Jump to content

Mad1: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
(88 intermediate revisions by 36 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{For|the desktop computer|MAD-1}}
{{protein
{{Infobox nonhuman protein
| Name = Mad1
| Name = Mad1
| image = tetramer Mad1_Mad2.png‎
| image = tetramer Mad1_Mad2.png
| width =
| width =
| caption =Crystal structure, tetramer of Mad1-Mad2 complex, yellow and red=Mad1 monomers, palegreen= Mad2 monomers
| caption =Crystal structure, tetramer of Mad1-Mad2 complex, yellow and red=Mad1 monomers, palegreen= Mad2 monomers
| Organism = ''S. cerevisiae'' S288c
| Symbol = MAD1
| Symbol = MAD1
| TaxID = 559292
| AltSymbols =
| AltSymbols =
| EntrezGene = 852794
| ATC_prefix=
| ATC_suffix=
| ATC_supplemental=
| CAS_number=
| CAS_supplemental=
| DrugBank=
| EntrezGene = 8379
| HGNCid =
| OMIM =
| PDB =1GO4
| PDB =1GO4
| RefSeq =
| UniProt = P40957
| RefSeqmRNA = NM_001180951.3
| UniProt = Q9Y6D9
| RefSeqProtein = NP_011429.3
| ECnumber =
| ECnumber =
| Chromosome =
| Chromosome = VII
| EntrezChromosome = NC_001139.9
| Arm =
| Band =
| GenLoc_start = 347119
| GenLoc_end = 349368
| LocusSupplementaryData =
}}
}}
'''Mad1''' is a non-essential [[protein]] which in [[yeast]] has a function in the [[Spindle checkpoint|spindle assembly checkpoint]] (SAC).<ref name ="Hardwick">

{{cite journal | vauthors = Hardwick KG, Murray AW | title = Mad1p, a phosphoprotein component of the spindle assembly checkpoint in budding yeast | journal = The Journal of Cell Biology | volume = 131 | issue = 3 | pages = 709–720 | year = 1995 | pmid = 7593191 | pmc = 2120625 | doi = 10.1083/jcb.131.3.709 }}

</ref>
'''Mad1''' is a non-essential protein in yeast which has a function in the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) which prevents cells from starting anaphase until the spindle is built up (THIS IS WHAT THE SAC DOES, AND NOT WHAT MAD1 ITSELF-ALONE- DOES, YOUR SENTENCE IS CONFUSING). The name Mad refers to the observation that mutant cells are mitotic arrest deficient (MAD) during the presence of microtubule depolymerization. Mad1 recruits the anaphase inhibitor Mad2 to unattached kinetochores and is essential for Mad2-Cdc20 complex formation (DEFINE CDC20 NOW) ''in vivo'' but not ''in vitro''. (IN SUMMARY REWRITE THIS PARAGRAPH SUCH THAT IT CAN BE SELF-CONTAINED AND REFERS TO ALREADY EXISTING PAGES IF THERE ARE ANY). In vivo, Mad1 acts as a competitive inhibitor
This checkpoint monitors chromosome attachment to spindle microtubules and prevents cells from starting anaphase until the spindle is built up. The name Mad refers to the observation that mutant cells are mitotic arrest deficient (MAD) during microtubule depolymerization. Mad1 recruits the anaphase inhibitor [[Mad2]] to unattached kinetochores and is essential for Mad2-[[Cdc20]] complex formation ''in vivo'' but not ''in vitro''. ''In vivo'', Mad1 acts as a competitive inhibitor
of the Mad2-Cdc20 complex.
<ref name ="Sironi">
of the Mad2-Cdc20 complex.<ref name ="Sironi">
{{cite journal | vauthors = Sironi L, Mapelli M, Knapp S, De Antoni A, Jeang KT, Musacchio A | title = Crystal structure of the tetrameric Mad1–Mad2 core complex: implications of a 'safety belt' binding mechanism for the spindle checkpoint | journal = The EMBO Journal | volume = 21 | issue = 10 | pages = 2496–2506 | year = 2002 | pmid = 12006501 | pmc = 126000 | doi = 10.1093/emboj/21.10.2496 }}
{{cite journal
</ref> Mad1 is phosphorylated by Mps1 which then leads together with other activities to the formation of the mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC). Thereby it inhibits the activity of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C). Homologues of Mad1 are conserved in eukaryotes from yeast to mammals.
| author = L. Sironi, M. Mapelli, S. Knapp1, A. De Antoni, K. Jeang and
A. Musacchio
| date = 2002
| title = Crystal structure of the tetrameric Mad1-Mad2 core
complex: implications of a `safety belt'
| journal = EMBO
| volume = 21
| pages = 2496-2506
| pmid = }}
</ref> Mad1 is phosphorylated by Mps1 which then leads to inhibition of the anaphase-promoting complex(cyclosome) (APC/C)activity (NOT DIRECTLY...). Homolog’s of Mad1 are conserved in eukaryotes (BETTER SAID, THEN: MAD1 IS CONSERVED IN EUKARYOTES- YOU HAVE NOT MENTIONED ANY ORGANISM AT THIS POINT AND IF YOU WANTED TO SUGGEST THAT MAD1 IS A YEAST PROTEIN 1- IT IS ALSO NAMED MAD1 IN MOST IF NOT ALL OTHER ORGANISMS, 2-YOU HAVE NOT SAID SO FAR THAT MAD1 IS A YEAST PROTEIN).




== Introduction ==
== Introduction ==
In the early 90s, YEAST genes were identified which mutations resulted in a defect in mitotic arrest in response to microtubule disassembly (mitotic arrest deficient genes-MAD genes). This cells showed during division no mitotic arrest in the presence of microtubule polymerization inhibitors and were therefore not able to delay cell division<ref name=Hardwick>{{cite journal |author=Hardwick KG, Murray AW |title=Mad1p, a phosphoprotein component of the spindle assembly checkpoint in budding yeast |journal=J. Cell Biol. |volume=131 |issue=3 |pages=709–20 |year=1995 |month=November |pmid=7593191 |pmc=2120625 |doi= |url=}}</ref>. The genes identified included the ''MAD1'', ''[[MAD2]]'' and ''[[MAD3]]'' genes. They are conserved in all [[eukaryotes]] and are involved in a pathway that is active in [[prometaphase]] to prevent the premature separation of sister [[chromatides]] and constitute the so called [[spindle assembly checkpoint]](SAC). This checkpoint monitors the status of chromosome attachment to the mitotic spindle and inhibits the [[metaphase]] to [[anaphase]] transition by preventing the activation of the [[anaphase-promoting complex]]/cyclosome (APC/C), and thereby the [[degradation]] of [[cell cycle]] regulators <ref name=Musaccio>{{cite journal |author=Musacchio A, Salmon ED |title=The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time |journal=Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. |volume=8 |issue=5 |pages=379–93 |year=2007 |month=May |pmid=17426725 |doi=10.1038/nrm2163 |url=}}</ref>. HERE SAY RAPIDLY (ONE SENTENCE) WHERE IS MAD1 LOCATED IN THIS PATHWAY (AT KINETOCHORES AND QUITE UPSTREAM IN THE SENSING MACHINERY)
In the early 90s, yeast genes were identified which mutations resulted in a defect in mitotic arrest in response to microtubule disassembly (mitotic arrest deficient genes - MAD genes). These cells showed no mitotic arrest in the presence of microtubule polymerization inhibitors and were therefore not able to delay cell division.<ref name="Hardwick"/> The genes identified included the ''MAD1'', ''[[MAD2]]'' and ''[[MAD3]]'' genes. They are conserved in all [[eukaryotes]] and are involved in a pathway that is active in [[prometaphase]] to prevent the premature separation of sister [[chromatids]] and constitute the so-called [[spindle assembly checkpoint]] (SAC). This checkpoint monitors the status of chromosome attachment to the mitotic spindle and inhibits the [[metaphase]] to [[anaphase]] transition by preventing the activation of the [[anaphase-promoting complex]]/cyclosome (APC/C), and thereby the [[Chemical decomposition|degradation]] of [[cell cycle]] regulators.<ref name=Musaccio>{{cite journal | vauthors = Musacchio A, Salmon ED | title = The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time | journal = Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. | volume = 8 | issue = 5 | pages = 379–93 | date = May 2007 | pmid = 17426725 | doi = 10.1038/nrm2163 | s2cid = 205494124 }}</ref> Mad1 in this pathway accumulates at unattached kinetochores and acts as a sensor for unattached kinetochores in this machinery.


== Function ==
== Function ==
[[Image:MAD1 function in SAC.jpg|thumb|400px|'''Fig. 2.''' '''Mad1 function in SAC.''' Mad1 homodimer in unattached kinetochores is bound to two c-Mad2 and forms a catalytic receptor for cytozolic o-Mad2. Complex Mad1-cMadD2-oMad2 catalyzes conformational change of inactive oMad2 to the active c-Mad2 form. C-Mad2 then binds to Cdc20 and mediates APC/C inhibition and mitotic arrest.]]
[[Image:MAD1 function in SAC.jpg|thumb|400px|Mad1 function in SAC. Mad1 homodimer in unattached kinetochores is bound to two c-Mad2 and forms a catalytic receptor for cytozolic o-Mad2. Complex Mad1-cMadD2-oMad2 catalyzes conformational change of inactive oMad2 to the active c-Mad2 form. C-Mad2 then binds to Cdc20 and mediates APC/C inhibition and mitotic arrest.]]
Eukaryotic cells show a mitotic arrest in the presence of microtubule polymerization inhibitors. A spindle assembly checkpoint monitors the status of the spindle and links the metaphase-anaphase transition to proper bipolar attachment of all kinetochores to the mitotic spindle. The spindle assembly checkpoint inhibits the activity of the anaphase promoting complex by preventing degradation of the downstream effectors leading to anaphase onset and exit from mitosis. Depletion of Mad1 leads to the loss of [[SAC]] function. Mad1 localise predominantly at unattached kinetochores and triggers mitotic arrest in case of single unattached kinetochore existence. Mad1 recruits an important SAC component [[Mad2]] to unattached kinetochores (Fig. 2) and induce signal mitotic arrest signal amplification. There is a pool of free cytoplasmic [[Mad2]] where it exists in its inactive open conformation called o-MAD2. When bound to Mad1, [[Mad2]] adopts active [[conformation]] called closed (c-Mad2) and forms heterotetramer of two MAD1 and two c-Mad2 units. Heterotetramer of Mad1–c-Mad2 is very stable and works as a [[catalytic]] [[receptor]] for free cytoplasmic o-Mad2. Free o-Mad2 binds to this receptor and changes its [[conformation]] to active closed form. This second c-MAD2 is transferred to [[Cdc20]] with yet unknown mechanism and forms Cdc20–c-Mad2 complex. This complex is an essential component of mitotic checkpoint complex [[MCC]]. MCC binds and inhibits [[APC]]/C and therefore arrests progression through mitosis <ref>{{cite journal |author=Yu H |title=Structural activation of Mad2 in the mitotic spindle checkpoint: the two-state Mad2 model versus the Mad2 template model |journal=J Cell Biol. |volume=173 |issue=2 |pages=153–157 |year=2006 |month=Apr |pmid=16636141}}</ref>, <ref name=Musaccio >{{cite journal |author=Musacchio A, Salmon ED |title=The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time |journal=Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. |volume=8 |issue=5 |pages=379–93 |year=2007 |month=May |pmid=17426725 |doi=10.1038/nrm2163 |url=}}</ref>.
Eukaryotic cells show a mitotic arrest in the presence of microtubule polymerization inhibitors. A spindle assembly checkpoint monitors the status of the spindle and links the metaphase-anaphase transition to proper bipolar attachment of all kinetochores to the mitotic spindle. The spindle assembly checkpoint inhibits the activity of the anaphase promoting complex by preventing degradation of downstream effectors, which otherwise lead to anaphase onset and exit from mitosis. Depletion of Mad1 leads to the loss of [[Spindle assembly checkpoint|SAC]] function. Mad1 localises predominantly at unattached kinetochores and triggers mitotic arrest in case of a single unattached kinetochore. Mad1 recruits the important SAC component [[Mad2]] to unattached kinetochores and induces mitotic arrest signal amplification. There is a pool of free cytoplasmic Mad2 in its inactive open conformation called o-MAD2. When bound to Mad1, Mad2 adopts an active [[Chemical structure|conformation]] called closed (c-Mad2) and forms a heterotetramer of two Mad1 and two c-Mad2 units. The heterotetramer of Mad1–c-Mad2 is very stable and works as a [[catalytic]] [[Receptor (biochemistry)|receptor]] for free cytoplasmic o-Mad2. Free o-Mad2 binds to this receptor and changes its conformation to the active closed form. This second c-MAD2 is transferred to [[Cdc20]] with yet unknown mechanism and forms Cdc20–c-Mad2 complex. This complex is an essential component of mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC). MCC binds and inhibits [[Anaphase-promoting complex|APC]]/C and therefore arrests progression through mitosis.<ref name="Musaccio"/><ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Yu H | title = Structural activation of Mad2 in the mitotic spindle checkpoint: the two-state Mad2 model versus the Mad2 template model | journal = J. Cell Biol. | volume = 173 | issue = 2 | pages = 153–157 | date = Apr 2006 | pmid = 16636141 | pmc = 2063805 | doi = 10.1083/jcb.200601172 }}</ref>


== Regulation ==
== Regulation ==
There are two upstream checkpoint [[kinases]] that are implicated in regulating MAD1 function through [[phosphorylation]] <ref name=Bharadwaj> {{cite journal |author=Bharadwaj R, Yu H |title=The spindle checkpoint, [[aneuploidy]], and [[cancer]]. |journal=Oncogene |volume=23 |issue=11 |pages=2016-27 |year=2000 }}</ref>. Mps1 phosphorylate Mad1 both ''in vitro'' and ''in vivo'' and is thought to regulate Mad1 and Mad2 localization to [[kinetochores]] and their interaction [[dynamics]]. [[BUB1]] is the other [[kinase]] that recruits Mad1 to [[kinetochore]] and activates it if [[kinetochore]] is unattached <ref name=Musaccio> {{cite journal |author=Musacchio A, Salmon ED |title=The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time |journal=Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. |volume=8 |issue=5 |pages=379–93 |year=2007 |month=May |pmid=17426725 |doi=10.1038/nrm2163 |url=}}</ref>.
There are two upstream checkpoint [[kinases]] implicated in regulating Mad1 function through [[phosphorylation]].<ref name=Bharadwaj>{{cite journal | vauthors = Bharadwaj R, Yu H | title = The spindle checkpoint, aneuploidy, and cancer | journal = Oncogene | volume = 23 | issue = 11 | pages = 2016–27 | year = 2000 | pmid = 15021889 | doi = 10.1038/sj.onc.1207374 | doi-access = }}</ref> Mps1 phosphorylates Mad1 both ''in vitro'' and ''in vivo'' and is thought to regulate Mad1 and Mad2 localization to [[kinetochores]] and their interaction dynamics. [[BUB1]] is the other kinase that recruits Mad1 to kinetochores and activates it if a kinetochore is unattached.<ref name="Musaccio"/>
If kinetochore is attached to spindle, SAC inhibitor p31<sup>comet</sup> inhibits Mad1 mediated conformational rearrangement of Mad2 and prevents Mad2 from binding to Cdc20 <ref name=Musaccio> {{cite journal |author=Musacchio A, Salmon ED |title=The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time |journal=Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. |volume=8 |issue=5 |pages=379–93 |year=2007 |month=May |pmid=17426725 |doi=10.1038/nrm2163 }}</ref>.
If a kinetochore is attached to spindle, SAC inhibitor p31<sup>comet</sup> inhibits Mad1 mediated conformational rearrangement of Mad2 and prevents Mad2 from binding to Cdc20.<ref name="Musaccio"/>


== Structural Features and Mechanism ==
== Structural features and mechanism ==
[[Image:Dimer Mad1_Mad2.png|thumb|400px|'''Fig. 2''' Crystal structure, dimer of Mad1-Mad2 complex, yellow and red=Mad1 monomers, palegreen= Mad2 monomers]]
[[Image:Dimer Mad1 Mad2.png|thumb|400px|Crystal structure, dimer of Mad1-Mad2 complex, yellow and red=Mad1 monomers, palegreen= Mad2 monomers]]
By biochemical methods Mad1 was predicted to encode a 90kD, 718-residue, <ref name ="Chen">
By biochemical methods Mad1 was predicted to encode a 90kD, 718-residue,<ref name ="Chen">
{{cite journal | vauthors = Chen RH, Shevchenko A, Mann M, Murray AW | title = Spindle Checkpoint Protein Xmad1 Recruits Xmad2 to Unattached Kinetochores | journal = The Journal of Cell Biology | volume = 143| issue = 2 | pages = 283–295 | year = 1998 | pmid = 9786942 | pmc = 2132829 | doi = 10.1083/jcb.143.2.283 }}
{{cite journal
</ref> [[coiled-coil]] [[protein]] with a characteristic rod shape<ref name="Hardwick"/>
| author = R. Chen, A. Shevchenko, M. Mann, and A. Murray| date = 1998
in 1995. Crystal structures followed soon. Then in 2002 the crystal structure of human Mad1 in complex with human Mad2 forming a tetramer was published. Due to experimental limitations the structure only shows Mad1 residues 484 - 584. Elongated Mad1 monomers are tightly held together by a parallel coiled-coil involving the N-terminal alpha helices. The Mad1 chains point away from the coiled-coil towards their Mad2 ligands forming two sub-complexes with Mad2. The segment between alpha helices 1 and 2 contains the Mad2 binding domain. The first part of this binding domain is flexible and adopts different conformations giving rise to an asymmetric complex. In their work, employing thermodynamic studies, Sironi et al.<ref name="Sironi"/>
| title = Spindle Checkpoint Protein Xmad1 Recruits
show that Mad1 functions such as to slow down the rate of Mad2-[[Cdc20]] complex formation and therefore acts as a competitive inhibitor ''in vivo''. Furthermore the authors suggest, the Mad1-Mad2 binding sites are buried inside the structure perhaps rendering the binding sites inaccessible for Cdc20 binding. Mad1-Mad2 binding is unusual in that the Mad2 C-terminal folds over Mad1. The authors therefore conclude that an unperturbed Mad1-Mad2 complex will not release Mad2 requiring a novel, so far poorly understood, mechanism of conformational change.<ref name="Sironi"/>
Xmad2 to Unattached Kinetochores| journal = The Journal of Cell Biology
| volume = 134
| pages = 283–295
| pmid = }}
</ref> [[coiled-coil]] [[protein]] with a characteristic rod shape <ref name ="Hardwick">
{{cite journal
| author = K. Hardwick and A. Murray| date = 1995
| title = Madlp, a Phosphoprotein Component of the
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint in Budding Yeast| journal = The Journal of Cell Biology
| volume = 131
| pages = 709-720
| pmid = }}
</ref>
in 1995. Chrystal structures followed soon. Then in 2002 the crystal structure of human Mad1 in complex with human Mad2 forming a tetramer was published (figure 1). Due to experimental limitations the structure only shows Mad1 residues 484 - 584. Elongated Mad1 monomers are tightly held together by a parallel coiled-coil involving the N-terminal alpha helices. The Mad1 chains point away from the coiled-cloil towards their Mad2 ligands forming two sub-complexes with Mad2. The segment between alpha helices 1 and 2 contains the Mad2 binding domain (figure 2). The first part of this binding domain is flexible and adopts different conformations giving rise to an asymmetric complex. In their work, employing thermodynamic studies, Sironi et al.
<ref name ="Sironi">
{{cite journal
| author = L. Sironi, M. Mapelli, S. Knapp1, A. De Antoni, K. Jeang and
A. Musacchio
| date = 2002
| title = Crystal structure of the tetrameric Mad1-Mad2 core
complex: implications of a `safety belt'
| journal = EMBO
| volume = 21
| pages = 2496-2506
| pmid = }}
</ref>
show that Mad1 functions such as to slow down the rate of Mad2-[[Cdc20]] complex formation and therefore acts as a competitive inhibitor in vivo. Furthermore the authors suggest, the Mad1-Mad2 binding sites are buried inside the structure perhaps rendering the binding sites inaccessible for Cdc20 binding. Mad1-Mad2 binding is unusual in that the Mad2 C-terminal folds over Mad1. The authors therefore conclude that an unperturbed Mad1-Mad2 complex will not release Mad2 requiring a novel, so far poorly understood, mechanism of conformational change <ref name ="Sironi">
{{cite journal
| author = L. Sironi, M. Mapelli, S. Knapp1, A. De Antoni, K. Jeang and
A. Musacchio
| date = 2002
| title = Crystal structure of the tetrameric Mad1-Mad2 core
complex: implications of a `safety belt'
| journal = EMBO
| volume = 21
| pages = 2496-2506
| pmid = }}
</ref>.


== Cancer ==
== Cancer ==
Mismatches in chromosome number (aneuploidies) during meiosis are responsible for human diseases like Down´s syndrome and also emerges frequently in cancer cells. The essential function of SAC gives rise to the hypothesis that mutations of the SAC and especially inactivation of SAC might be a reason for tumorigenesis or at least facilitate tumorigenesis<ref name=Musaccio>{{cite journal |author=Musacchio A, Salmon ED |title=The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time |journal=Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. |volume=8 |issue=5 |pages=379–93 |year=2007 |month=May |pmid=17426725 |doi=10.1038/nrm2163 |url=}}</ref>. Against this idea, it was shown that cancer cells undergo apoptosis when components of the SAC are not present<ref>{{cite journal |author=Kops GJ, Foltz DR, Cleveland DW |title=Lethality to human cancer cells through massive chromosome loss by inhibition of the mitotic checkpoint |journal=Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. |volume=101 |issue=23 |pages=8699–704 |year=2004 |month=June |pmid=15159543 |pmc=423258 |doi=10.1073/pnas.0401142101 |url=}}</ref>. In this model by contrast SAC inactivation becomes a potential way to kill rapidly dividing cancer cells. The molecular links between Mad1p, the SAC, apoptosis and cancer are still not fully understood <ref name=Musaccio>{{cite journal |author=Musacchio A, Salmon ED |title=The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time |journal=Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. |volume=8 |issue=5 |pages=379–93 |year=2007 |month=May |pmid=17426725 |doi=10.1038/nrm2163 |url=}}</ref>.
Mismatches in chromosome number (aneuploidies) during meiosis are responsible for human diseases like Down's syndrome and also emerge frequently in cancer cells. The essential function of SAC gives rise to the hypothesis that mutations of the SAC and especially inactivation of SAC might be a reason for tumorigenesis or at least facilitate tumorigenesis.<ref name="Musaccio"/> Against this idea, it was shown that cancer cells undergo apoptosis when components of the SAC are not present.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Kops GJ, Foltz DR, Cleveland DW | title = Lethality to human cancer cells through massive chromosome loss by inhibition of the mitotic checkpoint | journal = Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. | volume = 101 | issue = 23 | pages = 8699–704 | date = June 2004 | pmid = 15159543 | pmc = 423258 | doi = 10.1073/pnas.0401142101 | bibcode = 2004PNAS..101.8699K | doi-access = free }}</ref> In this model, in contrast to the other model, SAC inactivation becomes a potential way to kill rapidly dividing cancer cells. The molecular links between Mad1p, the SAC, apoptosis and cancer are still not fully understood.<ref name="Musaccio"/>


== See also ==
== See also ==
* [[MAD2]]
* [[MAD2]]
* [[Hyperphosphorylation]]
* [[Hyperphosphorylation]]



== References ==
== References ==
{{Reflist|35em}}
<references/>

== External links ==
[http://www.page1.ch Page of Sic1]


<!--
This is a comment. Do not add categories to your article until it is finished; just
[[Category:Cell cycle]]
[[Category:Cell cycle]]
[[Category:Genes]]
[[Category:Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes]]
[[Category:Proteins]]
[[Category:Proteins]]
-->

Latest revision as of 15:41, 12 April 2024

Mad1
Crystal structure, tetramer of Mad1-Mad2 complex, yellow and red=Mad1 monomers, palegreen= Mad2 monomers
Identifiers
OrganismS. cerevisiae S288c
SymbolMAD1
Entrez852794
PDB1GO4
RefSeq (mRNA)NM_001180951.3
RefSeq (Prot)NP_011429.3
UniProtP40957
Other data
ChromosomeVII: 0.35 - 0.35 Mb
Search for
StructuresSwiss-model
DomainsInterPro

Mad1 is a non-essential protein which in yeast has a function in the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC).[1] This checkpoint monitors chromosome attachment to spindle microtubules and prevents cells from starting anaphase until the spindle is built up. The name Mad refers to the observation that mutant cells are mitotic arrest deficient (MAD) during microtubule depolymerization. Mad1 recruits the anaphase inhibitor Mad2 to unattached kinetochores and is essential for Mad2-Cdc20 complex formation in vivo but not in vitro. In vivo, Mad1 acts as a competitive inhibitor of the Mad2-Cdc20 complex.[2] Mad1 is phosphorylated by Mps1 which then leads together with other activities to the formation of the mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC). Thereby it inhibits the activity of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C). Homologues of Mad1 are conserved in eukaryotes from yeast to mammals.

Introduction

[edit]

In the early 90s, yeast genes were identified which mutations resulted in a defect in mitotic arrest in response to microtubule disassembly (mitotic arrest deficient genes - MAD genes). These cells showed no mitotic arrest in the presence of microtubule polymerization inhibitors and were therefore not able to delay cell division.[1] The genes identified included the MAD1, MAD2 and MAD3 genes. They are conserved in all eukaryotes and are involved in a pathway that is active in prometaphase to prevent the premature separation of sister chromatids and constitute the so-called spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC). This checkpoint monitors the status of chromosome attachment to the mitotic spindle and inhibits the metaphase to anaphase transition by preventing the activation of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C), and thereby the degradation of cell cycle regulators.[3] Mad1 in this pathway accumulates at unattached kinetochores and acts as a sensor for unattached kinetochores in this machinery.

Function

[edit]
Mad1 function in SAC. Mad1 homodimer in unattached kinetochores is bound to two c-Mad2 and forms a catalytic receptor for cytozolic o-Mad2. Complex Mad1-cMadD2-oMad2 catalyzes conformational change of inactive oMad2 to the active c-Mad2 form. C-Mad2 then binds to Cdc20 and mediates APC/C inhibition and mitotic arrest.

Eukaryotic cells show a mitotic arrest in the presence of microtubule polymerization inhibitors. A spindle assembly checkpoint monitors the status of the spindle and links the metaphase-anaphase transition to proper bipolar attachment of all kinetochores to the mitotic spindle. The spindle assembly checkpoint inhibits the activity of the anaphase promoting complex by preventing degradation of downstream effectors, which otherwise lead to anaphase onset and exit from mitosis. Depletion of Mad1 leads to the loss of SAC function. Mad1 localises predominantly at unattached kinetochores and triggers mitotic arrest in case of a single unattached kinetochore. Mad1 recruits the important SAC component Mad2 to unattached kinetochores and induces mitotic arrest signal amplification. There is a pool of free cytoplasmic Mad2 in its inactive open conformation called o-MAD2. When bound to Mad1, Mad2 adopts an active conformation called closed (c-Mad2) and forms a heterotetramer of two Mad1 and two c-Mad2 units. The heterotetramer of Mad1–c-Mad2 is very stable and works as a catalytic receptor for free cytoplasmic o-Mad2. Free o-Mad2 binds to this receptor and changes its conformation to the active closed form. This second c-MAD2 is transferred to Cdc20 with yet unknown mechanism and forms Cdc20–c-Mad2 complex. This complex is an essential component of mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC). MCC binds and inhibits APC/C and therefore arrests progression through mitosis.[3][4]

Regulation

[edit]

There are two upstream checkpoint kinases implicated in regulating Mad1 function through phosphorylation.[5] Mps1 phosphorylates Mad1 both in vitro and in vivo and is thought to regulate Mad1 and Mad2 localization to kinetochores and their interaction dynamics. BUB1 is the other kinase that recruits Mad1 to kinetochores and activates it if a kinetochore is unattached.[3] If a kinetochore is attached to spindle, SAC inhibitor p31comet inhibits Mad1 mediated conformational rearrangement of Mad2 and prevents Mad2 from binding to Cdc20.[3]

Structural features and mechanism

[edit]
Crystal structure, dimer of Mad1-Mad2 complex, yellow and red=Mad1 monomers, palegreen= Mad2 monomers

By biochemical methods Mad1 was predicted to encode a 90kD, 718-residue,[6] coiled-coil protein with a characteristic rod shape[1] in 1995. Crystal structures followed soon. Then in 2002 the crystal structure of human Mad1 in complex with human Mad2 forming a tetramer was published. Due to experimental limitations the structure only shows Mad1 residues 484 - 584. Elongated Mad1 monomers are tightly held together by a parallel coiled-coil involving the N-terminal alpha helices. The Mad1 chains point away from the coiled-coil towards their Mad2 ligands forming two sub-complexes with Mad2. The segment between alpha helices 1 and 2 contains the Mad2 binding domain. The first part of this binding domain is flexible and adopts different conformations giving rise to an asymmetric complex. In their work, employing thermodynamic studies, Sironi et al.[2] show that Mad1 functions such as to slow down the rate of Mad2-Cdc20 complex formation and therefore acts as a competitive inhibitor in vivo. Furthermore the authors suggest, the Mad1-Mad2 binding sites are buried inside the structure perhaps rendering the binding sites inaccessible for Cdc20 binding. Mad1-Mad2 binding is unusual in that the Mad2 C-terminal folds over Mad1. The authors therefore conclude that an unperturbed Mad1-Mad2 complex will not release Mad2 requiring a novel, so far poorly understood, mechanism of conformational change.[2]

Cancer

[edit]

Mismatches in chromosome number (aneuploidies) during meiosis are responsible for human diseases like Down's syndrome and also emerge frequently in cancer cells. The essential function of SAC gives rise to the hypothesis that mutations of the SAC and especially inactivation of SAC might be a reason for tumorigenesis or at least facilitate tumorigenesis.[3] Against this idea, it was shown that cancer cells undergo apoptosis when components of the SAC are not present.[7] In this model, in contrast to the other model, SAC inactivation becomes a potential way to kill rapidly dividing cancer cells. The molecular links between Mad1p, the SAC, apoptosis and cancer are still not fully understood.[3]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c Hardwick KG, Murray AW (1995). "Mad1p, a phosphoprotein component of the spindle assembly checkpoint in budding yeast". The Journal of Cell Biology. 131 (3): 709–720. doi:10.1083/jcb.131.3.709. PMC 2120625. PMID 7593191.
  2. ^ a b c Sironi L, Mapelli M, Knapp S, De Antoni A, Jeang KT, Musacchio A (2002). "Crystal structure of the tetrameric Mad1–Mad2 core complex: implications of a 'safety belt' binding mechanism for the spindle checkpoint". The EMBO Journal. 21 (10): 2496–2506. doi:10.1093/emboj/21.10.2496. PMC 126000. PMID 12006501.
  3. ^ a b c d e f Musacchio A, Salmon ED (May 2007). "The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time". Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8 (5): 379–93. doi:10.1038/nrm2163. PMID 17426725. S2CID 205494124.
  4. ^ Yu H (Apr 2006). "Structural activation of Mad2 in the mitotic spindle checkpoint: the two-state Mad2 model versus the Mad2 template model". J. Cell Biol. 173 (2): 153–157. doi:10.1083/jcb.200601172. PMC 2063805. PMID 16636141.
  5. ^ Bharadwaj R, Yu H (2000). "The spindle checkpoint, aneuploidy, and cancer". Oncogene. 23 (11): 2016–27. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1207374. PMID 15021889.
  6. ^ Chen RH, Shevchenko A, Mann M, Murray AW (1998). "Spindle Checkpoint Protein Xmad1 Recruits Xmad2 to Unattached Kinetochores". The Journal of Cell Biology. 143 (2): 283–295. doi:10.1083/jcb.143.2.283. PMC 2132829. PMID 9786942.
  7. ^ Kops GJ, Foltz DR, Cleveland DW (June 2004). "Lethality to human cancer cells through massive chromosome loss by inhibition of the mitotic checkpoint". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101 (23): 8699–704. Bibcode:2004PNAS..101.8699K. doi:10.1073/pnas.0401142101. PMC 423258. PMID 15159543.