Jump to content

Talk:Ralph Roister Doister: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 210.1.193.14 - ""
m Remove unknown param from WP Elizabethan theatre: importance
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header|search=yes|arpol=yes|bottom=yes}}
{{WikiProject Theatre}}
{{MoSElement||collapsed=no|ev=bri|ci=foot|bi=mla|me=na|bc=ce|sc=y|em=em|oth=MLA author-date system used for citations (see ''[[Drama]]'' for an example)}}
{{LGBTProject |class=Stub}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Stub|1=

{{WikiProject Theatre|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Comedy|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject England|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Elizabethan theatre}}
}}
==Erotics of the letter==
While "Much like Terence's works, the play also "(displays) an erotics of the letter that simultaneously registers and occludes the 'open secret' of pederastic desire." may be true, it doesn't make much sense. Would someone like to elaborate? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/210.1.193.14|210.1.193.14]] ([[User talk:210.1.193.14|talk]]) 01:49, 6 December 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
While "Much like Terence's works, the play also "(displays) an erotics of the letter that simultaneously registers and occludes the 'open secret' of pederastic desire." may be true, it doesn't make much sense. Would someone like to elaborate? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/210.1.193.14|210.1.193.14]] ([[User talk:210.1.193.14|talk]]) 01:49, 6 December 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Latest revision as of 13:31, 12 April 2024

Erotics of the letter

[edit]

While "Much like Terence's works, the play also "(displays) an erotics of the letter that simultaneously registers and occludes the 'open secret' of pederastic desire." may be true, it doesn't make much sense. Would someone like to elaborate? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.1.193.14 (talk) 01:49, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]