Jump to content

Talk:List of tropical cyclones: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Remove unknown param from WP Weather: meteo-task-force
 
(48 intermediate revisions by 25 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{hurricane|class=Start|importance=High}}
{{oldafdfull|date=August 10, 2007|votepage=List of notable tropical cyclones}}
{{Old AfD multi|date=August 10, 2007|votepage=List of notable tropical cyclones}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|
'''Archives''': [[/Archive 1|01]]
{{WikiProject Lists|class=}}
{{WikiProject Weather|tropical-cyclones-project=yes}}
}}


== Newly redirected ==
__TOC__


Rather than a ''list of tropical cyclones'', this page is a partial list of various tropical cyclone articles. As a comprehensive list of tropical cyclone articles exists at [[Outline of tropical cyclones]], including those on this page, I have redirected this page there. [[User:Drdpw|Drdpw]] ([[User talk:Drdpw|talk]]) 18:44, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
== [[List_of_notable_tropical_cyclones#Most_intense_storms_on_record]] ==

Hmm... I'm thinking the list is probably too long and is bordering on being an indiscriminate collection of info/listcruft. I'd prefer a shorter one, say, top 5 from each basin, listed by basin. That would give 35 (WPac, EPac/CPac, Atl, NIO, SWIO, SEIO/Australia, SPac). As it stands only the section on the North Atlantic has a list of most intense storms within the basin. We could probably move that down to this section. That would solve the problem that we have right now, not knowing when/whether to list storms. Also, right now there's far too much emphasis on the WPac in this section. Splitting by basin would be better and remove any sign of systemic bias. – [[User talk:Chacor|Chacor]] 15:30, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
:There can't be systemic bias in the present situation. That would be like saying that a list of the highest-scoring NBA players ever shows a systemic bias towards black people. By the same logic, someone could say putting the 5 strongest of each basin gives undue recognition to basins which have traditionally far weaker storms. I suggest have both - a global list of the strongest, then a list of the 5 strongest in each basin. --[[User:Golbez|Golbez]] 10:47, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

== Sorry.... I probably made the edit history look disgusting. ==

I'm still getting used to adding in info in "boxes", so my latest edits took a while to actually get it right.

Apologies... <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:Gavirulax|Gavirulax]] ([[User talk:Gavirulax|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Gavirulax|contribs]]) 03:35, 16 March 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned -->

== Changed direct links to inline references ==
...but I left the no reference tag at the top of the page. Considering how many "facts" are on this page, we should have more than 9 references for the page. If everything was well referenced, this page could become B class. Of course, some entries like Isobel would be gone, for the page's benefit. [[User:Thegreatdr|Thegreatdr]] 19:59, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

== Keith ==

Hmm...I read somewhere that Keith's 872 mb pressure was measured by a plane but I wanted to confirm it before I changed the article. -- <font color="gold">[[List of Atlantic hurricane seasons|§]]</font>[[User talk: E. Brown|Hurricane]]<font color="black">[[Special:Emailuser/E._Brown|E]]</font><font color="red">[[User:E. Brown|RIC]]</font>[[WP:TROP|§]] <small>''[[Special:Contributions/E. Brown|archive]]''</small> 22:34, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

== Typhoon Man-yi (Japan 07/2007) ==

I think that Typhoon Man-Yi should be part of the '''Significant Typhoon''' list, but I am not sure where to put it.
It is significant because, according to Japanese national broadcasting company NHK, it is the 'strongest typhoon to hit the country in ''July'' since recording started after WWII'.
I am currently in Japan, and getting updated on this information by use of Japanese Weather website [http://www.tenki.jp Tenki.JP]. It is, however, only classed as a Category 1 typhoon, and that could cause controversy.


[[User:Lallous|lallous]] 20:28, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

:Sure, it could be added to the significant typhoon list, provided that is correct that Man-yi was the strongest typhoon to strike Japan in July. [[User:Hurricanehink|Hurricanehink]] (<small>[[User_talk:Hurricanehink|talk]]</small>) 02:31, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

== Name==
This should be renamed, either back to [[list of tropical cyclones]] or to [[lists of tropical cyclones]] (hmm where does that redirect to?). See [[Wikipedia:Lists_%28stand-alone_lists%29#Naming_conventions]] [[User:Kappa|Kappa]] 07:29, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

:Why? This isn't a list of a random bunch of tropical cyclones. They're here because they're notable in some way. I like List of notable tropical cyclones better. That's what this article is, a list of ''notable'' (ie: significant or otherwise out of the ordinary) tropical cyclones. I don't agree with this name change. -- <font color="gold">[[WP:TROP|§]]</font>[[User talk: E. Brown|Hurricane]]<font color="black">[[Special:Emailuser/E._Brown|E]]</font><font color="red">[[User:E. Brown|RIC]]</font><small>''[[Special:Contributions/E. Brown|archive]]''</small> 21:20, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

::Per the subjectivity of '''notable''', I would rather have the important info here moved to the [[List of tropical cyclone records]] page, which is currently rather short and pining for expansion. For now, though, I would rather move it back to List of notable tropical cyclones and talk about it, since something should be done. [[User:Hurricanehink|Hurricanehink]] (<small>[[User_talk:Hurricanehink|talk]]</small>) 23:19, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 01:16, 2 April 2024

Newly redirected

[edit]

Rather than a list of tropical cyclones, this page is a partial list of various tropical cyclone articles. As a comprehensive list of tropical cyclone articles exists at Outline of tropical cyclones, including those on this page, I have redirected this page there. Drdpw (talk) 18:44, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]