Template talk:APNI: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Latest revision as of 23:14, 7 June 2024

Australia: Biota

	Australia portal APNI is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
	This template is supported by WikiProject Australian biota.

Plants

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant

Access date?

Wouldn't an "access date" parameter be useful here? Guettarda (talk) 15:49, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New APNI reference

Using the method given here no longer works. APNI has been changed.

Gderrin (talk) 07:58, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Links of the form https://id.biodiversity.org.au/name/apni/107189 seem to be preferred now. Unfortunately the numbering seems to have changed. Maybe the template should have a new attribute such as 'apni-id', which could be used to generate the new link. Attribute 'id' should be deprecated, and old usages slowly converted? Batternut (talk) 09:16, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Gderrin and Batternut: This is currently still working as a redirects, adding the alternative parameter for renumbering of pages, to bypass current push to their search page, is a good idea. Any reason we should not make this happen. cygnis insignis 06:43, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Cygnis insignis: I'm not knowledgeable enough to say but it sounds like a good idea. Thanks. Gderrin (talk) 06:50, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers. As a prompt to some one bolder, I wonder how transclusions I might break by editing this? cygnis insignis 07:42, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{WikiProject banner shell|
-{{WP Australia | biota = yes | class = NA}}
+{{WikiProject Australia| biota = yes}}
+{{WikiProject Plants}}
+}}
 ==Access date?==
 Wouldn't an "access date" parameter be useful here?  [[User:Guettarda|Guettarda]] ([[User talk:Guettarda|talk]]) 15:49, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
+== New APNI reference ==
+Using the method given here no longer works. APNI has been changed.
+[[User:Gderrin|Gderrin]] ([[User talk:Gderrin|talk]]) 07:58, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
+: Links of the form https://id.biodiversity.org.au/name/apni/107189 seem to be preferred now. Unfortunately the numbering seems to have changed. Maybe the template should have a new attribute such as 'apni-id', which could be used to generate the new link. Attribute 'id' should be deprecated, and old usages slowly converted? [[User:Batternut|Batternut]] ([[User talk:Batternut|talk]]) 09:16, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
+:: {{ping|Gderrin|Batternut}} This is currently still working as a redirects, adding the alternative parameter for renumbering of pages, to bypass current push to their search page, is a good idea. Any reason we should not make this happen. [[User talk:Cygnis insignis|cygnis insignis]] 06:43, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
+:: {{ping|cygnis insignis}} I'm not knowledgeable enough to say but it sounds like a good idea. Thanks. [[User:Gderrin|Gderrin]] ([[User talk:Gderrin|talk]]) 06:50, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
+:::Cheers. As a prompt to some one bolder, I wonder how transclusions I might break by editing this? [[User talk:Cygnis insignis|cygnis insignis]] 07:42, 28 August 2018 (UTC)