Talk:Expected goals: Difference between revisions
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Remove 1 deprecated parameter: importance. Tag: |
m Reverted 1 edit by 2A02:2121:305:DDD9:BF:F17D:8862:6EA5 (talk) to last revision by OpalYosutebito |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Old AfD multi |date=10 February 2018 |result='''keep''' |page=Expected Goals}} |
{{Old AfD multi |date=10 February 2018 |result='''keep''' |page=Expected Goals}} |
||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start| |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1= |
||
{{WikiProject Football |importance=Low}} |
{{WikiProject Football |importance=Low}} |
||
{{WikiProject Ice Hockey |
{{WikiProject Ice Hockey}} |
||
{{WikiProject Sports }} |
{{WikiProject Sports }} |
||
}} |
}} |
||
Latest revision as of 15:12, 3 June 2024
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 10 February 2018. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 August 2020 and 4 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): MJT027, Gagasantos.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:59, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Peer Review (Alex DaSilva)
[edit]The article thus far has good historical content for the title term, Expected Goals, but I would suggest a couple things. First, I would suggest dividing the article into sections, one of which would be the origin of the term as well as its application to soccer and hockey. Another section I would say to create is a calculation section in which formulas for expected goals are derived. Following this, a content box should be created with a more developed lead section at the beginning of the article. As for the current content, I would recommend using shorter quotations and/or summarize what data scientists have stated rather than actually quoting them. I also believe wikipedia frowns upon hyperlinks to outside sources, which you have for the Sarah Rudd paragraph. Then of course, add some images to finish up. Alexdasilva47 (talk) 13:29, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Alexdasilva47: Hi Alex, I think your points are largely correct. I've also added two equals signs to either side of your title to create a new section, just so you know how to do that next time. Alyo (chat·edits) 15:23, 9 November 2020 (UTC)