Jump to content

Szpiro's conjecture: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m References: Journal cites, Added 1 doi to a journal cite using AWB (10365)
 
(46 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Conjecture in number theory}}
In [[number theory]], '''Szpiro's conjecture''' concerns a relationship between the [[conductor of an elliptic curve|conductor]] and the [[discriminant of an elliptic curve|discriminant]] of an [[elliptic curve]]. In a general form, it is equivalent to the well-known [[abc conjecture]]. It is named for [[Lucien Szpiro]] who formulated it in the 1980s.
{{Infobox mathematical statement
| name = Modified Szpiro conjecture
| image =
| caption =
| field = [[Number theory]]
| conjectured by = [[Lucien Szpiro]]
| conjecture date = 1981
| first proof by =
| first proof date =
| open problem =
| known cases =
| implied by =
| equivalent to = [[abc conjecture]]
| generalizations =
| consequences = {{plainlist|
*[[Beal conjecture]]
*[[Faltings's theorem]]
*[[Fermat's Last Theorem]]
*[[Fermat–Catalan conjecture]]
*[[Roth's theorem]]
*[[Tijdeman's theorem]]}}
}}


In [[number theory]], '''Szpiro's conjecture''' relates to the [[conductor of an elliptic curve|conductor]] and the discriminant of an [[elliptic curve]]. In a slightly modified form, it is equivalent to the well-known [[abc conjecture|''abc'' conjecture]]. It is named for [[Lucien Szpiro]], who formulated it in the 1980s. Szpiro's conjecture and its equivalent forms have been described as "the most important unsolved problem in [[Diophantine analysis]]" by [[Dorian Goldfeld]],<ref name="Goldfeld-1996">{{cite journal |last=Goldfeld |first=Dorian | author-link=Dorian M. Goldfeld |year=1996 |title=Beyond the last theorem |journal=[[Math Horizons]] |volume=4 |issue=September |pages=26–34 |jstor= 25678079 |doi=10.1080/10724117.1996.11974985 }}</ref> in part to its large number of consequences in number theory including [[Roth's theorem]], the [[Faltings's theorem|Mordell conjecture]], the [[Fermat–Catalan conjecture]], and [[Brocard's problem]].<ref>{{cite journal | first1=Enrico | last1=Bombieri|author-link=Enrico Bombieri | title=Roth's theorem and the abc-conjecture | journal=Preprint | year=1994 | publisher=ETH Zürich }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Elkies |first=N. D. |author-link=Noam Elkies |title=ABC implies Mordell |journal= International Mathematics Research Notices|volume=1991 |year=1991 |pages=99–109 |doi=10.1155/S1073792891000144 |issue=7 |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Pomerance |first=Carl |author-link=Carl Pomerance |chapter=Computational Number Theory |title=The Princeton Companion to Mathematics |publisher=[[Princeton University Press]] |year=2008 |pages=361–362 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |first=Andrzej |last=Dąbrowski |title=On the diophantine equation ''x''! + ''A'' = ''y''<sup>2</sup> | journal=Nieuw Archief voor Wiskunde, IV. |volume=14 |pages=321–324 |year=1996 | zbl=0876.11015 }}</ref>
The conjecture states that: given &epsilon; &gt; 0, there exists a constant ''C''(&epsilon;) such that for any elliptic curve ''E'' defined over '''Q''' with minimal discriminant &Delta; and conductor ''f'', we have


==Original statement==
:<math> \vert\Delta\vert \leq C(\varepsilon ) \cdot f^{6+\varepsilon }. \, </math>
The conjecture states that: given &epsilon; &gt; 0, there exists a constant ''C''(&epsilon;) such that for any elliptic curve ''E'' defined over '''Q''' with minimal discriminant &Delta; and conductor ''f'',


:<math> \vert\Delta\vert \leq C(\varepsilon ) \cdot f^{6+\varepsilon }. </math>
The '''modified Szpiro conjecture''' states that: given &epsilon; &gt; 0, there exists a constant ''C''(&epsilon;) such that for any elliptic curve ''E'' defined over '''Q''' with invariants ''c''<sub>4</sub>, ''c''<sub>6</sub> and conductor ''f'' (see [[Tate's algorithm#Notation]]), we have


==Modified Szpiro conjecture==
:<math> \max\{\vert c_4\vert^3,\vert c_6\vert^2\} \leq C(\varepsilon )\cdot f^{6+\varepsilon }. \, </math>
The '''modified Szpiro conjecture''' states that: given &epsilon; &gt; 0, there exists a constant ''C''(&epsilon;) such that for any elliptic curve ''E'' defined over '''Q''' with invariants ''c''<sub>4</sub>, ''c''<sub>6</sub> and conductor ''f'' (using [[Tate's algorithm#Notation|notation from Tate's algorithm]]),


:<math> \max\{\vert c_4\vert^3,\vert c_6\vert^2\} \leq C(\varepsilon )\cdot f^{6+\varepsilon }. </math>
==References==
* {{citation |first=S. |last=Lang |authorlink=Serge Lang |title=Survey of Diophantine geometry |publisher=[[Springer-Verlag]] |location=Berlin |year=1997 |isbn=3-540-61223-8 | zbl=0869.11051 | page=51 }}
* {{citation |first=L. |last=Szpiro |title=Seminaire sur les pinceaux des courbes de genre au moins deux |journal=Astérisque |volume=86 |issue=3 |year=1981 | zbl=0463.00009 | pages=44–78 }}
* {{citation |first=L. |last=Szpiro |title=Présentation de la théorie d'Arakelov |journal=Contemp. Math. |volume=67 |year=1987 | zbl=0634.14012 | pages=279–293 |doi=10.1090/conm/067/902599}}


===''abc'' conjecture===
[[Category:Conjectures]]
The [[Abc conjecture|''abc'' conjecture]] originated as the outcome of attempts by [[Joseph Oesterlé]] and [[David Masser]] to understand Szpiro's conjecture,<ref>{{citation|title=Arithmetic deformation theory via arithmetic fundamental groups and nonarchimedean theta functions, notes on the work of Shinichi Mochizuki|journal= European Journal of Mathematics|first=Ivan|last=Fesenko|volume=1 |issue=3| pages=405–440 | year=2015 |url=https://www.maths.nottingham.ac.uk/personal/ibf/notesoniut.pdf |doi=10.1007/s40879-015-0066-0|doi-access=free}}.</ref> and was then shown to be equivalent to the modified Szpiro's conjecture.<ref>{{Citation | last1=Oesterlé | first1=Joseph | author-link=Joseph Oesterlé | title=Nouvelles approches du "théorème" de Fermat | url= http://www.numdam.org/item?id=SB_1987-1988__30__165_0 | series=Séminaire Bourbaki exp 694 |mr=992208 | year=1988 | journal=Astérisque | issn=0303-1179 | issue=161 | pages=165–186}}</ref>
[[Category:Number theory]]


==Consequences==
{{further|abc conjecture#Some consequences}}
Szpiro's conjecture and its modified form are known to imply several important mathematical results and conjectures, including [[Roth's theorem]],<ref>{{cite book |doi=10.1007/978-3-0348-0859-0_13|chapter=Lecture on the abc Conjecture and Some of Its Consequences|title=Mathematics in the 21st Century|series=Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics|year=2015|last1=Waldschmidt|first1=Michel|volume=98|pages=211–230|isbn=978-3-0348-0858-3|chapter-url=https://webusers.imj-prg.fr/~michel.waldschmidt/articles/pdf/abcLahoreProceedings.pdf}}</ref> [[Faltings's theorem]],<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Elkies |first=N. D. |author-link=Noam Elkies |title=ABC implies Mordell |journal= International Mathematics Research Notices|volume=1991 |year=1991 |pages=99–109 |doi=10.1155/S1073792891000144 |issue=7 |doi-access= free}}</ref> [[Fermat–Catalan conjecture]],<ref>{{Cite book |last=Pomerance |first=Carl |author-link=Carl Pomerance |chapter=Computational Number Theory |title=The Princeton Companion to Mathematics |publisher=Princeton University Press |year=2008 |pages=361–362 }}</ref> and a negative solution to the [[Erdős–Ulam problem]].<ref>
{{citation
| last1 = Pasten | first1 = Hector
| doi = 10.1007/s00605-016-0973-2
| issue = 1
| journal = [[Monatshefte für Mathematik]]
| mr = 3592123
| pages = 99–126
| title = Definability of Frobenius orbits and a result on rational distance sets
| volume = 182
| year = 2017| s2cid = 7805117
}}
</ref>


==Claimed proofs==
{{Main|abc conjecture#Claimed proofs}}

In August 2012, [[Shinichi Mochizuki]] claimed a proof of Szpiro's conjecture by developing a new theory called [[inter-universal Teichmüller theory]] (IUTT).<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Ball |first1=Peter |date= 10 September 2012|title=Proof claimed for deep connection between primes |url=https://www.nature.com/news/proof-claimed-for-deep-connection-between-primes-1.11378 |journal=Nature |doi=10.1038/nature.2012.11378 |access-date=19 April 2020|doi-access=free }}</ref> However, the papers have not been accepted by the mathematical community as providing a proof of the conjecture,<ref>{{cite magazine|magazine=[[New Scientist]]|title=Baffling ABC maths proof now has impenetrable 300-page 'summary'|url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/2146647-baffling-abc-maths-proof-now-has-impenetrable-300-page-summary/|first=Timothy|last=Revell|date=September 7, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://mathbabe.org/2015/12/15/notes-on-the-oxford-iut-workshop-by-brian-conrad/ |first = Brian |last=Conrad |author-link=Brian Conrad| date=December 15, 2015 | title=Notes on the Oxford IUT workshop by Brian Conrad | access-date=March 18, 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Castelvecchi |first1=Davide |date=8 October 2015 |title=The biggest mystery in mathematics: Shinichi Mochizuki and the impenetrable proof |journal=Nature |volume=526 |issue= 7572|pages=178–181 |doi=10.1038/526178a |bibcode=2015Natur.526..178C |pmid=26450038|doi-access=free }}</ref> with [[Peter Scholze]] and [[Jakob Stix]] concluding in March 2018 that the gap was "so severe that … small modifications will not rescue the proof strategy".<ref>
{{ cite web | url=http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~motizuki/SS2018-08.pd | title=Why abc is still a conjecture
|first1= Peter |last1= Scholze |author-link1= Peter Scholze
|first2= Jakob |last2= Stix |author-link2= Jakob Stix
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200208075321/http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~motizuki/SS2018-08.pdf|archive-date=February 8, 2020|url-status=dead}} (updated version of their [http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~motizuki/SS2018-05.pdf May report]|)</ref><ref>{{cite magazine|url=https://www.quantamagazine.org/titans-of-mathematics-clash-over-epic-proof-of-abc-conjecture-20180920/ |title=Titans of Mathematics Clash Over Epic Proof of ABC Conjecture |magazine= [[Quanta Magazine]] |date=September 20, 2018 |first= Erica |last= Klarreich |author-link= Erica Klarreich }}</ref><ref>{{ cite web | url=http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~motizuki/IUTch-discussions-2018-03.html | title=March 2018 Discussions on IUTeich | access-date=October 2, 2018 }} Web-page by Mochizuki describing discussions and linking consequent publications and supplementary material</ref>

==See also==
* [[Arakelov theory]]

==References==
{{Reflist}}

==Bibliography==
* {{citation |first=S. |last=Lang |author-link=Serge Lang |title=Survey of Diophantine geometry |publisher=[[Springer-Verlag]] |location=Berlin |year=1997 |isbn=3-540-61223-8 | zbl=0869.11051 | page=51| url={{Google books|title=Encyclopedia of Mathematical Science vol.60|b9RqCQAAQBAJ|page=51|plainurl=yes}}}}
* {{Cite book|first=L. |last=Szpiro |title=Seminaire sur les pinceaux des courbes de genre au moins deux|chapter=Propriétés numériques du faisceau dualisant rélatif|series=Astérisque |volume=86 |issue=3 |year=1981 | zbl=0517.14006 | pages=44–78|url=http://www.numdam.org/item/AST_1981__86__R1_0.pdf }}
* {{citation |first=L. |last=Szpiro |title=Présentation de la théorie d'Arakelov |journal=Contemp. Math. |series=Contemporary Mathematics |volume=67 |year=1987 | zbl=0634.14012 | pages=279–293 |doi=10.1090/conm/067/902599|isbn=9780821850749 }}

[[Category:Conjectures]]
[[Category:Unsolved problems in number theory]]
[[Category:Abc conjecture]]
{{numtheory-stub}}
{{numtheory-stub}}

Latest revision as of 07:49, 9 June 2024

Modified Szpiro conjecture
FieldNumber theory
Conjectured byLucien Szpiro
Conjectured in1981
Equivalent toabc conjecture
Consequences

In number theory, Szpiro's conjecture relates to the conductor and the discriminant of an elliptic curve. In a slightly modified form, it is equivalent to the well-known abc conjecture. It is named for Lucien Szpiro, who formulated it in the 1980s. Szpiro's conjecture and its equivalent forms have been described as "the most important unsolved problem in Diophantine analysis" by Dorian Goldfeld,[1] in part to its large number of consequences in number theory including Roth's theorem, the Mordell conjecture, the Fermat–Catalan conjecture, and Brocard's problem.[2][3][4][5]

Original statement

[edit]

The conjecture states that: given ε > 0, there exists a constant C(ε) such that for any elliptic curve E defined over Q with minimal discriminant Δ and conductor f,

Modified Szpiro conjecture

[edit]

The modified Szpiro conjecture states that: given ε > 0, there exists a constant C(ε) such that for any elliptic curve E defined over Q with invariants c4, c6 and conductor f (using notation from Tate's algorithm),

abc conjecture

[edit]

The abc conjecture originated as the outcome of attempts by Joseph Oesterlé and David Masser to understand Szpiro's conjecture,[6] and was then shown to be equivalent to the modified Szpiro's conjecture.[7]

Consequences

[edit]

Szpiro's conjecture and its modified form are known to imply several important mathematical results and conjectures, including Roth's theorem,[8] Faltings's theorem,[9] Fermat–Catalan conjecture,[10] and a negative solution to the Erdős–Ulam problem.[11]

Claimed proofs

[edit]

In August 2012, Shinichi Mochizuki claimed a proof of Szpiro's conjecture by developing a new theory called inter-universal Teichmüller theory (IUTT).[12] However, the papers have not been accepted by the mathematical community as providing a proof of the conjecture,[13][14][15] with Peter Scholze and Jakob Stix concluding in March 2018 that the gap was "so severe that … small modifications will not rescue the proof strategy".[16][17][18]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Goldfeld, Dorian (1996). "Beyond the last theorem". Math Horizons. 4 (September): 26–34. doi:10.1080/10724117.1996.11974985. JSTOR 25678079.
  2. ^ Bombieri, Enrico (1994). "Roth's theorem and the abc-conjecture". Preprint. ETH Zürich.
  3. ^ Elkies, N. D. (1991). "ABC implies Mordell". International Mathematics Research Notices. 1991 (7): 99–109. doi:10.1155/S1073792891000144.
  4. ^ Pomerance, Carl (2008). "Computational Number Theory". The Princeton Companion to Mathematics. Princeton University Press. pp. 361–362.
  5. ^ Dąbrowski, Andrzej (1996). "On the diophantine equation x! + A = y2". Nieuw Archief voor Wiskunde, IV. 14: 321–324. Zbl 0876.11015.
  6. ^ Fesenko, Ivan (2015), "Arithmetic deformation theory via arithmetic fundamental groups and nonarchimedean theta functions, notes on the work of Shinichi Mochizuki" (PDF), European Journal of Mathematics, 1 (3): 405–440, doi:10.1007/s40879-015-0066-0.
  7. ^ Oesterlé, Joseph (1988), "Nouvelles approches du "théorème" de Fermat", Astérisque, Séminaire Bourbaki exp 694 (161): 165–186, ISSN 0303-1179, MR 0992208
  8. ^ Waldschmidt, Michel (2015). "Lecture on the abc Conjecture and Some of Its Consequences" (PDF). Mathematics in the 21st Century. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics. Vol. 98. pp. 211–230. doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-0859-0_13. ISBN 978-3-0348-0858-3.
  9. ^ Elkies, N. D. (1991). "ABC implies Mordell". International Mathematics Research Notices. 1991 (7): 99–109. doi:10.1155/S1073792891000144.
  10. ^ Pomerance, Carl (2008). "Computational Number Theory". The Princeton Companion to Mathematics. Princeton University Press. pp. 361–362.
  11. ^ Pasten, Hector (2017), "Definability of Frobenius orbits and a result on rational distance sets", Monatshefte für Mathematik, 182 (1): 99–126, doi:10.1007/s00605-016-0973-2, MR 3592123, S2CID 7805117
  12. ^ Ball, Peter (10 September 2012). "Proof claimed for deep connection between primes". Nature. doi:10.1038/nature.2012.11378. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  13. ^ Revell, Timothy (September 7, 2017). "Baffling ABC maths proof now has impenetrable 300-page 'summary'". New Scientist.
  14. ^ Conrad, Brian (December 15, 2015). "Notes on the Oxford IUT workshop by Brian Conrad". Retrieved March 18, 2018.
  15. ^ Castelvecchi, Davide (8 October 2015). "The biggest mystery in mathematics: Shinichi Mochizuki and the impenetrable proof". Nature. 526 (7572): 178–181. Bibcode:2015Natur.526..178C. doi:10.1038/526178a. PMID 26450038.
  16. ^ Scholze, Peter; Stix, Jakob. "Why abc is still a conjecture" (PDF). Archived from the original on February 8, 2020. (updated version of their May report|)
  17. ^ Klarreich, Erica (September 20, 2018). "Titans of Mathematics Clash Over Epic Proof of ABC Conjecture". Quanta Magazine.
  18. ^ "March 2018 Discussions on IUTeich". Retrieved October 2, 2018. Web-page by Mochizuki describing discussions and linking consequent publications and supplementary material

Bibliography

[edit]