Jump to content

Mad Dogs & Englishmen (film): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Bender the Bot (talk | contribs)
m top: HTTP→HTTPS for The New York Times. using AWB
 
(16 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 21: Line 21:
}}
}}


'''''Mad Dogs & Englishmen''''' is a 1971 American [[documentary film]] of [[Joe Cocker]]'s 1970 U.S. tour, directed by Pierre Adidge,<ref>http://ultimateclassicrock.com/joe-cocker-mad-dogs-englishmen/</ref> starring Cocker and [[Leon Russell]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nytimes.com/movie/review?res=9C03EED9163AE433A25753C3A9659C946090D6CF|title=Movie Review - Joe Cocker Mad Dogs and Englishmen - Mad Dogs and Englishmen' |publisher=The New York Times|accessdate=2 December 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/1802/Mad-Dogs-Englishmen/|title=Mad Dogs & Englishmen (1971) - Overview - TCM.com|work=Turner Classic Movies|accessdate=2 December 2014}}</ref> The film was released on March 29, 1971, by [[Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer]].
'''''Mad Dogs & Englishmen''''' is a 1971 American [[documentary film]] of [[Joe Cocker]]'s 1970 U.S. tour, directed by Pierre Adidge,<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://ultimateclassicrock.com/joe-cocker-mad-dogs-englishmen/|title = How Joe Cocker Corralled Everybody for 'Mad Dogs & Englishmen'}}</ref> starring Cocker and [[Leon Russell]].<ref name="canby" /><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/1802/Mad-Dogs-Englishmen/|title=Mad Dogs & Englishmen (1971) - Overview - TCM.com|work=Turner Classic Movies|accessdate=2 December 2014}}</ref> The film was released on March 29, 1971, by [[Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer]].

==Plot==
{{Section empty|date=November 2014}}


== Cast ==
== Cast ==
{{div col|2}}
{{castlist|
*[[Joe Cocker]]
*[[Joe Cocker]]
*[[Leon Russell]]
*[[Leon Russell]]
Line 46: Line 43:
*[[Donna Weiss]]
*[[Donna Weiss]]
*Pamela Poland
*Pamela Poland
*Matthew Moore
*[[Matthew Moore]]
*[[Daniel Moore (musician)|Daniel Moore]]
*[[Daniel Moore (musician)|Daniel Moore]]
*Bobby Jones
*Bobby Jones
*Nicole Barclay
*[[Nickey Barclay|Nicole Barclay]]
*[[Denny Cordell]]
*[[Denny Cordell]]
*Barney Cordell
*Barney Cordell
Line 57: Line 54:
*Connie Di Nardo
*Connie Di Nardo
*Gail Stainton
*Gail Stainton
*Linda Wolf
*[[Linda Wolf]]
*Andrea Cohen
*Andrea Cohen
*Carol Hughsby
*Carol Hughsby
*Carla Brown
*Carla Brown
*Sean Brown
*Sean Brown
*Mark Brown
*Kay Poorboy
*Kay Poorboy
*Francine Brockey
*Francine Brockey
Line 67: Line 65:
*Sallay Clear
*Sallay Clear
*Darlene Coy
*Darlene Coy
*Canina - the dog
{{div col end}}
}}

==Reception==
[[Roger Ebert]] of the ''[[Chicago Sun-Times]]'' gave the film three stars out of four and wrote that "the musical scenes are the best rock coverage since '[[Woodstock (film)|Woodstock]].' The sound is first rate, for one thing, and director Pierre Adidge has some idea of why Cocker electrifies a crowd."<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/mad-dogs-and-englishmen-1971 |title=Mad Dogs and Englishmen |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=April 27, 1971 |website=[[RogerEbert.com]] |accessdate=May 28, 2019 }}</ref> [[Vincent Canby]] of ''[[The New York Times]]'' called the film a "most satisfying, record-album of a movie" which "patronizes neither its audience nor its stars ... It is uncluttered, one of the best concert films so far."<ref name="canby">Canby, Vincent (March 30, 1971). [https://www.nytimes.com/1971/03/30/archives/mad-dogs-and-englishmen.html "Screen: 'Mad Dogs and Englishmen".] ''[[The New York Times]]''. 25.</ref> A review in ''[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]'' said, "Considerable technical expertise has gone into this production, and though the objective may be clear, it just hasn't turned out to be another 'Woodstock,' possibly because Joe Cocker's personality isn't all that endearing."<ref>"Film Reviews: Joe Cocker: Mad Dogs & Englishmen". ''[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]''. February 3, 1971. 26.</ref> [[Gene Siskel]] of the ''[[Chicago Tribune]]'' rated the film three stars out of four and wrote, "'Mad Dogs' is distinguishable from other 'rockumentaries' because it deals almost exclusively with the musician and his music. There are few side trips to cultural comments."<ref>Siskel, Gene (May 5, 1971). "'Mad Dogs' and..." ''[[Chicago Tribune]]''. Section 2, p. 7.</ref> [[Robert Hilburn]] of the ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'' stated, "As a film, 'Mad Dogs and Englishmen' is a good concert. For much of the picture's 114 minutes, the camera is on Joe Cocker, by most standards the best and most exciting singer in rock music ... But 'Mad Dogs and Englishmen,' unfortunately, fails in the end to rise above this interesting, but clearly limited historical summary of the Cocker tour. As a film, it doesn't establish its own importance."<ref>Hilburn, Robert (March 30, 1971). "Cocker Concert in 'Englishmen' Film". ''[[Los Angeles Times]]''. Part IV, p. 8.</ref> A negative review by Tom Zito of ''[[The Washington Post]]'' advised readers to "Forget the film and try [[Mad Dogs & Englishmen (album)|the record]]," explaining, "What emerges from all this is roughly two hours of footage that looks terrible on the screen and sounds almost as bad. The film is projected in an annoying square format, except for the moments when the screen area is broken up into some poorly coordinated split-screen effects. The camerawork is often sloppy ... the whole thing winds up looking and sounding like a cheap, imitation (indoor) 'Woodstock.'"<ref>Zito, Tom (May 11, 1971). "Mad Dogs and Englishmen". ''[[The Washington Post]]''. B9.</ref> James D. White of ''[[The Monthly Film Bulletin]]'' declared that "The music itself is excellent," but "The film's information content is minimal; and one's heart sinks as the screen is split into a double image for the first number and as the mandatory shots—of excited fans, of joint-rolling in a hotel bedroom, of an interview with a vacuous groupie—are inevitably wheeled out."<ref>{{cite journal |last=White |first=James D. |date=November 1971 |title=Mad Dogs and Englishmen |journal=[[The Monthly Film Bulletin]] |volume=38 |issue=454 |page=223 }}</ref>


==See also==
==See also==
Line 80: Line 82:
{{DEFAULTSORT:Mad Dogs and Englishmen (film)}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Mad Dogs and Englishmen (film)}}
[[Category:1971 films]]
[[Category:1971 films]]
[[Category:American films]]
[[Category:English-language films]]
[[Category:American documentary films]]
[[Category:American documentary films]]
[[Category:1970s documentary films]]
[[Category:1971 documentary films]]
[[Category:Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer films]]
[[Category:Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer films]]
[[Category:A&M Films films]]
[[Category:A&M Films films]]
[[Category:1970s English-language films]]

[[Category:1970s American films]]

{{music-documentary-film-stub}}
[[Category:English-language documentary films]]

Latest revision as of 20:49, 13 June 2024

Mad Dogs & Englishmen
Theatrical release poster
Directed byPierre Adidge
Produced byRobert Abel
Pierre Adidge
Harry Marks
StarringJoe Cocker
Leon Russell
CinematographyDavid Myers
Edited bySidney Levin
Production
companies
A&M Films
Creative Film Associates
Distributed byMetro-Goldwyn-Mayer
Release date
  • March 29, 1971 (1971-03-29)
Running time
117 minutes
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish

Mad Dogs & Englishmen is a 1971 American documentary film of Joe Cocker's 1970 U.S. tour, directed by Pierre Adidge,[1] starring Cocker and Leon Russell.[2][3] The film was released on March 29, 1971, by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer.

Cast

[edit]

Reception

[edit]

Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times gave the film three stars out of four and wrote that "the musical scenes are the best rock coverage since 'Woodstock.' The sound is first rate, for one thing, and director Pierre Adidge has some idea of why Cocker electrifies a crowd."[4] Vincent Canby of The New York Times called the film a "most satisfying, record-album of a movie" which "patronizes neither its audience nor its stars ... It is uncluttered, one of the best concert films so far."[2] A review in Variety said, "Considerable technical expertise has gone into this production, and though the objective may be clear, it just hasn't turned out to be another 'Woodstock,' possibly because Joe Cocker's personality isn't all that endearing."[5] Gene Siskel of the Chicago Tribune rated the film three stars out of four and wrote, "'Mad Dogs' is distinguishable from other 'rockumentaries' because it deals almost exclusively with the musician and his music. There are few side trips to cultural comments."[6] Robert Hilburn of the Los Angeles Times stated, "As a film, 'Mad Dogs and Englishmen' is a good concert. For much of the picture's 114 minutes, the camera is on Joe Cocker, by most standards the best and most exciting singer in rock music ... But 'Mad Dogs and Englishmen,' unfortunately, fails in the end to rise above this interesting, but clearly limited historical summary of the Cocker tour. As a film, it doesn't establish its own importance."[7] A negative review by Tom Zito of The Washington Post advised readers to "Forget the film and try the record," explaining, "What emerges from all this is roughly two hours of footage that looks terrible on the screen and sounds almost as bad. The film is projected in an annoying square format, except for the moments when the screen area is broken up into some poorly coordinated split-screen effects. The camerawork is often sloppy ... the whole thing winds up looking and sounding like a cheap, imitation (indoor) 'Woodstock.'"[8] James D. White of The Monthly Film Bulletin declared that "The music itself is excellent," but "The film's information content is minimal; and one's heart sinks as the screen is split into a double image for the first number and as the mandatory shots—of excited fans, of joint-rolling in a hotel bedroom, of an interview with a vacuous groupie—are inevitably wheeled out."[9]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "How Joe Cocker Corralled Everybody for 'Mad Dogs & Englishmen'".
  2. ^ a b Canby, Vincent (March 30, 1971). "Screen: 'Mad Dogs and Englishmen". The New York Times. 25.
  3. ^ "Mad Dogs & Englishmen (1971) - Overview - TCM.com". Turner Classic Movies. Retrieved 2 December 2014.
  4. ^ Ebert, Roger (April 27, 1971). "Mad Dogs and Englishmen". RogerEbert.com. Retrieved May 28, 2019.
  5. ^ "Film Reviews: Joe Cocker: Mad Dogs & Englishmen". Variety. February 3, 1971. 26.
  6. ^ Siskel, Gene (May 5, 1971). "'Mad Dogs' and..." Chicago Tribune. Section 2, p. 7.
  7. ^ Hilburn, Robert (March 30, 1971). "Cocker Concert in 'Englishmen' Film". Los Angeles Times. Part IV, p. 8.
  8. ^ Zito, Tom (May 11, 1971). "Mad Dogs and Englishmen". The Washington Post. B9.
  9. ^ White, James D. (November 1971). "Mad Dogs and Englishmen". The Monthly Film Bulletin. 38 (454): 223.
[edit]