Antibacterial soap: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m →Effectiveness: Clean up spacing errors around ref tags., replaced: /ref>T → /ref> T |
|||
| (45 intermediate revisions by 28 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Cleaning agents containing germ-killing chemicals}} |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
{{cs1 config|name-list-style=vanc}} |
|||
| ⚫ | '''Antibacterial soap''' is a [[soap]] which contains chemical ingredients that purportedly assist in killing bacteria.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm378393.htm#antibacterial |accessdate=16 April 2016 |title=FDA Taking Closer Look at 'Antibacterial' Soap |publisher=U.S. Food and Drug Administration}}</ref> The majority of antibacterial soaps contain [[triclosan]], though other chemical additives are also common.<ref name=Aiello>{{cite journal|vauthors=Aiello AE, Larson EL, Levy SB |title=Consumer Antibacterial Soaps: Effective or Just Risky? |journal=Clinical Infectious Diseases |volume=45 |issue=2 |date=September 2007 |pages=S137-47 |doi=10.1086/519255|url=https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/55477/1/Consumer%20antibacterial%20soaps%20Effective%20or%20just%20risky.web%202007%20aiello.pdf |pmid=17683018}}</ref> The effectiveness of products branded as being antibacterial has been disputed by some academics as well as the U.S. [[Food and Drug Administration]] (FDA).<ref name=Smith>{{cite web|url=http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/five-reasons-why-you-should-probably-stop-using-antibacterial-soap-180948078/?no-ist|title=Five Reasons Why You Should Probably Stop Using Antibacterial Soap|date=3 January 2014|work= |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | '''Antibacterial soap''' is a [[soap]] which contains chemical ingredients that purportedly assist in killing bacteria.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm378393.htm#antibacterial |accessdate=16 April 2016 |title=FDA Taking Closer Look at 'Antibacterial' Soap |publisher=U.S. Food and Drug Administration}}</ref> The majority of antibacterial soaps contain [[triclosan]], though other chemical additives are also common.<ref name=Aiello>{{cite journal|vauthors=Aiello AE, Larson EL, Levy SB |title=Consumer Antibacterial Soaps: Effective or Just Risky? |journal=Clinical Infectious Diseases |volume=45 |issue=2 |date=September 2007 |pages=S137-47 |doi=10.1086/519255|url=https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/55477/1/Consumer%20antibacterial%20soaps%20Effective%20or%20just%20risky.web%202007%20aiello.pdf |pmid=17683018|doi-access=free }}</ref> The effectiveness of products branded as being antibacterial has been disputed by some academics as well as the U.S. [[Food and Drug Administration]] (FDA).<ref name=Smith>{{cite web|url=http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/five-reasons-why-you-should-probably-stop-using-antibacterial-soap-180948078/?no-ist|title=Five Reasons Why You Should Probably Stop Using Antibacterial Soap|date=3 January 2014|work=Smithsonian Magazine|accessdate=3 September 2016}}</ref> |
||
==History== |
==History== |
||
The earliest antibacterial soap was [[carbolic soap]], which used up to 5% [[phenol]]s (carbolic acid). Fears about the safety of carbolic soaps chemical components on the skin brought about a ban on some of these chemical components.<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Oboh IO, Aluyor EO|title=A comparative study of a local plant extract as a possible potential medicated agent in the soap industry |journal=Global Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences |date=2011 |volume=17 |issue=3 |pages=345–348 |url=https://www.ajol.info/index.php/gjpas/article/view/78816 |issn=1118-0579}}</ref> |
The earliest antibacterial soap was [[carbolic soap]], which used up to 5% [[phenol]]s (carbolic acid). Fears about the safety of carbolic soaps chemical components on the skin brought about a ban on some of these chemical components.<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Oboh IO, Aluyor EO|title=A comparative study of a local plant extract as a possible potential medicated agent in the soap industry |journal=Global Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences |date=2011 |volume=17 |issue=3 |pages=345–348 |url=https://www.ajol.info/index.php/gjpas/article/view/78816 |issn=1118-0579}}</ref>[[Triclosan]] and other antibacterial agents have long been used in commercial cleaning products for hospitals and other healthcare settings, however they began to be used in home cleaning products during the 1990s.<ref name=Smith/> |
||
==Ingredients== |
|||
[[Triclosan]] and other antibacterial agents have long been used in commercial cleaning products for hospitals and other healthcare settings, however they began to be used in home cleaning products during the 1990s.<ref name=Smith/> |
|||
| ⚫ | [[Triclosan]] and [[triclocarban]] are the most common compounds used as antibacterials in soaps.<ref name="wp-ban">{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2016/09/02/fda-bans-some-antibacterial-soaps-and-body-washes/|title=FDA bans common ingredients in antibacterial soaps and body washes|date=2 September 2016|newspaper=Washington Post|accessdate=3 September 2016}}</ref> However, other common antibacterial ingredients in soaps include [[benzalkonium chloride]], [[benzethonium chloride]], and [[chloroxylenol]].<ref name=NPR>{{cite web|title=FDA Bans 19 Chemicals Used In Antibacterial Soaps |publisher=NPR |date=2 September 2016 |last = Kodjak | first = Alison | author-link= Alison Kodjak |url=https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2016/09/02/492394717/fda-bans-19-chemicals-used-in-antibacterial-soaps |accessdate=24 October 2017}}</ref> |
||
| ⚫ | |||
<ref>[https://naturalpuresoap.com/antibacterial-soaps-and-body-washes/ Antibacterial Soaps]</ref>==Ingredients== |
|||
| ⚫ | Claims that antibacterial soap is effective stem from the long-standing knowledge that triclosan can inhibit the growth of various bacteria, as well as some fungi.<ref name=Aiello/> However, more recent reviews have suggested that antibacterial soaps are no better than regular soaps at preventing illness or reducing bacteria on the hands of users.<ref name=Aiello/><ref name=FDA>{{cite web|url=https://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm378393.htm |accessdate=24 October 2017 |title=Antibacterial Soap? You Can Skip It, Use Plan Soap and Water |publisher=US FDA}}</ref> |
||
| ⚫ | [[Triclosan]] and [[triclocarban]] are the most common compounds used as antibacterials in soaps.<ref name="wp-ban">{{cite |
||
| ⚫ | In September 2016, the U.S. [[Food and Drug Administration]] banned the use of the common antibacterial ingredients triclosan and triclocarban, and 17 other ingredients frequently used in "antibacterial" soaps and washes, due to insufficient information on the long-term health effects of their use and a lack of evidence on their effectiveness. The FDA stated "There is no data demonstrating that over-the-counter antibacterial soaps are better at preventing illness than washing with plain soap and water".<ref name="NPR" /> The agency also asserted that despite requests for such information, the FDA did not receive sufficient data from manufacturers on the long-term health effects of these chemicals. This ban does not apply to [[hand sanitizer]].<ref name="wp-ban" /> This is due to the fact that hand sanitizer typically utilizes alcohol |
||
Some other antibacterial soap’s ingredients that are banned by FBA is Hexachlorophene, phenol greater than 1.5% and sodium oxychlorosene. Hexachlorophene has a number of side effect for skin such as skin dryness, redness and scaling while phenol can cause skin irritation. Likewise, sodium oxychlorosene ingredient contains in [https://naturalpuresoap.com/antibacterial-soaps-and-body-washes/ antibacterial soap] can cause skin allergy, redness, itching and Very bad skin irritation. |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | Claims that antibacterial soap is effective stem from the long-standing knowledge that triclosan can inhibit the growth of various bacteria, as well as some fungi.<ref name=Aiello/> However, more recent reviews have suggested that antibacterial soaps are no better than regular soaps at preventing illness or reducing bacteria on the hands of users.<ref name=Aiello/><ref name=FDA>{{cite web|url=https://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm378393.htm |accessdate=24 October 2017 |title=Antibacterial Soap? You Can Skip It, Use Plan Soap and Water |publisher=US FDA}}</ref> |
||
A 2017 statement by 200 scientists and medics published in the scientific journal Environmental Health Perspectives warns that anti-bacterial soaps and gels are useless and may cause harm.<ref name="pmid28632490">{{cite journal | vauthors = Halden RU, Lindeman AE, Aiello AE, Andrews D, Arnold WA, Fair P, Fuoco RE, Geer LA, Johnson PI, Lohmann R, McNeill K, Sacks VP, Schettler T, Weber R, Zoeller RT, Blum A | title = The Florence Statement on Triclosan and Triclocarban | journal = Environ Health Perspect | volume = 125 | issue = 6 | pages = 064501 | date = June 2017 | pmid = 28632490 | pmc = 5644973 | doi = 10.1289/EHP1788 }}</ref> The statement also cautioned against the use of antimicrobial agents in food contact materials, textiles, and paints.<ref name="pmid28632490"/> British firm Unilever claimed in 2017 to be phasing triclosan and triclocarban out of their products by the end of the year, adding they would be replaced by “a range of alternatives, including natural and nature-inspired antibacterial ingredients”.<ref name=Guardian>{{cite web|title=Antibacterial soaps may do more harm than good |work=The Guardian |date=27 June 2017 |last = Muanya | first = Chukwuma |url=https://guardian.ng/features/antibacterial-soaps-may-do-more-harm-than-good/ |accessdate=3 August 2022}}</ref> |
|||
| ⚫ | In September 2016, the U.S. [[Food and Drug Administration]] banned the use of the common antibacterial ingredients triclosan and triclocarban, and 17 other ingredients frequently used in "antibacterial" soaps and washes, due to insufficient information on the long-term health effects of their use and a lack of evidence on their effectiveness. The FDA stated "There is no data demonstrating that over-the-counter antibacterial soaps are better at preventing illness than washing with plain soap and water".<ref name="NPR" /> The agency also asserted that despite requests for such information, the FDA did not receive sufficient data from manufacturers on the long-term health effects of these chemicals. This ban does not apply to [[hand sanitizer]].<ref name="wp-ban" /> This is due to the fact that hand sanitizer typically utilizes alcohol |
||
| ⚫ | |||
Claims have been made in the media that antibacterial soap is more effective than plain soap in the prevention of the [[SARS-CoV-2]] virus. The CDC and the Food and Drug Administration both recommend plain soap; there is no evidence that antibacterial soaps are any better, and limited evidence that they might be worse long-term.<ref>{{cite web |author=Center for Drug Evaluation and Research |title=Q&A for Consumers: Hand Sanitizers and COVID-19 |url=https://www.fda.gov/drugs/information-drug-class/qa-consumers-hand-sanitizers-and-covid-19 |website=FDA |date=13 April 2020}}</ref> |
|||
A 2017 statement by 200 scientists and medics published in the scientific journal Environmental Health Perspectives warns that anti-bacterial soaps and gels are useless and may cause harm. The statement also cautioned against the use of antimicrobial agents in food storage containers, exercise mats and paints.<ref name="Antibacterial soaps">{{cite web |last1=Donelly |first1=Laura |title=Antibacterial soaps may do more harm than good, scientists warn |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/06/25/antibacterial-soaps-may-do-harm-good-scientists-warn/ |website=The Telegraph |accessdate=24 March 2019 |date=25 June 2007}}</ref>{{medical citation needed|date=April 2020}}<!--original paper?--> British firm Unilever claimed in 2017 to be phasing triclosan and triclocarban out of their products by the end of the year, adding they would be replaced by “a range of alternatives, including natural and nature-inspired antibacterial ingredients”. Many companies have already started using natural ingredients in their antibacterial products.<ref name="Antibacterial soaps and washes">{{cite web |title=Natural Antibacterial Soaps |url=https://skinseas.com/best-antibacterial-body-washes-soaps/ |website=Skin Seas |accessdate=24 November 2019}}</ref> |
|||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
* [[Antiseptic]] |
|||
{{Wikipedia books|Soap}} |
|||
*[[ |
* [[Disinfectant]] |
||
| ⚫ | |||
*[[Disinfectant]] |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
==References== |
==References== |
||
Latest revision as of 00:54, 1 June 2024
Antibacterial soap is a soap which contains chemical ingredients that purportedly assist in killing bacteria.[1] The majority of antibacterial soaps contain triclosan, though other chemical additives are also common.[2] The effectiveness of products branded as being antibacterial has been disputed by some academics as well as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).[3]
History
[edit]The earliest antibacterial soap was carbolic soap, which used up to 5% phenols (carbolic acid). Fears about the safety of carbolic soaps chemical components on the skin brought about a ban on some of these chemical components.[4]Triclosan and other antibacterial agents have long been used in commercial cleaning products for hospitals and other healthcare settings, however they began to be used in home cleaning products during the 1990s.[3]
Ingredients
[edit]Triclosan and triclocarban are the most common compounds used as antibacterials in soaps.[5] However, other common antibacterial ingredients in soaps include benzalkonium chloride, benzethonium chloride, and chloroxylenol.[6]
Effectiveness
[edit]Claims that antibacterial soap is effective stem from the long-standing knowledge that triclosan can inhibit the growth of various bacteria, as well as some fungi.[2] However, more recent reviews have suggested that antibacterial soaps are no better than regular soaps at preventing illness or reducing bacteria on the hands of users.[2][7]
In September 2016, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration banned the use of the common antibacterial ingredients triclosan and triclocarban, and 17 other ingredients frequently used in "antibacterial" soaps and washes, due to insufficient information on the long-term health effects of their use and a lack of evidence on their effectiveness. The FDA stated "There is no data demonstrating that over-the-counter antibacterial soaps are better at preventing illness than washing with plain soap and water".[6] The agency also asserted that despite requests for such information, the FDA did not receive sufficient data from manufacturers on the long-term health effects of these chemicals. This ban does not apply to hand sanitizer.[5] This is due to the fact that hand sanitizer typically utilizes alcohol to kill microbes rather than triclosan or similar ingredients.[citation needed]
A 2017 statement by 200 scientists and medics published in the scientific journal Environmental Health Perspectives warns that anti-bacterial soaps and gels are useless and may cause harm.[8] The statement also cautioned against the use of antimicrobial agents in food contact materials, textiles, and paints.[8] British firm Unilever claimed in 2017 to be phasing triclosan and triclocarban out of their products by the end of the year, adding they would be replaced by “a range of alternatives, including natural and nature-inspired antibacterial ingredients”.[9]
Claims have been made in the media that antibacterial soap is more effective than plain soap in the prevention of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The CDC and the Food and Drug Administration both recommend plain soap; there is no evidence that antibacterial soaps are any better, and limited evidence that they might be worse long-term.[10]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ "FDA Taking Closer Look at 'Antibacterial' Soap". U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Retrieved 16 April 2016.
- ^ a b c Aiello AE, Larson EL, Levy SB (September 2007). "Consumer Antibacterial Soaps: Effective or Just Risky?" (PDF). Clinical Infectious Diseases. 45 (2): S137-47. doi:10.1086/519255. PMID 17683018.
- ^ a b "Five Reasons Why You Should Probably Stop Using Antibacterial Soap". Smithsonian Magazine. 3 January 2014. Retrieved 3 September 2016.
- ^ Oboh IO, Aluyor EO (2011). "A comparative study of a local plant extract as a possible potential medicated agent in the soap industry". Global Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences. 17 (3): 345–348. ISSN 1118-0579.
- ^ a b "FDA bans common ingredients in antibacterial soaps and body washes". Washington Post. 2 September 2016. Retrieved 3 September 2016.
- ^ a b Kodjak A (2 September 2016). "FDA Bans 19 Chemicals Used In Antibacterial Soaps". NPR. Retrieved 24 October 2017.
- ^ "Antibacterial Soap? You Can Skip It, Use Plan Soap and Water". US FDA. Retrieved 24 October 2017.
- ^ a b Halden RU, Lindeman AE, Aiello AE, Andrews D, Arnold WA, Fair P, Fuoco RE, Geer LA, Johnson PI, Lohmann R, McNeill K, Sacks VP, Schettler T, Weber R, Zoeller RT, Blum A (June 2017). "The Florence Statement on Triclosan and Triclocarban". Environ Health Perspect. 125 (6): 064501. doi:10.1289/EHP1788. PMC 5644973. PMID 28632490.
- ^ Muanya C (27 June 2017). "Antibacterial soaps may do more harm than good". The Guardian. Retrieved 3 August 2022.
- ^ Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (13 April 2020). "Q&A for Consumers: Hand Sanitizers and COVID-19". FDA.