Jump to content

Talk:Death by burning: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Bladesmulti (talk | contribs)
15,638 edits
No edit summary
Add {{Safety resources}}
 
(91 intermediate revisions by 32 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{talk header}}
{{talk header}}
{{Safety resources}}
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1=
{{ChristianityWikiProject|class=start|importance=Mid}}
{{Law enforcement|class=start|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Christianity|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Death|class=c|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Law Enforcement|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Death|importance=high}}
}}
}}
{{OnThisDay|date1=2004-05-30|oldid1=6717944}}
{{OnThisDay|date1=2004-05-30|oldid1=6717944}}
{{British English}}
{{American English}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}}
|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}}
Line 15: Line 16:
|algo = old(180d)
|algo = old(180d)
|archive = Talk:Death by burning/Archive %(counter)d
|archive = Talk:Death by burning/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{Template:Distressing article}}
{{Broken anchors|links=
* <nowiki>[[List of Protestant martyrs of the English Reformation#List of Marian Martyrs|Marian Persecutions]]</nowiki> The anchor (#List of Marian Martyrs) has been [[Special:Diff/632679442|deleted by other users]] before. <!-- {"title":"List of Marian Martyrs","appear":{"revid":567240605,"parentid":567157691,"timestamp":"2013-08-05T10:23:24Z","replaced_anchors":{"The Marian Martyrs":"List of Marian Martyrs"},"removed_section_titles":["The Marian Martyrs"],"added_section_titles":["List of Marian Martyrs"]},"disappear":{"revid":632679442,"parentid":632679071,"timestamp":"2014-11-06T11:14:55Z","removed_section_titles":["List of Marian Martyrs"],"added_section_titles":["Protestants executed under Mary"]},"very_different":"33≥22","rename_to":"Protestants executed under Mary"} -->
}}
}}


== Category ==
== Some Terrible Problems in the Inquisition Section ==

In some places the text states (correctly, I believe) that the Inquisition did not execute anyone: secular authorities did. But other sections go right on claiming the Inquisition did this. One sentence even claims "the execution" did it: "actually executed by the Spanish execution." I am not an expert in this history, but both claims can't be right.


{{ping|Dimadick}} please could you explain what "Main topic article of the category" means, and how it justifies placing an article about a method of execution, into a category of articles about people? [[User:MPS1992|MPS1992]] ([[User talk:MPS1992|talk]]) 18:09, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
And footnote 37 is to a *novel*! No, you can't use fiction as a historical reference! [[User:GeneCallahan|GeneCallahan]] ([[User talk:GeneCallahan|talk]]) 21:34, 10 June 2014 (UTC)


Are you new to Wikipedia? Every category has a main article which explains the topic. [[User:Dimadick|Dimadick]] ([[User talk:Dimadick|talk]]) 18:28, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
== Possible copyright problem ==
[[File:Copyright-problem.svg|left|50x50px|alt=|link=]] This article has been revised as part of [[WP:CCI|a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement]]. (See [[WP:Contributor copyright investigations/Tobby72|the investigation subpage]]) Earlier text must not be restored, ''unless'' it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyrighted]] text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of ''information'', but not as a source of ''sentences'' or ''phrases''. Accordingly, the material ''may'' be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original ''or'' [[Wikipedia:Plagiarism|plagiarize]] from that source. Please see our [[Wikipedia:NFC#Text|guideline on non-free text]] for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. <!--Signature-->[[User:Diannaa|Diannaa]] ([[User talk:Diannaa|talk]]) 01:02, 20 July 2014 (UTC) <!--{{CCI}} end-->


:{{ping|Dimadick}} that is a surprising question. Please could you mention for me what the "main article" of [[:Category:Pharaohs of the Twelfth Dynasty of Egypt]] is, so that I might better understand your assertion. A precise link to policy on this would be an acceptable alternative. [[User:MPS1992|MPS1992]] ([[User talk:MPS1992|talk]]) 18:48, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
== Undue and unrelated content ==


[[:Wikipedia:Categorization#Eponymous_categories|Eponymous_categories]]: "A category that covers exactly the same topic as an article is known as the '''eponymous category''' for that article"... "The article itself should be a member of the eponymous category and should be sorted with a space to appear at the start of the listing (see [[#Sort keys]])."
Removed the Hindu tradition section because both of the sources are referring to metaphors of those translations that are outdated within the mainstream scholarship, one of them(by abhinav publications) is clearly unreliable source.


Open the category and see which is the eponymous article. [[User:Dimadick|Dimadick]] ([[User talk:Dimadick|talk]]) 18:54, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Removed the "Fire and the fault of Karma" because it reads like one set of philosophical opinions with nothing to do with the death by burning. Whole page must include the notable instances and practices, not irrelevant set of unsupported views. [[User:Bladesmulti|Bladesmulti]] ([[User talk:Bladesmulti|talk]]) 17:05, 25 September 2014 (UTC)


:{{ping|User:Dimadick}} I have opened [[:Category:Pharaohs of the Twelfth Dynasty of Egypt]] and there is no eponymous article. Please could you explain how that fits with your assertion "Every category has a main article which explains the topic". Please could you also indent your posts correctly when replying. [[User:MPS1992|MPS1992]] ([[User talk:MPS1992|talk]]) 19:12, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
It has a lot of much to do with Death by burning. Its about the widow burning in ancient India where widows were burned alive after the death of their husbands. How come it is not to do with the Hindu Traditions? I don't understand that . <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:John Harkins|John Harkins]] ([[User talk:John Harkins|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/John Harkins|contribs]]) 17:50, 25 September 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
::Not supported by the reference, so it is [[Wikipedia:SYNTH]], set of opinions do nothing especially when it is undue and unrelated. [[User:Bladesmulti|Bladesmulti]] ([[User talk:Bladesmulti|talk]]) 17:54, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
::The category we are discussing, not the Pharaohs category. [[User:Dimadick|Dimadick]] ([[User talk:Dimadick|talk]]) 19:14, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Dimadick}} So are you retracting your claim that "Every category has a main article which explains the topic"? [[User:MPS1992|MPS1992]] ([[User talk:MPS1992|talk]]) 19:17, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
It is not a set of opinions but rather truth which you try to declare it false. You say it is unrelated. There are sources given next to every statement. Please respect the sources. And don't revert now. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:John Harkins|John Harkins]] ([[User talk:John Harkins|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/John Harkins|contribs]]) 18:00, 25 September 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
::::No, I don't. Subcategorizing the category on the 12th dynasty, does not mean it lacks a main article. [[User:Dimadick|Dimadick]] ([[User talk:Dimadick|talk]]) 19:27, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
::Saying that "Life is filled with pain" has to do something with the death by burning? Or that Weinberger-Thomas(who?) is remembering that he had watched something but he don't remember the exact year? Simply nothing. [[User:Bladesmulti|Bladesmulti]] ([[User talk:Bladesmulti|talk]]) 18:12, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
:::::{{ping|Dimadick}} That's not very helpful. Perhaps there has been a misunderstanding. Which of the three options listed at [[:Wikipedia:Categorization#Eponymous_categories|Eponymous_categories]] are you proposing to use with regard to the article under discussion, i.e. [[Death by burning]]? [[User:MPS1992|MPS1992]] ([[User talk:MPS1992|talk]]) 19:30, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
::::::It is already listed as the main article of the category, and it is supposed to provide the category's definition (as no other definition was provided). Are you offering to write a better definition of the category's scope? [[User:Dimadick|Dimadick]] ([[User talk:Dimadick|talk]]) 19:33, 21 October 2019 (UTC)


== Off-topic entries ==
Read this.
"A number of sayings/rulings of Hindu sages contain prescripts for death penalty by means of heated metal. The [[Laws of Manu]], for example, states that the adulterer should be placed on an iron bed, well heated, and that the executioners are to continually add logs beneath it, until the "sinful wretch" is burned to death.<ref>''Manu, Haughton'' (1825), [http://books.google.com/?id=1blZAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA279 p.279]</ref> The sage [[Vasishta]], laid down that he who has sex with his guru's wife:"


The focus of this article is clearly meant to be a discussion of burning as a method of execution, rather than instances of where people are killed by fire more generally, whether by arson, firebombing in war (e.g. Dresden, Hiroshima, Nagasaki), or fires caused by law enforcement operations (e.g. Waco). I have therefore removed some subsections as being off-topic, with the aim of restoring the focus of the article. --[[User:RFBailey|RFBailey]] ([[User talk:RFBailey|talk]]) 01:46, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
You are only removing the Hindu related materials. May I know Why? <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:John Harkins|John Harkins]] ([[User talk:John Harkins|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/John Harkins|contribs]]) 18:35, 25 September 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
::Outdated commentaries that were copied from a missionary author, and edited by William Jones, they are regarded as fringed theories by the modern scholars or anyone after mid 19th century. Find me one source after mid 19th century that has used such defective translation.
::I check all recent editions, but you have only targeted particular material, so it must be your issue. [[User:Bladesmulti|Bladesmulti]] ([[User talk:Bladesmulti|talk]]) 18:41, 25 September 2014 (UTC)


== Burning at the stakes picture ==
So you mean that all the sources provided there in are incorrect and must be removed. ? <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:John Harkins|John Harkins]] ([[User talk:John Harkins|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/John Harkins|contribs]]) 18:55, 25 September 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:I removed the fringed, which can be removed. They are not supported by mainstream scholars or even little bit by any of the 20th century scholars. Look around, we don't use these names in any of the articles as source. It is the case with the 4/5 sources that has been added in your edition. You cannot add speculations or fringed theories on the article where small sections are used for providing the conclusion. [[User:Bladesmulti|Bladesmulti]] ([[User talk:Bladesmulti|talk]]) 19:06, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
In Russia, unlike the centuries-old English practice regarding women, it was not customary to burn people in public at the stakes. Since the 16th century, only the practice of burning heretics and witches in log cabins has been known. Avvakum and his accomplices were also [[:ru:сожжение в срубе|burned in a log house]]. It is strange that the article begins with Myasoedov's picturesque fantasy, which does not correspond to historical truth. [[User:Сурбас|Сурбас]] ([[User talk:Сурбас|talk]]) 08:40, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 00:41, 31 March 2024

Category

[edit]

@Dimadick: please could you explain what "Main topic article of the category" means, and how it justifies placing an article about a method of execution, into a category of articles about people? MPS1992 (talk) 18:09, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Are you new to Wikipedia? Every category has a main article which explains the topic. Dimadick (talk) 18:28, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Dimadick: that is a surprising question. Please could you mention for me what the "main article" of Category:Pharaohs of the Twelfth Dynasty of Egypt is, so that I might better understand your assertion. A precise link to policy on this would be an acceptable alternative. MPS1992 (talk) 18:48, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Eponymous_categories: "A category that covers exactly the same topic as an article is known as the eponymous category for that article"... "The article itself should be a member of the eponymous category and should be sorted with a space to appear at the start of the listing (see #Sort keys)."

Open the category and see which is the eponymous article. Dimadick (talk) 18:54, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Dimadick: I have opened Category:Pharaohs of the Twelfth Dynasty of Egypt and there is no eponymous article. Please could you explain how that fits with your assertion "Every category has a main article which explains the topic". Please could you also indent your posts correctly when replying. MPS1992 (talk) 19:12, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The category we are discussing, not the Pharaohs category. Dimadick (talk) 19:14, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Dimadick: So are you retracting your claim that "Every category has a main article which explains the topic"? MPS1992 (talk) 19:17, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No, I don't. Subcategorizing the category on the 12th dynasty, does not mean it lacks a main article. Dimadick (talk) 19:27, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Dimadick: That's not very helpful. Perhaps there has been a misunderstanding. Which of the three options listed at Eponymous_categories are you proposing to use with regard to the article under discussion, i.e. Death by burning? MPS1992 (talk) 19:30, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It is already listed as the main article of the category, and it is supposed to provide the category's definition (as no other definition was provided). Are you offering to write a better definition of the category's scope? Dimadick (talk) 19:33, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Off-topic entries

[edit]

The focus of this article is clearly meant to be a discussion of burning as a method of execution, rather than instances of where people are killed by fire more generally, whether by arson, firebombing in war (e.g. Dresden, Hiroshima, Nagasaki), or fires caused by law enforcement operations (e.g. Waco). I have therefore removed some subsections as being off-topic, with the aim of restoring the focus of the article. --RFBailey (talk) 01:46, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Burning at the stakes picture

[edit]

In Russia, unlike the centuries-old English practice regarding women, it was not customary to burn people in public at the stakes. Since the 16th century, only the practice of burning heretics and witches in log cabins has been known. Avvakum and his accomplices were also burned in a log house. It is strange that the article begins with Myasoedov's picturesque fantasy, which does not correspond to historical truth. Сурбас (talk) 08:40, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Death_by_burning&oldid=1216438337"