Talk:Isotomic conjugate: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
math |
Dedhert.Jr (talk | contribs) start |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=| |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=start| |
||
{{maths rating}} }} |
{{maths rating}} }} |
||
Latest revision as of 14:20, 27 May 2024
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
The article says: "Isotomic conjugates of lines are circumconics (so that isotomic conjugates of circumconics are lines)." This text was taken from the Isogonal conjugates page, which makes the same claim for isogonal conjugates! Is the statement really true for both kinds of conjugates? Also, the main statement does not in itself logically imply the parenthetical statement, so the "so that" wording is misleading. Is the parenthetical statement true? 77.56.105.240 (talk) 17:10, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
The Circumconic and inconic page only talks about isogonal conjugates, not isotomic conjugates, so I have removed the above sentence for now. 77.56.105.240 (talk) 17:15, 18 November 2007 (UTC)