Talk:La Grange Historic District (North Carolina)/GA1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Final comments: cmt |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
<big>Recommend alt text. @[[User:APK|APK]]</big> |
<big>Recommend alt text. @[[User:APK|APK]]</big> |
||
Overall: {{icon| |
Overall: {{icon|GA}} |
||
Pass/Fail: {{icon| |
Pass/Fail: {{icon|GA}} |
||
===Source Check=== |
===Source Check=== |
||
Forgot to add this! Pretty short article, took like 30 minutes. Passing! |
Forgot to add this! Pretty short article, took like 30 minutes. Passing! |
||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
=== Final comments === |
=== Final comments === |
||
PASSING! But please add alt text lol @[[User:APK|APK]] |
PASSING! But please add alt text lol @[[User:APK|APK]] |
||
:Thank you very much. [[User:APK|APK<span style="display:inline-block;transform:rotate(30deg)"> <span style="color: #000080;">'''hi :-)'''</span></span>]] ([[User talk:APK|<span style="color:#1a1a1a">talk</span>]]) 03:48, 20 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 03:48, 20 May 2024
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: APK (talk · contribs) 09:36, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: 48JCL (talk · contribs) 00:48, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I am excited to review this article.
It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
- b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
I’m sorry, but the CN tag is an issue for a GAN.
- Fixed. APK hi :-) (talk) 05:22, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Great! That’s a pass. 48JCL (talk • contribs) 16:57, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- b (citations to reliable sources): sources are reliable! Gov websites are working.
- c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): This was so tedious to do but thats a pass
It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): Contains major aspects.
- b (focused): doesn’t really focus on minor aspects. So pass!
It follows the neutral point of view policy. Nice job! This article strives for the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.: Pretty easy pass. Very few authors.
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): Yep, images are tagged, that’s a pass
- b (appropriate use with suitable captions): Captions are fine, however, when you say, 130 South Caswell Stret is one of many commercial buildings in need of repair, do you mean street?
Recommend alt text. @APK
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Source Check
[edit]Forgot to add this! Pretty short article, took like 30 minutes. Passing!
Final comments
[edit]PASSING! But please add alt text lol @APK
- Thank you very much. APK hi :-) (talk) 03:48, 20 May 2024 (UTC)