Talk:Essays (Montaigne): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Latest revision as of 17:22, 14 April 2024

Philosophy: Literature High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature

France Top‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Literature Top‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mmcginley96. Peer reviewers: Caleb Jeffreys.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:51, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Updated the external links again

I just removed the University of Adelaide link as that leads to nowhere and updated the Gutenberg link pointing to the wayback machine.

User:Murfman — Preceding undated comment added 20:48, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

Shouldn't there be an article for each of Montaigne's essays?

Too many to all list here, with analysis and everything.

Also, Montaigne may have been a humanist, but he was also a Deist, not one of the raving atheist humanists.

I don't think Montaigne really espoused anything like the degree of cultural relativism we have today; he certainly observed and marveled at the variety of the peoples of the world, but in simply not being judgmental, I do not think he was being a relativist. I propose, therefore, to modify that sentence. User:Waster

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Essays (Montaigne). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050624074441/http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/phl302/texts/montaigne/m-essays_contents.html to http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/phl302/texts/montaigne/m-essays_contents.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:51, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Content

I am going to begin to add some more citations to the "Content" section, which currently links to a picture... Sissizheng (talk) 06:41, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Content

I think the second paragraph of the content section needs some more citations. As I can see you're already aware of that. I think your additions to the article are really good. The citations you use are reliable, and the language you use seems neutral. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caleb Jeffreys (talk • contribs) 19:10, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

on style

the previous description of montaigne's style was unrecognizable to me, and i have been reading montaigne for six decades. the paragraph itself is uninformed but also incoherent, attributing a "structured" rhetoric to a book famous for breaking structure with asides, insertions and revisions, and claiming his "argument" is not designed to prove anything. i checked the citation at Britannica and can find nothing to support the previous characterization.Drollere (talk) 17:22, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{philosophy|importance=Mid|class=Start|literature=yes}}
+{{WikiProject banner shell |class=C|vital=yes|1=
+{{WikiProject Philosophy|importance=High|literature=yes}}
-{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_Chicago/History_of_Skepticism_(Winter_Quarter) | assignments = [[User:Sissizheng|Sissizheng]], [[User:Mmcginley96|Mmcginley96]] | reviewers = [[User:Caleb Jeffreys|Caleb Jeffreys]] }}
+{{WikiProject France |importance=Top}}
+{{WikiProject Literature|importance=Top}}
+}}
+==Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment==
+[[File:Sciences humaines.svg|40px]] This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available [[Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_Chicago/History_of_Skepticism_(Winter_Quarter)|on the course page]]. Student editor(s): [[User:Mmcginley96|Mmcginley96]]. Peer reviewers: [[User:Caleb Jeffreys|Caleb Jeffreys]].
+{{small|Above undated message substituted from [[Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment]] by [[User:PrimeBOT|PrimeBOT]] ([[User talk:PrimeBOT|talk]]) 20:51, 16 January 2022 (UTC)}}
+==Updated the external links again==
+I just removed the University of Adelaide link as that leads to nowhere and updated the Gutenberg link pointing to the wayback machine.
+[[User:Murfman]]  <!--Template:Undated--><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 20:48, 9 December 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+==Untitled==
 Shouldn't there be an article for each of Montaigne's essays?
@@ Line 29: / Line 43: @@
 == Content ==
-I think the second paragraph of the content section needs some more citations. As I can see you're already aware of that. I think your additions to the article are really good. The citations you use are reliable, and the language you use seems neutral.
+I think the second paragraph of the content section needs some more citations. As I can see you're already aware of that. I think your additions to the article are really good. The citations you use are reliable, and the language you use seems neutral.  <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Caleb Jeffreys|Caleb Jeffreys]] ([[User talk:Caleb Jeffreys#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Caleb Jeffreys|contribs]]) 19:10, 21 February 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+== on style ==
+the previous description of montaigne's style was unrecognizable to me, and i have been reading montaigne for six decades. the paragraph itself is uninformed but also incoherent, attributing a "structured" rhetoric to a book famous for breaking structure with asides, insertions and revisions, and claiming his "argument" is not designed to prove anything. i checked the citation at Britannica and can find nothing to support the previous characterization.[[User:Drollere|Drollere]] ([[User talk:Drollere|talk]]) 17:22, 14 April 2024 (UTC)