Jump to content

Talk:Roper (Dungeons & Dragons): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
adding criteria based on surface examination
top: Add WP banner(s) - Fictional character redirects
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|
{{D&D|class=start|importance=low
{{WikiProject Dungeons & Dragons}}
| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> = no
{{WikiProject Fictional characters}}
| b2 <!--Coverage & accuracy --> = <yes/no>
}}
| b3 <!--Structure --> = yes
{{Talk page of redirect}}{{Old prod|nom=TTN|nomdate=2020-02-05}}
| b4 <!--Grammar & style --> = <yes/no>
| b5 <!--Supporting materials --> = no
| b6 <!--Accessibility --> = <yes/no>}}


==Merge==
==Merge==

Latest revision as of 22:35, 2 May 2024

Merge

[edit]

Having recently started a List of Dungeons & Dragons monsters, I am trying to determine which monster articles should be redirected into the lists. I believe this article may be a suitable candidate to be merged and redirected into List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 1st edition monsters, as that is when it first debuted in the Dungeons & Dragons game. Please discuss reasons for or against such a merge. If no discussion has taken place 5 days from now, I will redirect this article to that list; otherwise I will follow whatever discussion takes place here. Thank you!  :) BOZ (talk) 03:07, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirected

[edit]

As there were no responses, I redirected this article to the list page. Since no response is also no consensus, any editor may restore this article at any time. However, rather than simply reverting, I urge you to use this space to develop some form of consensus regarding the article, lest another editor put this article up for deletion. BOZ (talk) 18:02, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Restored

[edit]

I am restoring this article to add a publication history section. If, afterwards, it is believed that this article should be redirected once again, you may do so. BOZ (talk) 14:05, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Classification

[edit]

"In the Dungeons & Dragons fantasy role-playing game, the roper is a magical beast, though whether it could actually be classified as an animal is debatable." What does that last part have to do with anything? It is a magical beast in Dungeons & Dragons, not an animal, and it does not (to my knowledge) exist in the real world. Xavius, the Satyr Lord (talk) 17:49, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If it doesn't make sense, feel free to remove or correct. 204.153.84.10 (talk) 18:48, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]