Template talk:US-writer-stub: Difference between revisions
Addition of code for categorization to "American writers" |
Tom.Reding (talk | contribs) m +{{WP Biography|a&e-work-group=yes}}, {{WPBS}}; cleanup |
||
(14 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell| |
|||
⚫ | Would it be possible to add content to the code that would automatically add stubbed items to [[:Category:American writers]]? That would be a helpful addition, obviating the need for a separate action at the time of article composition as a stub. [[User:Ceyockey|Courtland]] 04:18, 28 August 2005 (UTC) |
||
{{WikiProject Stub sorting}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Literature}} |
|||
{{WikiProject United States}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Biography|a&e-work-group=yes}} |
|||
}} |
|||
==Untitled== |
|||
⚫ | Would it be possible to add content to the code that would automatically add stubbed items to [[:Category:American writers]]? That would be a helpful addition, obviating the need for a separate action at the time of article composition as a stub. This would need to be a parameterized alteration so that the indexing term for the category is required at the time of stub template addition. [[User:Ceyockey|Courtland]] 04:18, 28 August 2005 (UTC) |
||
:I've never seen that done to other stubs, and I don't think it's desired behaviour. Once the stub has grown enough you are supposed to remove the stub tag and then you'd have to add <nowiki>[[Category:American writers|<whatever>]]</nowiki> to it anyway. Pluss if it's for example a novelist then <nowiki>[[Category:American novelists|<whatever>]]</nowiki> should be used instead and the American writers part becomes redundant contributing to bloading that category unnessesarily. It might be an idea to add the stub cat itself as a child of [[:Category:American writers]] though. That way people browsing for American writers will be more likely to find it. In fact I think I'll do that right now. --[[User:Sherool|Sherool]] 14:19, 28 August 2005 (UTC) |
|||
I think this template should refer to "American writers" instead of "US writers", just because that seems like a more grammatically correct way of stating nationality, and it seems to have become convention on Wikipedia. [[User:Andrea Parton|Andrea Parton]] 17:34, 12 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
==US -> U.S. per MoS== |
|||
The Wikipedia Manual of Style says that U.S. is preferred over US. Could someone please change the template to reflect this? [[User:Dismas|Dismas]]|[[User talk:Dismas|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 08:38, 25 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
==Request for change of template== |
|||
Since there is now a {{tl|US-poet-stub}} template, this template should say just "This article is about a United States writer", not "...about a United States writer or poet...". [[User:J. Finkelstein|J. Finkelstein]] 02:37, 18 May 2006 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 13:31, 6 June 2024
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Would it be possible to add content to the code that would automatically add stubbed items to Category:American writers? That would be a helpful addition, obviating the need for a separate action at the time of article composition as a stub. This would need to be a parameterized alteration so that the indexing term for the category is required at the time of stub template addition. Courtland 04:18, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
- I've never seen that done to other stubs, and I don't think it's desired behaviour. Once the stub has grown enough you are supposed to remove the stub tag and then you'd have to add [[Category:American writers|<whatever>]] to it anyway. Pluss if it's for example a novelist then [[Category:American novelists|<whatever>]] should be used instead and the American writers part becomes redundant contributing to bloading that category unnessesarily. It might be an idea to add the stub cat itself as a child of Category:American writers though. That way people browsing for American writers will be more likely to find it. In fact I think I'll do that right now. --Sherool 14:19, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
I think this template should refer to "American writers" instead of "US writers", just because that seems like a more grammatically correct way of stating nationality, and it seems to have become convention on Wikipedia. Andrea Parton 17:34, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
US -> U.S. per MoS
[edit]The Wikipedia Manual of Style says that U.S. is preferred over US. Could someone please change the template to reflect this? Dismas|(talk) 08:38, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
Request for change of template
[edit]Since there is now a {{US-poet-stub}} template, this template should say just "This article is about a United States writer", not "...about a United States writer or poet...". J. Finkelstein 02:37, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
- Template-Class Literature pages
- NA-importance Literature pages
- Template-Class United States pages
- NA-importance United States pages
- Template-Class United States articles of NA-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- Template-Class biography pages
- Template-Class biography (arts and entertainment) pages
- NA-importance biography (arts and entertainment) pages
- Arts and entertainment work group articles