Talk:La Grange Historic District (North Carolina)/GA1: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Latest revision as of 03:48, 20 May 2024

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: APK (talk · contribs) 09:36, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: 48JCL (talk · contribs) 00:48, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I am excited to review this article.

It is reasonably well written.

a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

It is factually accurate and verifiable.

a (reference section): I’m sorry, but the CN tag is an issue for a GAN.
- Fixed. APK hi :-) (talk) 05:22, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great! That’s a pass. 48JCL (talk • contribs) 16:57, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

b (citations to reliable sources): sources are reliable! Gov websites are working.
c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): This was so tedious to do but thats a pass

It is broad in its coverage.

a (major aspects): Contains major aspects.
b (focused): doesn’t really focus on minor aspects. So pass!

It follows the neutral point of view policy. Nice job! This article strives for the neutral point of view policy.

Fair representation without bias:

It is stable.

No edit wars, etc.: Pretty easy pass. Very few authors.

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): Yep, images are tagged, that’s a pass
b (appropriate use with suitable captions): Captions are fine, however, when you say, 130 South Caswell Stret is one of many commercial buildings in need of repair, do you mean street?

Recommend alt text. @APK

Overall: Pass/Fail:

Source Check

Forgot to add this! Pretty short article, took like 30 minutes. Passing!

Final comments

PASSING! But please add alt text lol @APK

Thank you very much. APK hi :-) (talk) 03:48, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 :Great! That’s a pass. <span style="text-shadow:#000000 0px 1px 2px;">[[User:48JCL|<span style="color:#000000">'''48JCL'''</span>]] ([[User_talk:48JCL|<span style="color:#000000">talk</span>]] • [[Special:Contributions/48JCL|<span style="color:#000000">contribs</span>]])</span> 16:57, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
 * b (citations to reliable sources): {{icon|ga}} sources are reliable! Gov websites are working.
-* c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
+* c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism): {{icon|ga}} This was so tedious to do but thats a '''pass'''
 It is broad in its coverage.
-* a (major aspects):
+* a (major aspects): {{icon|ga}} Contains major aspects.
+* b (focused):  {{icon|ga}} doesn’t really focus on minor aspects. So pass!
-* b (focused):
 It follows the neutral point of view policy. {{icon|GA}} Nice job! This article strives for the neutral point of view policy.
-* Fair representation without bias:
+* Fair representation without bias: {{icon|ga}}
 It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.: {{icon|GA}} Pretty easy pass. Very few authors.
@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 * b (appropriate use with suitable captions): {{icon|GA}} Captions are fine, however, when you say, 130 South Caswell Stret is one of many commercial buildings in need of repair, do you mean street?
 <big>Recommend alt text. @[[User:APK|APK]]</big>
-Overall: {{icon|NRY}}
-Pass/Fail: {{icon|NRY}}
+Overall: {{icon|GA}}
+Pass/Fail: {{icon|GA}}
 ===Source Check===
 Forgot to add this! Pretty short article, took like 30 minutes. Passing!
+=== Final comments ===
+PASSING! But please add alt text lol @[[User:APK|APK]]
+:Thank you very much. [[User:APK|APK<span style="display:inline-block;transform:rotate(30deg)"> <span style="color: #000080;">'''hi :-)'''</span></span>]] ([[User talk:APK|<span style="color:#1a1a1a">talk</span>]]) 03:48, 20 May 2024 (UTC)