooks.<ref>Making the Most of the Water We Have: The Soft Path Approach to Water Management, Edited by David B. Brooks, Oliver M. Brandes and Stephen Gurman, Earthscan, 2009</ref> The soft path is often framed as a more integrated and effective alternative to supply-side water resource management. Supply-side water management focuses on meeting demands for water through centralized, large-scale physical infrastructure, and centralized water management systems. In the 20th century, this approach focused on constructing bigger dams and drilling deeper wells to access more water to meet projected demands of consumers. More recently, a focus on demand-side management has emerged in regions where water supply is increasingly constrained (see, for example, Peak water), and it focuses on managing demand and making current practices more efficient. The soft path integrates both supply and demand concepts but in a broader context by recognizing that water is a means to satisfy demands for goods and services and asking how much water, of what qualities, is actually required to satisfy those demands efficiently and sustainably.<ref>Page 4. The Soft Path for Water in a Nutshell. 2005. Oliver M Brandes and David B Brooks. Friends of the Earth and POLIS Project on Ecological Governance. University of Victoria, Victoria, BC.</ref> Soft path water planning also requires broader institutional approaches to water management including the application of smart economics, the potential for distributed rather than centralized water systems, and more democratic participation in water policy decisions.<ref>G. Wolff and P.H. Gleick, "The Soft Path for Water" in The World's Water 2002-2003 (Island Press, Washington D.C., pp. 1-32.[http://www.pacinst.org/publications/worlds_water/worlds_water_2002_chapter1.pdf]</ref> Others have described the soft path as "unleashing the full potential of demand-side management.",<ref>[Quote]{{cite web |url=http://www.poliswaterproject.org/softpath |title=The Soft Path for Water &#124; Water Sustainability Project |accessdate=2009-02-20 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://archive.today/20120907002645/http://www.poliswaterproject.org/softpath |archivedate=2012-09-07 }} [Oliver M Brandes water expert]http://www.cbc.ca/blueprintalberta/experts/oliver-brandes.html</ref><ref>Page 4. Thinking Beyond Pipes and Pumps. (2006) Oliver M Brandes, Tony Maas and Ellen Reynolds. POLIS Project on Ecological Governance. University of Victoria, Victoria, BC.</ref><ref>{{cite web| url=https://watersoftenersolutions.com/best-salt-free-water-softeners/ |title= Salt Free Water Softener }} Saturday, 13 March 2021 </ref>


==Publications==
==Publications==
*[http://www.poliswaterproject.org/sites/default/files/nutshell_revised_aug07_lowres.pdfThe Soft Path for Water in a Nutshell. 2005. Oliver M Brandes and David B Brooks. Friends of the Earth and POLIS Project on Ecological Governance. University of Victoria, Victoria, BC.]
* The Soft Path for Water iPacific Instituten a Nutshell. 2005. Oliver M Brandes and David B Brooks. Friends of the Earth and POLIS Project on Ecological Governance. University of Victoria, Victoria, BC.
* [http://www.pacinst.org/publications/worlds_water/worlds_water_2002_chapter1.pdf G. Wolff and P.H. Gleick, "The Soft Path for Water" in The World's Water 2002-2003 (Island Press, Washington D.C., pp. 1-32.]
* G. Wolff and P.H. Gleick, "The Soft Path for Water" in The World's Water 2002-2003 (Island Press, Washington D.C., pp. 1-32.
* [http://www.pacinst.org/topics/water_and_sustainability/soft_path/science_112003.pdf P.H. Gleick, 2003. ''Science'', Volume 302, November 28, 2003, pp. 1524-1528.]
* P.H. Gleick, 2003. ''Science'', Volume 302, November 28, 2003, pp. 1524-1528.
*[http://www.pacinst.org/topics/water_and_sustainability/soft_path/nature_07252002.pdf P.H. Gleick, 2002. Nature, Volume 418, pg. 373, July 25, 2002.]
* P.H. Gleick, 2002. Nature, Volume 418, pg. 373, July 25, 2002.
*[http://www.iisd.org/natres/water/soft_paths.asp Manitoba Water Soft Path 2006.]
* Manitoba Water Soft Path 2006.
*The Energy Controversy: Soft Path Questions and Answers (1979) ISBN 978-0913890226
* The Energy Controversy: Soft Path Questions and Answers (1979) {{ISBN|978-0-913890-22-6}}
*[http://www.poliswaterproject.org/sites/default/files/oliver_casestudy.pdf A New Path to Water Sustainability for the Town of Oliver, BC - Soft Path Case Study by Oliver M Brandes Tony Maas Adam Mjolsness Ellen Reynolds. Uvic Printers. Feb 2008.]
* A New Path to Water Sustainability for the Town of Oliver, BC - Soft Path Case Study by Oliver M Brandes Tony Maas Adam Mjolsness Ellen Reynolds. Uvic Printers. Feb 2008.

⚫
==See also==

⚫
* Soft energy path
⚫
* Backcasting
⚫
* Ecological governance
*


==References==
==References==
{{Reflist}}
{{Reflist}}

⚫
==See also==
{{Portal|Sustainable development}}
⚫
* [[Soft energy path]]
* [[POLIS Water Sustainability Project]]
⚫
* [[Backcasting]]
* [[POLIS Project on Ecological Governance]]
⚫
* [[Ecological governance]]
* [[Pacific Institute]]


[[Category:Water supply]]
[[Category:Water supply]]
[[Category:Sustainability]]
[[Category:Water and the environment]]

Latest revision as of 23:48, 30 March 2024

The concept of the soft path was first used for energy resource management and was developed by Amory Lovins shortly after the shock of the 1973 energy crisis in the United States.[1] This concept has now been refined and applied to water, most notably by water experts Peter Gleick[2] and David Brooks.[3] The soft path is often framed as a more integrated and effective alternative to supply-side water resource management. Supply-side water management focuses on meeting demands for water through centralized, large-scale physical infrastructure, and centralized water management systems. In the 20th century, this approach focused on constructing bigger dams and drilling deeper wells to access more water to meet projected demands of consumers. More recently, a focus on demand-side management has emerged in regions where water supply is increasingly constrained (see, for example, Peak water), and it focuses on managing demand and making current practices more efficient. The soft path integrates both supply and demand concepts but in a broader context by recognizing that water is a means to satisfy demands for goods and services and asking how much water, of what qualities, is actually required to satisfy those demands efficiently and sustainably.[4] Soft path water planning also requires broader institutional approaches to water management including the application of smart economics, the potential for distributed rather than centralized water systems, and more democratic participation in water policy decisions.[5] Others have described the soft path as "unleashing the full potential of demand-side management.",[6][7][8]

Publications

[edit]
  • The Soft Path for Water iPacific Instituten a Nutshell. 2005. Oliver M Brandes and David B Brooks. Friends of the Earth and POLIS Project on Ecological Governance. University of Victoria, Victoria, BC.
  • G. Wolff and P.H. Gleick, "The Soft Path for Water" in The World's Water 2002-2003 (Island Press, Washington D.C., pp. 1-32.
  • P.H. Gleick, 2003. Science, Volume 302, November 28, 2003, pp. 1524-1528.
  • P.H. Gleick, 2002. Nature, Volume 418, pg. 373, July 25, 2002.
  • Manitoba Water Soft Path 2006.
  • The Energy Controversy: Soft Path Questions and Answers (1979) ISBN 978-0-913890-22-6
  • A New Path to Water Sustainability for the Town of Oliver, BC - Soft Path Case Study by Oliver M Brandes Tony Maas Adam Mjolsness Ellen Reynolds. Uvic Printers. Feb 2008.

See also

[edit]
  • Soft energy path
  • Backcasting
  • Ecological governance

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Energy Strategy: The Road Not Taken?" published in Foreign Affairs, in October 1976
  2. ^ "P.H. Gleick, 2002. Nature, Volume 418, pg. 373, July 25, 2002" (PDF).
  3. ^ Making the Most of the Water We Have: The Soft Path Approach to Water Management, Edited by David B. Brooks, Oliver M. Brandes and Stephen Gurman, Earthscan, 2009
  4. ^ Page 4. The Soft Path for Water in a Nutshell. 2005. Oliver M Brandes and David B Brooks. Friends of the Earth and POLIS Project on Ecological Governance. University of Victoria, Victoria, BC.
  5. ^ G. Wolff and P.H. Gleick, "The Soft Path for Water" in The World's Water 2002-2003 (Island Press, Washington D.C., pp. 1-32.[1]
  6. ^ [Quote]"The Soft Path for Water | Water Sustainability Project". Archived from the original on 2012-09-07. Retrieved 2009-02-20. [Oliver M Brandes water expert]http://www.cbc.ca/blueprintalberta/experts/oliver-brandes.html
  7. ^ Page 4. Thinking Beyond Pipes and Pumps. (2006) Oliver M Brandes, Tony Maas and Ellen Reynolds. POLIS Project on Ecological Governance. University of Victoria, Victoria, BC.
  8. ^ "Salt Free Water Softener". Saturday, 13 March 2021
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Soft_water_path&oldid=1216431735"