Talk:Vere Chappell: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 09:56, 20 April 2024

This article was nominated for deletion on 25 August 2023. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Chicago

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Philosophy: Philosophers / Metaphysics / Mind / Contemporary Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophers
	Metaphysics
	Philosophy of mind
	Contemporary philosophy

Not COI

Not an autobiography; I have a similar name but I am not the subject of this article. I am related to the subject, but the article is entirely neutral. The subject is definitely notable, cited in several other Wiki articles. I have added a third-party reference and will look for more. Vchappell (talk) 01:04, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

While the subject may be notable, there do not seem to be enough sources on which to base a biographical article, so the article looks like a resume or curriculum vitae, which is not encyclopedic. Yworo (talk) 06:10, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Remove Notability Flag?

According to Wikipedia's Notability Guidelines^[1], "The publication of an anniversary or memorial journal volume or a Festschrift dedicated to a particular person is usually enough to satisfy Criterion 1" and "Academics/professors meeting any one of the following conditions, as substantiated through reliable sources, are notable."

The book, Contemporary Perspectives on Early Modern Philosophy: Essays in Honor of Vere Chappell^[2] is a festschrift published in honor of Vere Chappell.

Although the word "festschrift" does not appear in the publisher's description of the book, it is referred to as such elsewhere (for example: Knowledge, Reason, and Taste: Kant's Response to Hume by Paul Guyer, page 21^[3] states: "Chapter 3, "Cause, Object, and Self" written in 2004 for a festschrift for Vere Chappell..."

Given that "the publication of a festschrift is usually enough to satisfy Criterion 1," would it be appropriate to remove the notability flag?

ALSO: Would Criterion 3 ("The person is or has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association...or a fellow of a major scholarly society") be met because he was a Fulbright fellow, National Endowment for Humanities fellow, and member of the American Philosophical Association, Aristotelian Society, and Royal Institute Philosophy?^[4]

Thank you for your consideration. I am a Wikipedia novice and the subject's son, so I would appreciate any assistance from more experienced Wikipedians. Vchappell (talk) 06:29, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(academics)
^ Contemporary Perspectives on Early Modern Philosophy: Essays in Honor of Vere Chappell[1]
^ Knowledge, Reason, and Taste: Kant's Response to Hume by Paul Guyer, page 21[2]
^ https://prabook.com/web/vere_claiborne.chappell/147668

Refs from AFD

Good keep. @Jahaza: are you planning to update the article with the sources you listed? - UtherSRG (talk) 11:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(academics)

[2] Contemporary Perspectives on Early Modern Philosophy: Essays in Honor of Vere Chappell[1]

[3] Knowledge, Reason, and Taste: Kant's Response to Hume by Paul Guyer, page 21[2]

[4] ttps://prabook.com/web/vere_claiborne.chappell/147668

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{Old AfD multi |date=25 August 2023 |result='''keep''' |page=Vere Claiborne Chappell}}
-{{ChicagoWikiProject|class=Stub|auto=inherit|importance=}}
+{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=no|class=Stub|listas=Chappell, Vere Claiborne|
-{{philosophy|philosopher=yes|importance=low|contemporary=yes|mind=yes|metaphysics=yes|class=stub}}
+{{WikiProject Biography|auto=inherit}}
+{{WikiProject Chicago|auto=inherit|importance=}}
+{{WikiProject Philosophy|philosopher=yes|importance=low|contemporary=yes|mind=yes|metaphysics=yes}}
+}}
 == Not COI ==
 Not an autobiography; I have a similar name but I am not the subject of this article.  I am related to the subject, but the article is entirely neutral.  The subject is definitely notable, cited in several other Wiki articles.  I have added a third-party reference and will look for more. [[User:Vchappell|Vchappell]] ([[User talk:Vchappell|talk]]) 01:04, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
+:While the subject may be notable, there do not seem to be enough sources on which to base a biographical article, so the article looks like a resume or curriculum vitae, which is not encyclopedic. [[User:Yworo|Yworo]] ([[User talk:Yworo|talk]]) 06:10, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
+== Remove Notability Flag? ==
+According to Wikipedia's Notability Guidelines<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(academics)</ref>, "The publication of an anniversary or memorial journal volume or a Festschrift dedicated to a particular person is usually enough to satisfy Criterion 1" and "Academics/professors meeting any one of the following conditions, as substantiated through reliable sources, are notable."
+The book, Contemporary Perspectives on Early Modern Philosophy: Essays in Honor of Vere Chappell<ref>Contemporary Perspectives on Early Modern Philosophy: Essays in Honor of Vere Chappell[https://broadviewpress.com/product/contemporary-perspectives-on-early-modern-philosophy/]</ref> is a festschrift published in honor of Vere Chappell.
+Although the word "festschrift" does not appear in the publisher's description of the book, it is referred to as such elsewhere (for example: Knowledge, Reason, and Taste: Kant's Response to Hume by Paul Guyer, page 21<ref>Knowledge, Reason, and Taste: Kant's Response to Hume by Paul Guyer, page 21[https://books.google.com/books?id=ubnWCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA21]</ref> states: "Chapter 3, "Cause, Object, and Self" written in 2004 for a festschrift for Vere Chappell..."
+Given that "the publication of a festschrift is usually enough to satisfy Criterion 1," would it be appropriate to remove the notability flag?
+ALSO: Would Criterion 3 ("The person is or has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association...or a fellow of a major scholarly society") be met because he was a Fulbright fellow, National Endowment for Humanities fellow, and member of the American Philosophical Association, Aristotelian Society, and Royal Institute Philosophy?<ref>https://prabook.com/web/vere_claiborne.chappell/147668</ref>
+Thank you for your consideration. I am a Wikipedia novice and the subject's son, so I would appreciate any assistance from more experienced Wikipedians.
+[[User:Vchappell|Vchappell]] ([[User talk:Vchappell|talk]]) 06:29, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
+{{reflist-talk}}
+== Refs from AFD ==
+Good keep. {{ping|Jahaza}} are you planning to update the article with the sources you listed? - [[User:UtherSRG|UtherSRG]] [[User_talk:UtherSRG|(talk)]] 11:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)