Jump to content

Talk:Adalah-NY: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Protected Talk:Adalah-NY: Persistent sock puppetry ([Edit=Allow only autoconfirmed users] (expires 20:22, 11 February 2014 (UTC)) [Move=Allow only autoconfirmed users] (expires 20:22, 11 February 2014 (UTC)))
Updated arbitration case
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell |class=C|1=
{{Consensus|<big>'''WARNING: ACTIVE ARBITRATION REMEDIES'''</big><p> The article [[{{SUBJECTPAGENAME}}]], along with other articles relating to the [[Arab–Israeli conflict]], is currently subject to active arbitration remedies, as laid out during '''[[WP:ARBPIA|a 2008 Arbitration case]]''', and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Arbitration Enforcement/Israel-Palestine articles|supplemented by community consensus]] in November 2010. The current restrictions are:
{{WikiProject Organizations|importance=Low}}
* All articles related to the Arab-Israeli conflict broadly construed are under [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#Other revert rules|'''WP:1RR''']] (one [[Wikipedia:Reverting|revert]] per editor per article ''per 24 hour period''). When in doubt, assume it is related.
{{WikiProject Human rights |importance=Low}}
** Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Reverts of edits made by anonymous IP editors that are not vandalism are exempt from 1RR but are subject to [[WP:EW|the usual rules on edit warring]].
{{WikiProject New York City |importance=Low}}
** Editors who otherwise violate this 1RR restriction may be blocked <u>without warning</u> by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.
{{WikiProject Israel |importance=Low}}
* After being warned, any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process may be blocked up to one year, topic-banned, further revert-restricted, or otherwise restricted from editing.
{{WikiProject Palestine |importance=Low}}
*Reports of editors violating any of these restrictions should be made to either the [[WP:AE|Arbitration enforcement]] or [[WP:EWN|Edit warring]] noticeboards.
}}
If you are a new editor, or an editor unfamiliar with the situation, please follow the above guidelines. You may also wish to review [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles|the arbitration case page]]. If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!}}
{{ARBPIA}}
<noinclude>


==Riham Barghouti==
==Riham Barghouti==

Latest revision as of 03:37, 20 June 2024


Riham Barghouti

[edit]

I am trying to edit this page to get it concise with Wikipedia guidelines. I know I am far off from getting there but I am trying. As for the section of Riham Barghouti, I think it is appropriate to list details about her since she is a founder and I was in the process of properly referencing this.DaltonCastle (talk) 22:18, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am working on properly referencing the section now. If the information is incorrect please feel free to reword it appropriately, I am more than willing to collaborate with you.DaltonCastle (talk) 22:21, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, this is not acceptable. You cannot add unsourced text implying that a living person is lying; you cannot make unsourced, and contentioys, assertions about the biography and activities of a living person; and you most certainly cannot add defamatory claims sourced to NGO Monitor RolandR (talk) 22:36, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, that's a fair point. I did not add any unsourced text, and if there was it was accidental. There were no claims that anyone was lying, simply that they were incorrect in an assumption. And I was not aware NGO Monitor was not an NPOV source...I'll keep that in mind from here on out. I'm still open to discussion.DaltonCastle (talk) 23:29, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Your edits claimed, with no apparent source, that Riham Barghouti was falsely claiming to be a Palestinian. They relied on an obvious error (now corrected) on the Jerusalem Fund website to imply that she was falsely claiming to be a professor of sociology. They made numerous unsourced assertions about her life and activities. The only evidence offered was her own writingss, which did not confirm the assertions but merely established that she made various statements. And you relied on the notorious NGO Monitor to back some of the defamatory claims. I suggest that you look at these threads in discussion pages about NGO Monitor, and its record of hounding and defaming its ideological opponents: Gerald Steinberg, NGO Monitor, User Soosim and others; Soosim;NGO Monitor as a source for Marc Garlasco; Reliability of Israeli human rights organization B'Tselem.
Nor did you offer any evidence, except for NGO Monitor's assertions, that Barghouti has any official or leading role in the organisation, and is worth any more than a brief mention here. The bottom line is that your edits, coloured by the hostility of NGO Monitor, presented a tendentious, and in places defamatory, picture of Riham Barghouti and her role in Adalah-NY. As such, they are impermissible in Wikipedia. RolandR (talk) 00:05, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]