Superinsulation: Difference between revisions
m Disambiguating links to Mold (link changed to Mold (fungus)) using DisamAssist. |
added Environmental technology infobox |
||
(20 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Method of insulating a building}} |
|||
{{For|the phenomenon in materials akin to superconductivity|Superinsulator}} |
{{For|the phenomenon in materials akin to superconductivity|Superinsulator}} |
||
[[Image:Passivhaus section en.jpg|thumb|300px|The [[passivhaus]] standard combines superinsulation with other techniques and technologies to achieve ultra-low energy use.]] |
[[Image:Passivhaus section en.jpg|thumb|300px|The [[passivhaus]] standard combines superinsulation with other techniques and technologies to achieve ultra-low energy use.]] |
||
'''Superinsulation''' is an approach to building design, construction, and retrofitting that dramatically reduces heat loss (and gain) by using much higher levels |
'''Superinsulation''' is an approach to building design, construction, and retrofitting that dramatically reduces heat loss (and gain) by using much higher insulation levels and airtightness than average. Superinsulation is one of the ancestors of the [[passive house]] approach. |
||
==Definition== |
==Definition== |
||
There is no universally agreed definition of superinsulation, but superinsulated buildings typically include: |
There is no universally agreed definition of superinsulation, but superinsulated buildings typically include: |
||
* Very high levels of [[Building insulation|insulation]], typically [[R-value (insulation)|R-40 (RSI-7)]] walls and [[R-value (insulation)|R-60 (RSI-10.6)]] roof, corresponding to [[International System of Units|SI]] [[U-value]]s of 0.15 and 0.1 W/(m |
* Very high levels of [[Building insulation|insulation]], typically [[R-value (insulation)|R-40 (RSI-7)]] walls and [[R-value (insulation)|R-60 (RSI-10.6)]] roof, corresponding to [[International System of Units|SI]] [[U-value]]s of 0.15 and 0.1 W/(m<sup>2</sup>·K) respectively) |
||
* Details to ensure insulation continuity where walls meet roofs, foundations, and other walls |
* Details to ensure insulation continuity where walls meet roofs, foundations, and other walls |
||
* Airtight construction, especially around doors and windows to prevent air infiltration pushing heat in or out |
* Airtight construction, especially around doors and windows, to prevent air infiltration pushing heat in or out |
||
* a [[heat recovery ventilation]] system to provide fresh air |
* a [[heat recovery ventilation]] system to provide fresh air |
||
* No large windows facing any particular direction<!-- (unlike [[passive solar]], which uses large windows facing the sun{{Fact|date=February 2009}} and fewer/smaller windows facing other directions). |
* No large windows facing any particular direction<!-- (unlike [[passive solar]], which uses large windows facing the sun{{Fact|date=February 2009}} and fewer/smaller windows facing other directions). |
||
* No large amounts of [[thermal mass]]{{Fact|date=February 2009}} |
* No large amounts of [[thermal mass]]{{Fact|date=February 2009}} |
||
* No active or passive solar heat {{Fact|date=February 2009}}(but may have [[solar water heating]] and/or [[hot water heat recycling]]) --> |
* No active or passive solar heat {{Fact|date=February 2009}}(but may have [[solar water heating]] and/or [[hot water heat recycling]]) --> |
||
* Much smaller than conventional heating system, sometimes just a small backup heater |
* Much smaller than a conventional heating system, sometimes just a small backup heater |
||
Nisson & Dutt (1985) suggest that a house might be described as "superinsulated" if the cost of space heating is lower than |
Nisson & Dutt (1985) suggest that a house might be described as "superinsulated" if the cost of space heating is lower than that of water heating.<ref>Nisson, J. D. Ned; and Gautam Dutt, ''The Superinsulated Home Book'', John Wiley & Sons, 1985 {{ISBN|0-471-88734-X}}, {{ISBN|0-471-81343-5}}</ref> |
||
Besides the meaning mentioned above of high level of insulation, the terms superinsulation and superinsulating materials are in use for high R/inch insulation materials like [[Vacuum insulated panel|vacuum insulation panels]] (VIPs) and [[aerogel]].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.iea-ebc.org/projects/project?AnnexID=65 |title=Long Term Performance of Super-Insulating Materials in Building Components and Systems |author=<!--Not stated--> |date=n.d. |publisher=[[International Energy Agency Energy in Buildings and Communities Programme]] |access-date= June 9, 2022}}</ref> |
|||
==Theory== |
==Theory== |
||
A superinsulated house is intended to reduce heating needs |
A superinsulated house is intended to reduce heating needs significantly and may even be heated predominantly by intrinsic heat sources (waste heat generated by appliances and the [[body heat]] of the occupants) with small amounts of backup heat. This has been demonstrated to work even in frigid climates but requires close attention to construction details in addition to the insulation (see [[IEA Solar Heating and Cooling Programme#Task 13|IEA Solar Heating & Cooling Implementing Agreement Task 13]]). |
||
== History == |
== History == |
||
The term "superinsulation" was coined by Wayne Schick at the [[University of Illinois |
The term "superinsulation" was coined by Wayne Schick at the [[University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign|University of Illinois Urbana–Champaign]]. In 1976 he was part of a team that developed a design called the "Lo-Cal" house, using computer simulations based on the climate of [[Madison, Wisconsin]]. Several houses, [[Duplex (building)|duplexes]] and condominiums based on Lo-Cal principles were built in [[Champaign–Urbana metropolitan area|Champaign–Urbana]] in the 1970s.<ref>McCulley, M. (2008, November). ''Pioneering superinsulation and the Lo-Cal House: Design, construction, evaluation and conclusions''. Paper presented at the 3rd Annual North American Passive House Conference, Duluth, MN</ref><ref name="Denzerbook">{{cite book |last=Denzer |first=Anthony|title=The Solar House: Pioneering Sustainable Design |publisher=Rizzoli|year=2013 |url=http://solarhousehistory.com/book/|isbn=978-0-8478-4005-2|url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130726200811/http://solarhousehistory.com/book/ |archive-date=2013-07-26 }}</ref> |
||
In 1977 the "Saskatchewan House"<ref>{{cite web|last1=Ralko|first1=Joe|url=http://esask.uregina.ca/entry/energy-efficient_houses.html| |
In 1977 the "Saskatchewan House"<ref>{{cite web|last1=Ralko|first1=Joe|url=http://esask.uregina.ca/entry/energy-efficient_houses.html|title=The Encyclopedia of Saskatchewan |publisher=[[University of Regina]] |access-date=June 9, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161224102808/https://esask.uregina.ca/entry/energy-efficient_houses.html |archive-date=December 24, 2016}}</ref> was built in [[Regina, Saskatchewan]], by a group of Canadian government agencies. It was the first house to demonstrate the value of superinsulation publicly and generated much attention. It originally included some experimental evacuated-tube solar panels, but they were not needed and were later removed. The house was heated primarily by waste heat from appliances and the occupants.<ref name="Denzerbook" /><ref name=Holladay>{{Cite web |last=Holladay |first=Martin |title=Forgotten Pioneers of Energy Efficiency |publisher=GreenBuildingAdvisor.com |date=April 17, 2009 |url=http://www.greenbuildingadvisor.com/blogs/dept/musings/forgotten-pioneers-energy-efficiency}}</ref> In 1977 the "Leger House" was built by Eugene Leger, in [[East Pepperell, Massachusetts]]. It had a more conventional appearance than the "Saskatchewan House", and also received extensive publicity.<ref name="Denzerbook" /> Publicity from the "Saskatchewan House" and the "Leger House" influenced other builders, and many superinsulated houses were built over the next few years. These houses also influenced Wolfgang Feist's development of the [[passive house|Passivhaus standard]].<ref name="Denzerbook" /> |
||
In 1977 the "Leger House" was built by Eugene Leger, in [[East Pepperell, Massachusetts]]. It had a more conventional appearance than the "Saskatchewan House", and also received extensive publicity.<ref name="Denzerbook" /> |
|||
Publicity from the "Saskatchewan House" and the "Leger House" influenced other builders, and many superinsulated houses were built over the next few years. These houses also influenced [[Wolfgang Feist]] when he developed the [[passive house|Passivhaus standard]].<ref name="Denzerbook" /> |
|||
The Kropper house was the first super-insulated retrofit in the US. In 1979, Steve Kropper and the Rowell Energy group undertook the retrofit of a 1911 triple-decker, a three family home design nearly identical to the estimated 18,000 triple-deckers in the City of Boston. The walls were insulated to R-38 primarily due to 4" of cellulose blown into the original wall cavity, a 1/2" air gap then a rigid 2" foil-faced poly-isocyanurate board. The ceiling was insulated to R-53 with a combination of cellulose blown into the ceiling rafters then layers of fiberglass batts. The windows were unexceptional at R-2, excepting the low infiltration and use of casement units with better seals than the existing double-hung windows. Each unit was heated from a 30 gallon gas fired water heater with a low volume circulating pump in one zone for each floor. Peak load once super-insulated was estimated at 32,500 BTU/hour (dt= 65), compared with 170,600 BTU/hour for the original source, individual forced hot air furnaces burning #2 fuel oil. Due to the challenge of reducing infiltration in a retrofit, no intentional source of outside air was required. The project was documented in the [https://www.csmonitor.com/1981/1028/102853.html Christian Science Monitor (October 28, 1981)], Boston Herald (September 23, 1980) Better Homes and Gardens, [http://bostonglobe.newspapers.com/image/437273294 the Boston Globe (Nov 19, 1982)], NE Solar Energy Association and many other publications. |
|||
==Retrofits== |
==Retrofits== |
||
It is possible, and increasingly desirable, to retrofit superinsulation to |
It is possible, and increasingly desirable, to [[Retrofitting|retrofit]] superinsulation to existing houses or buildings. The easiest way is often to add layers of continuous rigid exterior insulation,<ref>{{cite conference |url=http://www.buildingscience.com/documents/reports/rr-1012-residential-exterior-wall-superinsulation-retrofit |last=Ueno |first=K |title=Residential Exterior Wall Superinsulation Retrofit Details and Analysis |conference=Thermal Performance of the Exterior Envelopes of Whole Buildings XI International Conference|access-date=2011-01-22 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110128014936/http://www.buildingscience.com/documents/reports/rr-1012-residential-exterior-wall-superinsulation-retrofit |publisher=ASHRAE |archive-date=2011-01-28}}</ref> and sometimes by building new exterior walls that allow more space for insulation. A [[vapor barrier]] can be installed outside the original framing but may not be needed. An improved continuous air barrier is almost always worth adding, as older homes tend to be drafty, and such an air barrier can be significant for energy savings and durability. Care should be exercised when adding a vapor barrier as it can reduce drying of incidental moisture or even cause summer (in climates with humid summers) [[interstitial condensation]] and consequent [[mold]] and [[mildew]]. This may cause health problems for the occupants and may damage the structure. Many builders in northern Canada use a simple 1/3 to 2/3 approach, placing the vapor barrier no further out than 1/3 of the R-value of the insulated portion of the wall. This method is generally valid for interior walls with little or no vapor resistance (e.g., they use fibrous insulation) and controls air leakage condensation and vapor diffusion condensation. This approach will ensure that condensation does not occur on or to the inside of the vapor barrier during cold weather. The 1/3:2/3 rule will ensure that the vapor barrier temperature will not fall below the [[dew point]] temperature of the interior air and will minimize the possibility of cold-weather [[condensation]] problems. |
||
For example, with an internal room temperature of 20 °C (68 °F), the vapor barrier will then only reach 7.3 °C (45 °F) when the outside temperature is at −18 °C (−1 °F). Indoor air dew point temperatures are more likely to be in the order of around 0 °C (32 °F) when it is that cold outdoors, much lower than the predicted vapor barrier temperature, and hence the 1/3:2/3 rule is quite conservative. For climates that do not often experience −18 °C, the 1/3:2/3 rule should be amended to 40:60 or 50:50. As the interior air dewpoint temperature is an important basis for such rules, buildings with high interior humidities during cold weather (e.g., museums, swimming pools, humidified or poorly ventilated airtight homes) may require different rules, as can buildings with drier interior environments (e.g., highly ventilated buildings and warehouses). The 2009 International Residential Code embodies more sophisticated rules to guide the choice of insulation on the exterior of new homes, which can be applied when retrofitting older homes. |
|||
⚫ | A vapor |
||
⚫ | A vapor-permeable building wrap on the outside of the original wall helps keep the wind out and allows the wall assembly to dry to the exterior. [[Bituminous waterproofing|Asphalt felt]] and other products, such as porous polymer-based products, are available for this purpose and usually double as the water-resistant barrier/drainage plane. |
||
⚫ | Interior retrofits are possible where the owner wants to preserve the old exterior siding |
||
⚫ | Interior retrofits are possible where the owner wants to preserve the old exterior siding or where [[Setback (land use)|setback]] requirements limit space for an exterior retrofit. Sealing the air barrier is more complex, and the [[thermal insulation]] continuity is compromised (because of the many partition, floor, and service penetrations); the original wall assembly is rendered colder in cold weather (and hence more prone to condensation and slower to dry), occupants are exposed to significant disruptions, and the house is left with less interior space. Another approach is to use the 1/3 to 2/3 method mentioned above—to install a vapor retarder on the inside of the existing wall (if there is not one already) and add insulation and support structure to the interior. This way, utilities (power, telephone, cable, and plumbing) can be added to the new wall space without penetrating the air barrier. Polyethylene vapor barriers are risky except in frigid climates because they limit the wall's ability to dry to the interior. This approach also limits the amount of interior insulation that can be added to a relatively small amount (e.g., only R-6 insulation can be added to a 2×4 R-12 wall). |
||
==Costs and benefits== |
==Costs and benefits== |
||
In new construction, |
In new construction, the extra insulation and wall framing cost may be offset by not requiring a dedicated central heating system. A central furnace is often justified or required to ensure sufficiently uniform temperatures in homes with numerous rooms, more than one floor, air conditioning, or large size. Small furnaces are not very expensive, and some ductwork to every room is generally required to provide ventilation air. When peak demand and annual energy use are low, costly and sophisticated central heating systems are only sometimes needed. Hence, even electric resistance heaters may be used. Electric heaters are typically only used on cold winter nights when the overall demand for electricity in the rest of the house is low. Other backup heaters, such as wood pellets, wood stoves, natural gas boilers, or even furnaces, are widely used. The cost of a superinsulation retrofit should be balanced against the future price of heating fuel (which can be expected to fluctuate from year to year due to supply problems, natural disasters, or geopolitical events), the desire to reduce pollution from heating a building, or the desire to provide exceptional thermal comfort. |
||
During a power failure, a superinsulated house stays warm longer as heat loss is much less than |
During a power failure, a superinsulated house stays warm longer as heat loss is much less than usual, but the thermal storage capacity of the structural materials and contents is the same. Adverse weather may hamper efforts to restore power, leading to weeks or more outages. When deprived of their continuous supply of electricity (either for heat directly or to operate gas-fired [[Furnace (house heating)|furnaces]]), conventional houses cool rapidly and may be at greater risk of costly damage from freezing water pipes. Residents who use supplemental heating methods without proper care during such episodes or at any other time may subject themselves to the risk of [[Fire#Uncontrolled fire|fire]] or [[carbon monoxide poisoning]]. |
||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
{{Portal|energy}} |
{{Portal|energy}} |
||
⚫ | |||
The first superinsulated houses used standard stud-wall construction, but other building techniques can be used: |
|||
* [[Building insulation]] |
|||
⚫ | |||
*[[ |
* [[Earth shelter]] |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
* [[Energy conservation]] |
|||
*[[Earth sheltering|Earth-sheltered]] |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
*[[ |
* [[Quadruple glazing]] |
||
⚫ | |||
*[[Passive house]] |
|||
*[[ |
* [[Straw-bale construction]] |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
*[[Zero-energy building]] |
* [[Zero-energy building]] |
||
⚫ | |||
==Notes== |
==Notes== |
||
Line 63: | Line 61: | ||
==References== |
==References== |
||
{{Refbegin}} |
{{Refbegin}} |
||
*Computation and description of an outside insulation house: [https://web.archive.org/web/20070626232339/http://jehhan.ifrance.com/index.html To build for tomorrow] (translated from French) |
* Computation and description of an outside insulation house: [https://web.archive.org/web/20070626232339/http://jehhan.ifrance.com/index.html To build for tomorrow] (translated from French) |
||
*Booth, Don, ''Sun/Earth Buffering and Superinsulation'', 1983, {{ISBN|0-9604422-4-3}} |
* Booth, Don, ''Sun/Earth Buffering and Superinsulation'', 1983, {{ISBN|0-9604422-4-3}} |
||
*Marshall, Brian; and Robert Argue, ''The Super-Insulated Retrofit Book'', Renewable Energy in Canada, 1981 {{ISBN|0-920456-45-6}}, {{ISBN|0-920456-43-X}} |
* Marshall, Brian; and Robert Argue, ''The Super-Insulated Retrofit Book'', Renewable Energy in Canada, 1981 {{ISBN|0-920456-45-6}}, {{ISBN|0-920456-43-X}} |
||
*[[William Shurcliff|Shurcliff, William A.]], ''Superinsulated houses: A survey of principles and practice'', Brick House Pub. Co, 1981, 1982 {{ISBN|0-931790-25-5}} |
* [[William Shurcliff|Shurcliff, William A.]], ''Superinsulated houses: A survey of principles and practice'', Brick House Pub. Co, 1981, 1982 {{ISBN|0-931790-25-5}} |
||
*[[William Shurcliff|Shurcliff, William A.]], ''Superinsulated Houses and Air-To-Air Heat Exchangers'', Brick House Pub Co, 1988, {{ISBN|0-931790-73-5}} |
* [[William Shurcliff|Shurcliff, William A.]], ''Superinsulated Houses and Air-To-Air Heat Exchangers'', Brick House Pub Co, 1988, {{ISBN|0-931790-73-5}} |
||
{{Refend}} |
{{Refend}} |
||
==External links== |
==External links== |
||
*[http://www.greenbuildingadvisor.com/blogs/dept/energy-solutions/how-much-insulation-needed Joe Lstiburek's 10-20-40-60 rule] |
* [http://www.greenbuildingadvisor.com/blogs/dept/energy-solutions/how-much-insulation-needed Joe Lstiburek's 10-20-40-60 rule] |
||
*[http://www.quadlock.com/green_building/building_shell_superinsulation.htm Optimization of the Building Shell with Superinsulation] |
* [http://www.quadlock.com/green_building/building_shell_superinsulation.htm Optimization of the Building Shell with Superinsulation] |
||
*[http://www.motherearthnews.com/green-homes/super-insulated-house-zmaz82mjzglo.aspx?ViewAll=True#axzz2WUIDQeEK Super-Insulated House Plans (Mother Earth News)] |
* [http://www.motherearthnews.com/green-homes/super-insulated-house-zmaz82mjzglo.aspx?ViewAll=True#axzz2WUIDQeEK Super-Insulated House Plans (Mother Earth News)] |
||
*[http://www.scanhome.ie/philosophy.php Why Superinsulation is so important in building to passive house standard] |
* [http://www.scanhome.ie/philosophy.php Why Superinsulation is so important in building to passive house standard] |
||
*[http://www.buildingscience.com/resources/high-r-value Drawings and specs of 12 different superinsulated wall assemblies] |
* [http://www.buildingscience.com/resources/high-r-value Drawings and specs of 12 different superinsulated wall assemblies] |
||
*[http://www.buildingscience.com/documents/digests/bsd-139-deep-energy-retrofit-of-a-sears-roebuck-house-a-home-for-the-next-100-years Superinsulation retrofit of a 1915 Sears Roebuck house] |
* [http://www.buildingscience.com/documents/digests/bsd-139-deep-energy-retrofit-of-a-sears-roebuck-house-a-home-for-the-next-100-years Superinsulation retrofit of a 1915 Sears Roebuck house] |
||
⚫ | |||
*{{cite web |
|||
| title = Resources on the History of Superinsulation |
|||
{{Environmental technology}} |
|||
| publisher = solarhousehistory.com |
|||
⚫ | |||
[[Category:Building biology]] |
[[Category:Building biology]] |
||
Line 86: | Line 83: | ||
[[Category:Energy conservation]] |
[[Category:Energy conservation]] |
||
[[Category:Environmental design]] |
[[Category:Environmental design]] |
||
[[Category:Heating, |
[[Category:Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning]] |
||
[[Category:Low-energy building]] |
[[Category:Low-energy building]] |
||
[[Category:Sustainable technologies]] |
[[Category:Sustainable technologies]] |
Latest revision as of 10:08, 3 April 2024
Superinsulation is an approach to building design, construction, and retrofitting that dramatically reduces heat loss (and gain) by using much higher insulation levels and airtightness than average. Superinsulation is one of the ancestors of the passive house approach.
Definition
[edit]There is no universally agreed definition of superinsulation, but superinsulated buildings typically include:
- Very high levels of insulation, typically R-40 (RSI-7) walls and R-60 (RSI-10.6) roof, corresponding to SI U-values of 0.15 and 0.1 W/(m2·K) respectively)
- Details to ensure insulation continuity where walls meet roofs, foundations, and other walls
- Airtight construction, especially around doors and windows, to prevent air infiltration pushing heat in or out
- a heat recovery ventilation system to provide fresh air
- No large windows facing any particular direction
- Much smaller than a conventional heating system, sometimes just a small backup heater
Nisson & Dutt (1985) suggest that a house might be described as "superinsulated" if the cost of space heating is lower than that of water heating.[1]
Besides the meaning mentioned above of high level of insulation, the terms superinsulation and superinsulating materials are in use for high R/inch insulation materials like vacuum insulation panels (VIPs) and aerogel.[2]
Theory
[edit]A superinsulated house is intended to reduce heating needs significantly and may even be heated predominantly by intrinsic heat sources (waste heat generated by appliances and the body heat of the occupants) with small amounts of backup heat. This has been demonstrated to work even in frigid climates but requires close attention to construction details in addition to the insulation (see IEA Solar Heating & Cooling Implementing Agreement Task 13).
History
[edit]The term "superinsulation" was coined by Wayne Schick at the University of Illinois Urbana–Champaign. In 1976 he was part of a team that developed a design called the "Lo-Cal" house, using computer simulations based on the climate of Madison, Wisconsin. Several houses, duplexes and condominiums based on Lo-Cal principles were built in Champaign–Urbana in the 1970s.[3][4]
In 1977 the "Saskatchewan House"[5] was built in Regina, Saskatchewan, by a group of Canadian government agencies. It was the first house to demonstrate the value of superinsulation publicly and generated much attention. It originally included some experimental evacuated-tube solar panels, but they were not needed and were later removed. The house was heated primarily by waste heat from appliances and the occupants.[4][6] In 1977 the "Leger House" was built by Eugene Leger, in East Pepperell, Massachusetts. It had a more conventional appearance than the "Saskatchewan House", and also received extensive publicity.[4] Publicity from the "Saskatchewan House" and the "Leger House" influenced other builders, and many superinsulated houses were built over the next few years. These houses also influenced Wolfgang Feist's development of the Passivhaus standard.[4]
Retrofits
[edit]It is possible, and increasingly desirable, to retrofit superinsulation to existing houses or buildings. The easiest way is often to add layers of continuous rigid exterior insulation,[7] and sometimes by building new exterior walls that allow more space for insulation. A vapor barrier can be installed outside the original framing but may not be needed. An improved continuous air barrier is almost always worth adding, as older homes tend to be drafty, and such an air barrier can be significant for energy savings and durability. Care should be exercised when adding a vapor barrier as it can reduce drying of incidental moisture or even cause summer (in climates with humid summers) interstitial condensation and consequent mold and mildew. This may cause health problems for the occupants and may damage the structure. Many builders in northern Canada use a simple 1/3 to 2/3 approach, placing the vapor barrier no further out than 1/3 of the R-value of the insulated portion of the wall. This method is generally valid for interior walls with little or no vapor resistance (e.g., they use fibrous insulation) and controls air leakage condensation and vapor diffusion condensation. This approach will ensure that condensation does not occur on or to the inside of the vapor barrier during cold weather. The 1/3:2/3 rule will ensure that the vapor barrier temperature will not fall below the dew point temperature of the interior air and will minimize the possibility of cold-weather condensation problems.
For example, with an internal room temperature of 20 °C (68 °F), the vapor barrier will then only reach 7.3 °C (45 °F) when the outside temperature is at −18 °C (−1 °F). Indoor air dew point temperatures are more likely to be in the order of around 0 °C (32 °F) when it is that cold outdoors, much lower than the predicted vapor barrier temperature, and hence the 1/3:2/3 rule is quite conservative. For climates that do not often experience −18 °C, the 1/3:2/3 rule should be amended to 40:60 or 50:50. As the interior air dewpoint temperature is an important basis for such rules, buildings with high interior humidities during cold weather (e.g., museums, swimming pools, humidified or poorly ventilated airtight homes) may require different rules, as can buildings with drier interior environments (e.g., highly ventilated buildings and warehouses). The 2009 International Residential Code embodies more sophisticated rules to guide the choice of insulation on the exterior of new homes, which can be applied when retrofitting older homes.
A vapor-permeable building wrap on the outside of the original wall helps keep the wind out and allows the wall assembly to dry to the exterior. Asphalt felt and other products, such as porous polymer-based products, are available for this purpose and usually double as the water-resistant barrier/drainage plane.
Interior retrofits are possible where the owner wants to preserve the old exterior siding or where setback requirements limit space for an exterior retrofit. Sealing the air barrier is more complex, and the thermal insulation continuity is compromised (because of the many partition, floor, and service penetrations); the original wall assembly is rendered colder in cold weather (and hence more prone to condensation and slower to dry), occupants are exposed to significant disruptions, and the house is left with less interior space. Another approach is to use the 1/3 to 2/3 method mentioned above—to install a vapor retarder on the inside of the existing wall (if there is not one already) and add insulation and support structure to the interior. This way, utilities (power, telephone, cable, and plumbing) can be added to the new wall space without penetrating the air barrier. Polyethylene vapor barriers are risky except in frigid climates because they limit the wall's ability to dry to the interior. This approach also limits the amount of interior insulation that can be added to a relatively small amount (e.g., only R-6 insulation can be added to a 2×4 R-12 wall).
Costs and benefits
[edit]In new construction, the extra insulation and wall framing cost may be offset by not requiring a dedicated central heating system. A central furnace is often justified or required to ensure sufficiently uniform temperatures in homes with numerous rooms, more than one floor, air conditioning, or large size. Small furnaces are not very expensive, and some ductwork to every room is generally required to provide ventilation air. When peak demand and annual energy use are low, costly and sophisticated central heating systems are only sometimes needed. Hence, even electric resistance heaters may be used. Electric heaters are typically only used on cold winter nights when the overall demand for electricity in the rest of the house is low. Other backup heaters, such as wood pellets, wood stoves, natural gas boilers, or even furnaces, are widely used. The cost of a superinsulation retrofit should be balanced against the future price of heating fuel (which can be expected to fluctuate from year to year due to supply problems, natural disasters, or geopolitical events), the desire to reduce pollution from heating a building, or the desire to provide exceptional thermal comfort.
During a power failure, a superinsulated house stays warm longer as heat loss is much less than usual, but the thermal storage capacity of the structural materials and contents is the same. Adverse weather may hamper efforts to restore power, leading to weeks or more outages. When deprived of their continuous supply of electricity (either for heat directly or to operate gas-fired furnaces), conventional houses cool rapidly and may be at greater risk of costly damage from freezing water pipes. Residents who use supplemental heating methods without proper care during such episodes or at any other time may subject themselves to the risk of fire or carbon monoxide poisoning.
See also
[edit]- Building insulation material
- Building insulation
- Earth shelter
- Earthship
- Energy conservation
- Insulating concrete form (ICF)
- Quadruple glazing
- Seasonal thermal energy storage (STES)
- Straw-bale construction
- Structural insulated panel (SIP)
- Zero-energy building
Notes
[edit]- ^ Nisson, J. D. Ned; and Gautam Dutt, The Superinsulated Home Book, John Wiley & Sons, 1985 ISBN 0-471-88734-X, ISBN 0-471-81343-5
- ^ "Long Term Performance of Super-Insulating Materials in Building Components and Systems". International Energy Agency Energy in Buildings and Communities Programme. n.d. Retrieved June 9, 2022.
- ^ McCulley, M. (2008, November). Pioneering superinsulation and the Lo-Cal House: Design, construction, evaluation and conclusions. Paper presented at the 3rd Annual North American Passive House Conference, Duluth, MN
- ^ a b c d Denzer, Anthony (2013). The Solar House: Pioneering Sustainable Design. Rizzoli. ISBN 978-0-8478-4005-2. Archived from the original on 2013-07-26.
- ^ Ralko, Joe. "The Encyclopedia of Saskatchewan". University of Regina. Archived from the original on December 24, 2016. Retrieved June 9, 2022.
- ^ Holladay, Martin (April 17, 2009). "Forgotten Pioneers of Energy Efficiency". GreenBuildingAdvisor.com.
- ^ Ueno, K. Residential Exterior Wall Superinsulation Retrofit Details and Analysis. Thermal Performance of the Exterior Envelopes of Whole Buildings XI International Conference. ASHRAE. Archived from the original on 2011-01-28. Retrieved 2011-01-22.
References
[edit]- Computation and description of an outside insulation house: To build for tomorrow (translated from French)
- Booth, Don, Sun/Earth Buffering and Superinsulation, 1983, ISBN 0-9604422-4-3
- Marshall, Brian; and Robert Argue, The Super-Insulated Retrofit Book, Renewable Energy in Canada, 1981 ISBN 0-920456-45-6, ISBN 0-920456-43-X
- Shurcliff, William A., Superinsulated houses: A survey of principles and practice, Brick House Pub. Co, 1981, 1982 ISBN 0-931790-25-5
- Shurcliff, William A., Superinsulated Houses and Air-To-Air Heat Exchangers, Brick House Pub Co, 1988, ISBN 0-931790-73-5
External links
[edit]- Joe Lstiburek's 10-20-40-60 rule
- Optimization of the Building Shell with Superinsulation
- Super-Insulated House Plans (Mother Earth News)
- Why Superinsulation is so important in building to passive house standard
- Drawings and specs of 12 different superinsulated wall assemblies
- Superinsulation retrofit of a 1915 Sears Roebuck house
- Resources on the History of Superinsulation