Montgomery Blair Sibley: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
GreenC bot (talk | contribs) Move 1 url. Wayback Medic 2.5 per WP:URLREQ#thehill.com |
||
(42 intermediate revisions by 27 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description|American lawyer}} |
|||
{{Userspace notes}} |
|||
{{Infobox person |
|||
⚫ | |||
| name = Montgomery Blair Sibley |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
| birth_date = {{birth date and age|1956|10|14}} |
|||
| birth_place = [[Rochester, New York]] |
|||
| death_date = <!-- {{Death date and age|YYYY|MM|DD|YYYY|MM|DD}} (death date then birth date) --> |
|||
| death_place = |
|||
| nationality = American |
|||
| other_names = |
|||
| known_for = |
|||
| occupation = }} |
|||
⚫ | |||
Blair wrote a book about Palfrey, and his defense of her, entitled '' |
Blair wrote a book about Palfrey, and his defense of her, entitled ''Why Just Her: The Judicial Lynching of the D.C. Madam, Deborah Jeane Palfrey''.<ref name=WhyJustHer/> Henry Vinson, author of ''Confessions of a D.C. Madam'', wrote that Sibley "had to contend with the fed's judicial chicanery and sleight of hand."<ref name=ConfessionDCMadam/> |
||
In 2008, |
In 2008, The Florida Bar suspended Sibley's right to practice law in that state for three years.<ref name=Over/> Sibley was later determined to be a [[Vexatious litigation|vexatious]] litigator.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://gawker.com/disbarred-birther-attorney-says-he-has-records-from-dc-1767915692|title=Disbarred Birther Attorney Says He Has Records From "DC Madam" Escort Service Case That Could Change 2016 Election|last=O'Connor|first=Brendan|website=Gawker|language=en-US|access-date=2016-04-03|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160402133237/http://gawker.com/disbarred-birther-attorney-says-he-has-records-from-dc-1767915692|archive-date=2016-04-02}}</ref> |
||
In 2012, Sibley unsuccessfully sued President [[Barack Obama]], alleging that he was not a [[natural-born citizen]].<ref name=Huffpo2012-01-12/><ref name=Huffpo2012-03-29/> |
In 2012, Sibley unsuccessfully sued President [[Barack Obama]], alleging that he was not a [[natural-born citizen]].<ref name=Huffpo2012-01-12/><ref name=Huffpo2012-03-29/> |
||
== 2016 Presidential Election == |
== 2016 Presidential Election == |
||
⚫ | In 2016, Sibley, who claims to have Palfrey's phone records, unsuccessfully attempted to have her records unsealed.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://wtop.com/presidential-election/2016/03/ex-lawyer-asks-supreme-court-to-allow-release-of-d-c-madam-phone-records-or-else/|title=Ex-lawyer asks Supreme Court to allow release of 'D.C. Madam' phone records — or else|website=WTOP|language=en-US|access-date=2016-04-03}}</ref> Sibley claims the information they contain would be highly relevant to voters in the upcoming [[2016 United States presidential election|2016 presidential election]].<ref name=Huffpo2012-01-12/><ref name=Huffpo2012-03-29/> |
||
⚫ | In 2016, Sibley, who claims to have Palfrey's phone records, unsuccessfully attempted to have her records unsealed.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://wtop.com/presidential-election/2016/03/ex-lawyer-asks-supreme-court-to-allow-release-of-d-c-madam-phone-records-or-else/|title=Ex-lawyer asks Supreme Court to allow release of 'D.C. Madam' phone records — or else|website=WTOP|language=en-US|access-date=2016-04-03}}</ref> Sibley claims the information |
||
In February 2016, Sibley sued then-Chief Judge [[Richard W. Roberts]], and his clerk, for failing to file his motion to lift the restraining order ([[gag order]]) that prevents Sibley from releasing her records.<ref name=Wtop2016-02-09/><ref name=Wtop2016-02-23/> |
In February 2016, Sibley sued then-Chief Judge [[Richard W. Roberts]], and his clerk, for failing to file his motion to lift the restraining order ([[gag order]]) that prevents Sibley from releasing her records.<ref name=Wtop2016-02-09/><ref name=Wtop2016-02-23/> |
||
⚫ | Sibley then requested that the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] release him from the lower court's restraining order, stating: "To be clear, if Sibley is not allowed to file his Motion to Modify the Restraining Order and thereafter does not promptly receive a fair and impartial hearing on that Motion, he will justifiably consider the Restraining Order void as a result of being denied such a hearing by the District Court, the [[United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit|D.C. Circuit Court]] and now this Court."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/274512-former-attorney-asks-supreme-court-to-allow-release-of-dc-madam/|title=Ex-attorney asks Supreme Court for release of 'DC Madam' records|last=Savransky|first=Rebecca|website=[[The Hill (newspaper)|The Hill]]|access-date=2016-04-02}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/lawyer_seeking_permission_to_release_d.c._madams_client_list_alleges_federa|title=Lawyer says he can't ask permission to release client list of 'DC Madam' because judge barred motion|website=ABA Journal|access-date=2016-04-03}}</ref> |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | The U.S. Supreme Court denied Sibley's application.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-03-31/dc-madams-attorney-says-election-bombshell-already-online|title=D.C. Madam's Attorney Says Election Bombshell Already Online|last=Nelson|first=Steven|date=2016-03-31|website=[[U.S. News & World Report]]|access-date=2016-04-02}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.insideedition.com/headlines/15618-dc-madams-attorney-i-have-bombshell-information-that-could-affect-2016-election|title=D.C. Madam's Attorney: I Have Bombshell Information That Could Affect 2016 Election|website=Inside Edition|access-date=2016-04-03}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.therightperspective.org/2016/04/01/has-anonymous-dropped-ted-cruz-dc-madam-phone-dox/|title=Has Anonymous Dropped Ted Cruz 'DC Madam' Phone Dox?|website=The Right Perspective|access-date=2016-04-03}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/reliable-source/wp/2016/02/02/former-lawyer-for-the-d-c-madam-says-names-in-her-records-could-be-relevant-to-election/|title=Former lawyer for the 'D.C. Madam' says names in her records could be 'relevant' to election|last=Heil|first=Emily|date=2016-02-02|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|language=en-US|issn=0190-8286|access-date=2016-04-03}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/scotus-denies-request-dc-madam-s-attorney-release-info-n551121?cid=sm_twitter_feed_politics|title=SCOTUS Denies Request from D.C. Madam's Attorney to Release Info|website=[[NBC News]]|access-date=2016-04-05}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-05-02/supreme-court-wont-release-dc-madam-records|title=Supreme Court Won't Release D.C. Madam Records|first=Steven|last=Nelson|date=May 2, 2016|work=[[U.S. News & World Report]]}}</ref> |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
Sibley claims he has [[upload]]ed the records to multiple servers in multiple countries with a 72 hour [[dead man's switch]],<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/years-later-the-dc-madam-scandal-relevant-once-more|title=Years later, the 'D.C. Madam' scandal is relevant once more|website=MSNBC|access-date=2016-04-03}}</ref> which if it is not reset will automatically send copies of the phone records to unnamed reporters. Sibley claims that these records contain information relevant to the [[United States presidential election, 2016|2016 presidential election]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://montgomeryblairsibley.com/library/ApplicationFinal.pdf|title=Application for a stay of a restraining order|last=|first=|date=|website=|publisher=|access-date=}}</ref> |
|||
Chief Justice Roberts of the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday, April 5, 2016 denied the request to lift a lower court order, in place since 2007, that bars Sibley from releasing any information about her records.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/scotus-denies-request-dc-madam-s-attorney-release-info-n551121?cid=sm_twitter_feed_politics|title=SCOTUS Denies Request from D.C. Madam's Attorney to Release Info|website=NBC News|access-date=2016-04-05}}</ref> Sibley countered with the final judicial remedy he can seek, invoking [https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/supct/rule_22 Supreme Court Rule 22.4],<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/supct/rule_22|title=Rule 22. Applications to Individual Justices|last=Staff|first=LII|website=LII / Legal Information Institute|language=en|access-date=2016-04-07}}</ref> a plea to a second associate justice other than the one of original jurisdiction. He chose to file a plea to [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]] of the U.S. Supreme Court, [[Clarence Thomas]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-04-07/other-dc-madam-associates-discuss-potential-election-bombshell|title=Other D.C. Madam Associates Discuss Potential Election Bombshell|last=Nelson|first=Steven|date=2016-04-07|website=US News & World Report|access-date=2016-04-09}}</ref> |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{Reflist|refs= |
{{Reflist|refs= |
||
<ref name=Wtop2016-02-09> |
<ref name=Wtop2016-02-09> |
||
{{cite news |
{{cite news |
||
| url = http://wtop.com/presidential-election/2016/02/ex-lawyer-for-d-c-madam-has-names-not-just-client-phone-numbers/ |
| url = http://wtop.com/presidential-election/2016/02/ex-lawyer-for-d-c-madam-has-names-not-just-client-phone-numbers/ |
||
| title = Ex-lawyer for |
| title = Ex-lawyer for 'D.C. Madam' has names, not just client phone numbers |
||
| publisher = [[WTOP]] |
| publisher = [[WTOP-FM|WTOP]] |
||
| author = Neal Augenstein |
| author = Neal Augenstein |
||
| date = 2016-02-09 |
| date = 2016-02-09 |
||
| page = |
| page = |
||
| location = |
| location = |
||
| |
| access-date = 2016-04-08 |
||
| archivedate = |
|||
| accessdate = 2016-04-08 |
|||
⚫ | |||
| quote = Citing the restraining orders, Sibley has declined to disclose which, if any presidential candidates might be affected by the names on the CD. |
| quote = Citing the restraining orders, Sibley has declined to disclose which, if any presidential candidates might be affected by the names on the CD. |
||
}} |
}} |
||
</ref> |
</ref> |
||
<ref name=Wtop2016-02-23> |
<ref name=Wtop2016-02-23> |
||
{{cite news |
{{cite news |
||
| url = http://wtop.com/presidential-election/2016/02/ex-lawyer-d-c-madam-sues-federal-chief-judge-clerk-1-million/ |
| url = http://wtop.com/presidential-election/2016/02/ex-lawyer-d-c-madam-sues-federal-chief-judge-clerk-1-million/ |
||
| title = Ex-lawyer for |
| title = Ex-lawyer for 'D.C. Madam' sues federal chief judge, clerk for $1 million each |
||
| publisher = [[WTOP]] |
| publisher = [[WTOP-FM|WTOP]] |
||
| author = Neal Augenstein |
| author = Neal Augenstein |
||
| date = 2016-02-23 |
| date = 2016-02-23 |
||
| page = |
| page = |
||
| location = |
| location = |
||
| |
| access-date = 2016-04-08 |
||
⚫ | |||
| archivedate = |
|||
| accessdate = 2016-04-08 |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
}} |
}} |
||
</ref> |
</ref> |
||
Line 62: | Line 64: | ||
| title = Confessions of a D.C. Madam: The Politics of Sex, Lies, and Blackmail |
| title = Confessions of a D.C. Madam: The Politics of Sex, Lies, and Blackmail |
||
| author = Henry Vinson |
| author = Henry Vinson |
||
| publisher = |
| publisher = Trine Day |
||
| year = 2015 |
| year = 2015 |
||
| isbn = 9781937584306 |
| isbn = 9781937584306 |
||
| quote = Mr Sibley |
| quote = Mr Sibley vigorously defended Ms Palfrey, but he had to contend with the feds judicial chicanery and sleight of hand. Ms Palfrey's initial trial judge had authorized Mr Sibley's subpoenas of the White House, State Department, CIA, etc., and he also authorized subpoenas of AT&T Mobility, Sprint/Nextel, T-Mobile USA, and Alltel, which would have mandated those carriers to provide Ms Palfrey with the names and addresses of the individuals who contacted her escort service. |
||
}} |
}} |
||
</ref> |
</ref> |
||
<ref name=Huffpo2012-01-12> |
<ref name=Huffpo2012-01-12> |
||
{{cite news |
{{cite news |
||
Line 77: | Line 79: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
</ref> |
</ref> |
||
<ref name=Huffpo2012-03-29> |
<ref name=Huffpo2012-03-29> |
||
{{cite news |
{{cite news |
||
Line 84: | Line 86: | ||
| author = Arin Greenwood |
| author = Arin Greenwood |
||
| date = 2012-03-29 |
| date = 2012-03-29 |
||
| work = [[The Huffington Post]] |
| work = [[The Huffington Post]] |
||
}} |
}} |
||
</ref> |
</ref> |
||
<ref name=WhyJustHer> |
<ref name=WhyJustHer> |
||
{{cite book |
{{cite book |
||
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=m9a5poqL9rYC& |
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=m9a5poqL9rYC&q=%22Montgomery+Blair+Sibley%22+OR+%22Montgomery+Sibley%22+%22Deborah+Palfrey%22+OR+%22Deborah+Jeane+Palfrey%22 |
||
| title = Why Just Her: The Judicial Lynching of the D.C. Madam, Deborah Jeane Palfrey |
| title = Why Just Her: The Judicial Lynching of the D.C. Madam, Deborah Jeane Palfrey |
||
| author = Montgomery Sibley |
| author = Montgomery Sibley |
||
Line 97: | Line 99: | ||
| location = |
| location = |
||
| isbn = 9781439227954 |
| isbn = 9781439227954 |
||
| |
| access-date = 2016-04-06 |
||
| quote = |
| quote = |
||
}} |
}} |
||
</ref> |
</ref> |
||
<ref name=Wapo2007-05-04> |
<ref name=Wapo2007-05-04> |
||
{{cite news |
{{cite news |
||
| url = |
| url = https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/03/AR2007050302233.html |
||
| title = The Colorful Case of A Well-Named Lawyer |
| title = The Colorful Case of A Well-Named Lawyer |
||
| |
| work = [[Washington Post]] |
||
| author = Neely Tucker |
| author = Neely Tucker |
||
| date = 2007-05-04 |
| date = 2007-05-04 |
||
| page = |
| page = |
||
| location = |
| location = |
||
| |
| access-date = 2016-04-05 |
||
⚫ | |||
| archivedate = |
|||
| accessdate = 2016-04-05 |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
}} |
}} |
||
</ref> |
</ref> |
||
<ref name=Over> |
<ref name=Over> |
||
{{cite news |
{{cite news |
||
| url = http://overlawyered.com/2008/05/montgomery-blair-sibley-suspended/ |
| url = http://overlawyered.com/2008/05/montgomery-blair-sibley-suspended/ |
||
| title = Montgomery Blair Sibley suspended |
| title = Montgomery Blair Sibley suspended |
||
Line 126: | Line 125: | ||
| page = |
| page = |
||
| location = |
| location = |
||
| |
| access-date = 2016-04-05 |
||
⚫ | |||
| archivedate = |
|||
| accessdate = 2016-04-05 |
|||
| deadurl = No |
|||
⚫ | |||
}} |
}} |
||
</ref> |
</ref> |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Sibley, Montgomery Blair}} |
|||
[[Category:1956 births]] |
|||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Living people]] |
||
[[Category:Lawyers from Rochester, New York]] |
|||
[[Category:Florida lawyers]] |
Latest revision as of 05:51, 16 April 2024
Montgomery Blair Sibley | |
---|---|
Born | |
Nationality | American |
Montgomery Blair Sibley (born October 14, 1956) is a former American lawyer who had his Florida Bar license suspended in 2008, and is best known for defending Deborah Palfrey, the "DC Madam", in 2007–2008.[1][2]
Blair wrote a book about Palfrey, and his defense of her, entitled Why Just Her: The Judicial Lynching of the D.C. Madam, Deborah Jeane Palfrey.[2] Henry Vinson, author of Confessions of a D.C. Madam, wrote that Sibley "had to contend with the fed's judicial chicanery and sleight of hand."[3]
In 2008, The Florida Bar suspended Sibley's right to practice law in that state for three years.[4] Sibley was later determined to be a vexatious litigator.[5]
In 2012, Sibley unsuccessfully sued President Barack Obama, alleging that he was not a natural-born citizen.[6][7]
2016 Presidential Election
[edit]In 2016, Sibley, who claims to have Palfrey's phone records, unsuccessfully attempted to have her records unsealed.[8] Sibley claims the information they contain would be highly relevant to voters in the upcoming 2016 presidential election.[6][7]
In February 2016, Sibley sued then-Chief Judge Richard W. Roberts, and his clerk, for failing to file his motion to lift the restraining order (gag order) that prevents Sibley from releasing her records.[9][10]
Sibley then requested that the U.S. Supreme Court release him from the lower court's restraining order, stating: "To be clear, if Sibley is not allowed to file his Motion to Modify the Restraining Order and thereafter does not promptly receive a fair and impartial hearing on that Motion, he will justifiably consider the Restraining Order void as a result of being denied such a hearing by the District Court, the D.C. Circuit Court and now this Court."[11][12]
The U.S. Supreme Court denied Sibley's application.[13][14][15][16][17][18]
References
[edit]- ^
Neely Tucker (2007-05-04). "The Colorful Case of A Well-Named Lawyer". Washington Post. Retrieved 2016-04-05.
Montgomery Blair Sibley, attorney for the morally impugned and legally challenged, is first and foremost Montgomery Blair Sibley, which is to say a descendant of some of the most powerful families in Washington history.
- ^ a b Montgomery Sibley (2009). Why Just Her: The Judicial Lynching of the D.C. Madam, Deborah Jeane Palfrey. Why Just Her. ISBN 9781439227954. Retrieved 2016-04-06.
- ^
Henry Vinson (2015). Confessions of a D.C. Madam: The Politics of Sex, Lies, and Blackmail. Trine Day. ISBN 9781937584306.
Mr Sibley vigorously defended Ms Palfrey, but he had to contend with the feds judicial chicanery and sleight of hand. Ms Palfrey's initial trial judge had authorized Mr Sibley's subpoenas of the White House, State Department, CIA, etc., and he also authorized subpoenas of AT&T Mobility, Sprint/Nextel, T-Mobile USA, and Alltel, which would have mandated those carriers to provide Ms Palfrey with the names and addresses of the individuals who contacted her escort service.
- ^
Ted Frank (2008-05-15). "Montgomery Blair Sibley suspended". Overlawyered. Retrieved 2016-04-05.
After years of over-the-top abusive litigation, the state bar finally took action, and he has been suspended by the Florida bar for three years.
- ^ O'Connor, Brendan. "Disbarred Birther Attorney Says He Has Records From "DC Madam" Escort Service Case That Could Change 2016 Election". Gawker. Archived from the original on 2016-04-02. Retrieved 2016-04-03.
- ^ a b Arin Greenwood (2012-01-12). "Montgomery Blair Sibley Files Birther Lawsuit, Is Running For President On D.C. Voting Rights Platform". Huffington Post.
- ^ a b Arin Greenwood (2012-03-29). "Birther Presidential Candidate Montgomery Blair Sibley Files Petition With Supreme Court". The Huffington Post.
- ^ "Ex-lawyer asks Supreme Court to allow release of 'D.C. Madam' phone records — or else". WTOP. Retrieved 2016-04-03.
- ^
Neal Augenstein (2016-02-09). "Ex-lawyer for 'D.C. Madam' has names, not just client phone numbers". WTOP. Retrieved 2016-04-08.
Citing the restraining orders, Sibley has declined to disclose which, if any presidential candidates might be affected by the names on the CD.
- ^
Neal Augenstein (2016-02-23). "Ex-lawyer for 'D.C. Madam' sues federal chief judge, clerk for $1 million each". WTOP. Retrieved 2016-04-08.
Without providing any specifics, Sibley has contended that information found within Palfrey's escort service records could affect the 2016 presidential election.
- ^ Savransky, Rebecca. "Ex-attorney asks Supreme Court for release of 'DC Madam' records". The Hill. Retrieved 2016-04-02.
- ^ "Lawyer says he can't ask permission to release client list of 'DC Madam' because judge barred motion". ABA Journal. Retrieved 2016-04-03.
- ^ Nelson, Steven (2016-03-31). "D.C. Madam's Attorney Says Election Bombshell Already Online". U.S. News & World Report. Retrieved 2016-04-02.
- ^ "D.C. Madam's Attorney: I Have Bombshell Information That Could Affect 2016 Election". Inside Edition. Retrieved 2016-04-03.
- ^ "Has Anonymous Dropped Ted Cruz 'DC Madam' Phone Dox?". The Right Perspective. Retrieved 2016-04-03.
- ^ Heil, Emily (2016-02-02). "Former lawyer for the 'D.C. Madam' says names in her records could be 'relevant' to election". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 2016-04-03.
- ^ "SCOTUS Denies Request from D.C. Madam's Attorney to Release Info". NBC News. Retrieved 2016-04-05.
- ^ Nelson, Steven (May 2, 2016). "Supreme Court Won't Release D.C. Madam Records". U.S. News & World Report.