Talk:La Grange Historic District (North Carolina)/GA1: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Latest revision as of 03:48, 20 May 2024

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: APK (talk · contribs) 09:36, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: 48JCL (talk · contribs) 00:48, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I am excited to review this article.

It is reasonably well written.

a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

It is factually accurate and verifiable.

a (reference section): I’m sorry, but the CN tag is an issue for a GAN.
- Fixed. APK hi :-) (talk) 05:22, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great! That’s a pass. 48JCL (talk • contribs) 16:57, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

b (citations to reliable sources): sources are reliable! Gov websites are working.
c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): This was so tedious to do but thats a pass

It is broad in its coverage.

a (major aspects): Contains major aspects.
b (focused): doesn’t really focus on minor aspects. So pass!

It follows the neutral point of view policy. Nice job! This article strives for the neutral point of view policy.

Fair representation without bias:

It is stable.

No edit wars, etc.: Pretty easy pass. Very few authors.

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): Yep, images are tagged, that’s a pass
b (appropriate use with suitable captions): Captions are fine, however, when you say, 130 South Caswell Stret is one of many commercial buildings in need of repair, do you mean street?

Recommend alt text. @APK

Overall: Pass/Fail:

Source Check

Forgot to add this! Pretty short article, took like 30 minutes. Passing!

Final comments

PASSING! But please add alt text lol @APK

Thank you very much. APK hi :-) (talk) 03:48, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 Hello! I am excited to review this article.
-{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:left"
+It is reasonably well written.
-|- style="vertical-align:top;"
+* a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
-! width="30" | Rate   <!-- Replace the question marks below with "y", "n", or nothing to change the assessment icon -->
+* b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
-! width="300"| [[WP:Good article criteria|Attribute]]
+It is factually accurate and verifiable.
-!            | Review Comment
+* a (reference section):  {{icon|ga}} I’m sorry, but the CN tag is an issue for a GAN.
-|- style="vertical-align:top;"
+** Fixed. [[User:APK|APK<span style="display:inline-block;transform:rotate(30deg)"> <span style="color: #000080;">'''hi :-)'''</span></span>]] ([[User talk:APK|<span style="color:#1a1a1a">talk</span>]]) 05:22, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
-| colspan="3" | '''1.''' {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1}}: <!-- Well written. Add comments to the ends of the lines below. -->
-<!-- The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct. -->
+:Great! That’s a pass. <span style="text-shadow:#000000 0px 1px 2px;">[[User:48JCL|<span style="color:#000000">'''48JCL'''</span>]] ([[User_talk:48JCL|<span style="color:#000000">talk</span>]] • [[Special:Contributions/48JCL|<span style="color:#000000">contribs</span>]])</span> 16:57, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
-{{GATable/item|1a|?|
+* b (citations to reliable sources): {{icon|ga}} sources are reliable! Gov websites are working.
-}}
+* c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism): {{icon|ga}} This was so tedious to do but thats a '''pass'''
-<!-- it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. -->
+It is broad in its coverage.
-{{GATable/item|1b|?|
+* a (major aspects): {{icon|ga}} Contains major aspects.
-}}
+* b (focused):  {{icon|ga}} doesn’t really focus on minor aspects. So pass!
-|- style="vertical-align:top;"
+It follows the neutral point of view policy. {{icon|GA}} Nice job! This article strives for the neutral point of view policy.
-| colspan="3" | '''2.''' {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2}}, as shown by a [[WP:GAN/I#R3|source spot-check]]: <!-- Verifiable. Add comments to the ends of the lines below (after |). -->
+* Fair representation without bias: {{icon|ga}}
-<!-- It provides references to all sources of information in the section(s) dedicated to the attribution of these sources according to the guide to layout. -->
+It is stable.
-{{GATable/item|2a|?|
+* No edit wars, etc.: {{icon|GA}} Pretty easy pass. Very few authors.
-}}
+It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
-<!-- All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines. -->
+* a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  {{icon|GA}} Yep, images are tagged, that’s a '''pass'''
-{{GATable/item|2b|?|
+* b (appropriate use with suitable captions): {{icon|GA}} Captions are fine, however, when you say, 130 South Caswell Stret is one of many commercial buildings in need of repair, do you mean street?
-}}
+<big>Recommend alt text. @[[User:APK|APK]]</big>
-<!-- It contains no original research. -->
-{{GATable/item|2c|?|
+Overall: {{icon|GA}}
-}}
+Pass/Fail: {{icon|GA}}
-<!-- It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism. -->
+===Source Check===
-{{GATable/item|2d|?|
+Forgot to add this! Pretty short article, took like 30 minutes. Passing!
-}}
-|- style="vertical-align:top;"
+=== Final comments ===
-| colspan="3" | '''3.''' {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3}}: <!-- Broad. Add comments to the ends of the lines below (after |). -->
+PASSING! But please add alt text lol @[[User:APK|APK]]
-<!-- Coverage. It addresses the [[Wikipedia:Out of scope|main aspects of the topic]]. -->
-{{GATable/item|3a|?|
+:Thank you very much. [[User:APK|APK<span style="display:inline-block;transform:rotate(30deg)"> <span style="color: #000080;">'''hi :-)'''</span></span>]] ([[User talk:APK|<span style="color:#1a1a1a">talk</span>]]) 03:48, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
-}}
-<!-- Focus. It stays [[Wikipedia:Article size|focused on the topic]] without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). -->
-{{GATable/item|3b|?|
-}}
-<!-- Neutral. Add comments to the end of the line below (after |). -->
-{{GATable/item|4|?|
-}}
-<!-- Stable. Add comments to the end of the line below (after |). -->
-{{GATable/item|5|?|
-}}
-|- style="vertical-align:top;"
-| colspan="3" | '''6.''' {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6}}: <!-- Images. Add comments to the ends of the lines below (after |). -->
-<!-- Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content. -->
-{{GATable/item|6a|pass|
-}}
-<!-- Images are [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images#Pertinence and encyclopedic nature|relevant]] to the topic, and have [[Wikipedia:CAP|suitable captions]]. -->
-{{GATable/item|6b|pass|
-}}
-<!-- Overall. Add comments to the end of the line below (after |). -->
-{{GATable/item|7|<!-- Replace this comment with your final assessment: "y" or "n" -->|
-}}
-|}