Jump to content

Talk:Vere Chappell: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Jahaza moved page Talk:Vere Claiborne Chappell to Talk:Vere Chappell: Academic who usually published as "Vere Chappell" so that is common name
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
GreenC bot (talk | contribs)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Old AfD multi |date=25 August 2023 |result='''keep''' |page=Vere Claiborne Chappell}}
{{Old AfD multi |date=25 August 2023 |result='''keep''' |page=Vere Claiborne Chappell}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=no|1=
{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=no|class=Stub|listas=Chappell, Vere Claiborne|
{{WikiProject Biography|auto=inherit|living=no|class=stub|listas=Chappell, Vere Claiborne}}
{{WikiProject Biography|auto=inherit}}
{{WikiProject Chicago|class=Stub|auto=inherit|importance=}}
{{WikiProject Chicago|auto=inherit|importance=}}
{{WikiProject Philosophy|philosopher=yes|importance=low|contemporary=yes|mind=yes|metaphysics=yes|class=stub}}
{{WikiProject Philosophy|philosopher=yes|importance=low|contemporary=yes|mind=yes|metaphysics=yes}}
}}
}}


Line 9: Line 9:
Not an autobiography; I have a similar name but I am not the subject of this article. I am related to the subject, but the article is entirely neutral. The subject is definitely notable, cited in several other Wiki articles. I have added a third-party reference and will look for more. [[User:Vchappell|Vchappell]] ([[User talk:Vchappell|talk]]) 01:04, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
Not an autobiography; I have a similar name but I am not the subject of this article. I am related to the subject, but the article is entirely neutral. The subject is definitely notable, cited in several other Wiki articles. I have added a third-party reference and will look for more. [[User:Vchappell|Vchappell]] ([[User talk:Vchappell|talk]]) 01:04, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
:While the subject may be notable, there do not seem to be enough sources on which to base a biographical article, so the article looks like a resume or curriculum vitae, which is not encyclopedic. [[User:Yworo|Yworo]] ([[User talk:Yworo|talk]]) 06:10, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
:While the subject may be notable, there do not seem to be enough sources on which to base a biographical article, so the article looks like a resume or curriculum vitae, which is not encyclopedic. [[User:Yworo|Yworo]] ([[User talk:Yworo|talk]]) 06:10, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on [[Vere Claiborne Chappell]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=730701589 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110727030435/http://www.broadviewpress.com/chapters/9781551116624.pdf to http://www.broadviewpress.com/chapters/9781551116624.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).

{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}

Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 18:49, 20 July 2016 (UTC)


== Remove Notability Flag? ==
== Remove Notability Flag? ==
Line 37: Line 24:
Thank you for your consideration. I am a Wikipedia novice and the subject's son, so I would appreciate any assistance from more experienced Wikipedians.
Thank you for your consideration. I am a Wikipedia novice and the subject's son, so I would appreciate any assistance from more experienced Wikipedians.
[[User:Vchappell|Vchappell]] ([[User talk:Vchappell|talk]]) 06:29, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
[[User:Vchappell|Vchappell]] ([[User talk:Vchappell|talk]]) 06:29, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

{{reflist-talk}}

== Refs from AFD ==

Good keep. {{ping|Jahaza}} are you planning to update the article with the sources you listed? - [[User:UtherSRG|UtherSRG]] [[User_talk:UtherSRG|(talk)]] 11:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 09:56, 20 April 2024

Not COI

[edit]

Not an autobiography; I have a similar name but I am not the subject of this article. I am related to the subject, but the article is entirely neutral. The subject is definitely notable, cited in several other Wiki articles. I have added a third-party reference and will look for more. Vchappell (talk) 01:04, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

While the subject may be notable, there do not seem to be enough sources on which to base a biographical article, so the article looks like a resume or curriculum vitae, which is not encyclopedic. Yworo (talk) 06:10, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Remove Notability Flag?

[edit]

According to Wikipedia's Notability Guidelines[1], "The publication of an anniversary or memorial journal volume or a Festschrift dedicated to a particular person is usually enough to satisfy Criterion 1" and "Academics/professors meeting any one of the following conditions, as substantiated through reliable sources, are notable."

The book, Contemporary Perspectives on Early Modern Philosophy: Essays in Honor of Vere Chappell[2] is a festschrift published in honor of Vere Chappell.

Although the word "festschrift" does not appear in the publisher's description of the book, it is referred to as such elsewhere (for example: Knowledge, Reason, and Taste: Kant's Response to Hume by Paul Guyer, page 21[3] states: "Chapter 3, "Cause, Object, and Self" written in 2004 for a festschrift for Vere Chappell..."

Given that "the publication of a festschrift is usually enough to satisfy Criterion 1," would it be appropriate to remove the notability flag?

ALSO: Would Criterion 3 ("The person is or has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association...or a fellow of a major scholarly society") be met because he was a Fulbright fellow, National Endowment for Humanities fellow, and member of the American Philosophical Association, Aristotelian Society, and Royal Institute Philosophy?[4]

Thank you for your consideration. I am a Wikipedia novice and the subject's son, so I would appreciate any assistance from more experienced Wikipedians. Vchappell (talk) 06:29, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(academics)
  2. ^ Contemporary Perspectives on Early Modern Philosophy: Essays in Honor of Vere Chappell[1]
  3. ^ Knowledge, Reason, and Taste: Kant's Response to Hume by Paul Guyer, page 21[2]
  4. ^ https://prabook.com/web/vere_claiborne.chappell/147668

Refs from AFD

[edit]

Good keep. @Jahaza: are you planning to update the article with the sources you listed? - UtherSRG (talk) 11:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]