Resuscitator: Difference between revisions
Pbsouthwood (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (19 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Medical device using positive pressure to inflate the lungs}} |
{{Short description|Medical device using positive pressure to inflate the lungs}} |
||
{{More citations needed|date=May 2014}} |
{{More citations needed|date=May 2014}} |
||
A '''resuscitator''' is a device using positive pressure to inflate the lungs of an [[Syncope (medicine)|unconscious]] person who is [[apnea|not breathing]], in order to keep them [[oxygen]]ated and alive. There are three basic types: a ''manual'' version (also known as a ''[[bag valve mask]]'') consisting of a mask and a large hand-squeezed plastic bulb using ambient air, or with supplemental oxygen from a high-pressure tank. The second type is the ''expired air'' or breath powered resuscitator. The third type is an ''oxygen powered'' resuscitator. These are driven by pressurized gas delivered by a regulator, and can either be automatic or manually controlled. The most popular type of gas powered resuscitator are |
A '''resuscitator''' is a device using positive pressure to inflate the lungs of an [[Syncope (medicine)|unconscious]] person who is [[apnea|not breathing]], in order to keep them [[oxygen]]ated and alive.{{cn|date=July 2023}} There are three basic types: a ''manual'' version (also known as a ''[[bag valve mask]]'') consisting of a mask and a large hand-squeezed plastic bulb using ambient air, or with supplemental oxygen from a high-pressure tank. The second type is the ''expired air'' or breath powered resuscitator. The third type is an ''oxygen powered'' resuscitator. These are driven by pressurized gas delivered by a regulator, and can either be automatic or manually controlled. The most popular type of gas powered resuscitator are time cycled, volume constant ventilators. In the early days of pre-hospital emergency services, pressure cycled devices like the Pulmotor were popular but yielded less than satisfactory results. Most modern resuscitators are designed to allow the patient to breathe on his own should he recover the ability to do so. All resuscitation devices should be able to deliver more than 85% oxygen when a gas source is available. |
||
==Mechanism and function== |
|||
===Manual resuscitators=== |
|||
{{main|Bag valve mask}} |
|||
Manual resuscitators, also known as bag valve masks, consist of a flexible oro-nasal face-mask with non-return valves and a large hand-squeezed plastic bulb using ambient air, or with supplemental oxygen from a high-pressure tank. The mask covers the mouth and nose, and has a peripheral seal that fits most face shapes, and is generally held in place by the operator.{{cn|date=July 2023}} |
|||
{{expand section|summary of main article|date=July 2023}} |
|||
===Expired air resuscitators=== |
|||
{{main|Pocket mask}} |
|||
A pocket mask, or pocket face mask or CPR mask, is an expired air resuscitation device used to safely deliver [[artificial respiration|rescue breaths]] during a [[cardiac arrest]] or [[respiratory arrest]]. It is a small portable device used in the pre-hospital setting to provide emergency ventilation to a patient who is either in respiratory failure or cardiac arrest. The pocket mask is designed to be placed over the lower face of the patient, creating a seal enclosing both the mouth and nose. Air is then administered to the patient by the responder who exhales through a one-way filter valve. The system is capable of delivering up to 16% oxygen with exhaled air.{{cn|date=July 2023}} |
|||
Modern pocket masks have either a built in one-way valve or a disposable filter to protect the operator responder from potentially infectious bodily fluids, such as vomit or blood.<ref name="lifesavers" >{{cite web |url= http://www.lifesavers.org.uk/press_release/pdf/Pocket_Mask_Resuscitation.pdf |title= Pocket Mask Resuscitation |access-date= 2008-01-18 |url-status= dead |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20110717132947/http://www.lifesavers.org.uk/press_release/pdf/Pocket_Mask_Resuscitation.pdf |archive-date= 2011-07-17 }}</ref> Many masks also have a built-in oxygen addition tube, allowing for administration of 50-60% oxygen. |
|||
===Oxygen powered resuscitators=== |
|||
{{empty section|date=July 2023}} |
|||
== History == |
== History == |
||
| Line 8: | Line 23: | ||
[[File:Lungmotor resuscitation device advertisement (newspaper, 1917).jpg|thumb|Early "Lungmotor" resuscitation device]] |
[[File:Lungmotor resuscitation device advertisement (newspaper, 1917).jpg|thumb|Early "Lungmotor" resuscitation device]] |
||
When ambulance services began to form in major cities around the world, such as in London, New York and Los Angeles, [[Emergency medical services]] or EMS was developed. In these early days, perhaps{{weasel-inline}} the most advanced piece of equipment carried on these ambulances were devices for delivering supplemental oxygen to patients in respiratory distress.{{cn}} The Pulmotor and later models, such as the Emerson Resuscitator, used heavy cylinders of oxygen to power a device which forced air into the patient's lungs.{{clarify|Air forced in osing oxygen power?}}{{cn}} While better than no oxygen at all, these old units were problematic. Aside from often failing to sense obstructions in the airway, the Emerson, and to a lesser degree the Pulmotor, were large, bulky and heavy. The Emerson Resuscitator required two strong men to carry it from the ambulance to the victim. Perhaps the greatest defect, however, was the fact that these units "cycled".{{cn}} |
When ambulance services began to form in major cities around the world, such as in London, New York and Los Angeles, [[Emergency medical services]] or EMS was developed. In these early days, perhaps{{weasel-inline|date=July 2023}} the most advanced piece of equipment carried on these ambulances were devices for delivering supplemental oxygen to patients in respiratory distress.{{cn|date=July 2023}} The Pulmotor and later models, such as the Emerson Resuscitator, used heavy cylinders of oxygen to power a device which forced air into the patient's lungs.{{clarify|Air forced in osing oxygen power?|date=July 2023}}{{cn|date=July 2023}} While better than no oxygen at all, these old units were problematic. Aside from often failing to sense obstructions in the airway, the Emerson, and to a lesser degree the Pulmotor, were large, bulky and heavy. The Emerson Resuscitator required two strong men to carry it from the ambulance to the victim. Perhaps the greatest defect, however, was the fact that these units "cycled".{{cn|date=July 2023}} |
||
Cycling was a feature that was built into most resuscitators built before the 1960s, including the Pulmotor and Emerson models. To ensure that the victim's lungs were not injured from being over-inflated, the resuscitator was pre-set to provide what was considered a safe pressure of oxygen. Once the unit reached this limit, it ceased to pump oxygen. For patients with [[chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]] (COPD), or any form of obstructive lung disease, the delivered pressure was insufficient pressure to fill the lungs with oxygen, meaning that, for patients with any sort of obstructive lung disease, units that pressure cycled did more harm than good.{{clarify|how was harm don?}} Pressure cycling also meant that [[cardiopulmonary resuscitation]] was impossible to perform if a patient's respiration was being supported by one of these units. If chest compressions were to be done, the cycle would be retarded and the resuscitator would be unable to provide oxygen as long as the chest was being compressed. For victims of smoke inhalation and drowning, however, the benefits outweighed the negatives, so these units found a home on ambulances around the world. The devices that cycled on the basis of upper and lower pressure limits are known as pressure cycled automatic resuscitators. In the UK the introduction of BS6850:1987 Ventilatory Resuscitators confirmed that "....automatic pressure-cycled gas-powered resuscitators are not considered suitable for such use (closed chest cardiac compression)..." and confirmed the standards required for gas powered resuscitators and operator powered resuscitators.<ref>{{cite book|title=BS 6850:1987 British Standard Specification for Ventilatory resuscitators|year=1987|publisher=British Standards Institution|isbn=0-580-15880-2}}</ref> The following year a similar ISO standard was introduced.<ref>{{cite book|title=ISO 8382:1988 Resuscitators intended for use with humans|year=1988|publisher=International Organization for Standardization}}</ref> Around this date most manufacturers supplied or introduced time - volume cycled resuscitators and pressure cycled devices were discontinued. |
Cycling was a feature that was built into most resuscitators built before the 1960s, including the Pulmotor and Emerson models. To ensure that the victim's lungs were not injured from being over-inflated, the resuscitator was pre-set to provide what was considered a safe pressure of oxygen. Once the unit reached this limit, it ceased to pump oxygen. For patients with [[chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]] (COPD), or any form of obstructive lung disease, the delivered pressure was insufficient pressure to fill the lungs with oxygen, meaning that, for patients with any sort of obstructive lung disease, units that pressure cycled did more harm than good.{{clarify|how was harm don?|date=July 2023}} Pressure cycling also meant that [[cardiopulmonary resuscitation]] was impossible to perform if a patient's respiration was being supported by one of these units. If chest compressions were to be done, the cycle would be retarded and the resuscitator would be unable to provide oxygen as long as the chest was being compressed. For victims of smoke inhalation and drowning, however, the benefits outweighed the negatives, so these units found a home on ambulances around the world. The devices that cycled on the basis of upper and lower pressure limits are known as pressure cycled automatic resuscitators. In the UK the introduction of BS6850:1987 Ventilatory Resuscitators confirmed that "....automatic pressure-cycled gas-powered resuscitators are not considered suitable for such use (closed chest cardiac compression)..." and confirmed the standards required for gas powered resuscitators and operator powered resuscitators.<ref>{{cite book|title=BS 6850:1987 British Standard Specification for Ventilatory resuscitators|year=1987|publisher=British Standards Institution|isbn=0-580-15880-2}}</ref> The following year a similar ISO standard was introduced.<ref>{{cite book|title=ISO 8382:1988 Resuscitators intended for use with humans|year=1988|publisher=International Organization for Standardization}}</ref> Around this date most manufacturers supplied or introduced time - volume cycled resuscitators and pressure cycled devices were discontinued. |
||
Both the Pulmotor and the Emerson depended to a large extent upon the patient's ability to breathe the oxygen in order to be beneficial. Due to the limitations imposed by the cycling feature, this meant that patients in need of rescue breathing benefited little from the application of these devices. The Emerson and Pulmotor were utilized until the mid-1960s, when a breakthrough in the history of oxygen delivery was made: the demand valve.<ref name="Demand valve assembly for use with breathing or resuscitation equipment" <ref>{{cite book|last=CHANEY|first=G.|title=US Patent 3,285,261|date=Nov 15, 1966}}</ref> |
Both the Pulmotor and the Emerson depended to a large extent upon the patient's ability to breathe the oxygen in order to be beneficial. Due to the limitations imposed by the cycling feature, this meant that patients in need of rescue breathing benefited little from the application of these devices. The Emerson and Pulmotor were utilized until the mid-1960s, when a breakthrough in the history of oxygen delivery was made: the demand valve.<ref name="Demand valve assembly for use with breathing or resuscitation equipment" <ref>{{cite book|last=CHANEY|first=G.|title=US Patent 3,285,261|date=Nov 15, 1966}}</ref> |
||
The first appearance of the expired air resuscitator type was the Brooke Airway introduced in 1957.{{cn}} |
The first appearance of the expired air resuscitator type was the Brooke Airway introduced in 1957.{{cn|date=July 2023}} |
||
The demand valve was a revolutionary new piece of equipment.{{cn}} At the push of a button, high-flow oxygen could be delivered into the lungs of the patient without the complication of the device cycling and, the associated chance of ceasing to administer oxygen. Any amount of pressure that might be required to inflate the lungs could be achieved,{{clarify|was there not a higher risk of pulmonary over-inflation injury?}} and the demand valve was better able to detect obstructions in the lungs and more able to "work with the patient" than the Emerson and Pulmotor could.{{clarify|what does work with the patient mean}} The demand valve could also provide oxygen at any flow rate required to a conscious patient in respiratory distress. Conserving the often limited reserves of oxygen was easier with a demand valve, as oxygen was designed only to flow when either the button was depressed or the casualty inhaled. Later medical opinion decided that getting high flow oxygen into a |
The demand valve was a revolutionary new piece of equipment.{{cn|date=July 2023}} At the push of a button, high-flow oxygen could be delivered into the lungs of the patient without the complication of the device cycling and, the associated chance of ceasing to administer oxygen. Any amount of pressure that might be required to inflate the lungs could be achieved,{{clarify|was there not a higher risk of pulmonary over-inflation injury?|date=July 2023}} and the demand valve was better able to detect obstructions in the lungs and more able to "work with the patient" than the Emerson and Pulmotor could.{{clarify|what does work with the patient mean|date=July 2023}} The demand valve could also provide oxygen at any flow rate required to a conscious patient in respiratory distress. Conserving the often limited reserves of oxygen was easier with a demand valve, as oxygen was designed only to flow when either the button was depressed or the casualty inhaled. Later medical opinion decided that getting high flow oxygen into a patient's airway was a factor in causing vomiting and aspiration. Demand valve resuscitators were introduced with restrictors to limit flow rates to 40 lpm. Use of the demand valve resuscitator in Europe was limited by the lack of pressure relief valve or audible alarm for high pressure.{{cn|date=July 2023}}{{clarify|what is the relevance of pressure relief valve and alarm?|date=July 2023}} |
||
One of the first modern resuscitation ventilators was the HARV, later called the PneuPac 2R or Yellow Box.{{cn}}{{clarify|some context needed}} |
One of the first modern resuscitation ventilators was the HARV, later called the PneuPac 2R or Yellow Box.{{cn|date=July 2023}}{{clarify|some context needed|date=July 2023}} |
||
== Modern day == |
== Modern day == |
||
{{clarify|Time span for "modern day"}}The [[bag valve mask|ambu-bag]] was a further advancement in resuscitation. Introduced in the 1960s by the Danish company Ambu, this device allowed two rescuers to perform CPR and ventilation on a non-breathing patient with an acceptable chance of success. The ambu-bag has now mostly replaced the demand valve as the primary method of ventilation, largely due to concerns of potential over-inflation with the demand valve by untrained rescuers. The ambu-bag, unlike the older version of the demand valve (all new models of demand valve now have pressure relief valves set at 60 cm of water to prevent accidental overinflation of the lungs), has a "pop-off" valve to prevent inflation at greater than 40 pounds -per-square-inch (275.79 kilo-pascals), with the result being that it is generally more common in the pre-hospital setting than the demand valve. However, the demand valve remains popular with BLS providers, and in situations where conserving supplies of oxygen is of paramount importance. The demand valve, while less popular today than it was previously, still remains in service, albeit with important safety features added, including the addition of a pressure-relief valve to prevent over-inflation and the restriction of its flow to 40 liters a minute. |
{{clarify|Time span for "modern day"|date=July 2023}}The [[bag valve mask|ambu-bag]] was a further advancement in resuscitation. Introduced in the 1960s by the Danish company Ambu, this device allowed two rescuers to perform CPR and ventilation on a non-breathing patient with an acceptable chance of success. The ambu-bag has now mostly replaced the demand valve as the primary method of ventilation, largely due to concerns of potential over-inflation with the demand valve by untrained rescuers. The ambu-bag, unlike the older version of the demand valve (all new models of demand valve now have pressure relief valves set at 60 cm of water to prevent accidental overinflation of the lungs), has a "pop-off" valve to prevent inflation at greater than 40 pounds -per-square-inch (275.79 kilo-pascals), with the result being that it is generally more common in the pre-hospital setting than the demand valve. However, the demand valve remains popular with BLS providers, and in situations where conserving supplies of oxygen is of paramount importance. The demand valve, while less popular today than it was previously, still remains in service, albeit with important safety features added, including the addition of a pressure-relief valve to prevent over-inflation and the restriction of its flow to 40 liters a minute. |
||
Newer products have been developed and are available. In 1992 the Genesis(R) II time/volume cycled resuscitator (now upgraded to meet the current, international, resuscitation guidelines and called the CAREvent(R) ALS and CA)provide the SIMV{{clarify|SIMV?|date=July 2023}} automatic ventilation mode with demand breathing for the spontaneously breathing patient. These devices work like full blown transport ventilators yet are simple enough to operate that they can be used in an emergency situation by pre-hospital healthcare providers and are small enough to be easily transportable. Having a manual override control for use during mask CPR they meet the requirements of the current resuscitation standards. The Oxylator (R) EM-100 introduced in the late 1990s and subsequently replaced by the more flexible Oxylator (R) EMX and HD are pressure cycled devices that utilize pressure, rather than time, cycling to ventilate the patient. |
|||
More recently the microVENT resuscitator range introduced two new models, the microVENT(R) CPR and the microVENT(R)World. These two new time/volume resuscitators meet the latest requirements for resuscitation and are claimed to be lighter and smaller than most similar products.<ref name="Brochure download">{{cite web|title=Manufacturer information|url=http://www.meditech.gb.com/Downloads.html|website |
More recently the microVENT resuscitator range introduced two new models, the microVENT(R) CPR and the microVENT(R)World. These two new time/volume resuscitators meet the latest requirements for resuscitation and are claimed to be lighter and smaller than most similar products.<ref name="Brochure download">{{cite web|title=Manufacturer information|url=http://www.meditech.gb.com/Downloads.html|website=Meditech (B.N.O.S. Meditech Ltd.)|accessdate=18 December 2014}}</ref> |
||
Most established automatic resuscitator manufacturers developed time/volume cycled resuscitators as these are acknowledged{{by whom?}} as preferable to pressure cycled resuscitators.{{cn}}{{clarify|why are they better}} |
Most established automatic resuscitator manufacturers developed time/volume cycled resuscitators as these are acknowledged{{by whom?|date=July 2023}} as preferable to pressure cycled resuscitators.{{cn|date=July 2023}}{{clarify|why are they better|date=July 2023}} |
||
== Response considerations == |
== Response considerations == |
||
A manual resuscitator{{clarify|what is a manual resuscitator?|date=July 2023}} should be used on a victim only in an environment where the air is unquestionably safe to breathe. |
A manual resuscitator{{clarify|what is a manual resuscitator?|date=July 2023}} should be used on a victim only in an environment where the air is unquestionably safe to breathe.{{clarify|decided how? what if it is not safe?|date=July 2023}} |
||
==References== |
==References== |
||
| Line 35: | Line 50: | ||
==External links== |
==External links== |
||
* [https://kissoflife.nl/ Kiss of Life CPR Mask] |
|||
=== General === |
=== General === |
||
* [http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=35715024EB705379BC527B436562F16D?doi=10.1.1.630.5641&rep=rep1&type=pdf ''It began with the Pulmotor: One Hundred Years of Artificial Ventilation''] by Ernst Bahns, published by [[Dräger (company)|Dräger Medical AG & Co. KG]], Lübeck, Germany (original manufacturers of the Pulmotor, and many other ventilation items, to the present day) (a lengthy, illustrated history of the development of artificial ventilation, interwoven with the publishers' own apparently self-promotional corporate history). |
* [http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=35715024EB705379BC527B436562F16D?doi=10.1.1.630.5641&rep=rep1&type=pdf ''It began with the Pulmotor: One Hundred Years of Artificial Ventilation''] by Ernst Bahns, published by [[Dräger (company)|Dräger Medical AG & Co. KG]], Lübeck, Germany (original manufacturers of the Pulmotor, and many other ventilation items, to the present day) (a lengthy, illustrated history of the development of artificial ventilation, interwoven with the publishers' own apparently self-promotional corporate history). |
||
| Line 44: | Line 60: | ||
* [http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=35715024EB705379BC527B436562F16D?doi=10.1.1.630.5641&rep=rep1&type=pdf ''It began with the Pulmotor: One Hundred Years of Artificial Ventilation''] by Ernst Bahns, published by [[Dräger (company)|Dräger Medical AG & Co. KG]], Lübeck, Germany (original manufacturers of the Pulmotor). |
* [http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=35715024EB705379BC527B436562F16D?doi=10.1.1.630.5641&rep=rep1&type=pdf ''It began with the Pulmotor: One Hundred Years of Artificial Ventilation''] by Ernst Bahns, published by [[Dräger (company)|Dräger Medical AG & Co. KG]], Lübeck, Germany (original manufacturers of the Pulmotor). |
||
{{Breathing apparatus|medical}} |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
Latest revision as of 04:11, 10 May 2024
 | This article needs additional citations for verification. (May 2014) |
A resuscitator is a device using positive pressure to inflate the lungs of an unconscious person who is not breathing, in order to keep them oxygenated and alive.[citation needed] There are three basic types: a manual version (also known as a bag valve mask) consisting of a mask and a large hand-squeezed plastic bulb using ambient air, or with supplemental oxygen from a high-pressure tank. The second type is the expired air or breath powered resuscitator. The third type is an oxygen powered resuscitator. These are driven by pressurized gas delivered by a regulator, and can either be automatic or manually controlled. The most popular type of gas powered resuscitator are time cycled, volume constant ventilators. In the early days of pre-hospital emergency services, pressure cycled devices like the Pulmotor were popular but yielded less than satisfactory results. Most modern resuscitators are designed to allow the patient to breathe on his own should he recover the ability to do so. All resuscitation devices should be able to deliver more than 85% oxygen when a gas source is available.
Mechanism and function
[edit]Manual resuscitators
[edit]Manual resuscitators, also known as bag valve masks, consist of a flexible oro-nasal face-mask with non-return valves and a large hand-squeezed plastic bulb using ambient air, or with supplemental oxygen from a high-pressure tank. The mask covers the mouth and nose, and has a peripheral seal that fits most face shapes, and is generally held in place by the operator.[citation needed]
![[icon]](/enwiki/wiki/File:Wiki_letter_w_cropped.svg){kind=small} | This section needs expansion with: summary of main article. You can help by adding to it. (July 2023) |
Expired air resuscitators
[edit]A pocket mask, or pocket face mask or CPR mask, is an expired air resuscitation device used to safely deliver rescue breaths during a cardiac arrest or respiratory arrest. It is a small portable device used in the pre-hospital setting to provide emergency ventilation to a patient who is either in respiratory failure or cardiac arrest. The pocket mask is designed to be placed over the lower face of the patient, creating a seal enclosing both the mouth and nose. Air is then administered to the patient by the responder who exhales through a one-way filter valve. The system is capable of delivering up to 16% oxygen with exhaled air.[citation needed]
Modern pocket masks have either a built in one-way valve or a disposable filter to protect the operator responder from potentially infectious bodily fluids, such as vomit or blood.[1] Many masks also have a built-in oxygen addition tube, allowing for administration of 50-60% oxygen.
Oxygen powered resuscitators
[edit] | This section is empty. You can help by adding to it. (July 2023) |
History
[edit]Resuscitators began in 1907 [2] when Heinrich Dräger, owner of the Drägerwerk AG Company, produced the "Pulmotor" Resuscitator. Considered to be the first practical device for delivering oxygen to unconscious patients or patients in respiratory distress, the Pulmotor influenced resuscitators for many years.
.jpg)
When ambulance services began to form in major cities around the world, such as in London, New York and Los Angeles, Emergency medical services or EMS was developed. In these early days, perhaps[weasel words] the most advanced piece of equipment carried on these ambulances were devices for delivering supplemental oxygen to patients in respiratory distress.[citation needed] The Pulmotor and later models, such as the Emerson Resuscitator, used heavy cylinders of oxygen to power a device which forced air into the patient's lungs.[clarification needed][citation needed] While better than no oxygen at all, these old units were problematic. Aside from often failing to sense obstructions in the airway, the Emerson, and to a lesser degree the Pulmotor, were large, bulky and heavy. The Emerson Resuscitator required two strong men to carry it from the ambulance to the victim. Perhaps the greatest defect, however, was the fact that these units "cycled".[citation needed]
Cycling was a feature that was built into most resuscitators built before the 1960s, including the Pulmotor and Emerson models. To ensure that the victim's lungs were not injured from being over-inflated, the resuscitator was pre-set to provide what was considered a safe pressure of oxygen. Once the unit reached this limit, it ceased to pump oxygen. For patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or any form of obstructive lung disease, the delivered pressure was insufficient pressure to fill the lungs with oxygen, meaning that, for patients with any sort of obstructive lung disease, units that pressure cycled did more harm than good.[clarification needed] Pressure cycling also meant that cardiopulmonary resuscitation was impossible to perform if a patient's respiration was being supported by one of these units. If chest compressions were to be done, the cycle would be retarded and the resuscitator would be unable to provide oxygen as long as the chest was being compressed. For victims of smoke inhalation and drowning, however, the benefits outweighed the negatives, so these units found a home on ambulances around the world. The devices that cycled on the basis of upper and lower pressure limits are known as pressure cycled automatic resuscitators. In the UK the introduction of BS6850:1987 Ventilatory Resuscitators confirmed that "....automatic pressure-cycled gas-powered resuscitators are not considered suitable for such use (closed chest cardiac compression)..." and confirmed the standards required for gas powered resuscitators and operator powered resuscitators.[3] The following year a similar ISO standard was introduced.[4] Around this date most manufacturers supplied or introduced time - volume cycled resuscitators and pressure cycled devices were discontinued.
Both the Pulmotor and the Emerson depended to a large extent upon the patient's ability to breathe the oxygen in order to be beneficial. Due to the limitations imposed by the cycling feature, this meant that patients in need of rescue breathing benefited little from the application of these devices. The Emerson and Pulmotor were utilized until the mid-1960s, when a breakthrough in the history of oxygen delivery was made: the demand valve.[5]
The first appearance of the expired air resuscitator type was the Brooke Airway introduced in 1957.[citation needed]
The demand valve was a revolutionary new piece of equipment.[citation needed] At the push of a button, high-flow oxygen could be delivered into the lungs of the patient without the complication of the device cycling and, the associated chance of ceasing to administer oxygen. Any amount of pressure that might be required to inflate the lungs could be achieved,[clarification needed] and the demand valve was better able to detect obstructions in the lungs and more able to "work with the patient" than the Emerson and Pulmotor could.[clarification needed] The demand valve could also provide oxygen at any flow rate required to a conscious patient in respiratory distress. Conserving the often limited reserves of oxygen was easier with a demand valve, as oxygen was designed only to flow when either the button was depressed or the casualty inhaled. Later medical opinion decided that getting high flow oxygen into a patient's airway was a factor in causing vomiting and aspiration. Demand valve resuscitators were introduced with restrictors to limit flow rates to 40 lpm. Use of the demand valve resuscitator in Europe was limited by the lack of pressure relief valve or audible alarm for high pressure.[citation needed][clarification needed]
One of the first modern resuscitation ventilators was the HARV, later called the PneuPac 2R or Yellow Box.[citation needed][clarification needed]
Modern day
[edit][clarification needed]The ambu-bag was a further advancement in resuscitation. Introduced in the 1960s by the Danish company Ambu, this device allowed two rescuers to perform CPR and ventilation on a non-breathing patient with an acceptable chance of success. The ambu-bag has now mostly replaced the demand valve as the primary method of ventilation, largely due to concerns of potential over-inflation with the demand valve by untrained rescuers. The ambu-bag, unlike the older version of the demand valve (all new models of demand valve now have pressure relief valves set at 60 cm of water to prevent accidental overinflation of the lungs), has a "pop-off" valve to prevent inflation at greater than 40 pounds -per-square-inch (275.79 kilo-pascals), with the result being that it is generally more common in the pre-hospital setting than the demand valve. However, the demand valve remains popular with BLS providers, and in situations where conserving supplies of oxygen is of paramount importance. The demand valve, while less popular today than it was previously, still remains in service, albeit with important safety features added, including the addition of a pressure-relief valve to prevent over-inflation and the restriction of its flow to 40 liters a minute.
Newer products have been developed and are available. In 1992 the Genesis(R) II time/volume cycled resuscitator (now upgraded to meet the current, international, resuscitation guidelines and called the CAREvent(R) ALS and CA)provide the SIMV[clarification needed] automatic ventilation mode with demand breathing for the spontaneously breathing patient. These devices work like full blown transport ventilators yet are simple enough to operate that they can be used in an emergency situation by pre-hospital healthcare providers and are small enough to be easily transportable. Having a manual override control for use during mask CPR they meet the requirements of the current resuscitation standards. The Oxylator (R) EM-100 introduced in the late 1990s and subsequently replaced by the more flexible Oxylator (R) EMX and HD are pressure cycled devices that utilize pressure, rather than time, cycling to ventilate the patient. More recently the microVENT resuscitator range introduced two new models, the microVENT(R) CPR and the microVENT(R)World. These two new time/volume resuscitators meet the latest requirements for resuscitation and are claimed to be lighter and smaller than most similar products.[6]
Most established automatic resuscitator manufacturers developed time/volume cycled resuscitators as these are acknowledged[by whom?] as preferable to pressure cycled resuscitators.[citation needed][clarification needed]
Response considerations
[edit]A manual resuscitator[clarification needed] should be used on a victim only in an environment where the air is unquestionably safe to breathe.[clarification needed]
References
[edit]- ^ "Pocket Mask Resuscitation" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-07-17. Retrieved 2008-01-18.
- ^ Bahns, Ernst (2001). The Evolution of Ventilation. Dragerwerk AG. pp. 10–11. ISBN 3-926762-17-9.
- ^ BS 6850:1987 British Standard Specification for Ventilatory resuscitators. British Standards Institution. 1987. ISBN 0-580-15880-2.
- ^ ISO 8382:1988 Resuscitators intended for use with humans. International Organization for Standardization. 1988.
- ^ CHANEY, G. (Nov 15, 1966). US Patent 3,285,261.
- ^ "Manufacturer information". Meditech (B.N.O.S. Meditech Ltd.). Retrieved 18 December 2014.
External links
[edit]General
[edit]- It began with the Pulmotor: One Hundred Years of Artificial Ventilation by Ernst Bahns, published by Dräger Medical AG & Co. KG, Lübeck, Germany (original manufacturers of the Pulmotor, and many other ventilation items, to the present day) (a lengthy, illustrated history of the development of artificial ventilation, interwoven with the publishers' own apparently self-promotional corporate history).
Pulmotor
[edit]- "1907: The first mechanical ventilator: The Pulmotor," by John Bottrell (registered respiratory therapist), April 19, 2017, Asthma History blog, retrieved April 12, 2020
- "Draeger Pulmotor", Wood Library-Museum of Anesthesiology
- "The Return of the Pulmotor as a 'Resuscitator': A Back-Step toward the Death of Thousands," by Yandell Henderson, December 1943, Science.
- It began with the Pulmotor: One Hundred Years of Artificial Ventilation by Ernst Bahns, published by Dräger Medical AG & Co. KG, Lübeck, Germany (original manufacturers of the Pulmotor).
| |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
