Belief system: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Reverted to revision 498098724 by Jeraphine Gryphon. |
Undid revision 1220162034 by 2804:431:F73C:9C6E:3D3B:5D5C:DD86:5735 (talk) |
||
| (40 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
#REDIRECT [[Belief#Belief systems]] |
|||
{{One source|article|date=February 2012}} |
|||
A '''belief system''' is a set of mutually supportive [[belief]]s. The beliefs may be [[Religious belief|religious]], [[Philosophy|philosophical]], [[Ideology|ideological]] or a combination of these. Philosopher [[Jonathan Glover]] says that beliefs are always a part of a belief system, and that belief systems are difficult to completely revise.<ref name=BitesGlover/> |
|||
{{R with history}} {{R to section}} |
|||
==Overview== |
|||
[[File:Snipa.JPG|thumb|right|240px|Philosopher Jonathan Glover warns that belief systems are like whole boats in the water; it is extremely difficult to alter them all at once (e.g. it may be too stressful, or people may maintain their biases without realizing it) <ref name=BitesGlover/> ]] |
|||
The British philosopher [[Stephen Law]] has described some belief systems (including belief in [[homeopathy]], [[psychic powers]] and [[alien abduction]]) as "[[wiktionary:claptrap|claptrap]]" and said that they "draw people in and hold them captive so they become willing slaves ... if you get sucked in, it can be extremely difficult to think your way clear again".<ref>[[New Scientist]] (magazine), 11 June 2011 [http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21028160.200-a-field-guide-to-bullshit.html]</ref> |
|||
Jonathan Glover believes that he and other philosophers ought to play some role in starting dialogues between people with deeply held, opposing belief, especially if there is risk of violence. Glover also believes that philosophy can offer insights about beliefs that would be relevant to such dialogue. |
|||
Glover suggests that beliefs have to be considered holistically, and that no belief exists in isolation in the mind of the believer. They always implicate and relate to other beliefs.<ref name=BitesGlover/>Glover provides the example of a patient with an illness who returns to a doctor, but the doctor says that the prescribed medicine is not working. At that point, the patient has a great deal of flexibility in choosing what beliefs to keep or reject; the patient could believe that the doctor is incompetent, that the doctor's assistants made a mistake, that the patient's own body is unique in some unexpected way, that western medicine is ineffective, or even that western science is entirely unable to discover truths about ailments.<ref name=BitesGlover/> |
|||
Glover maintains that any person can continue to hold any belief if they would really like to<ref name=BitesGlover/> (e.g. with help from [[ad hoc hypotheses]]). One belief can be held fixed, and other beliefs will be altered around it. Glover warns that some beliefs may not be entirely [[Explicit memory|explicitly]] believed (e.g. some people may not realize they have racist beliefs systems adopted from their environment as a child). Glover believes that people tend to first realize that beliefs can change, and may be contingent on our upbringing, around age 12 or 15.<ref name=BitesGlover/> |
|||
Glover emphasizes that beliefs are difficult to change. He says that we may try to rebuild our beliefs on more secure foundations, [[axioms]], like building a new house, but warns that this may not be possible. Glover offers the example of [[René Descartes]], saying about Descartes that "He starts off with the characteristic beliefs of a 17th century frenchman, he then junks the lot, he rebuilds the system, and somehow it looks a lot like the beliefs of 17th century frenchman." To Glover, belief systems are not like houses but are instead like boats. As Glover puts it: "Maybe the whole thing needs re-building, but inevitably at any point you have to keep enough of it intact to keep floating."<ref name=BitesGlover/> |
|||
Glover's final message is that, if people talk about their beliefs, they may find more deep, relevant, philosophical ways in which they disagree (e.g. less obvious beliefs, or more deeply held beliefs). Glover thinks that people often manage to find agreements and consensus through philosophy. He says that at very least, if people do not convert each other, they will hold their own beliefs more open mindedly and will be less likely to go to war over conflicting beliefs.<ref name=GloverBeliefs>[http://www.jonathanglover.co.uk/philosophy-beliefs-and-conflicts/philosophy-beliefs-and-conflicts'' 'Philosophy, Beliefs, and Conflict' '', JonathanGlover.co.uk]</ref><ref name=BitesGlover>[http://philosophybites.com/2011/10/jonathan-glover-on-systems-of-belief.html"Jonathan Glover on systems of belief", Philosophy Bites Podcast, Oct 9 2011]</ref> |
|||
==See also== |
|||
{{wiktionary|belief system}} |
|||
*[[Life stance]] |
|||
*[[World view]] |
|||
*[[List of philosophies]] |
|||
==References== |
|||
{{Reflist}} |
|||
[[Category:Belief]] |
|||
[[Category:Conceptual systems]] |
|||
[[ko:신앙 체계]] |
|||
[[fi:Uskomusjärjestelmä]] |
|||
[[sv:Trosuppfattning]] |
|||
Latest revision as of 07:12, 22 April 2024
Redirect to:
- With history: This is a redirect from a page containing substantive page history. This page is kept as a redirect to preserve its former content and attributions. Please do not remove the tag that generates this text (unless the need to recreate content on this page has been demonstrated), nor delete this page.
- This template should not be used for redirects having some edit history but no meaningful content in their previous versions, nor for redirects created as a result of a page merge (use {{R from merge}} instead), nor for redirects from a title that forms a historic part of Wikipedia (use {{R with old history}} instead).
- To a section: This is a redirect from a topic that does not have its own page to a section of a page on the subject. For redirects to embedded anchors on a page, use {{R to anchor}} instead.