Talk:Game theory: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 06:11, 10 May 2024

Game theory is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on January 13, 2006.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 13, 2005	Peer review	Reviewed
December 4, 2005	Featured article candidate	Promoted
March 18, 2008	Featured article review	Demoted

Current status: Former featured article

Political game theory was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 16 March 2016 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Game theory. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Game theory Top‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Game theory, an attempt to improve, grow, and standardize Wikipedia's articles related to Game theory. We need your help! Join in \| Fix a red link \| Add content \| Weigh inGame theoryWikipedia:WikiProject Game theoryTemplate:WikiProject Game theorygame theory
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

Business Top‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mathematics High‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics
High	This article has been rated as High-priority on the project's priority scale.
	This was a selected article on the Mathematics Portal.

Economics High‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gambling: Poker Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamblingWikipedia:WikiProject GamblingTemplate:WikiProject GamblingGambling

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Poker (assessed as Mid-importance).

WikiProject Gambling To-do:

Current collaborations:

Improve an article to FA

Improve an article to A

Help with the Gambling articles needing attention.
Tag the talk pages of Gambling-related articles with the {{WikiProject Gambling}} banner.
The link to the Missouri gambling site is now out of date and needs to be updated.
Japan section reads as though it was written by the gambling industry - quotes of 160% returns are 'citation needed'.

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Systems High‑importance

	Systems science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the field of Operations research.

Finance & Investment High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Game theory was copied or moved into Game design with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4

This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

GT in epidemiology

In this edit I partially restored this edit which was reverted in this edit. A review article of the use of tool X in field Y is exactly the correct type of WP:RS to establish a claim of the form "X is a commonly used tool in Y field". I also added in coverage in the popular media for good measure. It certainly looks to me like game theory is used enough in epidemiology to warrant including a section about it in this article. The second half of the material that was reverted, in contrast, is WP:UNDUE focus on a single paper for inclusion in a general encyclopedia article on game theory, and I have not restored that. - Astrophobe (talk) 16:10, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nobel Prizes

"As of 2014, with the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences going to game theorist Jean Tirole, eleven game theorists have won the economics Nobel Prize. John Maynard Smith was awarded the Crafoord Prize for his application of evolutionary game theory."

This is pretty out of date. If I'm not mistaken the 2016 and 2020 Nobel Prizes were awarded for work in Game Theory. If someone is able to confirm this understanding, I suggest an edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.217.255.209 (talk) 23:57, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction should mention John Nash

The introduction mentions von Neumann and Morgenstern, but doesn't mention John Nash or Nash equilibria. It probably should, though. Macoroni (talk) 19:37, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{afd-merged-from|Political game theory|Political game theory|16 March 2016}}
-{{Vital article|level=4|topic=Mathematics|class=C}}
 {{Article history
 |action1=PR
@@ Line 20: / Line 18: @@
 |currentstatus=FFA
 }}
+{{afd-merged-from|Political game theory|Political game theory|16 March 2016}}
-{{Copied |from=Game theory |from_oldid=632113506 |to=Game design |diff=https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Game_design&diff=637880014&oldid=637862346 }}
+{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|vital=yes|1=
-{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
-{{WikiProject Game theory|class=c|importance=top}}
+{{WikiProject Game theory|importance=top}}
-{{WikiProject Business|class=c|importance=Top}}
+{{WikiProject Business|importance=Top}}
-{{maths rating|frequentlyviewed=yes|vital=Y|class=c|importance=high|field=applied|portal=Y}}
+{{WikiProject Mathematics|importance=high|portal=Y}}
-{{WikiProject Economics|class=c|importance=high}}
+{{WikiProject Economics|importance=high}}
-{{WikiProject Gambling|class=c
+{{WikiProject Gambling
 <!-- B-Class checklist -->
-<!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. -->|b1=no
+<!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. -->|importance=mid|poker=yes|poker-importance=mid|needs-picture=}}
+{{WikiProject Politics|importance=mid}}
-<!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. -->|b2=yes
+{{WikiProject Systems|importance=high|field=Operations research}}
-<!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. -->|b3=yes
+{{WikiProject Finance & Investment|importance=high}}
-<!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. -->|b4=yes
-<!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. -->|b5=yes
-<!-- 6. The article presents its content in an appropriately accessible way. -->|b6=yes
-|importance=mid|poker=yes|poker-importance=mid|needs-picture=}}
-{{WikiProject Politics|class=c|importance=mid}}
-{{WikiProject Systems|class=c|importance=high|field=Operations research}}
-{{WikiProject Finance|class=c |importance=high}}
-{{WP1.0|v0.5=pass|class=c|category=Math|VA=yes}}
 }}
+{{Copied |from=Game theory |from_oldid=632113506 |to=Game design |diff=https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Game_design&diff=637880014&oldid=637862346 }}
 {{annual readership}}
 {{User:MiszaBot/config
 | algo=old(365d)
 | archive=Talk:Game theory/Archive %(counter)d
-| counter=3
+| counter=4
 | maxarchivesize=75K
 | archiveheader={{Automatic archive navigator}}
@@ Line 52: / Line 45: @@
 {{Archive box|auto=yes}}
+==GT in epidemiology==
+In [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Game_theory&oldid=1044106617 this edit] I partially restored [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Game_theory&oldid=1044093326 this edit] which was reverted in [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Game_theory&oldid=1044095064 this edit]. A review article of the use of tool X in field Y is ''exactly'' the correct type of [[WP:RS]] to establish a claim of the form "X is a commonly used tool in Y field". I also added in coverage in the popular media for good measure. It certainly looks to me like game theory is used enough in epidemiology to warrant including a section about it in this article. The second half of the material that was reverted, in contrast, is [[WP:UNDUE]] focus on a single paper for inclusion in a general encyclopedia article on game theory, and I have not restored that. - [[User:Astrophobe|<span style="color:#ff69b4">'''Astrophobe'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Astrophobe|''talk'']]) 16:10, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
-== Quantum game theory ==
+== Nobel Prizes ==
-Unless I'm looking the wrong place, the quantum game theory page is a bit bare (to say the least) but in any case, does anyone agree that it would be interesting if added here?
-QGT is one of the more interesting and accessible topics in quantum theory.- 26/10/06 Paul
-== "Perfect information and imperfect information" section ==
-This seems to mix everything up. I'd suggest a rewrite like this, but I don't feel qualified to change it.
-----
-Perfect information and imperfect information
-Main article: Perfect information
-An important subset of sequential games consists of games of perfect information. A game is one of perfect information if all players know the moves previously made by all other players. Thus, only sequential games can be games of perfect information because players in simultaneous games do not know the actions of the other players. Interesting examples of perfect-information games include the ultimatum game and centipede game. Recreational games of perfect information games include chess, go and mancala.
-Perfect information is often confused with complete information, which is a similar concept. See: (provide a link to one place where notion is discussed well...)
-Most games studied in game theory are imperfect-information games. Many card games are games of imperfect information, such as poker or contract bridge. Games of incomplete information can be reduced, however, to games of imperfect information by introducing "moves by nature" (Leyton-Brown & Shoham
-== The first sentence is not good, and most of the intro is a real struggle ==
-I don't know this topic. The whole intro is very hard to follow for the uninitiated. And in the 1st sentence using the phrase "rational decision-makers" without links is so broad and sounds more philosophical than mathematical. Is that the nature of this thing, still very amorphous even after ~60 years?
-The 4th sentence would be a better start: "game theory applies to a wide range of behavioral relations, and is now an umbrella term for the science of logical decision making in humans, animals, and computers." But again, those three are very not equally "rational decision-makers" unless that distinction is made way more clear.
-I do not know this topic so I can't suggest how to improve it, except to say it direly needs clarity.  <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Gatfish|Gatfish]] ([[User talk:Gatfish#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Gatfish|contribs]]) 04:01, 17 September 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-: "Logical" and "rational" are both common words, and are synonyms.  The precise meaning of the words is explained in the body of the article, as one would expect.  Can you try to articulate further what you think is unclear/difficult/whatever about the first paragraph?  --[[User:Joel B. Lewis|JBL]] ([[User_talk:Joel_B._Lewis|talk]]) 11:20, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
-::Agree with Lewis. —[[User:Collective Loosers|Collective Loosers]] ([[User talk:Collective Loosers|talk]]) 16:12, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
+"As of 2014, with the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences going to game theorist Jean Tirole, eleven game theorists have won the economics Nobel Prize. John Maynard Smith was awarded the Crafoord Prize for his application of evolutionary game theory."
-== Behavioral game theory, decision-making, and rethinking the design of "economics and business" heading's content ==
+This is pretty out of date. If I'm not mistaken the 2016 and 2020 Nobel Prizes were awarded for work in Game Theory. If someone is able to confirm this understanding, I suggest an edit.  <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/131.217.255.209|131.217.255.209]] ([[User talk:131.217.255.209#top|talk]]) 23:57, 14 October 2021 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-This article needs to refer to (and link to) [[behavioral game theory]]. Behavioral game theory has grown from economics, but also the psychology of judgement and decision-making. It's basically game theory applied to human decision-making that includes considerations for bounded rationality, "natural" preferences, norms, etc. It's now used in everything from anthropology to resource management, hardly restricted to economics and business. In the "General and Applied Uses" > "Economics and Business" subheading of the article, behavioral economics is mentioned, but behavioral game theory is not, even though it's in the titles of several citations. The content itself under that heading has become fairly redundant with the rest of the article, and doesn't have much content specific to business or economics. Of course, since econ, sociology, psych, etc are all social sciences, there's going to be a decent amount of overlap and fuzziness of topics. Still, I'd suggest that
-. "Economics and Business" be reworked with some content that's specific to business and economics.
-. A "Decision-Making and Social Behavior" heading be added that includes some of the content from [[behavioral game theory]], links to it, and refers to it by name. Alternatively, the heading could just be "Behavioral Game Theory."
-[[Special:Contributions/174.52.240.90|174.52.240.90]] ([[User talk:174.52.240.90|talk]]) 20:56, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
+== Introduction should mention John Nash ==
-== Algorithmic Game Theory ==
+The introduction mentions von Neumann and Morgenstern, but doesn't mention John Nash or Nash equilibria. It probably should, though. [[User:Macoroni|Macoroni]] ([[User talk:Macoroni|talk]]) 19:37, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
-A very hot modern area of game theoretic research. Tied to econ AI and distributed algos. Lots of robust results. Should be mentioned in the article. [[Special:Contributions/2601:14D:4002:6D00:F557:B35D:C52A:CAD4|2601:14D:4002:6D00:F557:B35D:C52A:CAD4]] ([[User talk:2601:14D:4002:6D00:F557:B35D:C52A:CAD4|talk]]) 08:28, 29 January 2020 (UTC)