Talk:DNA sequencing: Difference between revisions
Harryboyles (talk | contribs) m removing unsupported parameters in WikiProject banners |
|||
(17 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
⚫ | |||
{{Vital article|topic=Biology|subpage=General|level=5|class=C}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Molecular Biology|importance=Low|genetics=yes|genetics-importance=Top|COMPBIO=yes|COMPBIO-importance=High|MCB=yes|MCB-importance=High}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Neuroscience |importance=Low}} |
||
{{WikiProject Computational Biology |class=C |importance=High}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Genetics |class=C |importance=Top}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Neuroscience}} |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
{{oldpeerreview|archive=1}} |
{{oldpeerreview|archive=1}} |
||
Line 22: | Line 18: | ||
{{archivebox|large=no|auto=long}} |
{{archivebox|large=no|auto=long}} |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | If this is possible that a DNA strand can be copied by tRNA mRNA and create a polypeptide sequence, and we know we can replicate it. over the years I have studied this subject and heard the some where someone is mapping the dna sequence of a human being as the dna is all similar obviously not the same or we would all be carbon copies of each other like the bits that make us tall short different eye colour ect. then why do we insist on hacking people open and mending holes in hearts etc if a sample of tissue can be replicated and grown on a mouse back for example how long will it be that it is a simple thing called copy and paste we use it all the time in computers copy the affected area and past a new bit back in this can be put in the form of an injection or hyper spray and as scar tissue is formed over an area of a wound it’s the body’s way of compensating for the loss of information to that area why can’t we do the same. |
||
== Media == |
|||
==Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment== |
|||
[[File:Sciences humaines.svg|40px]] This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between <span class="mw-formatted-date" title="2020-05-12">12 May 2020</span> and <span class="mw-formatted-date" title="2020-06-22">22 June 2020</span>. Further details are available [[Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Southern_Utah_University/BIOL_3060_Genetics_Lecture_(Summer_2020)|on the course page]]. Peer reviewers: [[User:Cstaheli|Cstaheli]]. |
|||
Adding images to the different ways of sequencing DNA could really help with understanding how they work. [[User:EliasMari|EliasMari]] ([[User talk:EliasMari|talk]]) 03:00, 26 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
==Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment== |
|||
[[File:Sciences humaines.svg|40px]] This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between <span class="mw-formatted-date" title="2021-03-29">29 March 2021</span> and <span class="mw-formatted-date" title="2021-06-04">4 June 2021</span>. Further details are available [[Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_Washington/Meso_and_Microfluidics_in_Chemical_Analysis_(Spring_Quarter_2021)|on the course page]]. Student editor(s): [[User:Shady2021|Shady2021]]. |
|||
==Wiki Education assignment: Zoology== |
|||
{{small|Above undated message substituted from [[Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment]] by [[User:PrimeBOT|PrimeBOT]] ([[User talk:PrimeBOT|talk]]) 19:45, 17 January 2022 (UTC)}} |
|||
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_Puerto_Rico/Zoology_(Spring) | assignments = [[User:Nanalpr|Nanalpr]] | start_date = 2023-01-30 | end_date = 2023-04-30 }} |
|||
==Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment== |
|||
[[File:Sciences humaines.svg|40px]] This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available [[Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Ohio_University/Writing_in_the_Life_Sciences_(Fall)|on the course page]]. Student editor(s): [[User:Krusec|Krusec]]. Peer reviewers: [[User:Krusec|Krusec]]. |
|||
<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by [[User:Nanalpr|Nanalpr]] ([[User talk:Nanalpr|talk]]) 02:22, 22 February 2023 (UTC)</span> |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | If this is possible that a DNA strand can be copied by tRNA mRNA and create a polypeptide sequence, and we know we can replicate it. over the years I have studied this subject and heard the some where someone is mapping the dna sequence of a human being as the dna is all similar obviously not the same or we would all be carbon copies of each other like the bits that make us tall short different eye colour ect. then why do we insist on hacking people open and mending holes in hearts etc if a sample of tissue can be replicated and grown on a mouse back for example how long will it be that it is a simple thing called copy and paste we use it all the time in computers copy the affected area and past a new bit back in this can be put in the form of an injection or hyper spray and as scar tissue is formed over an area of a wound it’s the body’s way of compensating for the loss of information to that area why can’t we do the same. |
||
== complaint == |
|||
==some history for you Noobs== |
|||
this section |
|||
back in 2007 or there bouts, a person called cinnamon colbert complained that the human genome hadn't actually been sequenced |
|||
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_sequencing#Microscopy-based_techniques |
|||
and this guy was mocked and jeered and reverted |
|||
well, today Nature , one of the most prestiqous scientific journals in the entire world, says, quote |
|||
seeems like you all owe colbert a big apology |
|||
quote |
|||
Fully finished genomes |
|||
Roughly one-tenth of the human genome remained uncharted when genomics researchers Karen Miga at the University of California, Santa Cruz, and Adam Phillippy at the National Human Genome Research Institute in Bethesda, Maryland, launched the Telomere-to-Telomere (T2T) consortium in 2019. Now, that number has dropped to zero. In a preprint published in May last year, the consortium reported the first end-to-end sequence of the human genome, adding nearly 200 million new base pairs to the widely used human consensus genome sequence known as GRCh38, and writing the final chapter of the Human Genome Project1. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/50.245.17.105|50.245.17.105]] ([[User talk:50.245.17.105#top|talk]]) 17:16, 4 February 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
is sort of clickbaitish: this is a dead method that has never actually worked very well if at all yet posters keep pumping it (not, IMO, hyperbole) |
|||
⚫ | editors, can't we do something about this ??? <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Cinnamon colbert|Cinnamon colbert]] ([[User talk:Cinnamon colbert#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Cinnamon colbert|contribs]]) 17:38, 30 December 2023 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
also, see the abstract to this article |
|||
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.06.24.497523v1 |
|||
==complaint== |
|||
you people are so out of touch |
|||
this section |
|||
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_sequencing#Sample_preparation |
|||
is really wierd; it just lists robots but comnpanies like Sage Science, Circulomics,etc et are not mentioned <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Cinnamon colbert|Cinnamon colbert]] ([[User talk:Cinnamon colbert#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Cinnamon colbert|contribs]]) 17:54, 30 December 2023 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== this article is getting longer, fancier, but not better== |
|||
I actually know something about DNA sequencing (I have done maxam gilbert, sanger, sequenase/sanger, minion, ilmn, pacbio) |
|||
and the article is just a mess |
|||
⚫ |
Latest revision as of 00:17, 19 May 2024
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
DNA sequencing received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 360 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
THE REPLICATION AND DETERMINATION OF DNA IN ITS RAW FORM.
[edit]If this is possible that a DNA strand can be copied by tRNA mRNA and create a polypeptide sequence, and we know we can replicate it. over the years I have studied this subject and heard the some where someone is mapping the dna sequence of a human being as the dna is all similar obviously not the same or we would all be carbon copies of each other like the bits that make us tall short different eye colour ect. then why do we insist on hacking people open and mending holes in hearts etc if a sample of tissue can be replicated and grown on a mouse back for example how long will it be that it is a simple thing called copy and paste we use it all the time in computers copy the affected area and past a new bit back in this can be put in the form of an injection or hyper spray and as scar tissue is formed over an area of a wound it’s the body’s way of compensating for the loss of information to that area why can’t we do the same.
Media
[edit]Adding images to the different ways of sequencing DNA could really help with understanding how they work. EliasMari (talk) 03:00, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Zoology
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 January 2023 and 30 April 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Nanalpr (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Nanalpr (talk) 02:22, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
complaint
[edit]this section https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_sequencing#Microscopy-based_techniques
is sort of clickbaitish: this is a dead method that has never actually worked very well if at all yet posters keep pumping it (not, IMO, hyperbole) editors, can't we do something about this ??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cinnamon colbert (talk • contribs) 17:38, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
complaint
[edit]this section https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_sequencing#Sample_preparation
is really wierd; it just lists robots but comnpanies like Sage Science, Circulomics,etc et are not mentioned — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cinnamon colbert (talk • contribs) 17:54, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- C-Class vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- C-Class Molecular Biology articles
- Low-importance Molecular Biology articles
- C-Class Genetics articles
- Top-importance Genetics articles
- WikiProject Genetics articles
- C-Class MCB articles
- High-importance MCB articles
- WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology articles
- C-Class Computational Biology articles
- High-importance Computational Biology articles
- WikiProject Computational Biology articles
- All WikiProject Molecular Biology pages
- C-Class neuroscience articles
- Low-importance neuroscience articles
- Old requests for peer review