Jump to content

Talk:Treaty of Axim: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
GA failed
BattyBot (talk | contribs)
top: Fixed WikiProject template(s) to remove page from Category:WikiProject templates with unknown parameters or a sub-category, plus general fixes
 
(18 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Article history
{{FailedGA|14:55, 19 June 2008 (UTC)|topic=History}}
|action1=PR
{{oldpeerreview|archive=1}}
|action1date=06:18, 12 May 2008
{{WikiProject History
|action1link=Wikipedia:Peer review/Treaty of Axim (1642)/archive1
|importance=
|action1result=reviewed
|class=Start
|action1oldid=210379968
|peer-review=yes

}}
|action2=GAN
{{AfricaProject
|action2date=14:55, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
|importance=
|action2result=not listed
|class=Start
|action2oldid=219473828
|A-Class=

|peer-review=yes
|dykdate=5 May 2008
|old-peer-review=
|dykentry=... that forces of the [[Dutch West India Company]] captured [[Axim]] in present-day [[Ghana]] and signed a '''[[Treaty of Axim (1642)|treaty]]''' with the local [[West Africa]]ns in 1642 to become the major European power in the [[Gold Coast (region)|Gold Coast region]]?
|attention=
|views=460
<!-- Portals -->
|currentstatus=FGAN
|portal6-name=Ghana
|topic=History
|Ghana=yes
}}
{{WikiProject Netherlands
|importance=
|class=Start
|peer-review=yes
}}
{{WikiProject International relations
|importance=
|class=Start
|peer-review=yes
}}
}}
{{WikiProject International law
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1=
|importance=
{{WikiProject History|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Africa|importance=Mid|attention=|Ghana=yes|Ghana-importance=}}
|class=Start
{{WikiProject Netherlands}}
}}
{{WikiProject International relations|law=yes|importance=Mid}}
{{WPMILHIST
{{WikiProject Law|importance=Mid}}
|class=start
|Dutch-task-force=yes
{{WikiProject Military history|class=C|b1=no|b2=yes|b3=yes|b4=yes|b5=yes|Dutch-task-force=yes
|African-task-force=yes
|African-task-force=yes
<!-- B-Class-1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. -->
<!-- B-Class-1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. -->
|B-Class-1=
<!-- B-Class-2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. -->
|B-Class-2=
<!-- B-Class-3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. -->
|B-Class-3=
<!-- B-Class-4. It is free from major grammatical errors. -->
|B-Class-4=
<!-- B-Class-5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. -->
|B-Class-5=
}}
}}
}}
{{dyktalk|5 May|2008}}

== GA review ==


==GA review==
When reading through the article I have identified the following points which I believe need to be adressed before the article is promoted to GA status.
When reading through the article I have identified the following points which I believe need to be adressed before the article is promoted to GA status.


Line 61: Line 41:


:Failed GAN as it has been on hold for a while (several weeks) and the issues have not been addressed. [[User:Anonymous101|Anonymous101]] ([[User talk:Anonymous101|talk]]) 14:55, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
:Failed GAN as it has been on hold for a while (several weeks) and the issues have not been addressed. [[User:Anonymous101|Anonymous101]] ([[User talk:Anonymous101|talk]]) 14:55, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

== Reversed changes ==

Last changes made to the article reversed, as these were making broad historical claims regarding the nature of the state and kingship which were not properly underpinned by references. Reference to Barbot was incomplete and possibly incorrect. Moreover, edits were made by anonymous editor.

Suggestion is to thrash out the issues first in the discussion section of the Axim article, where the same type of changes were made, and only then copy relevant parts to this article
[[User:Doortmont|Michel Doortmont]] ([[User talk:Doortmont|talk]]) 23:55, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 04:22, 7 April 2024

Former good article nomineeTreaty of Axim was a History good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 12, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
June 19, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 5, 2008.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that forces of the Dutch West India Company captured Axim in present-day Ghana and signed a treaty with the local West Africans in 1642 to become the major European power in the Gold Coast region?
Current status: Former good article nominee

GA review

[edit]

When reading through the article I have identified the following points which I believe need to be adressed before the article is promoted to GA status.

  • Expand the article to allow it to be more broad in its coverage.
  • Add more references to verify all points of the article
  • Find citations for places where [citation needed] is shown.

I haven't finished looking through the article so i may add more.

If you think I am being unreasonable please tell me. Anonymous101 (talk) 20:25, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Failed GAN as it has been on hold for a while (several weeks) and the issues have not been addressed. Anonymous101 (talk) 14:55, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reversed changes

[edit]

Last changes made to the article reversed, as these were making broad historical claims regarding the nature of the state and kingship which were not properly underpinned by references. Reference to Barbot was incomplete and possibly incorrect. Moreover, edits were made by anonymous editor.

Suggestion is to thrash out the issues first in the discussion section of the Axim article, where the same type of changes were made, and only then copy relevant parts to this article Michel Doortmont (talk) 23:55, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]