Jump to content

Talk:Game theory: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Game theory/Archive 3) (bot
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 8 WikiProject templates. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Gambling}}.
 
(37 intermediate revisions by 23 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{afd-merged-from|Political game theory|Political game theory|16 March 2016}}
{{Vital article|level=4|topic=Mathematics|class=C}}
{{Article history
{{Article history
|action1=PR
|action1=PR
Line 20: Line 18:
|currentstatus=FFA
|currentstatus=FFA
}}
}}
{{afd-merged-from|Political game theory|Political game theory|16 March 2016}}
{{Copied |from=Game theory |from_oldid=632113506 |to=Game design |diff=https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Game_design&diff=637880014&oldid=637862346 }}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Game theory|class=c|importance=top}}
{{WikiProject Game theory|importance=top}}
{{WikiProject Business|class=c|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Business|importance=Top}}
{{maths rating|frequentlyviewed=yes|vital=Y|class=c|importance=high|field=applied|portal=Y}}
{{WikiProject Mathematics|importance=high|portal=Y}}
{{WikiProject Economics|class=c|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Economics|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Gambling|class=c
{{WikiProject Gambling
<!-- B-Class checklist -->
<!-- B-Class checklist -->
<!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. -->|b1=no
<!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. -->|importance=mid|poker=yes|poker-importance=mid|needs-picture=}}
{{WikiProject Politics|importance=mid}}
<!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. -->|b2=yes
{{WikiProject Systems|importance=high|field=Operations research}}
<!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. -->|b3=yes
{{WikiProject Finance & Investment|importance=high}}
<!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. -->|b4=yes
<!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. -->|b5=yes
<!-- 6. The article presents its content in an appropriately accessible way. -->|b6=yes
|importance=mid|poker=yes|poker-importance=mid|needs-picture=}}
{{WikiProject Politics|class=c|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Systems|class=c|importance=high|field=Operations research}}
{{WikiProject Finance|class=c |importance=high}}
{{WP1.0|v0.5=pass|class=c|category=Math|VA=yes}}
}}
}}
{{Copied |from=Game theory |from_oldid=632113506 |to=Game design |diff=https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Game_design&diff=637880014&oldid=637862346 }}

{{annual readership}}
{{annual readership}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo=old(365d)
| algo=old(365d)
| archive=Talk:Game theory/Archive %(counter)d
| archive=Talk:Game theory/Archive %(counter)d
| counter=3
| counter=4
| maxarchivesize=75K
| maxarchivesize=75K
| archiveheader={{Automatic archive navigator}}
| archiveheader={{Automatic archive navigator}}
Line 52: Line 45:
{{Archive box|auto=yes}}
{{Archive box|auto=yes}}


==GT in epidemiology==
== Quantum game theory ==
In [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Game_theory&oldid=1044106617 this edit] I partially restored [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Game_theory&oldid=1044093326 this edit] which was reverted in [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Game_theory&oldid=1044095064 this edit]. A review article of the use of tool X in field Y is ''exactly'' the correct type of [[WP:RS]] to establish a claim of the form "X is a commonly used tool in Y field". I also added in coverage in the popular media for good measure. It certainly looks to me like game theory is used enough in epidemiology to warrant including a section about it in this article. The second half of the material that was reverted, in contrast, is [[WP:UNDUE]] focus on a single paper for inclusion in a general encyclopedia article on game theory, and I have not restored that. - [[User:Astrophobe|<span style="color:#ff69b4">'''Astrophobe'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Astrophobe|''talk'']]) 16:10, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Unless I'm looking the wrong place, the quantum game theory page is a bit bare (to say the least) but in any case, does anyone agree that it would be interesting if added here?
QGT is one of the more interesting and accessible topics in quantum theory.- 26/10/06 Paul

== "Perfect information and imperfect information" section ==

This seems to mix everything up. I'd suggest a rewrite like this, but I don't feel qualified to change it.

----
Perfect information and imperfect information
Main article: Perfect information

An important subset of sequential games consists of games of perfect information. A game is one of perfect information if all players know the moves previously made by all other players. Thus, only sequential games can be games of perfect information because players in simultaneous games do not know the actions of the other players. Interesting examples of perfect-information games include the ultimatum game and centipede game. Recreational games of perfect information games include chess, go and mancala.

Perfect information is often confused with complete information, which is a similar concept. See: (provide a link to one place where notion is discussed well...)

Most games studied in game theory are imperfect-information games. Many card games are games of imperfect information, such as poker or contract bridge. Games of incomplete information can be reduced, however, to games of imperfect information by introducing "moves by nature" (Leyton-Brown & Shoham

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on [[Game theory]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=804689862 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120505140924/http://www.cup.cam.ac.uk/asia/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=9780521872829 to http://www.cup.cam.ac.uk/asia/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=9780521872829

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 15:05, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

== Removal of Economics Sidebar ==


== Nobel Prizes ==
I think that the economics sidebar should be removed, since Game Theory doesn't seem to be primarily concerned with Economics. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Get Learnt|Get Learnt]] ([[User talk:Get Learnt#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Get Learnt|contribs]]) 05:33, 30 May 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


"As of 2014, with the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences going to game theorist Jean Tirole, eleven game theorists have won the economics Nobel Prize. John Maynard Smith was awarded the Crafoord Prize for his application of evolutionary game theory."
Yes I would be in agreement with you, there are much more approproate imagges. Fro exampel a symbolic depiction of the a network or the proziners Dilema.


I first met Game Theory in Apllied Mathematics II - Dynamic Programming <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Philipdc|Philipdc]] ([[User talk:Philipdc#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Philipdc|contribs]]) 12:46, 28 June 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
This is pretty out of date. If I'm not mistaken the 2016 and 2020 Nobel Prizes were awarded for work in Game Theory. If someone is able to confirm this understanding, I suggest an edit. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/131.217.255.209|131.217.255.209]] ([[User talk:131.217.255.209#top|talk]]) 23:57, 14 October 2021 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


== Introduction should mention John Nash ==
== ''(Non-)determinstic'': in terminology? ==


The introduction mentions von Neumann and Morgenstern, but doesn't mention John Nash or Nash equilibria. It probably should, though. [[User:Macoroni|Macoroni]] ([[User talk:Macoroni|talk]]) 19:37, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
I hesitate to add this, as I am not familiar with the usual terminology, but surely there is an important distinction, worth adding under ''[[Game_theory#Game_types|Game types]]'', between games whose course is entirely determined by the decisions of the players and those influenced by an element of chance. (This is of course not the same as [[Determinacy]] or a [[determined game]].) If added, it would also belong in [[Glossary of game theory]]. ''{{ping|David Eppstein}} since you just edited the article!'' [[User:PJTraill|PJTraill]] ([[User talk:PJTraill|talk]]) 14:28, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 06:11, 10 May 2024

Former featured articleGame theory is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on January 13, 2006.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 13, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
December 4, 2005Featured article candidatePromoted
March 18, 2008Featured article reviewDemoted
Current status: Former featured article


GT in epidemiology

[edit]

In this edit I partially restored this edit which was reverted in this edit. A review article of the use of tool X in field Y is exactly the correct type of WP:RS to establish a claim of the form "X is a commonly used tool in Y field". I also added in coverage in the popular media for good measure. It certainly looks to me like game theory is used enough in epidemiology to warrant including a section about it in this article. The second half of the material that was reverted, in contrast, is WP:UNDUE focus on a single paper for inclusion in a general encyclopedia article on game theory, and I have not restored that. - Astrophobe (talk) 16:10, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nobel Prizes

[edit]

"As of 2014, with the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences going to game theorist Jean Tirole, eleven game theorists have won the economics Nobel Prize. John Maynard Smith was awarded the Crafoord Prize for his application of evolutionary game theory."

This is pretty out of date. If I'm not mistaken the 2016 and 2020 Nobel Prizes were awarded for work in Game Theory. If someone is able to confirm this understanding, I suggest an edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.217.255.209 (talk) 23:57, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction should mention John Nash

[edit]

The introduction mentions von Neumann and Morgenstern, but doesn't mention John Nash or Nash equilibria. It probably should, though. Macoroni (talk) 19:37, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]