Jump to content

Talk:Hartebeest: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
AnomieBOT (talk | contribs)
add angola
 
(29 intermediate revisions by 19 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Article history
{{British English}}

{{ArticleHistory
|action1=GAN
|action1=GAN
|action1date=23:28, 10 February 2013
|action1date=23:28, 10 February 2013
Line 13: Line 11:
|action2result=not promoted
|action2result=not promoted
|action2oldid=553920743
|action2oldid=553920743
|currentstatus=GA
|topic=biology}}
{{WikiProject Mammals|importance=low|class=GA}}
{{AfricaProject|Tanzania=yes|Tanzania-importance=Top|importance=Top|class=GA|Angola-importance=Top}}


|action3=FAC
[[/1]]
|action3date=2016-04-08
|action3link=Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Hartebeest/archive2
|action3result=promoted
|action3oldid=714119238


|currentstatus=FA
{{Talk:Hartebeest/GA1}}
|maindate=8 March 2022

|topic=biology
==Standing to 1m?==
}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=FA|
"Hartebeest stand to a bit over 1 m (3.3 ft)."
{{WikiProject Mammals|importance=low}}

{{WikiProject Africa|Tanzania=yes|Tanzania-importance=Top|importance=Top|Angola-importance=Top|Botswana=yes|Botswana-importance=High|Angola=yes}}
WIKIPEDIA: YOU ARE SUKING MORE AND MORE. MEANWHILE, REVERT YOUR JAVASCRIPT SO IT DOESN'T HANG/CRASH OLDER BROWSERS.
}}
{{British English}}
{{archive box|auto=yes}}


== Some author citations are incorrect ==
What does this mean? That an adult male stands about 1m at the shoulder, perhaps? And why standing to? [[User:Chiswick Chap|Chiswick Chap]] ([[User talk:Chiswick Chap|talk]]) 07:50, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
:While it had already been specified to mean "at the shoulder" in one instance, I specified it for the other as well. The "stand to" is just a stylistic choice. A similar stylistic choice is used in the featured article [[Cougar]]. <font face="webdings"><font color="#007FFF">ö</font></font><font face="segoe script">[[User:Brambleberry of RiverClan|<font color="dodgerblue">Brambleberry</font>]] [[User talk:Brambleberry of RiverClan|<font color="#9C9C9C">of</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Brambleberry of RiverClan|<font color="dodgerblue">RiverClan</font>]]</font> 21:30, 7 March 2013 (UTC)


I noticed several mistakes w.r.t author citations. I can't check all of them right now, but remember that parentheses around an author citation mean that it was originally described in a different genus and also that the author does not change (other than the parentheses) when the genus is transferred.
:: Thanks for reply. [[User:Chiswick Chap|Chiswick Chap]] ([[User talk:Chiswick Chap|talk]]) 21:37, 7 March 2013 (UTC)


For instance, in the synonyms:
== Orphaned references in [[:Hartebeest]] ==
* ''Antilope buselaphus'' {{small|Pallas, 1766}}
* ''Antilope bubalis'' {{small|Pallas, 1767}}
Since Pallas described them in the genus ''Antilope'', there should be no parentheses.


* ''B. buselaphus'' would have the author citation {{small|(Pallas, 1766)}}, maybe {{small|(Pallas, 1766) Lichtenstein, 1814}} but certainly not just {{small|(Lichtenstein, 1814)}}
I check pages listed in [[:Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting]] to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for [[User:AnomieBOT/docs/OrphanReferenceFixer|orphaned references]] in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of [[:Hartebeest]]'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for ''this'' article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.


For the subspecies
<b>Reference named "ITIS":</b><ul>
* ''A. b. cokii'' {{small|Günther, 1884}} — parentheses are incorrect as Günther described it as ''Alcelaphus cokii'', i.e., within the same genus.
<li>From [[Mongalla gazelle]]: {{ITIS|ID=898627|taxon=''Eudorcas rufifrons albonotata''}}</li>
* ''A. b. tora'' {{small|Gray, 1873}} also should not have parentheses.
<li>From [[Llama]]: {{cite web|title=Lama|url=http://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=624943#|publisher=Integrated Taxonomic Information System|accessdate=5 January 2013}}</li>
</ul>


[[User:Umimmak|Umimmak]] ([[User talk:Umimmak|talk]]) 02:07, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. [[User:AnomieBOT|AnomieBOT]][[User talk:AnomieBOT|<font color="#888800">⚡</font>]] 11:49, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 20:21, 11 June 2024

Featured articleHartebeest is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 8, 2022.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 10, 2013Good article nomineeListed
May 9, 2013Featured article candidateNot promoted
April 8, 2016Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

Some author citations are incorrect

[edit]

I noticed several mistakes w.r.t author citations. I can't check all of them right now, but remember that parentheses around an author citation mean that it was originally described in a different genus and also that the author does not change (other than the parentheses) when the genus is transferred.

For instance, in the synonyms:

  • Antilope buselaphus Pallas, 1766
  • Antilope bubalis Pallas, 1767

Since Pallas described them in the genus Antilope, there should be no parentheses.

  • B. buselaphus would have the author citation (Pallas, 1766), maybe (Pallas, 1766) Lichtenstein, 1814 but certainly not just (Lichtenstein, 1814)

For the subspecies

  • A. b. cokii Günther, 1884 — parentheses are incorrect as Günther described it as Alcelaphus cokii, i.e., within the same genus.
  • A. b. tora Gray, 1873 also should not have parentheses.

Umimmak (talk) 02:07, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]