Jump to content

Talk:Hartebeest: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
VoxelBot (talk | contribs)
Updating Article history
add angola
 
(32 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Article history
{{British English}}

{{ArticleHistory
|action1=GAN
|action1=GAN
|action1date=23:28, 10 February 2013
|action1date=23:28, 10 February 2013
Line 13: Line 11:
|action2result=not promoted
|action2result=not promoted
|action2oldid=553920743
|action2oldid=553920743
|currentstatus=GA
|topic=biology}}
{{MaTalk|importance=low|class=GA}}
{{AfricaProject|Tanzania=yes|Tanzania-importance=Top|importance=Top|class=GA|Angola-importance=Top}}


|action3=FAC
[[/1]]
|action3date=2016-04-08
|action3link=Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Hartebeest/archive2
|action3result=promoted
|action3oldid=714119238

|currentstatus=FA
|maindate=8 March 2022
|topic=biology
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=FA|
{{WikiProject Mammals|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Africa|Tanzania=yes|Tanzania-importance=Top|importance=Top|Angola-importance=Top|Botswana=yes|Botswana-importance=High|Angola=yes}}
}}
{{British English}}
{{archive box|auto=yes}}

== Some author citations are incorrect ==


I noticed several mistakes w.r.t author citations. I can't check all of them right now, but remember that parentheses around an author citation mean that it was originally described in a different genus and also that the author does not change (other than the parentheses) when the genus is transferred.
{{Talk:Hartebeest/GA1}}


For instance, in the synonyms:
==Standing to 1m?==
* ''Antilope buselaphus'' {{small|Pallas, 1766}}
* ''Antilope bubalis'' {{small|Pallas, 1767}}
Since Pallas described them in the genus ''Antilope'', there should be no parentheses.


* ''B. buselaphus'' would have the author citation {{small|(Pallas, 1766)}}, maybe {{small|(Pallas, 1766) Lichtenstein, 1814}} but certainly not just {{small|(Lichtenstein, 1814)}}
"Hartebeest stand to a bit over 1 m (3.3 ft)."


For the subspecies
What does this mean? That an adult male stands about 1m at the shoulder, perhaps? And why standing to? [[User:Chiswick Chap|Chiswick Chap]] ([[User talk:Chiswick Chap|talk]]) 07:50, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
* ''A. b. cokii'' {{small|Günther, 1884}} — parentheses are incorrect as Günther described it as ''Alcelaphus cokii'', i.e., within the same genus.
:While it had already been specified to mean "at the shoulder" in one instance, I specified it for the other as well. The "stand to" is just a stylistic choice. A similar stylistic choice is used in the featured article [[Cougar]]. <font face="webdings"><font color="#007FFF">ö</font></font><font face="segoe script">[[User:Brambleberry of RiverClan|<font color="dodgerblue">Brambleberry</font>]] [[User talk:Brambleberry of RiverClan|<font color="#9C9C9C">of</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Brambleberry of RiverClan|<font color="dodgerblue">RiverClan</font>]]</font> 21:30, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
* ''A. b. tora'' {{small|Gray, 1873}} also should not have parentheses.


:: Thanks for reply. [[User:Chiswick Chap|Chiswick Chap]] ([[User talk:Chiswick Chap|talk]]) 21:37, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
[[User:Umimmak|Umimmak]] ([[User talk:Umimmak|talk]]) 02:07, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 20:21, 11 June 2024

Featured articleHartebeest is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 8, 2022.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 10, 2013Good article nomineeListed
May 9, 2013Featured article candidateNot promoted
April 8, 2016Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

Some author citations are incorrect

[edit]

I noticed several mistakes w.r.t author citations. I can't check all of them right now, but remember that parentheses around an author citation mean that it was originally described in a different genus and also that the author does not change (other than the parentheses) when the genus is transferred.

For instance, in the synonyms:

  • Antilope buselaphus Pallas, 1766
  • Antilope bubalis Pallas, 1767

Since Pallas described them in the genus Antilope, there should be no parentheses.

  • B. buselaphus would have the author citation (Pallas, 1766), maybe (Pallas, 1766) Lichtenstein, 1814 but certainly not just (Lichtenstein, 1814)

For the subspecies

  • A. b. cokii Günther, 1884 — parentheses are incorrect as Günther described it as Alcelaphus cokii, i.e., within the same genus.
  • A. b. tora Gray, 1873 also should not have parentheses.

Umimmak (talk) 02:07, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]