Jump to content

Sociocognitive: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Both meanings are used within the literature. We cannot promote only one of them as the main meaning. This would be very misleading for the readers and also unfair towards a part of scientific community.
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Problem where complex cognitive and social properties are reciprocally connected and essential}}
'''Socio-cognitive''' or '''sociocognitive''' has been used in academic literature with two different meanings: 1) it either describes how processes of group formation effect cognition, studied in [[cognitive sociology]], or 2) it refers to the integration of the [[cognition|cognitive]] and [[social]] properties of [[system]]s, [[wikt:process|process]]es, [[function (engineering)|function]]s, [[Model (abstract)|models]], as well as can indicate the branch of [[science]], [[engineering]] or [[technology]], such as ''socio-cognitive research'', ''socio-cognitive interactions''.
<ref>C. J. Hemingway and T. G. Gough (1998), A Socio-Cognitive Theory of Information Systems, Technical Report 98.25, School of Computer Studies, University of Leeds,
December 1998.</ref>
This term is especially used when [[complexity|complex]] cognitive and social properties are reciprocally connected and essential for a given problem.


'''Sociocognitive''' or '''socio-cognitive''' is a term especially used when [[complexity|complex]] cognitive and social properties are reciprocally connected and essential for a given problem.
'''Socio-cognitive research''' is [[human factor]] and socio-organizational factor based, and assumes an integrated [[knowledge engineering]], environment and [[business]] [[modeling perspectives|modeling perspective]], therefore it is not ''[[social cognition]]'' which rather is a branch of [[psychology]] focused on ''how people process social information''.

It has been used in academic literature with three different meanings:<ref>C. J. Hemingway and T. G. Gough (1998), A Socio-Cognitive Theory of Information Systems, Technical Report 98.25, School of Computer Studies, University of Leeds, December 1998.</ref>
# It can indicate a branch of [[science]], [[engineering]] or [[technology]], such as ''socio-cognitive research'', or ''socio-cognitive interactions'',
# It can refer to the integration of the [[cognition|cognitive]] and [[social]] properties of [[system]]s, [[wikt:process|process]]es, [[function (engineering)|function]]s, as well as [[Model (abstract)|models]], or
# It can describe how processes of group formation effect cognition, studied in [[cognitive sociology]].

== Socio-cognitive engineering ==
'''Socio-cognitive research''' is [[Human factors and ergonomics|human factor]] and socio-organizational factor based, and assumes an integrated [[knowledge engineering]], environment and [[business]] [[modeling perspectives|modeling perspective]], therefore it is not ''[[social cognition]]'' which rather is a branch of [[psychology]] focused on ''how people process social information''.


'''Socio-cognitive engineering''' ('''SCE''') includes a set of theoretical interdisciplinary frameworks, methodologies, methods and software tools for the design of [[Human-centered computing (discipline)|human centred]] technologies,<ref>M. Sharples at al.(2002), [http://www.eee.bham.ac.uk/sharplem/Papers/mediate%20ejor.pdf Socio-cognitive engineering: a methodology for the design of humancentred technology] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060923190713/http://www.eee.bham.ac.uk/sharplem/Papers/mediate%20ejor.pdf |date=2006-09-23 }}, European Journal of Operational Research</ref> as well as, for the improvement of large complex human-technology systems.
'''Socio-cognitive engineering''' ('''SCE''') includes a set of theoretical interdisciplinary frameworks, methodologies, methods and software tools for the design of [[Human-centered computing (discipline)|human centred]] technologies,<ref>M. Sharples at al.(2002), [http://www.eee.bham.ac.uk/sharplem/Papers/mediate%20ejor.pdf Socio-cognitive engineering: a methodology for the design of humancentred technology] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060923190713/http://www.eee.bham.ac.uk/sharplem/Papers/mediate%20ejor.pdf |date=2006-09-23 }}, European Journal of Operational Research</ref> as well as, for the improvement of large complex human-technology systems.
Line 10: Line 15:
Both above approaches are applicable for the identification and design of a computer-based semi-/proto-Intelligent [[Decision Support System]]s ([[intelligent support systems|IDSS]]),<ref>A. M. Gadomski, et al.(2001).,
Both above approaches are applicable for the identification and design of a computer-based semi-/proto-Intelligent [[Decision Support System]]s ([[intelligent support systems|IDSS]]),<ref>A. M. Gadomski, et al.(2001).,
[http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.58.6341 Towards intelligent decision support systems for emergency managers: the IDA approach]. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, Vol. 2, No. 3/4.</ref> for the operators and managers of large socially critical systems, for high-risk tasks, such as different types of [[emergency]] and [[disaster]] management, where [[human error]]s and socio-cognitive organization [[vulnerability]] can be the cause of serious losses.<ref>A. M. Gadomski (2009), [http://www.inderscience.com/search/index.php?action=record&rec_id=22853&prevQuery=&ps=10&m=or Human organisation socio-cognitive vulnerability: the TOGA meta-theory approach to the modelling methodology], International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, Vol. 5, No.1/2 pp. 120-155.</ref>
[http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.58.6341 Towards intelligent decision support systems for emergency managers: the IDA approach]. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, Vol. 2, No. 3/4.</ref> for the operators and managers of large socially critical systems, for high-risk tasks, such as different types of [[emergency]] and [[disaster]] management, where [[human error]]s and socio-cognitive organization [[vulnerability]] can be the cause of serious losses.<ref>A. M. Gadomski (2009), [http://www.inderscience.com/search/index.php?action=record&rec_id=22853&prevQuery=&ps=10&m=or Human organisation socio-cognitive vulnerability: the TOGA meta-theory approach to the modelling methodology], International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, Vol. 5, No.1/2 pp. 120-155.</ref>

== Integration of cognitive social properties of systems ==
{{Empty section|date=December 2023}}

== Group formation effect cognition ==
{{Empty section|date=December 2023}}


==See also==
==See also==

Latest revision as of 23:14, 3 May 2024

Sociocognitive or socio-cognitive is a term especially used when complex cognitive and social properties are reciprocally connected and essential for a given problem.

It has been used in academic literature with three different meanings:[1]

  1. It can indicate a branch of science, engineering or technology, such as socio-cognitive research, or socio-cognitive interactions,
  2. It can refer to the integration of the cognitive and social properties of systems, processes, functions, as well as models, or
  3. It can describe how processes of group formation effect cognition, studied in cognitive sociology.

Socio-cognitive engineering

[edit]

Socio-cognitive research is human factor and socio-organizational factor based, and assumes an integrated knowledge engineering, environment and business modeling perspective, therefore it is not social cognition which rather is a branch of psychology focused on how people process social information.

Socio-cognitive engineering (SCE) includes a set of theoretical interdisciplinary frameworks, methodologies, methods and software tools for the design of human centred technologies,[2] as well as, for the improvement of large complex human-technology systems.

Both above approaches are applicable for the identification and design of a computer-based semi-/proto-Intelligent Decision Support Systems (IDSS),[3] for the operators and managers of large socially critical systems, for high-risk tasks, such as different types of emergency and disaster management, where human errors and socio-cognitive organization vulnerability can be the cause of serious losses.[4]

Integration of cognitive social properties of systems

[edit]

Group formation effect cognition

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ C. J. Hemingway and T. G. Gough (1998), A Socio-Cognitive Theory of Information Systems, Technical Report 98.25, School of Computer Studies, University of Leeds, December 1998.
  2. ^ M. Sharples at al.(2002), Socio-cognitive engineering: a methodology for the design of humancentred technology Archived 2006-09-23 at the Wayback Machine, European Journal of Operational Research
  3. ^ A. M. Gadomski, et al.(2001)., Towards intelligent decision support systems for emergency managers: the IDA approach. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, Vol. 2, No. 3/4.
  4. ^ A. M. Gadomski (2009), Human organisation socio-cognitive vulnerability: the TOGA meta-theory approach to the modelling methodology, International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, Vol. 5, No.1/2 pp. 120-155.
[edit]