Jump to content

Photon antibunching: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Changed text to reflect the fact that the temporal "definition" of antibunching from the new Ref. [4] is, in fact, more general than the one given prior.
Aspir8 (talk | contribs)
simplify intro paragraph
Tag: references removed
 
(41 intermediate revisions by 28 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Refimprove|date=May 2008}}
{{More citations needed|date=May 2008}}


[[Image:Photon bunching.png|thumb|Photon detections as a function of time for a) antibunching (e.g. light emitted from a single atom), b) random (e.g. a coherent state, laser beam), and c) bunching (chaotic light). τ<sub>c</sub> is the coherence time (the time scale of photon or intensity fluctuations).]]
[[File:Photon bunching.svg|thumb|Photon detections as a function of time for a) antibunching (e.g. light emitted from a single atom), b) random (e.g. a coherent state, laser beam), and c) bunching (chaotic light). τ<sub>c</sub> is the coherence time (the time scale of photon or intensity fluctuations).]]
'''Photon antibunching''' generally refers to a light field with photons more equally spaced than a coherent laser field,<ref>Anti-bunching and Entanglement - http://www.ucd.ie/speclab/UCDSOPAMS/peoplehtml/quantumoptics2006/lecture5.pdf</ref> a signature being signals at appropriate detectors which are [[correlation and dependence|anticorrelated]]{{Clarify|date=September 2012}}. More specifically, it can (but it need not<ref>{{cite journal | last = Singh | first = S | year = 1983 | title = Antibunching, sub-poissonian photon statistics and finite bandwidth effects in resonance fluorescence | journal = Optics Communications | volume = 44 | pages = 254–258 | doi = 10.1016/0030-4018(83)90132-3 | bibcode=Singh1983254 | issue = 4}}</ref>) refer to [[sub-Poissonian]] photon statistics, that is a photon number distribution for which the variance is less than the mean. Nevertheless this kind of statistics was not observed directly with [[photon number resolving detector]]{{Citation needed|date=August 2011}}. A coherent state, as output by a laser far above threshold has [[Poisson distribution|Poissonian]] statistics yielding random photon spacing; while a [[Black-body radiation|thermal light]] field has [[super-Poissonian]] statistics and yields bunched photon spacing. In the thermal (bunched) case, the number of fluctuations is larger than a coherent state; for an antibunched source they are smaller.<ref>{{cite journal | last = Paul | first = H | year = 1982 | title = Photon antibunching | journal = Reviews of Modern Physics | volume = 54 | pages = 1061–1102 | doi = 10.1103/RevModPhys.54.1061 | bibcode=1982RvMP...54.1061P | issue = 4}}</ref>
'''Photon antibunching''' generally refers to a light field with photons more equally spaced than a coherent laser field,<ref>Anti-bunching and Entanglement - https://web.archive.org/web/20110615173635/http://www.ucd.ie/speclab/UCDSOPAMS/peoplehtml/quantumoptics2006/lecture5.pdf</ref> a signature being a measured two-time correlation suppressed below that of a coherent laser field. More specifically, it can refer to [[sub-Poissonian]] photon statistics, that is a photon number distribution for which the variance is less than the mean. A coherent state, as output by a laser far above threshold, has [[Poisson distribution|Poissonian]] statistics yielding random photon spacing; while a [[Black-body radiation|thermal light]] field has [[super-Poissonian]] statistics and yields bunched photon spacing. In the thermal [[Hanbury Brown and Twiss effect|(bunched) case]], the number of fluctuations is larger than a coherent state; for an antibunched source they are smaller.<ref>{{cite journal | last = Paul | first = H | year = 1982 | title = Photon antibunching | journal = Reviews of Modern Physics | volume = 54 | pages = 1061–1102 | doi = 10.1103/RevModPhys.54.1061 | bibcode=1982RvMP...54.1061P | issue = 4}}</ref>


==Explanation==
The variance of the photon number distribution is
The variance of the photon number distribution is


Line 22: Line 23:
</math>
</math>


The second-order intensity correlation function (for zero delay time) is defined as
The second-order intensity [[Degree of coherence|correlation function]] (for zero delay time) is defined as


: <math>
: <math>
Line 36: Line 37:
</math>
</math>


Then we see that sub-Poisson photon statistics, one definition of photon antibunching, is given by <math>
Then we see that sub-Poisson photon statistics, one definition of photon antibunching{{clarify|date=December 2022}}, is given by <math>
g^{(2)}(0) < 1</math>. We can equivalently express antibunching by <math>Q< 0</math> where the [[Mandel Q Parameter]] is defined as
g^{(2)}(0) < 1</math>. We can equivalently express antibunching by <math>Q< 0</math> where the [[Mandel Q parameter]] is defined as


: <math>
: <math>
Line 43: Line 44:
</math>
</math>


If the field had a classical stochastic process underlying it, say a positive definite probability distribution for photon number, the variance would have to be greater than or equal to the mean. This can be shown by an application of the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality to the definition of <math>g^{(2)}(0)</math>. Sub-Poissonian fields violate this, and hence are nonclassical in the sense that there can be no underlying positive definite probability distribution for photon number (or intensity).
If the field had a classical stochastic process underlying it, say a positive definite probability distribution for photon number, the variance would have to be greater than or equal to the mean. This can be shown by an application of the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality to the definition of <math>g^{(2)}(0)</math>. Sub-Poissonian fields violate this, and hence are nonclassical in the sense that there can be no underlying positive definite probability distribution for photon number (or intensity).


Photon antibunching by this definition was first observed by [[H. Jeff Kimble|Kimble]], [[Leonard Mandel|Mandel]], and Dagenais in [[resonance fluorescence]]. A driven atom cannot emit two photons at once, and so in this case <math>g^{(2)}(0)=0.0</math>. An experiment with more precision that did not require subtraction of a background count rate was done for a single atom in an ion trap by Walther et al.
Photon antibunching by this definition was first proposed by Carmichael and Walls<ref>H. J. Carmichael and D. F. Walls, A Quantum-Mechanical Master Equation Treatment of the Dynamical Stark Effect, J. Phys. B: Atom. Mol. Phys. 9, 1199 (1976).</ref> and first observed by [[H. Jeff Kimble|Kimble]], [[Leonard Mandel|Mandel]], and Dagenais in [[resonance fluorescence]]. A driven atom cannot emit two photons at once, and so in this case <math>g^{(2)}(0)=0</math>. An experiment with more precision that did not require subtraction of a background count rate was done for a single atom in an ion trap by Walther et al.


A more general definition for photon antibunching concerns the slope of the correlation function away from zero time delay. It can also be shown by an application of the [[Cauchy-Schwarz inequality]] to the time dependent intensity correlation function
A more general definition for photon antibunching concerns the slope of the correlation function away from zero time delay. It can also be shown by an application of the [[Cauchy–Schwarz inequality]] to the time dependent intensity [[Degree of coherence|correlation function]]


: <math>
: <math>
Line 53: Line 54:
</math>
</math>


It can be shown that for a classical positive definite probability distribution to exist (i.e. for the field to be classical) <math>g^{(2)}(0) \leq g^{(2)}(\tau)</math><ref>{{cite journal | last = Zou | first = X T | last = Mandel | first = L | year = 1990 | title = Photon-antibunching and sub-Poissonian photon statistics | journal = Phys. Rev. A | volume = 41 | pages = 475-476 | doi = 10.1103/PhysRevA.41.475 | issue = 1}}</ref>. Hence a rise in the second order intensity correlation function at early times is also nonclassical. This initial rise is photon antibunching.
It can be shown that for a classical positive definite probability distribution to exist (i.e. for the field to be classical) <math>g^{(2)}(\tau) \leq g^{(2)}(0)</math>.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Zou | first1 = X T | last2 = Mandel | first2 = L | year = 1990 | title = Photon-antibunching and sub-Poissonian photon statistics | journal = Phys. Rev. A | volume = 41 | pages = 475–476 | doi = 10.1103/PhysRevA.41.475 | issue = 1 | pmid=9902890| bibcode = 1990PhRvA..41..475Z }}</ref> Hence a rise in the second order intensity correlation function at early times is also nonclassical. This initial rise is photon antibunching.


Another way of looking at this time dependent correlation function, inspired by quantum trajectory theory is
Another way of looking at this time dependent correlation function, inspired by quantum trajectory theory is
Line 69: Line 70:
with <math>|\Psi_C\rangle</math> is the state conditioned on previous detection of a photon at time <math>\tau=0</math>.
with <math>|\Psi_C\rangle</math> is the state conditioned on previous detection of a photon at time <math>\tau=0</math>.


== Sources ==
==Experiments==


Spatial antibunching has been observed in photon pairs produced by [[spontaneous parametric down-conversion]]. <ref>{{cite journal |last1=Nogueira |first1=W. A. T. |last2=Walborn |first2=S. P.|last3=P\'adua |first3=S.|last4=Monken |first4=C. H. |title=Experimental Observation of Spatial Antibunching of Photons |journal=Phys. Rev. Lett. |date=30 April 2001 |volume=86 |issue=18 |pages=4009–4012 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.4009|pmid=11328082 |arxiv=quant-ph/0206039 |bibcode=2001PhRvL..86.4009N |s2cid=25655506 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Nogueira |first1=W. A. T. |last2=Walborn |first2=S. P. |last3=P\'adua |first3=S.|last4=Monken |first4=C. H. |title=Generation of a Two-Photon Singlet Beam |journal=Phys. Rev. Lett. |date=30 January 2004 |volume=92 |issue=4 |page=043602 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.043602|pmid=14995372 |arxiv=quant-ph/0503117 |bibcode=2004PhRvL..92d3602N |s2cid=25022990 }}</ref>
* <small>Article based on text from [http://qwiki.stanford.edu/wiki/Main_Page Qwiki], reproduced under the [[GNU free documentation license]]: see [http://qwiki.stanford.edu/wiki/Photon_Antibunching Photon Antibunching]</small>

== References ==

{{reflist|1}}


== See also ==
== See also ==
Line 82: Line 79:
* [[Fock state]]
* [[Fock state]]
* [[Hong–Ou–Mandel effect]]
* [[Hong–Ou–Mandel effect]]
* [[Hanbury Brown and Twiss effect]]
* [[Photon bunching]]
* [[Squeezed coherent state]]
* [[Squeezed coherent state]]

== Sources ==
* <small>Article based on text from [https://web.archive.org/web/20080603152249/http://qwiki.stanford.edu/wiki/Main_Page Qwiki], reproduced under the [[GNU Free Documentation License]]: see [https://web.archive.org/web/20080317040903/http://qwiki.stanford.edu/wiki/Photon_Antibunching Photon Antibunching]</small>

== References ==
<references />

==External links==
*[https://www.becker-hickl.com/applications/antibunching-experiments/ Photon antibunching] (Becker & Hickl GmbH, web page)


[[Category:Quantum optics]]
[[Category:Quantum optics]]

Latest revision as of 08:01, 25 June 2024

Photon detections as a function of time for a) antibunching (e.g. light emitted from a single atom), b) random (e.g. a coherent state, laser beam), and c) bunching (chaotic light). τc is the coherence time (the time scale of photon or intensity fluctuations).

Photon antibunching generally refers to a light field with photons more equally spaced than a coherent laser field,[1] a signature being a measured two-time correlation suppressed below that of a coherent laser field. More specifically, it can refer to sub-Poissonian photon statistics, that is a photon number distribution for which the variance is less than the mean. A coherent state, as output by a laser far above threshold, has Poissonian statistics yielding random photon spacing; while a thermal light field has super-Poissonian statistics and yields bunched photon spacing. In the thermal (bunched) case, the number of fluctuations is larger than a coherent state; for an antibunched source they are smaller.[2]

Explanation

[edit]

The variance of the photon number distribution is

Using commutation relations, this can be written as

This can be written as

The second-order intensity correlation function (for zero delay time) is defined as

This quantity is basically the probability of detecting two simultaneous photons, normalized by the probability of detecting two photons at once for a random photon source. Here and after we assume stationary counting statistics.

Then we have

Then we see that sub-Poisson photon statistics, one definition of photon antibunching[clarification needed], is given by . We can equivalently express antibunching by where the Mandel Q parameter is defined as

If the field had a classical stochastic process underlying it, say a positive definite probability distribution for photon number, the variance would have to be greater than or equal to the mean. This can be shown by an application of the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality to the definition of . Sub-Poissonian fields violate this, and hence are nonclassical in the sense that there can be no underlying positive definite probability distribution for photon number (or intensity).

Photon antibunching by this definition was first proposed by Carmichael and Walls[3] and first observed by Kimble, Mandel, and Dagenais in resonance fluorescence. A driven atom cannot emit two photons at once, and so in this case . An experiment with more precision that did not require subtraction of a background count rate was done for a single atom in an ion trap by Walther et al.

A more general definition for photon antibunching concerns the slope of the correlation function away from zero time delay. It can also be shown by an application of the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality to the time dependent intensity correlation function

It can be shown that for a classical positive definite probability distribution to exist (i.e. for the field to be classical) .[4] Hence a rise in the second order intensity correlation function at early times is also nonclassical. This initial rise is photon antibunching.

Another way of looking at this time dependent correlation function, inspired by quantum trajectory theory is

where

with is the state conditioned on previous detection of a photon at time .

Experiments

[edit]

Spatial antibunching has been observed in photon pairs produced by spontaneous parametric down-conversion. [5][6]

See also

[edit]

Sources

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Anti-bunching and Entanglement - https://web.archive.org/web/20110615173635/http://www.ucd.ie/speclab/UCDSOPAMS/peoplehtml/quantumoptics2006/lecture5.pdf
  2. ^ Paul, H (1982). "Photon antibunching". Reviews of Modern Physics. 54 (4): 1061–1102. Bibcode:1982RvMP...54.1061P. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.54.1061.
  3. ^ H. J. Carmichael and D. F. Walls, A Quantum-Mechanical Master Equation Treatment of the Dynamical Stark Effect, J. Phys. B: Atom. Mol. Phys. 9, 1199 (1976).
  4. ^ Zou, X T; Mandel, L (1990). "Photon-antibunching and sub-Poissonian photon statistics". Phys. Rev. A. 41 (1): 475–476. Bibcode:1990PhRvA..41..475Z. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.41.475. PMID 9902890.
  5. ^ Nogueira, W. A. T.; Walborn, S. P.; P\'adua, S.; Monken, C. H. (30 April 2001). "Experimental Observation of Spatial Antibunching of Photons". Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (18): 4009–4012. arXiv:quant-ph/0206039. Bibcode:2001PhRvL..86.4009N. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.4009. PMID 11328082. S2CID 25655506.
  6. ^ Nogueira, W. A. T.; Walborn, S. P.; P\'adua, S.; Monken, C. H. (30 January 2004). "Generation of a Two-Photon Singlet Beam". Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (4): 043602. arXiv:quant-ph/0503117. Bibcode:2004PhRvL..92d3602N. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.043602. PMID 14995372. S2CID 25022990.
[edit]