Jump to content

Betsygate: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Adding short description: "Political scandal in the United Kingdom" (Shortdesc helper)
Mehy19 (talk | contribs)
m Smear allegations: switched order of "by Vanessa Gearson" and "in January 2003"
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Political scandal in the United Kingdom}}
{{Short description|Political scandal in the United Kingdom}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=June 2013}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=January 2023}}
'''Betsygate''' was a [[political scandal]] in the United Kingdom while [[Iain Duncan Smith]] (IDS) was [[Leader of the Conservative Party (UK)|Leader of the Conservative Party]]. The scandal was over the level of pay that lain Duncan Smith's wife Elisabeth ("Betsy") enjoyed as her husband's [[diary secretary]].
'''Betsygate''' was a [[political scandal]] in the United Kingdom concerning the level of pay received by Elisabeth ("Betsy") Duncan Smith, the wife and [[diary secretary]] of the then [[Leader of the Conservative Party (UK)|Leader of the Conservative Party]], [[Iain Duncan Smith]].


==The allegation==
==The allegation==
Line 7: Line 7:


==The substance==
==The substance==
Rikki Radford, Iain Duncan Smith's constituency agent since 2002, allegedly denied that Mrs. Duncan Smith had fulfilled a professional role for her husband since he became party leader, saying: "I know for sure she doesn't . . . The bottom line is that she's his wife and she gets on with looking after the kids."<ref name="email">[https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1443987/Aides-email-warning-of-risk-to-IDS-triggered-investigation.html Aide's email warning of risk to IDS triggered investigation], Andrew Sparrow and [[Benedict Brogan]], ''[[The Daily Telegraph]]'' 13 October 2003</ref>
Rikki Radford, Iain Duncan Smith's constituency agent since 2002, allegedly denied that Mrs. Duncan Smith had fulfilled a professional role for her husband since he became party leader, saying: "I know for sure she doesn't ... The bottom line is that she's his wife and she gets on with looking after the kids."<ref name="email">{{cite news |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1443987/Aides-email-warning-of-risk-to-IDS-triggered-investigation.html |title=Aide's email warning of risk to IDS triggered investigation] |first1=Andrew |last1=Sparrow |first2=Benedict |last2=Brogan |author-link2=Benedict Brogan |newspaper=The Daily Telegraph |date=13 October 2003 |url-access=subscription}}</ref>


Furthermore, only one of 18 groups in Duncan Smith's constituency visited by him in 2002 allegedly recalled any contact with Mrs. Duncan Smith. A party official in the constituency and six Tory MPs also told the journalists that they saw no evidence of Mrs. Duncan Smith working for her husband during the 15-month period in question.<ref name="email"/>
Furthermore, only one of 18 groups in Duncan Smith's constituency visited by him in 2002 allegedly recalled any contact with Mrs. Duncan Smith. A party official in the constituency and six Tory MPs also told the journalists that they saw no evidence of Mrs. Duncan Smith working for her husband during the 15-month period in question.<ref name="email"/>


Crick's report was expected to go out on the Thursday before the Conservative Party conference but it was vetoed at the last minute by BBC executives, who were nervous about running the story for fear that the information had come from people with an interest in the downfall of IDS.<ref name="email"/> Crick was forced to first present his case to the accused for his comments, and then laid out the details of his investigation to the [[British House of Commons|House of Commons]] [[Committee on Standards and Privileges]], at the request of lawyers of IDS.<ref name=committee>[https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmstnprv/476/476.pdf Report], [[Committee on Standards and Privileges]], [[British House of Commons|House of Commons]], 2003</ref>
Crick's report was expected to go out on the Thursday before the Conservative Party conference but it was vetoed at the last minute by BBC executives, who were nervous about running the story for fear that the information had come from people with an interest in the downfall of IDS.<ref name="email"/> Crick was forced to first present his case to the accused for his comments, and then laid out the details of his investigation to the [[House of Commons of the United Kingdom|House of Commons]] [[Committee on Standards and Privileges]], at the request of lawyers of IDS.<ref name=committee>{{cite web |url=https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmstnprv/476/476.pdf |title=Conduct of Mr Iain Duncan Smith: Fourth Report of Session 2003–04 |publisher=[[House of Commons of the United Kingdom|House of Commons]] [[Committee on Standards and Privileges]] |date=2003}}</ref>


==Smear allegations==
==Smear allegations==
An email written by Vanessa Gearson in January 2003, who was working in Duncan Smith's office (and was the later Conservative candidate for [[Cheltenham (UK Parliament constituency)|Cheltenham]] at the [[2005 United Kingdom general election|2005 general election]]), expressed concern that the allowance might become the subject of a journalistic (newspaper or television) exposé — a copy of the email found its way to Crick's investigation. People close to Duncan Smith began attributing the leaking of the document to the party's Chief Executive [[Mark MacGregor]], as well as his close friend [[Robbie Gibb]], a ''Newsnight'' producer.<ref name="email"/>
An email written in January 2003 by Vanessa Gearson, who was working in Duncan Smith's office (and was later the Conservative candidate for [[Cheltenham (UK Parliament constituency)|Cheltenham]] at the [[2005 United Kingdom general election|2005 general election]]), expressed concern that the allowance might become the subject of a journalistic (newspaper or television) exposé. A copy of the email found its way to Crick's investigation. People close to Duncan Smith began attributing the leaking of the document to the party's Chief Executive [[Mark MacGregor]], as well as his close friend [[Robbie Gibb]], a ''Newsnight'' producer.<ref name="email"/>


==Investigations==
==Investigations==
A report from a Parliamentary watchdog cleared Duncan Smith of any wrongdoing: The Commissioner "found no evidence that Duncan Smith made improper claims under the Additional Costs Allowance in respect of his home". However, he found that a significant proportion of Mrs Duncan Smith's work, and that paid to Miss Annabelle Eyre and Mrs Christine Watson in their roles of Private Secretary to the Leader of the Opposition "would more appropriately have been funded out of Short Money than out of the Parliamentary Staffing Allowance. Nevertheless, it was accepted that there was an absence of definition of key terms meaning that members had no guidance to scope their two allowances. The Commons Standards Committee found that Duncan Smith's arrangements "were not ideal" and that no rules had been broken.<ref name=committee/>
A report from a Parliamentary watchdog cleared Duncan Smith of any wrongdoing: The Commissioner "found no evidence that Duncan Smith made improper claims under the Additional Costs Allowance in respect of his home". However, he found that a significant proportion of Mrs Duncan Smith's work, and that paid to Miss Annabelle Eyre and Mrs Christine Watson in their roles of Private Secretary to the Leader of the Opposition, "would more appropriately have been funded out of Short Money than out of the Parliamentary Staffing Allowance". Nevertheless, it was accepted that there was an absence of definition of key terms meaning that members had no guidance to scope their two allowances. The Commons Standards Committee found that Duncan Smith's arrangements "were not ideal" but that no rules had been broken.<ref name=committee/>


A January 2006 internal Party investigation exonerated MacGregor. Nevertheless, Duncan Smith laid the blame for his downfall completely at MacGregor's and Gearson's feet, and threatened to resign the party whip if either of them were ever again able to stand as Conservative candidates.<ref name="backlash">[https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1519431/Cameron-faces-backlash-over-Betsygate-officials.html Cameron faces backlash over 'Betsygate' officials], Brendan Carlin, ''The Daily Telegraph'' 26 May 2006</ref>
A January 2006 internal Party investigation exonerated MacGregor. Nevertheless, Duncan Smith laid the blame for his downfall completely at MacGregor's and Gearson's feet, and threatened to resign the party whip if either were ever again able to stand as Conservative candidates.<ref name="backlash">{{cite news |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1519431/Cameron-faces-backlash-over-Betsygate-officials.html |title=Cameron faces backlash over 'Betsygate' officials |first=Brendan |last=Carlin |newspaper=The Daily Telegraph |date=26 May 2006 |url-access=subscription}}</ref>


==References==
==References==

Latest revision as of 13:03, 30 May 2024

Betsygate was a political scandal in the United Kingdom concerning the level of pay received by Elisabeth ("Betsy") Duncan Smith, the wife and diary secretary of the then Leader of the Conservative Party, Iain Duncan Smith.

The allegation

[edit]

In May 2002, Michael Crick, an investigative journalist on the BBC Newsnight programme, initiated an investigation into the pay received by Mrs. Duncan Smith, and asserted that the pay was not commensurate with the duties she performed during the period from September 2001 to December 2002.

The substance

[edit]

Rikki Radford, Iain Duncan Smith's constituency agent since 2002, allegedly denied that Mrs. Duncan Smith had fulfilled a professional role for her husband since he became party leader, saying: "I know for sure she doesn't ... The bottom line is that she's his wife and she gets on with looking after the kids."[1]

Furthermore, only one of 18 groups in Duncan Smith's constituency visited by him in 2002 allegedly recalled any contact with Mrs. Duncan Smith. A party official in the constituency and six Tory MPs also told the journalists that they saw no evidence of Mrs. Duncan Smith working for her husband during the 15-month period in question.[1]

Crick's report was expected to go out on the Thursday before the Conservative Party conference but it was vetoed at the last minute by BBC executives, who were nervous about running the story for fear that the information had come from people with an interest in the downfall of IDS.[1] Crick was forced to first present his case to the accused for his comments, and then laid out the details of his investigation to the House of Commons Committee on Standards and Privileges, at the request of lawyers of IDS.[2]

Smear allegations

[edit]

An email written in January 2003 by Vanessa Gearson, who was working in Duncan Smith's office (and was later the Conservative candidate for Cheltenham at the 2005 general election), expressed concern that the allowance might become the subject of a journalistic (newspaper or television) exposé. A copy of the email found its way to Crick's investigation. People close to Duncan Smith began attributing the leaking of the document to the party's Chief Executive Mark MacGregor, as well as his close friend Robbie Gibb, a Newsnight producer.[1]

Investigations

[edit]

A report from a Parliamentary watchdog cleared Duncan Smith of any wrongdoing: The Commissioner "found no evidence that Duncan Smith made improper claims under the Additional Costs Allowance in respect of his home". However, he found that a significant proportion of Mrs Duncan Smith's work, and that paid to Miss Annabelle Eyre and Mrs Christine Watson in their roles of Private Secretary to the Leader of the Opposition, "would more appropriately have been funded out of Short Money than out of the Parliamentary Staffing Allowance". Nevertheless, it was accepted that there was an absence of definition of key terms meaning that members had no guidance to scope their two allowances. The Commons Standards Committee found that Duncan Smith's arrangements "were not ideal" but that no rules had been broken.[2]

A January 2006 internal Party investigation exonerated MacGregor. Nevertheless, Duncan Smith laid the blame for his downfall completely at MacGregor's and Gearson's feet, and threatened to resign the party whip if either were ever again able to stand as Conservative candidates.[3]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d Sparrow, Andrew; Brogan, Benedict (13 October 2003). "Aide's email warning of risk to IDS triggered investigation]". The Daily Telegraph.
  2. ^ a b "Conduct of Mr Iain Duncan Smith: Fourth Report of Session 2003–04" (PDF). House of Commons Committee on Standards and Privileges. 2003.
  3. ^ Carlin, Brendan (26 May 2006). "Cameron faces backlash over 'Betsygate' officials". The Daily Telegraph.
[edit]