Talk:My Dress-Up Darling: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
refideas |
Leonidlednev (talk | contribs) m Reverted edits by 125.165.102.168 (talk) to last revision by Cewbot: using talk page as forum |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start| |
||
{{WikiProject Anime and manga|importance=Low}} |
|||
}} |
|||
{{Refideas |
{{Refideas |
||
|1=https://febri.jp/topics/my-dress-up-darling-an-interview1/ |
|1=https://febri.jp/topics/my-dress-up-darling-an-interview1/ |
||
|2=https://febri.jp/topics/my-dress-up-darling-an-interview2/ |
|2=https://febri.jp/topics/my-dress-up-darling-an-interview2/ |
||
}} |
}} |
||
== Notability as an orphan/the production section? == |
|||
In the 'Production' section, is it notable that the creator set him as an orphan? It's rarely if at all mentioned, and he lives with his grandfather. Just wondering if I should move/remove the information. thx! [[User:Realtent|Realtent]] ([[User talk:Realtent|talk]]) 16:06, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:I think it's fine as is, but I would not be able to say for sure without reading the source myself, which I can't do. I would say that for the time being it should be left alone so that someone who is able to read the interview and place the information in proper context can make an informed decision as to its inclusion when improving the section. That's just my opinion, however. <small style="font-size:40%;">'''''[[User:BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4|ostensibly singular userpage]]'''''</small> <small style="font-size:60%;">('''''[[User talk:BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4|inquire within]]''''')</small> 16:10, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::Alright then, so if I were to go expand the 'production' section, what would be credible/wikipedia-accepted sources to use? I can find some at a search, but I don't know which are usable [[User:Realtent|Realtent]] ([[User talk:Realtent|talk]]) 16:17, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::There's a list of topic-relevant reliable sources at [[WP:A&M/RS]]; I'd recommend using that as a starting point. <small style="font-size:40%;">'''''[[User:BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4|ostensibly singular userpage]]'''''</small> <small style="font-size:60%;">('''''[[User talk:BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4|inquire within]]''''')</small> 16:18, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
== Credibility of specific sources? (DualShockers) == |
|||
While trying to expand the 'Production' section in a fashion similar to other pages like [[One-Punch Man#Production|One Punch Man]], I was trying to find a source with the creation date of the manga, because there's not a source for it. I found an article on a website called DualShockers with the manga publication date. Would it be fine to put it in here? Any other sources that say the same would be great. thx. [[User:Realtent|Realtent]] ([[User talk:Realtent|talk]]) 15:39, 8 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:There is actually already [[My_Dress-Up_Darling#cite_note-12|a source cited in the page]] saying when the manga's run began, so an additional source for that probably isn't needed. I don't know for certain about DualShockers, but they seem potentially fine as a source for opinions and uncontroversial claims. I wouldn't use them to demonstrate notability or base any article primarily on their coverage, however. If you want to get a more complete opinion on their reliability you might be best off asking other editors at [[WT:ANIME]]. <small style="font-size:40%;">'''''[[User:BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4|ostensibly singular userpage]]'''''</small> <small style="font-size:60%;">('''''[[User talk:BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4|inquire within]]''''')</small> 15:51, 8 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 17:59, 6 May 2024
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
Notability as an orphan/the production section?
[edit]In the 'Production' section, is it notable that the creator set him as an orphan? It's rarely if at all mentioned, and he lives with his grandfather. Just wondering if I should move/remove the information. thx! Realtent (talk) 16:06, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
- I think it's fine as is, but I would not be able to say for sure without reading the source myself, which I can't do. I would say that for the time being it should be left alone so that someone who is able to read the interview and place the information in proper context can make an informed decision as to its inclusion when improving the section. That's just my opinion, however. ostensibly singular userpage (inquire within) 16:10, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
- Alright then, so if I were to go expand the 'production' section, what would be credible/wikipedia-accepted sources to use? I can find some at a search, but I don't know which are usable Realtent (talk) 16:17, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
- There's a list of topic-relevant reliable sources at WP:A&M/RS; I'd recommend using that as a starting point. ostensibly singular userpage (inquire within) 16:18, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
- Alright then, so if I were to go expand the 'production' section, what would be credible/wikipedia-accepted sources to use? I can find some at a search, but I don't know which are usable Realtent (talk) 16:17, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Credibility of specific sources? (DualShockers)
[edit]While trying to expand the 'Production' section in a fashion similar to other pages like One Punch Man, I was trying to find a source with the creation date of the manga, because there's not a source for it. I found an article on a website called DualShockers with the manga publication date. Would it be fine to put it in here? Any other sources that say the same would be great. thx. Realtent (talk) 15:39, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- There is actually already a source cited in the page saying when the manga's run began, so an additional source for that probably isn't needed. I don't know for certain about DualShockers, but they seem potentially fine as a source for opinions and uncontroversial claims. I wouldn't use them to demonstrate notability or base any article primarily on their coverage, however. If you want to get a more complete opinion on their reliability you might be best off asking other editors at WT:ANIME. ostensibly singular userpage (inquire within) 15:51, 8 September 2022 (UTC)