Talk:Ralph Roister Doister: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by 210.1.193.14 - "" |
Tom.Reding (talk | contribs) m Remove unknown param from WP Elizabethan theatre: importance |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header|search=yes|arpol=yes|bottom=yes}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{MoSElement||collapsed=no|ev=bri|ci=foot|bi=mla|me=na|bc=ce|sc=y|em=em|oth=MLA author-date system used for citations (see ''[[Drama]]'' for an example)}} |
|||
{{LGBTProject |class=Stub}} |
|||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Stub|1= |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{WikiProject Comedy|importance=low}} |
|||
{{WikiProject England|importance=low}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Elizabethan theatre}} |
|||
}} |
|||
==Erotics of the letter== |
|||
While "Much like Terence's works, the play also "(displays) an erotics of the letter that simultaneously registers and occludes the 'open secret' of pederastic desire." may be true, it doesn't make much sense. Would someone like to elaborate? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/210.1.193.14|210.1.193.14]] ([[User talk:210.1.193.14|talk]]) 01:49, 6 December 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
While "Much like Terence's works, the play also "(displays) an erotics of the letter that simultaneously registers and occludes the 'open secret' of pederastic desire." may be true, it doesn't make much sense. Would someone like to elaborate? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/210.1.193.14|210.1.193.14]] ([[User talk:210.1.193.14|talk]]) 01:49, 6 December 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Latest revision as of 13:31, 12 April 2024
Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ralph Roister Doister article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article uses the following optional standards for Style elements.
Please help us maintain consistency in the article by following these standards:
Please do not change these settings unless consensus has been reached. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Erotics of the letter
[edit]While "Much like Terence's works, the play also "(displays) an erotics of the letter that simultaneously registers and occludes the 'open secret' of pederastic desire." may be true, it doesn't make much sense. Would someone like to elaborate? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.1.193.14 (talk) 01:49, 6 December 2008 (UTC)