Jump to content

Talk:Paul Tsongas: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Yobot (talk | contribs)
m Tagging, Set WPBiography work group priorities: politician,, replaced: WPBiography → WikiProject Biography using AWB (7429)
m {{U.S. Congress}}: +|subject=person; cleanup
 
(21 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject United States presidential elections|class=C|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|living=no|listas=Tsongas, Paul|1=
{{WikiProject U.S. Congress|class=C|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject U.S. Congress|importance=mid|subject=person}}
{{WikiProject Biography|living=no|class=C|politician-priority=low|politician-work-group=yes|listas=Tsongas, Paul}}
{{WikiProject Biography|politician-priority=low|politician-work-group=yes}}
{{WikiProject United States|importance=high|MA=yes|MA-importance=high|USPE=yes|USPE-importance=Mid|Lowell=yes|Lowell-importance=top|Dartmouth=yes|Dartmouth-importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Massachusetts|class=C|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Lowell, Massachusetts|class=C|importance=top}}
{{WikiProject Dartmouth College|class=C|importance=mid}}
}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config | algo = old(365d) | archive = Talk:Paul Tsongas/Archive %(counter)d | counter = 1 | maxarchivesize = 150K | archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}} | minthreadstoarchive = 1 | minthreadsleft = 8 }}

==Had he won the presidency==
"A few years later the cancer returned and he died of pneumonia and liver failure two days short of what, had he won the presidency, would have been the end of his first term."

This seems to be a slightly biased statement. He didn't win his party's nomination, nevermind the Electoral College. Why not just say, "he passed away on ** [whatever day he died]"?
''(the above comment was posted by someone from IP 128.253.229.131)''

:I disagree, 128.253.229.131. The original version is not biased, it was factual, and it contains important information which is lost in your truncated version. I think the original version should be restored.
: [[User:NCdave|NCdave]] 18:37, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

:: Had he been elected, his date of death could have been completely different, as his life would have changed considerably. It's pure conjecture and doesn't belong here. [[User:Don Williams|Don Williams]] 20:45, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

:::'''Agreed''' [[User:Gang14|Gang14]] 21:24, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

:::: I think that, while, yes, it's conjecture, it's not ''pure'' conjecture. We know the date on which his first term would have ended. We know the date on which he died. Yes, certainly, had he been Prez, his medical care would have been entrusted to others, and the end result might have been somewhat, perhaps entirely, different. But I've seen this kind of commentary elsewhere about other people, and it's somewhat interesting. In Tsongas' case, it's even more relevant, given the fact that his cancer and its possible return was a minor issue during the campaign. And I'll bet that the next time a serious candidate for president has a history of cancer that it'll come up that Tsongas didn't live to what would have been the end of his first term. That makes it relevant, methinks. [[User:Unschool|Unschool]] 03:29, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

=="A few years later the cancer returned"==
What cancer? It seems like there must have been a mention of [[cancer]] in an earlier revision of this article, but that was removed without this sentence being cleaned up.
[[Special:Contributions/65.24.249.74|65.24.249.74]] ([[User talk:65.24.249.74|talk]]) 06:04, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
:The cancer was [[non-Hodgkins lymphoma]], mentioned earlier in the article.--[[User:HughGRex|HughGRex]] ([[User talk:HughGRex|talk]]) 14:11, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
::Ah, OK. I didn't read the article sequentially, and after I read the latter section, I searched for "cancer" with my browser and didn't find anything else. It might be nice to mention cancer in the same sentence where lymphoma is mentioned, or maybe not. If it were added, it would prevent others from making my mistake. But I'm not sure I could get the wording right. [[Special:Contributions/65.24.249.74|65.24.249.74]] ([[User talk:65.24.249.74|talk]]) 04:37, 30 January 2008 (UTC)


==Simpsons mention==
==Simpsons mention==
Line 35: Line 12:
So what's the tune? If it's not-to-be-forgotten, let's hear it. I must have forgotten it. --[[User:Feitclub|Feitclub]] 02:41, Nov 4, 2004 (UTC)
So what's the tune? If it's not-to-be-forgotten, let's hear it. I must have forgotten it. --[[User:Feitclub|Feitclub]] 02:41, Nov 4, 2004 (UTC)


* The only tune I remember is the one about [[C. Everett Koop]] -- [[User:Two halves|Two Halves]]
:The only tune I remember is the one about [[C. Everett Koop]] -- [[User:Two halves|Two Halves]] <!--Template:Undated--><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 21:29, 8 August 2007 (UTC)</small>


**Dating this section [[User:Gang14|Gang14]] 00:49, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
::Dating this section [[User:Gang14|Gang14]] 00:49, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

:"Come on everybody, have some sexual congress! Not the kind of congress that contains Paul Tsongas!" - [[Homer Simpson]], ''[[Catch 'Em If You Can]]'', 15x18. --[[User:Jatkins|Jatkins]] <sup>([[User talk:Jatkins|talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jatkins|contribs]])</sup> 22:49, 27 December 2016 (UTC)


== Favorite Tsongas quote ==
== Favorite Tsongas quote ==

My favorite Tsongas quip was this one:
My favorite Tsongas quip was this one:


Line 59: Line 37:
::I put it in the article. I hope nobody objects. [[User:NCdave|NCdave]] ([[User talk:NCdave|talk]]) 07:18, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
::I put it in the article. I hope nobody objects. [[User:NCdave|NCdave]] ([[User talk:NCdave|talk]]) 07:18, 5 February 2008 (UTC)


=="A few years later the cancer returned"==
== pronunciation ==
What cancer? It seems like there must have been a mention of [[cancer]] in an earlier revision of this article, but that was removed without this sentence being cleaned up.
[[Special:Contributions/65.24.249.74|65.24.249.74]] ([[User talk:65.24.249.74|talk]]) 06:04, 20 January 2008 (UTC)


:The cancer was [[non-Hodgkins lymphoma]], mentioned earlier in the article.--[[User:HughGRex|HughGRex]] ([[User talk:HughGRex|talk]]) 14:11, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
Is it really pronounced "SONG-gus", as the article claims, with no initial "t" sound? I suppose that's possible, but ''Tsongas'' is a Greek name, and that's certainly not how a Greek would pronounce it. --[[User:Delirium|Delirium]] 17:55, 19 September 2006 (UTC)


::Ah, OK. I didn't read the article sequentially, and after I read the latter section, I searched for "cancer" with my browser and didn't find anything else. It might be nice to mention cancer in the same sentence where lymphoma is mentioned, or maybe not. If it were added, it would prevent others from making my mistake. But I'm not sure I could get the wording right. [[Special:Contributions/65.24.249.74|65.24.249.74]] ([[User talk:65.24.249.74|talk]]) 04:37, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
: I never heard it pronounced any way but SONG-gus. [[User:Don Williams|Don Williams]] 20:47, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

:: Indeed. It ''may'' well be pronounced differently in Greek. But few of us in the US speak Greek or endeavour to pronounce words of Greek origin with an authentic Greek pronunciation. [[User:Unschool|Unschool]] 03:31, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

==Mention of wife==
Should his wife be mentioned at all? or even that she's running for his old seat? [[User:Gang14|Gang14]] 21:26, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

==Merge==
'''For''' I think this would benefit both articles [[User:Gang14|Gang14]] 23:34, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
:'''Merge done''' [[User:Gang14|Gang14]] 21:17, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
:: What articles were merged? [[User:Unschool|Unschool]] 03:32, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
::: [[Paul Tsongas presidential campaign, 1992]] and [[Paul Tsongas]] [[User:Gang14|Gang14]] 04:45, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

==[[Pyrrhic victory]] vs [[Moral victory]]==

I personally like pyrrhic victory because it makes more sense in this context. Just because someone doesn't understand the term doesn't mean we should use it. [[User:Gang14|Gang14]] 00:35, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

: First of all, the term "moral victory" here is '''''not''''' a substitute for "Pyrrhic victory". The two terms have almost nothing to do with one another. Please allow me to explain.

:A moral victory is won in which the "moral victor" does not actually win. For example, a football team that is a 42-point underdog, but actually loses by only a single point might be said to have achieved a moral victory. In point of fact, they lost, but they still might feel good about themselves because they did much better than they were expected to do. This is the essence of a moral victory: Being pleased, despite having lost.

:The term "Pyrrhic victory" carries with it not only the fact that the ostensible victor needs to have won the "battle", but also the connotation that the winner—''in order to secure the win''—was forced to take steps that would ultimately lead to his defeat in the "war". It is not just the fact that you win the battle and then lose the war. It is that ''you lose the war '''because''' of the steps that you had to take to win the battle''. In a way, it's almost the opposite of a moral victory: Being in a worse position after the contest, despite having won.

:Yes, Tsongas won the Battle of New Hampshire in the winter and lost the War for the Democratic Nomination by the summer. But he did not lose the War ''because'' of anything that he did in New Hampshire. Therefore his New Hampshire win does not constitute a Pyrrhic victory.

:Can the term "Pyrrhic victory" apply to a political campaign? Certainly. Let us suppose that, after Iowa and New Hampshire, Rudy Giulliani finds himself trailing the more conservative Duncan Hunter (yeah, I know—it'll never happen. I'm just making up an example.) So Giulliani, fearing that he is going to lose the GOP nomination, swings to the right in his policies. He abandons his pro-choice stand and announces that in his heart, he thinks that abortion is murder and that women who gets abortions should be fined and that abortionists should be executed. So then Giulliani's abortion stance rallies the conservative base around him and he wins the Republican nomination. But in the general election the Democratic candidate endlessly plays clips of Giulliani's fiery anti-abortion rhetoric, and Giulliani—who had previously been seen as a political moderate—loses the respect and votes of millions of independent voters, and he goes down in flames in the November election. In such a case we would say that Giulliani's winning of the Republican nomination was a Pyrrhic victory. It was a win, yes, but the steps that he took to win that battle would cost him the war, in the long run.

:Now I don't mind if someone objects to the use of "moral victory" for Clinton's 2nd place finish. At the time I myself objected to that characterization, but I know that Clinton's team was successfully able to spin it as such, and that is now how most people see it. I don't think it's a perfect use of the term. But I would strongly object to the use of Pyrrhic victory for Tsongas' win, as it fails to capture the essence of that term. [[User:Unschool|Unschool]] 05:36, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

::I don't think either term is good as an unqualified description of what happened. I'd use "moral victory" only if it were supported by a citation (a notable source that described the result that way). Otherwise, I'd just say that the Clinton campaign was able to spin the result as an upset victory because he had exceeded expectations. [[User:JamesMLane|JamesMLane]]<small>&nbsp;[[User_talk:JamesMLane|t]]&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/JamesMLane|c]]</small> 08:59, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

:::I see and understand on you point on a pyrrhic victory, I misunderstood the term. But I also agree that it moral victory is also not the correct term to use in this context so the point of "the Clinton campaign was able to spin the result as an upset victory because he had exceeded expectations." I feel would be the best. [[User:Gang14|Gang14]] 15:45, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

:::: Yeah, I have no problem getting rid of the use of "moral victory" here. [[User:Unschool|Unschool]] 22:14, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

::::: See why cant all discussions go like this [[User:Gang14|Gang14]] 23:16, 22 October 2007 (UTC)


== Parental Units ==
== Parental Units ==
Anybody got anything on his folks? Most notable, and not so notable, people have the names of their folks listed or mentioned clearly. Anybody got anything on Paul's Parents? [[User:Scott Anafas|Scott Anafas]] ([[User talk:Scott Anafas|talk]]) 15:29, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Anybody got anything on his folks?
Most notable, and not so notable, people have the names of their folks listed or mentioned clearly. Anybody got anything on Paul's Parents? [[User:Scott Anafas|Scott Anafas]] ([[User talk:Scott Anafas|talk]]) 15:29, 22 May 2008 (UTC)


== 'Tsongased' ==
== 'Tsongased' ==

In Orrin Hatch's autobiography he refers to the ERA hearings in which Tsongas was shown to be completely unprepared for serious questioning because he was so unprepared and fell apart (complained that he hadn't been given questions before-hand, to which Hatch replied something like, "We never give the questions before-hand.") Eventually Tsongas asked to be dismissed to catch a plane.
In Orrin Hatch's autobiography he refers to the ERA hearings in which Tsongas was shown to be completely unprepared for serious questioning because he was so unprepared and fell apart (complained that he hadn't been given questions before-hand, to which Hatch replied something like, "We never give the questions before-hand.") Eventually Tsongas asked to be dismissed to catch a plane.


Line 115: Line 57:
:If you can find a source then sure [[User:Gang14|Gang14]] ([[User talk:Gang14|talk]]) 16:38, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
:If you can find a source then sure [[User:Gang14|Gang14]] ([[User talk:Gang14|talk]]) 16:38, 27 August 2009 (UTC)


"Hatch revealed Tsongas unprepared to discuss the ERA's effects on inter alia, abortion rights, fair housing, women in the militia, homosexual marriages, veterans' preference, seniority practices, insurance rate distinctions, and non-coeducational colleges." (Page 87 of 'Constitutional inequality: the political fortunes of the Equal Rights Amendment' by Gilbert Yale Steiner)


Common usage examples:<br/>

"Hatch revealed Tsongas unprepared to discuss the ERA's effects on inter alia, abortion rights, fair housing, women in the militia, homosexual marriages, veterans' preference, seniority practices, insurance rate distinctions, and non-coeducational colleges."
(Page 87 of 'Constitutional inequality: the political fortunes of the Equal Rights Amendment' by Gilbert Yale Steiner)


Common usage examples:
"I hope we don't [sic]"Tsongased" by a Bill Clinton-type campaigner." Retrieved August 30, 2009 from tins.rklau.com/2003/08/kerry-on-meet-press.html
"I hope we don't [sic]"Tsongased" by a Bill Clinton-type campaigner." Retrieved August 30, 2009 from tins.rklau.com/2003/08/kerry-on-meet-press.html


Line 134: Line 72:
based on this context, I would propose the following definition for the term ‘Tsongased,’
based on this context, I would propose the following definition for the term ‘Tsongased,’


Tsongased: Verb (past tense) A weakening of one’s issue or cause resulting from a lack of background knowledge about the cause itself, or, the humiliation resulting from being seen as failing a debate as a result of same. (eg.) The Senator was Tsongased this evening in the debate when he couldn’t answer any of his opponent’s inquiries regarding his party’s policies on immigration reform.
Tsongased: Verb (past tense) A weakening of one’s issue or cause resulting from a lack of background knowledge about the cause itself, or, the humiliation resulting from being seen as failing a debate as a result of same. (eg.) The Senator was Tsongased this evening in the debate when he couldn’t answer any of his opponent’s inquiries regarding his party’s policies on immigration reform. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/99.199.140.178|99.199.140.178]] ([[User talk:99.199.140.178#top|talk]]) 07:31, 20 September 2009 (UTC)</small>



Hey all. I seem to be finding a wall of silence here. In the event that more references are needed, please consider the following from the Milwaukee Sentinel and the NWU Law review;
Hey all. I seem to be finding a wall of silence here. In the event that more references are needed, please consider the following from the Milwaukee Sentinel and the NWU Law review;
Line 153: Line 90:


based on these articles the history seems quite clear that Tsongas was blown out of the water and humiliated at the ERA hearings. And the fact that this pivotal moment in US legal history found Tsongas "shamefully unprepared" and "visibly shaken" deserves some recognition. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/99.199.159.196|99.199.159.196]] ([[User talk:99.199.159.196|talk]]) 11:35, 12 October 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
based on these articles the history seems quite clear that Tsongas was blown out of the water and humiliated at the ERA hearings. And the fact that this pivotal moment in US legal history found Tsongas "shamefully unprepared" and "visibly shaken" deserves some recognition. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/99.199.159.196|99.199.159.196]] ([[User talk:99.199.159.196|talk]]) 11:35, 12 October 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:I noticed someone reverted the "Tsongased" paragraph and didn't bother to discuss it here. I have returned it. I don't see how perhaps his largest failure (which is immortalized by a political term being coined to him by name) is not relevant or noteworthy. The context (a key hearing on the ERA) is likewise of huge importance. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/173.180.103.183|173.180.103.183]] ([[User talk:173.180.103.183|talk]]) 07:18, 11 February 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Tsongas Dry Cleaners ==
I found it interesting that the article said his father "was a Greek immigrant who worked as a dry-cleaner.[1]" Having lived in Lowell and being only three years younger than Paul Tsongas, my recollection was that Tsongas Dry Cleaners was a substantial business in Lowell. A quick search of the web shows this New York Times article - [http://www.nytimes.com/1997/01/23/us/hometown-recalls-paul-tsongas-as-hero-who-inspired-renewal-and-pride.html Hometown Recalls Paul Tsongas as Hero Who Inspired Renewal and Pride]

''He was the pillar of the Lowell community,'' said 71-year-old Arthur C. Anton, the owner of Anton's Cleaners and a friend of Mr. Tsongas's father, who also owned a dry cleaning business, as he left the Tsongas house this evening. ''He had an ability to get people to respond to his vision, his dreams. We're so proud of him for what he has done for us, and what he left us.''

--[[User:Steven Greenberg|Steven Greenberg]] ([[User talk:Steven Greenberg|talk]]) 20:10, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

: I've just added something about Tsongas' father owning a successful dry cleaning business in Lowell. You should edit or improve upon my wording if you wish, [[User:Steven Greenberg]]. --- [[User:Professor JR|Professor JR]] ([[User talk:Professor JR|talk]]) 21:29, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

== External links modified ==
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on [[Paul Tsongas]]. Please take a moment to review [[special:diff/814901068|my edit]]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080610151549/http://www.cheslog.com/craig/parrhesia/tsongascall.html to http://www.cheslog.com/craig/parrhesia/tsongascall.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091211190004/http://paultsongasarena.com/overview.asp to http://www.paultsongasarena.com/overview.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 16:07, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

== Victorious New Hampshire campaign ==
The victorious [[Paul Tsongas]] New Hampshire campaign was led by Ms. Susan Prolman of [[Nashua, New Hampshire]], who later worked for [[Humane Society of the United States]] and [[National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition]], both of [[Washington DC]].<ref>[https://www.linkedin.com/in/susan-prolman-a3468299/ LinkedIn profile for Susan Prolman]</ref> [[User:MaynardClark|MaynardClark]] ([[User talk:MaynardClark|talk]]) 04:41, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

{{reflist-talk}}

Latest revision as of 13:54, 12 June 2024

Simpsons mention

[edit]

"His name was mentioned briefly, in a not-to-be-forgotten tune, on The Simpsons."

So what's the tune? If it's not-to-be-forgotten, let's hear it. I must have forgotten it. --Feitclub 02:41, Nov 4, 2004 (UTC)

The only tune I remember is the one about C. Everett Koop -- Two Halves — Preceding undated comment added 21:29, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Dating this section Gang14 00:49, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
"Come on everybody, have some sexual congress! Not the kind of congress that contains Paul Tsongas!" - Homer Simpson, Catch 'Em If You Can, 15x18. --Jatkins (talk - contribs) 22:49, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Favorite Tsongas quote

[edit]

My favorite Tsongas quip was this one:

"If you think that the words 'government' and 'efficiency' belong in the same sentence, we have counseling available outside."

I'm sure that's close, but it might not be exactly correct. Can anyone verify it?

NCdave 04:11, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Found it:
"If anyone thinks the words 'government' and 'efficiency' belong in the same sentence, we have counseling available."
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,974992-3,00.html
NCdave 18:28, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I put it in the article. I hope nobody objects. NCdave (talk) 07:18, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"A few years later the cancer returned"

[edit]

What cancer? It seems like there must have been a mention of cancer in an earlier revision of this article, but that was removed without this sentence being cleaned up. 65.24.249.74 (talk) 06:04, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The cancer was non-Hodgkins lymphoma, mentioned earlier in the article.--HughGRex (talk) 14:11, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, OK. I didn't read the article sequentially, and after I read the latter section, I searched for "cancer" with my browser and didn't find anything else. It might be nice to mention cancer in the same sentence where lymphoma is mentioned, or maybe not. If it were added, it would prevent others from making my mistake. But I'm not sure I could get the wording right. 65.24.249.74 (talk) 04:37, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Parental Units

[edit]

Anybody got anything on his folks? Most notable, and not so notable, people have the names of their folks listed or mentioned clearly. Anybody got anything on Paul's Parents? Scott Anafas (talk) 15:29, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

'Tsongased'

[edit]

In Orrin Hatch's autobiography he refers to the ERA hearings in which Tsongas was shown to be completely unprepared for serious questioning because he was so unprepared and fell apart (complained that he hadn't been given questions before-hand, to which Hatch replied something like, "We never give the questions before-hand.") Eventually Tsongas asked to be dismissed to catch a plane.

There is a political term created as a result of Tsongas' poor showing in the questioning, "Tsongased." As in, "I hope the Governor doesn't get 'Tsongased' if they bring up foreign investment in the debate tonight."

There should be at least some reference to this political term and the events which inspired the term. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Canadiandy (talkcontribs) 22:44, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you can find a source then sure Gang14 (talk) 16:38, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Hatch revealed Tsongas unprepared to discuss the ERA's effects on inter alia, abortion rights, fair housing, women in the militia, homosexual marriages, veterans' preference, seniority practices, insurance rate distinctions, and non-coeducational colleges." (Page 87 of 'Constitutional inequality: the political fortunes of the Equal Rights Amendment' by Gilbert Yale Steiner)

Common usage examples:
"I hope we don't [sic]"Tsongased" by a Bill Clinton-type campaigner." Retrieved August 30, 2009 from tins.rklau.com/2003/08/kerry-on-meet-press.html

"GOP or DEM and he's Tsongased in the Primaries, as someone more polished makes him look the fool." Retrieved Augist 30, 2009 from www.sporttaco.com/.../Top_5_Third_Party_Candidates_ever_3907.html

"Dean won't be Tsongased this time." Retrieved August 30, 2009 from www.dailykos.com/story/2003/10/25/231845/52. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.199.140.178 (talk) 05:43, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, me again, Canadiandy. From the Steiner reference you will also find the following which might give you a framework for the defining the term ‘Tsongased.’

“The colloquy qualifies as an ERA disaster because it made opponents seem both more knowledgeable about the subject than the supporters and more concerned about what belongs in the Constitution.” (Steiner)

based on this context, I would propose the following definition for the term ‘Tsongased,’

Tsongased: Verb (past tense) A weakening of one’s issue or cause resulting from a lack of background knowledge about the cause itself, or, the humiliation resulting from being seen as failing a debate as a result of same. (eg.) The Senator was Tsongased this evening in the debate when he couldn’t answer any of his opponent’s inquiries regarding his party’s policies on immigration reform. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.199.140.178 (talk) 07:31, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey all. I seem to be finding a wall of silence here. In the event that more references are needed, please consider the following from the Milwaukee Sentinel and the NWU Law review;


“But a second chance is not a guarantee of success. It is entirely possible to do it all over again and do it wrong. We saw a prime example of that in the Senate two weeks ago when sponsor Sen. Paul Tsongas (D-Mass.) showed up shamefully unprepared for the opening exchange with anti-ERA Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah).”

Goodman, Ellen. Editorial. P. 14. The Milwaukee Sentinel. June 10, 1983


The very first question posed to a witness in the ERA II hearings was Hatch’s query to Tsongas: “What precisely, in your view, is the standard of review that the equal rights amendment would establish for Federal and State legislation that employ sex classifications?” But Tsongas declined to delve deeply into the legal intricacies of the amendment. “There is no one who would argue that we have at this point an exact understanding of where it will lead,” he said at one point in the exchange. When Hatch then asked whether Tsongas agreed that the analysis set out in the Yale ERA Article remained the “definitive statement” on the amendment’s meaning, Tsongas said he had not read the article. Hatch followed up with a litany of specific questions about the ERA’s projected legal impact on everything from abortion funding, to veterans’ preferences, to seniority systems, to single sex schools, to maternity leave, to combat restrictions, to the legality of same-sex marriage. Tsongas dodged them all, emphasizing that all constitutional amendments contained some ambiguities and suggesting that Hatch had not subjected his own proposed human life (antiabortion) amendment to such a rigorous standard of certainty. The exchange grew heated. “You knew damn well that these are specific issues, that no one coming here unprepared could answer,” Tsongas shot back at one point. The Associated Press described Tsongas as “visibly shaken.” Though he continued to accuse Hatch of hypocrisy, Tsongas agreed to submit a detailed list of answers to Hatch’s questions. Thus, in the first hour of the first hearing, Hatch had both established the agenda for the remaining hearings and created the impression that the amendment’s proponents were long on platitudes and short on specifics. Even some ERA sympathizers were aghast at Tsongas’s apparent inability.

Mayeri, Serena. A New E.R.A. Or a New Era? Amendment Advocacy and the Reconstitution of Feminism. Northwestern University Law Review Vol. 103, No. 3. (2009).


based on these articles the history seems quite clear that Tsongas was blown out of the water and humiliated at the ERA hearings. And the fact that this pivotal moment in US legal history found Tsongas "shamefully unprepared" and "visibly shaken" deserves some recognition. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.199.159.196 (talk) 11:35, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed someone reverted the "Tsongased" paragraph and didn't bother to discuss it here. I have returned it. I don't see how perhaps his largest failure (which is immortalized by a political term being coined to him by name) is not relevant or noteworthy. The context (a key hearing on the ERA) is likewise of huge importance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.180.103.183 (talk) 07:18, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tsongas Dry Cleaners

[edit]

I found it interesting that the article said his father "was a Greek immigrant who worked as a dry-cleaner.[1]" Having lived in Lowell and being only three years younger than Paul Tsongas, my recollection was that Tsongas Dry Cleaners was a substantial business in Lowell. A quick search of the web shows this New York Times article - Hometown Recalls Paul Tsongas as Hero Who Inspired Renewal and Pride

He was the pillar of the Lowell community, said 71-year-old Arthur C. Anton, the owner of Anton's Cleaners and a friend of Mr. Tsongas's father, who also owned a dry cleaning business, as he left the Tsongas house this evening. He had an ability to get people to respond to his vision, his dreams. We're so proud of him for what he has done for us, and what he left us.

--Steven Greenberg (talk) 20:10, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've just added something about Tsongas' father owning a successful dry cleaning business in Lowell. You should edit or improve upon my wording if you wish, User:Steven Greenberg. --- Professor JR (talk) 21:29, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Paul Tsongas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:07, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Victorious New Hampshire campaign

[edit]

The victorious Paul Tsongas New Hampshire campaign was led by Ms. Susan Prolman of Nashua, New Hampshire, who later worked for Humane Society of the United States and National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition, both of Washington DC.[1] MaynardClark (talk) 04:41, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References