Jump to content

Voluntarism (philosophy): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
 
(35 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Doctrine prioritizing will over intellect}}
{{about|the metaphysical philosophy||Voluntarism (disambiguation)}}
{{about|the metaphysical philosophy||Voluntarism (disambiguation)}}
{{More citations needed|date=May 2023}}
'''Voluntarism''' is "any metaphysical or psychological system that assigns to the [[Will (philosophy)|will]] ([[Latin]]: ''voluntas'') a more predominant role than that attributed to the [[intellect]]",<ref>[http://www.britannica.com/topic/voluntarism-philosophy Voluntarism – Britannica.com]</ref> or equivalently "the doctrine that will is the basic factor, both in the universe and in human conduct".<ref>{{cite book|author=[[Will Durant|Durant, Will]]| title=[[The Story of Philosophy]]|publisher=Touchstone Books-Simon & Schuster|location=New York City, New York| year=1926|isbn=0-671-69500-2}}</ref> This description has been applied to various points of view from different cultural eras in the areas of [[metaphysics]], [[psychology]], [[political philosophy]] and [[theology]].
'''Voluntarism''' is "any metaphysical or psychological system that assigns to the [[Will (philosophy)|will]] ([[Latin]]: ''voluntas'') a more predominant role than that attributed to the [[intellect]]",<ref name=Brit>[https://www.britannica.com/topic/voluntarism-philosophy Voluntarism (philosophy)][[Britannica.com]]</ref> or equivalently "the doctrine that will is the basic factor, both in the universe and in human conduct".<ref>{{cite book |last=Durant |first=Will |author-link=Will Durant |title=[[The Story of Philosophy]] |publisher=Touchstone Books-[[Simon & Schuster]] |location=New York City, New York |year=1926 |isbn=0-671-69500-2}}</ref> Voluntarism has appeared at various points throughout the history of philosophy, seeing application in the areas of [[metaphysics]], [[psychology]], [[political philosophy]] and [[theology]].


The term voluntarism was introduced by [[Ferdinand Tönnies]] into the philosophical literature and particularly used by [[Wilhelm Wundt]] and [[Friedrich Paulsen]].
The term voluntarism was introduced by [[Ferdinand Tönnies]] into the philosophical literature and particularly used by [[Wilhelm Wundt]] and [[Friedrich Paulsen]].
Line 6: Line 8:
== Theological voluntarism<!-- 'Voluntarism (theology)' and 'Theological voluntarism' redirect here. --> ==
== Theological voluntarism<!-- 'Voluntarism (theology)' and 'Theological voluntarism' redirect here. --> ==
=== Medieval theological voluntarism<!--'Medieval theological voluntarism' redirects here. --> ===
=== Medieval theological voluntarism<!--'Medieval theological voluntarism' redirects here. --> ===
Associated with [[Duns Scotus]] and [[William of Ockham]] (two of the foremost medieval [[Scholasticism|scholastic]] philosophers), '''medieval theological voluntarism'''<!-- Boldface per WP:R#PLA. --> is generally taken to be the philosophical emphasis on the divine will and human freedom (''voluntas superior intellectu''). For example, Scotus held that morality comes from God's will and choice rather than his intellect or knowledge. Accordingly, God should be defined as an [[omnipotence|omnipotent]] being whose actions should not and cannot be ultimately rationalized and explained through reason. As such, voluntarism is usually contrasted with [[intellectualism]], championed by the [[Scholasticism|scholastic]] [[Thomas Aquinas]].<ref>[http://www.iep.utm.edu/voluntar/ "Voluntarism"] entry in the ''[[Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy]]''</ref>
Associated with [[Duns Scotus]] and [[William of Ockham]]<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |last=Walker |first=L. |date=1912 |url=http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15505a.htm |title=Voluntarism |encyclopedia=[[Catholic Encyclopedia]] |location=New York |publisher=Robert Appleton Company |access-date=September 27, 2019 |via=[[New Advent]]}}</ref> (two of the foremost medieval [[Scholasticism|scholastic]] philosophers), '''medieval theological voluntarism'''<!-- Boldface per WP:R#PLA --> (not to be confused with [[meta-ethical]] [[theological voluntarism]]) is generally taken to be the philosophical emphasis on the divine will and human freedom over and above the intellect ({{lang|la|voluntas superior intellectu}}). For example, Scotus held that morality comes from God's will and choice rather than his intellect or knowledge. Accordingly, God should be defined as an [[omnipotence|omnipotent]] being whose actions should not and cannot be ultimately rationalized and explained through reason. As such, voluntarism is usually contrasted with [[intellectualism]], championed by the [[Scholasticism|scholastic]] [[Thomas Aquinas]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.iep.utm.edu/voluntar/ |title=Voluntarism |website=[[Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy]]}}</ref>


=== Theological voluntarism as an approach to natural philosophy<!-- 'Theological voluntarism as an approach to natural philosophy' redirects here. --> ===
=== Theological voluntarism as an approach to natural philosophy<!-- 'Theological voluntarism as an approach to natural philosophy' redirects here. --> ===
'''Theological voluntarism'''<!-- Boldface per WP:R#PLA. --> also refers to theological commitments—that is, specific interpretations of doctrines of Christianity—arguably held by certain early modern natural philosophers such as [[Pierre Gassendi]], [[Walter Charleton]], [[Robert Boyle]],<ref>[[Peter Harrison (historian)|Peter Harrison]], ''The Fall of Man and the Foundations of Science'', Cambridge University Press, p. 220: "There has been considerable discussion in the secondary literature about the impact of Boyle's theological voluntatism on his approach to natural philosophy."</ref> [[Isaac Barrow]] and [[Isaac Newton]]. It resulted in an empirical approach associated with early modern science. Voluntarism therefore allows that faith or belief in God can be achieved by will as opposed to requiring a prior divine gift of faith to the individual. This notion holds at least in so far as it has found favor among some historians and philosophers (e.g. the historian [[Francis Oakley]] and the philosopher [[Michael B. Foster]]).<ref>[[Peter Harrison (historian)|Peter Harrison]], [https://books.google.com/books?id=l4g5t8EDGe0C&pg=PA39&dq=%22Was+Newton+a+Voluntarist%3F%22#PPA39,M1 "Was Newton a Voluntarist?"] (pp. 39-64), in: ''Newton and Newtonianism: New Studies'', ed. by James E. Force, Sarah Hutton. Springer, 2004. {{ISBN|1-4020-1969-6}}.</ref> A 20th-century theologian of voluntarism was [[James Luther Adams]].
'''Theological voluntarism'''<!-- Boldface per WP:R#PLA --> also refers to theological commitments—that is, specific interpretations of doctrines of Christianity—arguably held by certain early modern natural philosophers such as [[Pierre Gassendi]], [[Walter Charleton]], [[Robert Boyle]],<ref>{{cite book |author-link=Peter Harrison (historian) |first=Peter |last=Harrison |title=The Fall of Man and the Foundations of Science |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |page=220 |quote=There has been considerable discussion in the secondary literature about the impact of Boyle's theological voluntatism on his approach to natural philosophy.}}</ref> [[Isaac Barrow]] and [[Isaac Newton]]. It resulted in an empirical approach associated with early modern science. Voluntarism therefore allows that faith or belief in God can be achieved by will as opposed to requiring a prior divine gift of faith to the individual. This notion holds at least in so far as it has found favor among some historians and philosophers (e.g. the historian [[Francis Oakley]] and the philosopher [[Michael B. Foster]]).<ref>{{cite book |author-link=Peter Harrison (historian) |first=Peter |last=Harrison |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=l4g5t8EDGe0C&dq=%22Was+Newton+a+Voluntarist%3F%22&pg=PA39 |chapter=Was Newton a Voluntarist? |pages=39–64 |title=Newton and Newtonianism: New Studies |editor1-first=James E. |editor1-last=Force |editor2-first=Sarah |editor2-last=Hutton |publisher=Springer |date=2004 |isbn=1-4020-1969-6 |via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref> A 20th-century theologian of voluntarism was [[James Luther Adams]].


== Metaphysical voluntarism<!-- 'Metaphysical voluntarism' and 'Voluntarism (metaphysics)' redirect here. --> ==
== Metaphysical voluntarism<!-- 'Metaphysical voluntarism' and 'Voluntarism (metaphysics)' redirect here. --> ==
A proponent of '''metaphysical voluntarism'''<!-- Boldface per WP:R#PLA. --> is 19th-century German philosopher [[Arthur Schopenhauer]]. In his view, the will is not reasoning, but an irrational, unconscious urge in relation to which the intellect represents a secondary phenomenon. The will is actually the force at the core of all reality. This putting out of the drive–intention–vital dynamics later influenced [[Friedrich Nietzsche]] ([[will to power]]), [[Philipp Mainländer]] (will to die), [[Eduard von Hartmann]], [[Julius Bahnsen]] and [[Sigmund Freud]] ([[Pleasure principle (psychology)|will to pleasure]])
A proponent of '''metaphysical voluntarism'''<!-- Boldface per WP:R#PLA --> is 19th-century German philosopher [[Arthur Schopenhauer]].<ref name=Brit/> In his view, the will is not reasoning, but an irrational, unconscious urge in relation to which the intellect represents a secondary phenomenon. The will is actually the force at the core of all reality. This putting out of the drive–intention–vital dynamics later influenced [[Friedrich Nietzsche]] ([[will to power]]), [[Philipp Mainländer]] (will to die), [[Eduard von Hartmann]], [[Julius Bahnsen]] and [[Sigmund Freud]] ([[Pleasure principle (psychology)|will to pleasure]]).


== Epistemological voluntarism<!-- 'Epistemological voluntarism' and 'Voluntarism (epistemology)' redirect here. --> ==
== Epistemological voluntarism<!-- 'Epistemological voluntarism' and 'Voluntarism (epistemology)' redirect here. --> ==

In [[epistemology]], voluntarism describes the view that belief is a matter of the will rather than one of simply registering one's cognitive attitude or degree of psychological certainty with respect to a stated proposition. If one is a voluntarist with respect to beliefs, it is coherent to simultaneously feel very certain about a particular proposition P and assign P a very low subjective probability. This is the basis of [[Bas van Fraassen]]'s principle of reflection.
In [[epistemology]], '''epistemological voluntarism'''<!-- Boldface per WP:R#PLA --><ref>{{cite journal |first=Sandy |last=Boucher |title=Stances and Epistemology: Values, Pragmatics, and Rationality |journal=[[Metaphilosophy]] |volume=49 |number=4 |date=July 2018 |pages=521–547|doi=10.1111/meta.12317 |s2cid=149788977 }}</ref> is the view that belief is a matter of the will rather than one of simply registering one's cognitive attitude or degree of psychological certainty with respect to a stated proposition. If one is a voluntarist with respect to beliefs, it is coherent to simultaneously feel very certain about a particular proposition P and assign P a very low subjective probability. This is the basis of [[Bas van Fraassen]]'s [[van Fraassen's reflection principle|reflection principle]]. See also: [[Doxastic voluntarism]].


== Political voluntarism<!-- 'Political voluntarism' and 'Voluntarism (politics)' redirect here. -->==
== Political voluntarism<!-- 'Political voluntarism' and 'Voluntarism (politics)' redirect here. -->==
'''Political voluntarism'''<!-- Boldface per WP:R#PLA. -->, or [[voluntaryism]], is the view that understands political authority to be will-based. This view which was propounded by theorists like [[Thomas Hobbes]], [[Jean-Jacques Rousseau]] and many members of the [[German idealist]] tradition understands political authority as emanating from a will.<ref>Christopher W. Morris, [https://www.philosophy.umd.edu/sites/philosophy.umd.edu/files/Morris/Morris-PopSov-2000.PDF "The Very Idea of Popular Sovereignty: “We the People” Reconsidered"], ''Social Philosophy and Policy'' 17 (1):1 (2000).</ref>
'''Political voluntarism'''<!-- Boldface per WP:R#PLA -->, or [[voluntaryism]], is the view that understands political authority to be will-based. This view which was propounded by theorists like [[Thomas Hobbes]], [[Jean-Jacques Rousseau]] and many members of the [[German idealist]] tradition understands political authority as emanating from a will.<ref>Christopher W. Morris, [https://www.philosophy.umd.edu/sites/philosophy.umd.edu/files/Morris/Morris-PopSov-2000.PDF "The Very Idea of Popular Sovereignty: “We the People” Reconsidered"], ''Social Philosophy and Policy'' 17 (1):1 (2000).</ref>


== Marxist context ==
In [[Marxist]] discourse, voluntarism was used to designate a connection between a philosophical commitment to metaphysical voluntarism (especially [[Machism]]) and a political commitment to extreme revolutionary tactics, particularly associated with [[Alexander Bogdanov]].<ref>Paul LeBlanc. ''Lenin and the Revolutionary Party''.</ref> Today, most self-identified voluntaryists today are [[Libertarianism|libertarians]].
In [[Marxist]] discourse, voluntarism was used to designate a connection between a philosophical commitment to metaphysical voluntarism (especially [[Machism]]) and a political commitment to extreme revolutionary tactics, particularly associated with [[Alexander Bogdanov]].<ref>Paul LeBlanc. ''Lenin and the Revolutionary Party''.</ref>

The Soviet Union promoted [[Shock worker|shock work]] during the First Five-Year Plan period in an effort to increase productivity through human effort in the absence of more developed machinery.<ref name=":102">{{Cite book |last=Li |first=Jie |title=Cinematic Guerillas: Propaganda, Projectionists, and Audiences in Socialist China |publisher=[[Columbia University Press]] |year=2023 |isbn=9780231206273 |location=New York, NY}}</ref>{{Rp|page=57}}

The Cuban [[Revolutionary Offensive]] sought to encourage voluntary labor in the countryside both to accelerate development of the socialist economy and to encourage the development of the socialist [[New Man (utopian concept)|New Man]] ethos.<ref name=":0">{{Cite book |last=Cederlöf |first=Gustav |title=The Low-Carbon Contradiction: Energy Transition, Geopolitics, and the Infrastructural State in Cuba |date=2023 |publisher=[[University of California Press]] |isbn=978-0-520-39313-4 |series=Critical environments: nature, science, and politics |location=Oakland, California}}</ref>{{Rp|pages=37–38}}


== Critical voluntarism<!-- 'Critical voluntarism' redirects here. --> ==
== Critical voluntarism<!-- 'Critical voluntarism' redirects here. --> ==
[[Hugo Dingler]]'s '''critical voluntarism'''<!-- Boldface per WP:R#PLA. --> in the [[philosophy of science]] is a form of [[conventionalism]] which posits that theorizing in the sciences starts with an unavoidable free decision of the will.<ref>[[Peter Janich]], ''Protophysics of Time: Constructive Foundation and History of Time Measurement'', Springer, 2012.</ref> The successor school of Dingler's critical voluntarism is the methodical [[Constructivist epistemology|constructivism]] of the Erlangen School (cf. also the [[methodical culturalism]] of the [[Marburg School]]).
[[Hugo Dingler]]'s '''critical voluntarism'''<!-- Boldface per WP:R#PLA --> in the [[philosophy of science]] is a form of [[conventionalism]] which posits that theorizing in the sciences starts with an unavoidable free decision of the will.<ref>[[Peter Janich]], ''Protophysics of Time: Constructive Foundation and History of Time Measurement'', Springer, 2012.</ref> The successor school of Dingler's critical voluntarism is the methodical [[Constructivist epistemology|constructivism]] of the [[Erlangen School of constructivism|Erlangen School]] (cf. also the [[methodical culturalism]] of the [[Marburg School]]).


== See also ==
== See also ==
* [[Conatus]]
* [[Free will]]
* [[Free will]]
* [[Voluntarism (action)]]
* [[Structuralism (psychology)#Wundt and structuralism|Voluntarism (psychology)]]
* [[Voluntarism (psychology)]]
* [[Voluntaryism]]


== Notes and references ==
== Notes and references ==
{{reflist|2}}
{{Reflist|2}}


== External links ==
== External links ==
* [http://www.iep.utm.edu/voluntar/ Voluntarism] entry in the [http://www.iep.utm.edu/ Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy]
* [http://www.iep.utm.edu/voluntar/ Voluntarism] entry in the [http://www.iep.utm.edu/ Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy]
* {{cite IEP|url-id=doxa-vol|title=Doxastic Voluntarism}}
* {{cite IEP|url-id=doxa-vol|title=Doxastic Voluntarism}}

{{Catholic philosophy footer}}


[[Category:Epistemological theories]]
[[Category:Epistemological theories]]
[[Category:Metaphysical theories]]
[[Category:Free will]]
[[Category:Theology]]
[[Category:Theology]]
[[Category:Scotism]]
[[Category:Scotism]]
[[Category:Occamism]]
[[Category:Criticism of rationalism]]

Latest revision as of 20:23, 13 April 2024

Voluntarism is "any metaphysical or psychological system that assigns to the will (Latin: voluntas) a more predominant role than that attributed to the intellect",[1] or equivalently "the doctrine that will is the basic factor, both in the universe and in human conduct".[2] Voluntarism has appeared at various points throughout the history of philosophy, seeing application in the areas of metaphysics, psychology, political philosophy and theology.

The term voluntarism was introduced by Ferdinand Tönnies into the philosophical literature and particularly used by Wilhelm Wundt and Friedrich Paulsen.

Theological voluntarism

[edit]

Medieval theological voluntarism

[edit]

Associated with Duns Scotus and William of Ockham[3] (two of the foremost medieval scholastic philosophers), medieval theological voluntarism (not to be confused with meta-ethical theological voluntarism) is generally taken to be the philosophical emphasis on the divine will and human freedom over and above the intellect (voluntas superior intellectu). For example, Scotus held that morality comes from God's will and choice rather than his intellect or knowledge. Accordingly, God should be defined as an omnipotent being whose actions should not and cannot be ultimately rationalized and explained through reason. As such, voluntarism is usually contrasted with intellectualism, championed by the scholastic Thomas Aquinas.[4]

Theological voluntarism as an approach to natural philosophy

[edit]

Theological voluntarism also refers to theological commitments—that is, specific interpretations of doctrines of Christianity—arguably held by certain early modern natural philosophers such as Pierre Gassendi, Walter Charleton, Robert Boyle,[5] Isaac Barrow and Isaac Newton. It resulted in an empirical approach associated with early modern science. Voluntarism therefore allows that faith or belief in God can be achieved by will as opposed to requiring a prior divine gift of faith to the individual. This notion holds at least in so far as it has found favor among some historians and philosophers (e.g. the historian Francis Oakley and the philosopher Michael B. Foster).[6] A 20th-century theologian of voluntarism was James Luther Adams.

Metaphysical voluntarism

[edit]

A proponent of metaphysical voluntarism is 19th-century German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer.[1] In his view, the will is not reasoning, but an irrational, unconscious urge in relation to which the intellect represents a secondary phenomenon. The will is actually the force at the core of all reality. This putting out of the drive–intention–vital dynamics later influenced Friedrich Nietzsche (will to power), Philipp Mainländer (will to die), Eduard von Hartmann, Julius Bahnsen and Sigmund Freud (will to pleasure).

Epistemological voluntarism

[edit]

In epistemology, epistemological voluntarism[7] is the view that belief is a matter of the will rather than one of simply registering one's cognitive attitude or degree of psychological certainty with respect to a stated proposition. If one is a voluntarist with respect to beliefs, it is coherent to simultaneously feel very certain about a particular proposition P and assign P a very low subjective probability. This is the basis of Bas van Fraassen's reflection principle. See also: Doxastic voluntarism.

Political voluntarism

[edit]

Political voluntarism, or voluntaryism, is the view that understands political authority to be will-based. This view which was propounded by theorists like Thomas Hobbes, Jean-Jacques Rousseau and many members of the German idealist tradition understands political authority as emanating from a will.[8]

Marxist context

[edit]

In Marxist discourse, voluntarism was used to designate a connection between a philosophical commitment to metaphysical voluntarism (especially Machism) and a political commitment to extreme revolutionary tactics, particularly associated with Alexander Bogdanov.[9]

The Soviet Union promoted shock work during the First Five-Year Plan period in an effort to increase productivity through human effort in the absence of more developed machinery.[10]: 57 

The Cuban Revolutionary Offensive sought to encourage voluntary labor in the countryside both to accelerate development of the socialist economy and to encourage the development of the socialist New Man ethos.[11]: 37–38 

Critical voluntarism

[edit]

Hugo Dingler's critical voluntarism in the philosophy of science is a form of conventionalism which posits that theorizing in the sciences starts with an unavoidable free decision of the will.[12] The successor school of Dingler's critical voluntarism is the methodical constructivism of the Erlangen School (cf. also the methodical culturalism of the Marburg School).

See also

[edit]

Notes and references

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Voluntarism (philosophy)Britannica.com
  2. ^ Durant, Will (1926). The Story of Philosophy. New York City, New York: Touchstone Books-Simon & Schuster. ISBN 0-671-69500-2.
  3. ^ Walker, L. (1912). "Voluntarism". Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. Retrieved September 27, 2019 – via New Advent.
  4. ^ "Voluntarism". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  5. ^ Harrison, Peter. The Fall of Man and the Foundations of Science. Cambridge University Press. p. 220. There has been considerable discussion in the secondary literature about the impact of Boyle's theological voluntatism on his approach to natural philosophy.
  6. ^ Harrison, Peter (2004). "Was Newton a Voluntarist?". In Force, James E.; Hutton, Sarah (eds.). Newton and Newtonianism: New Studies. Springer. pp. 39–64. ISBN 1-4020-1969-6 – via Google Books.
  7. ^ Boucher, Sandy (July 2018). "Stances and Epistemology: Values, Pragmatics, and Rationality". Metaphilosophy. 49 (4): 521–547. doi:10.1111/meta.12317. S2CID 149788977.
  8. ^ Christopher W. Morris, "The Very Idea of Popular Sovereignty: “We the People” Reconsidered", Social Philosophy and Policy 17 (1):1 (2000).
  9. ^ Paul LeBlanc. Lenin and the Revolutionary Party.
  10. ^ Li, Jie (2023). Cinematic Guerillas: Propaganda, Projectionists, and Audiences in Socialist China. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. ISBN 9780231206273.
  11. ^ Cederlöf, Gustav (2023). The Low-Carbon Contradiction: Energy Transition, Geopolitics, and the Infrastructural State in Cuba. Critical environments: nature, science, and politics. Oakland, California: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-39313-4.
  12. ^ Peter Janich, Protophysics of Time: Constructive Foundation and History of Time Measurement, Springer, 2012.
[edit]