Talk:Willow Grove Park Mall: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Harrison49 (talk | contribs) GA |
Harryboyles (talk | contribs) m →top: removing unsupported parameter 'auto' in {{WikiProject Shopping Centers}} |
||
(11 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ArticleHistory |
|||
⚫ | |||
|action1=GAN |
|||
⚫ | |||
|action1date=14:08, 24 May 2011 |
|||
⚫ | |||
|action1link=Talk:Willow Grove Park Mall/GA1 |
|||
⚫ | |||
|action1result=listed |
|||
|class=C |
|||
|action1oldid=429982342 |
|||
|auto=yes |
|||
|importance=low |
|||
⚫ | |||
|action2=PR |
|||
|action2date=01:42, 10 March 2012 |
|||
|action2link=Wikipedia:Peer review/Willow Grove Park Mall/archive1 |
|||
|action2result=reviewed |
|||
|action2oldid=478895612 |
|||
⚫ | |||
|currentstatus=GA |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA| |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
}} |
|||
{{Talk:Willow Grove Park Mall/GA1}} |
{{Talk:Willow Grove Park Mall/GA1}} |
||
== Mall sold - not! == |
|||
Apologies for the confusion in my edit which cited the Mall's having been sold once more. The subject of the article was a shopping center, not the mall. --User:Ceyockey (<small>''[[User talk:Ceyockey|talk to me]]''</small>) 13:55, 21 December 2011 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 11:25, 8 April 2024
Willow Grove Park Mall has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Willow Grove Park Mall/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Harrison49 (talk) 12:53, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- The article is well referenced, with plenty of citations.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It covers the major aspects of the subject.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- The article maintains a neutral point of view.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- The article does not appear to be subject to edit warring.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Images are freely licenced and used well.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall: Good work. For future improvement, look to try and increase the size of the Economic impact section with more figures. Harrison49 (talk) 14:08, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Mall sold - not!
[edit]Apologies for the confusion in my edit which cited the Mall's having been sold once more. The subject of the article was a shopping center, not the mall. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 13:55, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Art and architecture good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- GA-Class Pennsylvania articles
- Low-importance Pennsylvania articles
- GA-Class Philadelphia articles
- Low-importance Philadelphia articles
- Automatically assessed Philadelphia articles
- GA-Class Shopping center articles
- Mid-importance Shopping center articles