Iterated function: Difference between revisions
Oldtimermath (talk | contribs) m link added |
m Fixed broken link to tetration.org |
||
(40 intermediate revisions by 19 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Use dmy dates|date=May 2019|cs1-dates=y}} |
{{Use dmy dates|date=May 2019|cs1-dates=y}} |
||
[[File:Powers of rotation, shear, and their compositions.svg|thumb|400px|Iterated transformations of the object on the left<br>On top is a clockwise rotation by 90°. It has [[Order (group theory)|order]] 4, because that is the smallest positive exponent that produces the identity. Below is a [[shear mapping]] with infinite order.<br><small>Below that are their [[Function composition|compositions]], which both have order 3.</small>]] |
|||
[[File:An iterated direct similarity yields spirals.svg|thumb|upright=1.8|[[Function composition|Composed]] with itself '''repeatedly''', [[Similarity (geometry)|similarity]] {{math|''F''}}<br |
|||
/>of [[Similarity (geometry)#Similarity_with_a_center|center]] ''S '' enlarges the smallest [[Regular polygon|'''regular''']] [[pentagon]] into successive [[Concentric objects|concentric]] pentagons, in manner that the outline of each one<br |
|||
/>passes through all vertices of the previous pentagon,<br |
|||
/>of which it is the [[Image_(mathematics)#Image_of_an_element|image]] under {{math|''F''}}. If [[Transformation (function)|transformation]] {{math|''F''}}<br |
|||
/>is '''iterated''' indefinitely, then ''A '' and ''K''<br |
|||
/>are the starting points of two infinite [[spiral]]s.]] |
|||
In [[mathematics]], an '''iterated function''' is a function |
In [[mathematics]], an '''iterated function''' is a function that is obtained by [[function composition|composing]] another function with itself two or several times. The process of repeatedly applying the same function is called [[iteration]]. In this process, starting from some initial object, the result of applying a given function is fed again into the function as input, and this process is repeated. |
||
:{{nobr|1=''L'' = <math>\mathit{F}\,</math>( ''K ''), ''M '' = <math>\mathit{F}\,\circ \mathit{F}\,</math>( ''K '') = <math>\mathit{F}\;^{2}\,</math>( ''K ''),}}<br />with the circle‑shaped symbol of function composition. |
|||
For example, on the image on the right: |
|||
⚫ | |||
:{{nobr|1=<math>L = F(K), \ M = F \circ F (K) = F^2(K).</math>}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
==Definition== |
==Definition== |
||
Line 19: | Line 16: | ||
Let {{mvar|''X''}} be a set and {{math|''f'': ''X'' → ''X''}} be a [[function (mathematics)|function]]. |
Let {{mvar|''X''}} be a set and {{math|''f'': ''X'' → ''X''}} be a [[function (mathematics)|function]]. |
||
Defining {{math| ''f'' <sup>''n''</sup>}} as the ''n''-th iterate of {{mvar|''f''}}, where ''n'' is a non-negative integer, by: |
|||
Defining {{math| ''f'' <sup>''n''</sup>}} as the ''n''-th iterate of {{mvar|''f''}} (a notation introduced by [[Hans Heinrich Bürmann]]{{citation needed|date=August 2020|reason=The fact is undisputable, but for historical completeness, let's find Bürmann's original work on this and add here as a citation. It must be dated significantly before 1813 (according to Herschel in 1820 und Cajori in 1929.)}}<ref name="Herschel_1820"/><ref name="Cajori_1929"/> and [[John Frederick William Herschel]]<!-- in 1813 --><ref name="Herschel_1813"/><ref name="Herschel_1820"/><ref name="Peano_1903"/><ref name="Cajori_1929"/>), where ''n'' is a non-negative integer, by: |
|||
<math display="block">f^0 ~ \stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=} ~ \operatorname{id}_X</math> |
<math display="block">f^0 ~ \stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=} ~ \operatorname{id}_X</math> |
||
and |
and |
||
<math display="block">f^{n+1} ~ \stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=} ~ f \circ f^{n},</math> |
<math display="block">f^{n+1} ~ \stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=} ~ f \circ f^{n},</math> |
||
where {{math|id<sub>''X''</sub>}} is the [[identity function]] on {{mvar|''X''}} and {{math|(''f'' {{text| {{math| <math>\circ</math> }} }} ''g'')(''x'') {{=}} ''f'' (''g''(''x''))}} denotes [[function composition]]. This notation has been traced to and [[John Frederick William Herschel]] in 1813.<ref name="Herschel_1813"/><ref name="Herschel_1820"/><ref name="Peano_1903"/><ref name="Cajori_1929"/> Herschel credited [[Hans Heinrich Bürmann]] for it, but without giving a specific reference to the work of Bürmann, which remains undiscovered.<ref>{{cite book|title=Encounters with Chaos and Fractals|first1=Denny|last1=Gulick|first2=Jeff|last2=Ford|edition=3rd|publisher=CRC Press|year=2024|isbn=9781003835776|page=2|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aVQIEQAAQBAJ&pg=PA2}}</ref> |
|||
where {{math|id<sub>''X''</sub>}} is the [[identity function]] on {{mvar|''X''}} and {{math|''f''○''g''}} denotes [[function composition]]. That is, |
|||
:{{math|(''f''○''g'')(''x'') {{=}} ''f'' (''g''(''x''))}}, |
|||
always [[associative]]. |
|||
Because the notation {{math|''f'' <sup>''n''</sup>}} may refer to both iteration (composition) of the function {{mvar|''f''}} or [[Exponentiation#Iterated functions|exponentiation of the function]] {{mvar|''f''}} (the latter is commonly used in [[trigonometric functions|trigonometry]]), some mathematicians{{citation needed|date=August 2020|reason=Origin? Example authors?}} choose to use {{math|∘}} to denote the compositional meaning, writing {{math|''f''{{i sup|∘''n''}}(''x'')}} for the {{mvar|n}}-th iterate of the function {{math|''f''(''x'')}}, as in, for example, {{math|''f''{{i sup|∘3}}(''x'')}} meaning {{math|''f''(''f''(''f''(''x'')))}}. For the same purpose, {{math|''f'' <sup>[''n'']</sup>(''x'')}} was used by [[Benjamin Peirce]]<ref name="Peirce_1852"/><ref name="Cajori_1929"/><ref group="nb">while {{math|''f'' <sup>(''n'')</sup>}} is taken for the [[Derivative#Lagrange's notation|{{math|''n''}}th derivative]]</ref> whereas [[Alfred Pringsheim]] and [[Jules Molk]] suggested {{math|{{i sup|''n''}}''f''(''x'')}} instead.<ref name="Pringsheim-Molk_1907"/><ref name="Cajori_1929"/><ref group="nb" name="NB_Rucker"/> |
Because the notation {{math|''f'' <sup>''n''</sup>}} may refer to both iteration (composition) of the function {{mvar|''f''}} or [[Exponentiation#Iterated functions|exponentiation of the function]] {{mvar|''f''}} (the latter is commonly used in [[trigonometric functions|trigonometry]]), some mathematicians{{citation needed|date=August 2020|reason=Origin? Example authors?}} choose to use {{math|∘}} to denote the compositional meaning, writing {{math|''f''{{i sup|∘''n''}}(''x'')}} for the {{mvar|n}}-th iterate of the function {{math|''f''(''x'')}}, as in, for example, {{math|''f''{{i sup|∘3}}(''x'')}} meaning {{math|''f''(''f''(''f''(''x'')))}}. For the same purpose, {{math|''f'' <sup>[''n'']</sup>(''x'')}} was used by [[Benjamin Peirce]]<ref name="Peirce_1852"/><ref name="Cajori_1929"/><ref group="nb">while {{math|''f'' <sup>(''n'')</sup>}} is taken for the [[Derivative#Lagrange's notation|{{math|''n''}}th derivative]]</ref> whereas [[Alfred Pringsheim]] and [[Jules Molk]] suggested {{math|{{i sup|''n''}}''f''(''x'')}} instead.<ref name="Pringsheim-Molk_1907"/><ref name="Cajori_1929"/><ref group="nb" name="NB_Rucker"/> |
||
Line 35: | Line 30: | ||
: <math>f^m \circ f^n = f^n \circ f^m = f^{m+n}~.</math> |
: <math>f^m \circ f^n = f^n \circ f^m = f^{m+n}~.</math> |
||
This is structurally identical to the property of [[exponentiation]] that {{math|1=''a''<sup>''m''</sup>''a''<sup>''n''</sup> = ''a''<sup>''m'' + ''n''</sup> |
This is structurally identical to the property of [[exponentiation]] that {{math|1=''a''<sup>''m''</sup>''a''<sup>''n''</sup> = ''a''<sup>''m'' + ''n''</sup>}}. |
||
In general, for arbitrary general (negative, non-integer, etc.) indices {{mvar|m}} and {{mvar|n}}, this relation is called the '''translation functional equation''', cf. [[Schröder's equation]] and [[Abel equation]]. On a logarithmic scale, this reduces to the '''nesting property''' of [[Chebyshev polynomials]], {{math|1=''T''<sub>''m''</sub>(''T''<sub>''n''</sub>(''x'')) = ''T''<sub>''m n''</sub>(''x'')}}, since {{math|1=''T''<sub>''n''</sub>(''x'') = cos(''n'' arccos(''x''))}}. |
In general, for arbitrary general (negative, non-integer, etc.) indices {{mvar|m}} and {{mvar|n}}, this relation is called the '''translation functional equation''', cf. [[Schröder's equation]] and [[Abel equation]]. On a logarithmic scale, this reduces to the '''nesting property''' of [[Chebyshev polynomials]], {{math|1=''T''<sub>''m''</sub>(''T''<sub>''n''</sub>(''x'')) = ''T''<sub>''m n''</sub>(''x'')}}, since {{math|1=''T''<sub>''n''</sub>(''x'') = cos(''n'' arccos(''x''))}}. |
||
Line 45: | Line 40: | ||
For a given {{mvar|x}} in {{mvar|X}}, the [[sequence]] of values {{math|''f''<sup>''n''</sup>(''x'')}} is called the '''[[orbit (dynamics)|orbit]]''' of {{mvar|x}}. |
For a given {{mvar|x}} in {{mvar|X}}, the [[sequence]] of values {{math|''f''<sup>''n''</sup>(''x'')}} is called the '''[[orbit (dynamics)|orbit]]''' of {{mvar|x}}. |
||
If {{math|1=''f'' <sup>''n''</sup> (''x'') = ''f'' <sup>''n''+''m''</sup> (''x'')}} for some integer {{ |
If {{math|1=''f'' <sup>''n''</sup> (''x'') = ''f'' <sup>''n''+''m''</sup> (''x'')}} for some integer {{math|m > 0}}, the orbit is called a '''periodic orbit'''. The smallest such value of {{mvar|m}} for a given {{mvar|x}} is called the '''period of the orbit'''. The point {{mvar|x}} itself is called a [[periodic point]]. The [[cycle detection]] problem in computer science is the [[algorithm]]ic problem of finding the first periodic point in an orbit, and the period of the orbit. |
||
==Fixed points== |
==Fixed points== |
||
If {{math|1='' |
If {{math|1='' ''x'' = f''(''x'')}} for some {{mvar|x}} in {{mvar|X}} (that is, the period of the orbit of {{mvar|x}} is {{math|1}}), then {{mvar|x}} is called a '''[[fixed point (mathematics)|fixed point]]''' of the iterated sequence. The set of fixed points is often denoted as {{math|'''Fix'''(''f'')}}. There exist a number of [[fixed-point theorem]]s that guarantee the existence of fixed points in various situations, including the [[Banach fixed point theorem]] and the [[Brouwer fixed point theorem]]. |
||
There are several techniques for [[convergence acceleration]] of the sequences produced by [[fixed point iteration]].<ref>{{Cite book| last1=Carleson|first1=L.| last2=Gamelin|first2=T. D. W.| title=Complex dynamics|series=Universitext: Tracts in Mathematics| publisher=Springer-Verlag| year=1993| isbn=0-387-97942-5| url-access=registration| url=https://archive.org/details/complexdynamics0000carl}}</ref> For example, the [[Aitken method]] applied to an iterated fixed point is known as [[Steffensen's method]], and produces quadratic convergence. |
There are several techniques for [[convergence acceleration]] of the sequences produced by [[fixed point iteration]].<ref>{{Cite book| last1=Carleson|first1=L.| last2=Gamelin|first2=T. D. W.| title=Complex dynamics|series=Universitext: Tracts in Mathematics| publisher=Springer-Verlag| year=1993| isbn=0-387-97942-5| url-access=registration| url=https://archive.org/details/complexdynamics0000carl}}</ref> For example, the [[Aitken method]] applied to an iterated fixed point is known as [[Steffensen's method]], and produces quadratic convergence. |
||
Line 55: | Line 50: | ||
==Limiting behaviour== |
==Limiting behaviour== |
||
Upon iteration, one may find that there are sets that shrink and converge towards a single point. In such a case, the point that is converged to is known as an [[attractive fixed point]]. Conversely, iteration may give the appearance of points diverging away from a single point; this would be the case for an [[unstable fixed point]].<ref>Istratescu, Vasile (1981). ''Fixed Point Theory, An Introduction'', D. Reidel, Holland. {{ISBN|90-277-1224-7}}.</ref> |
Upon iteration, one may find that there are sets that shrink and converge towards a single point. In such a case, the point that is converged to is known as an [[attractive fixed point]]. Conversely, iteration may give the appearance of points diverging away from a single point; this would be the case for an [[unstable fixed point]].<ref>Istratescu, Vasile (1981). ''Fixed Point Theory, An Introduction'', D. Reidel, Holland. {{ISBN|90-277-1224-7}}.</ref> |
||
When the points of the orbit converge to one or more limits, the set of [[accumulation point]]s of the orbit is known as the '''[[limit set]]''' or the '''ω-limit set'''. |
When the points of the orbit converge to one or more limits, the set of [[accumulation point]]s of the orbit is known as the '''[[limit set]]''' or the '''ω-limit set'''. |
||
The ideas of attraction and repulsion generalize similarly; one may categorize iterates into [[stable manifold|stable set]]s and [[unstable set]]s, according to the |
The ideas of attraction and repulsion generalize similarly; one may categorize iterates into [[stable manifold|stable set]]s and [[unstable set]]s, according to the behavior of small [[Neighbourhood (mathematics)|neighborhood]]s under iteration. Also see [[infinite compositions of analytic functions]]. |
||
Other limiting |
Other limiting behaviors are possible; for example, [[wandering point]]s are points that move away, and never come back even close to where they started. |
||
==Invariant measure== |
==Invariant measure== |
||
If one considers the evolution of a density distribution, rather than that of individual point dynamics, then the limiting behavior is given by the [[invariant measure]]. It can be visualized as the behavior of a point-cloud or dust-cloud under repeated iteration. The invariant measure is an eigenstate of the Ruelle-Frobenius-Perron operator or [[transfer operator]], corresponding to an eigenvalue of 1. Smaller eigenvalues correspond to unstable, decaying states. |
If one considers the evolution of a density distribution, rather than that of individual point dynamics, then the limiting behavior is given by the [[invariant measure]]. It can be visualized as the behavior of a point-cloud or dust-cloud under repeated iteration. The invariant measure is an eigenstate of the Ruelle-Frobenius-Perron operator or [[transfer operator]], corresponding to an eigenvalue of 1. Smaller eigenvalues correspond to unstable, decaying states. |
||
In general, because repeated iteration corresponds to a shift, the transfer operator, and its adjoint, the [[Koopman operator]] can both be interpreted as [[shift operator]]s action on a [[shift space]]. |
In general, because repeated iteration corresponds to a shift, the transfer operator, and its adjoint, the [[Koopman operator]] can both be interpreted as [[shift operator]]s action on a [[shift space]]. The theory of [[subshifts of finite type]] provides general insight into many iterated functions, especially those leading to chaos. |
||
==Fractional iterates and flows, and negative iterates== |
==Fractional iterates and flows, and negative iterates== |
||
[[File:TrivFctRootExm svg.svg|thumb|{{color|#20b080|''g'': '''R'''→'''R'''}} is a trivial functional 5th root of {{color|#901070|2=''f'': '''R'''<sup>+</sup>→'''R'''<sup>+</sup>, ''f''(''x'') = sin(''x'')}}. The computation of ''f''({{frac|π|6}}) = {{frac|1|2}} = ''g''<sup>5</sup>({{frac|π|6}}) is shown.]] |
[[File:TrivFctRootExm svg.svg|thumb|{{color|#20b080|''g'': '''R'''→'''R'''}} is a trivial functional 5th root of {{color|#901070|2=''f'': '''R'''<sup>+</sup>→'''R'''<sup>+</sup>, ''f''(''x'') = sin(''x'')}}. The computation of ''f''({{frac|π|6}}) = {{frac|1|2}} = ''g''<sup>5</sup>({{frac|π|6}}) is shown.]] |
||
The notion {{math|''f''{{i sup|1/''n''}}}} must be used with care when the equation {{math|1=''g''<sup>''n''</sup>(''x'') = ''f''(''x'')}} has multiple solutions, which is normally the case, as in [[Functional square root|Babbage's equation]] of the functional roots of the identity map. For example, for {{math|1=''n'' = 2}} and {{math|1=''f''(''x'') = 4''x'' − 6}}, both {{math|1=''g''(''x'') = 6 − 2''x''}} and {{math|1=''g''(''x'') = 2''x'' − 2}} are solutions; so the expression {{math|''f''<sup> 1/2</sup>(''x'')}} |
The notion {{math|''f''{{i sup|1/''n''}}}} must be used with care when the equation {{math|1=''g''<sup>''n''</sup>(''x'') = ''f''(''x'')}} has multiple solutions, which is normally the case, as in [[Functional square root|Babbage's equation]] of the functional roots of the identity map. For example, for {{math|1=''n'' = 2}} and {{math|1=''f''(''x'') = 4''x'' − 6}}, both {{math|1=''g''(''x'') = 6 − 2''x''}} and {{math|1=''g''(''x'') = 2''x'' − 2}} are solutions; so the expression {{math|''f''<sup> 1/2</sup>(''x'')}} does not denote a unique function, just as numbers have multiple algebraic roots. A trivial root of ''f'' can always be obtained if ''f''{{'}}s domain can be extended sufficiently, cf. picture. The roots chosen are normally the ones belonging to the orbit under study. |
||
Fractional iteration of a function can be defined: for instance, a [[functional square root|half iterate]] of a function {{mvar|f}} is a function {{mvar|g}} such that {{math|1=''g''(''g''(''x'')) = ''f''(''x'')}}.<ref>{{cite web |work=MathOverflow |title=Finding f such that f(f(x))=g(x) given g |url=https://mathoverflow.net/q/66538 }}</ref> This function {{math|''g''(''x'')}} can be written using the index notation as {{math|''f''<sup> 1/2</sup>(''x'')}} . Similarly, {{math|''f''<sup> 1/3</sup>(''x'')}} is the function defined such that {{math|1=''f''<sup>1/3</sup>(''f''<sup>1/3</sup>(''f''<sup>1/3</sup>(''x''))) = ''f''(''x'')}}, while {{math|''f''{{i sup|2/3}}(''x'')}} may be defined as equal to {{math|''f''{{i sup| 1/3}}(''f''{{i sup|1/3}}(''x''))}}, and so forth, all based on the principle, mentioned earlier, that {{math|1=''f''<sup> ''m''</sup> ○ ''f''<sup> ''n''</sup> = ''f''<sup> ''m'' + ''n''</sup>}}. This idea can be generalized so that the iteration count {{mvar|n}} becomes a '''continuous parameter''', a sort of continuous "time" of a continuous [[Orbit (dynamics)|orbit]].<ref>{{cite journal |first1=R. |last1=Aldrovandi |first2=L. P. |last2=Freitas |title=Continuous Iteration of Dynamical Maps |journal=J. Math. Phys. |volume=39 |issue=10 |pages=5324 |year=1998 |doi=10.1063/1.532574 |arxiv=physics/9712026 |bibcode=1998JMP....39.5324A |hdl=11449/65519 |s2cid=119675869 |hdl-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |first1=G. |last1=Berkolaiko |first2=S. |last2=Rabinovich |first3=S. |last3=Havlin |title=Analysis of Carleman Representation of Analytical Recursions |journal=J. Math. Anal. Appl. |volume=224 |pages=81–90 |year=1998 |doi=10.1006/jmaa.1998.5986 |doi-access=free }}</ref> |
Fractional iteration of a function can be defined: for instance, a [[functional square root|half iterate]] of a function {{mvar|f}} is a function {{mvar|g}} such that {{math|1=''g''(''g''(''x'')) = ''f''(''x'')}}.<ref>{{cite web |work=MathOverflow |title=Finding f such that f(f(x))=g(x) given g |url=https://mathoverflow.net/q/66538 }}</ref> This function {{math|''g''(''x'')}} can be written using the index notation as {{math|''f''<sup> 1/2</sup>(''x'')}} . Similarly, {{math|''f''<sup> 1/3</sup>(''x'')}} is the function defined such that {{math|1=''f''<sup>1/3</sup>(''f''<sup>1/3</sup>(''f''<sup>1/3</sup>(''x''))) = ''f''(''x'')}}, while {{math|''f''{{i sup|2/3}}(''x'')}} may be defined as equal to {{math|''f''{{i sup| 1/3}}(''f''{{i sup|1/3}}(''x''))}}, and so forth, all based on the principle, mentioned earlier, that {{math|1=''f''<sup> ''m''</sup> ○ ''f''<sup> ''n''</sup> = ''f''<sup> ''m'' + ''n''</sup>}}. This idea can be generalized so that the iteration count {{mvar|n}} becomes a '''continuous parameter''', a sort of continuous "time" of a continuous [[Orbit (dynamics)|orbit]].<ref>{{cite journal |first1=R. |last1=Aldrovandi |first2=L. P. |last2=Freitas |title=Continuous Iteration of Dynamical Maps |journal=J. Math. Phys. |volume=39 |issue=10 |pages=5324 |year=1998 |doi=10.1063/1.532574 |arxiv=physics/9712026 |bibcode=1998JMP....39.5324A |hdl=11449/65519 |s2cid=119675869 |hdl-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |first1=G. |last1=Berkolaiko |first2=S. |last2=Rabinovich |first3=S. |last3=Havlin |title=Analysis of Carleman Representation of Analytical Recursions |journal=J. Math. Anal. Appl. |volume=224 |pages=81–90 |year=1998 |doi=10.1006/jmaa.1998.5986 |doi-access=free }}</ref> |
||
In such cases, one refers to the system as a [[flow (mathematics)|flow]] |
In such cases, one refers to the system as a [[flow (mathematics)|flow]] (cf. section on [[#Conjugacy|conjugacy]] below.) |
||
If a function is bijective (and so possesses an inverse function), then negative iterates correspond to function inverses and their compositions. For example, {{math|''f''<sup> −1</sup>(''x'')}} is the normal inverse of {{mvar|f}}, while {{math|''f''<sup> −2</sup>(''x'')}} is the inverse composed with itself, i.e. {{math|1=''f''<sup> −2</sup>(''x'') = ''f''<sup> −1</sup>(''f''<sup> −1</sup>(''x''))}}. Fractional negative iterates are defined analogously to fractional positive ones; for example, {{math|''f''<sup> −1/2</sup>(''x'')}} is defined such that {{math|1=''f''<sup> −1/2</sup>(''f''<sup> −1/2</sup>(''x'')) = ''f''<sup> −1</sup>(''x'')}}, or, equivalently, such that {{math|1=''f''<sup> −1/2</sup>(''f''<sup> 1/2</sup>(''x'')) = ''f''<sup> 0</sup>(''x'') = ''x''}}. |
|||
=== Some formulas for fractional iteration=== |
=== Some formulas for fractional iteration=== |
||
One of several methods of finding a series formula for fractional iteration, making use of a fixed point, is as follows.<ref>{{cite web |title=Tetration.org |url= |
One of several methods of finding a series formula for fractional iteration, making use of a fixed point, is as follows.<ref>{{cite web |title=Tetration.org |url=https://tetration.org/index.php/Fractional_Iteration }}</ref> |
||
# First determine a fixed point for the function such that {{math|1=''f''(''a'') = ''a''}}. |
# First determine a fixed point for the function such that {{math|1=''f''(''a'') = ''a''}}. |
||
Line 113: | Line 109: | ||
\sqrt{2}^{ \sqrt{2}^{\sqrt{2}^{\cdots}} } = f^n(1) = 2 - (\ln 2)^n + \frac{(\ln 2)^{n+1}((\ln 2)^n-1)}{4(\ln 2-1)} - \cdots |
\sqrt{2}^{ \sqrt{2}^{\sqrt{2}^{\cdots}} } = f^n(1) = 2 - (\ln 2)^n + \frac{(\ln 2)^{n+1}((\ln 2)^n-1)}{4(\ln 2-1)} - \cdots |
||
</math> |
</math> |
||
which, taking just the first three terms, is correct to the first decimal place when ''n'' is |
which, taking just the first three terms, is correct to the first decimal place when ''n'' is positive. Also see [[Tetration]]: {{math|1=''f'' <sup>''n''</sup>(1) = <sup>''n''</sup>{{sqrt|2}}}}. Using the other fixed point {{math|1=''a'' = ''f''(4) {{=}} 4}} causes the series to diverge. |
||
For {{math|1= ''n'' = −1}}, the series computes the inverse function {{sfrac|2|ln ''x''|ln 2}}. |
For {{math|1= ''n'' = −1}}, the series computes the inverse function {{sfrac|2|ln ''x''|ln 2}}. |
||
Line 134: | Line 130: | ||
:{{math|''g''(''ϕ''(''y'')) {{=}} ''ϕ''(''y''+1)}}, a form known as the [[Abel equation]]. |
:{{math|''g''(''ϕ''(''y'')) {{=}} ''ϕ''(''y''+1)}}, a form known as the [[Abel equation]]. |
||
Even in the absence of a strict homeomorphism, near a fixed point, here taken to be at {{mvar|x}} = 0, {{mvar|f}}(0) = 0, one may often solve<ref>Kimura, Tosihusa (1971). "On the Iteration of Analytic Functions", [http://www.math.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp/~fe/ ''Funkcialaj Ekvacioj''] '''14''', 197-238.</ref> [[Schröder's equation]] for a function Ψ, which makes {{math|''f''(''x'')}} locally conjugate to a mere dilation, {{math|''g''(''x'') {{=}} ''f'' '(0) ''x''}}, that is |
Even in the absence of a strict homeomorphism, near a fixed point, here taken to be at {{mvar|x}} = 0, {{mvar|f}}(0) = 0, one may often solve<ref>Kimura, Tosihusa (1971). "On the Iteration of Analytic Functions", [http://www.math.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp/~fe/ ''Funkcialaj Ekvacioj''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120426011125/http://www.math.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp/~fe/ |date=2012-04-26 }} '''14''', 197-238.</ref> [[Schröder's equation]] for a function Ψ, which makes {{math|''f''(''x'')}} locally conjugate to a mere dilation, {{math|''g''(''x'') {{=}} ''f'' '(0) ''x''}}, that is |
||
:{{math|''f''(''x'') {{=}} Ψ<sup>−1</sup>(''f'' '(0) Ψ(''x''))}}. |
:{{math|''f''(''x'') {{=}} Ψ<sup>−1</sup>(''f'' '(0) Ψ(''x''))}}. |
||
Line 152: | Line 148: | ||
==Examples== |
==Examples== |
||
There are [[List of chaotic maps|many chaotic maps]]. |
There are [[List of chaotic maps|many chaotic maps]]. Well-known iterated functions include the [[Mandelbrot set]] and [[iterated function systems]]. |
||
Well-known iterated functions include the [[Mandelbrot set]] and [[iterated function systems]]. |
|||
[[Ernst Schröder (mathematician)|Ernst Schröder]],<ref name="schr">{{cite journal |last=Schröder |first=Ernst |author-link=Ernst Schröder (mathematician) |year=1870 |title=Ueber iterirte Functionen|journal=Math. Ann. |volume=3 |issue= 2|pages=296–322 | doi=10.1007/BF01443992 |s2cid=116998358 }}</ref> in 1870, worked out special cases of the [[logistic map]], such as the chaotic case {{math|1=''f''(''x'') = 4''x''(1 − ''x'')}}, so that {{math|1=Ψ(''x'') = arcsin |
[[Ernst Schröder (mathematician)|Ernst Schröder]],<ref name="schr">{{cite journal |last=Schröder |first=Ernst |author-link=Ernst Schröder (mathematician) |year=1870 |title=Ueber iterirte Functionen|journal=Math. Ann. |volume=3 |issue= 2|pages=296–322 | doi=10.1007/BF01443992 |s2cid=116998358 }}</ref> in 1870, worked out special cases of the [[logistic map]], such as the chaotic case {{math|1=''f''(''x'') = 4''x''(1 − ''x'')}}, so that {{math|1=Ψ(''x'') = arcsin({{radic|''x''}})<sup>2</sup>}}, hence {{math|1=''f'' <sup>''n''</sup>(''x'') = sin(2<sup>''n''</sup> arcsin({{radic|''x''}}))<sup>2</sup>}}. |
||
A nonchaotic case Schröder also illustrated with his method, {{math|1=''f''(''x'') = 2''x''(1 − ''x'')}}, yielded {{math|1=Ψ(''x'') = −{{sfrac|1|2}} ln(1 − 2''x'')}}, and hence {{math|1=''f''<sup>''n''</sup>(''x'') = −{{sfrac|1|2}}((1 − 2''x'')<sup>2<sup>''n''</sup></sup> − 1)}}. |
A nonchaotic case Schröder also illustrated with his method, {{math|1=''f''(''x'') = 2''x''(1 − ''x'')}}, yielded {{math|1=Ψ(''x'') = −{{sfrac|1|2}} ln(1 − 2''x'')}}, and hence {{math|1=''f''<sup>''n''</sup>(''x'') = −{{sfrac|1|2}}((1 − 2''x'')<sup>2<sup>''n''</sup></sup> − 1)}}. |
||
Line 186: | Line 181: | ||
*<math>\alpha = \frac{2ax + b \pm \sqrt{(2ax + b)^2 - 16}}{4}</math> |
*<math>\alpha = \frac{2ax + b \pm \sqrt{(2ax + b)^2 - 16}}{4}</math> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|<math>\frac{ax + b}{cx + d}</math> ([[ |
|<math>\frac{ax + b}{cx + d}</math> ([[fractional linear transformation]])<ref>Brand, Louis, "A sequence defined by a difference equation," ''[[American Mathematical Monthly]]'' '''62''', September 1955, 489–492. [https://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/2307362 online]</ref> |
||
|<math>\frac{a}{c} + \frac{bc - ad}{c} \left [ \frac{(cx - a + \alpha)\alpha^{n - 1} - (cx - a + \beta)\beta^{n - 1}}{(cx - a + \alpha)\alpha^{n} - (cx - a + \beta)\beta^{n}} \right ]</math><br> |
|<math>\frac{a}{c} + \frac{bc - ad}{c} \left [ \frac{(cx - a + \alpha)\alpha^{n - 1} - (cx - a + \beta)\beta^{n - 1}}{(cx - a + \alpha)\alpha^{n} - (cx - a + \beta)\beta^{n}} \right ]</math><br> |
||
where: |
where: |
||
Line 212: | Line 207: | ||
Note: these two special cases of {{math|''ax''<sup>2</sup> + ''bx'' + ''c''}} are the only cases that have a closed-form solution. Choosing ''b'' = 2 = –''a'' and ''b'' = 4 = –''a'', respectively, further reduces them to the nonchaotic and chaotic logistic cases discussed prior to the table. |
Note: these two special cases of {{math|''ax''<sup>2</sup> + ''bx'' + ''c''}} are the only cases that have a closed-form solution. Choosing ''b'' = 2 = –''a'' and ''b'' = 4 = –''a'', respectively, further reduces them to the nonchaotic and chaotic logistic cases discussed prior to the table. |
||
Some of these examples are related among themselves by simple conjugacies. |
|||
Some of these examples are related among themselves by simple conjugacies. A few further examples, essentially amounting to simple conjugacies of Schröder's examples can be found in ref.<ref>{{Cite journal | last1 = Katsura | first1 = S. | last2 = Fukuda | first2 = W. | doi = 10.1016/0378-4371(85)90048-2 | title = Exactly solvable models showing chaotic behavior | journal = Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications | volume = 130 | issue = 3 | pages = 597 | year = 1985 | bibcode = 1985PhyA..130..597K }}</ref> |
|||
==Means of study== |
==Means of study== |
||
Line 239: | Line 234: | ||
==Lie's data transport equation== |
==Lie's data transport equation== |
||
⚫ | |||
Iterated functions crop up in the series expansion of combined functions, such as {{math|''g''(''f''(''x''))}}. |
Iterated functions crop up in the series expansion of combined functions, such as {{math|''g''(''f''(''x''))}}. |
||
Line 262: | Line 258: | ||
For continuous iteration index {{mvar|t}}, then, now written as a subscript, this amounts to Lie's celebrated exponential realization of a continuous group, |
For continuous iteration index {{mvar|t}}, then, now written as a subscript, this amounts to Lie's celebrated exponential realization of a continuous group, |
||
:<math>e^{t~\frac{\partial ~~}{\partial h(x)}} g(x)= g(h^{-1}(h(x )+t))= g(f_t(x)).</math> |
:<math>e^{t~\frac{\partial ~~}{\partial h(x)}} g(x)= g(h^{-1}(h(x )+t))= g(f_t(x)).</math> |
||
The initial flow velocity {{mvar|v}} suffices to determine the entire flow, given this exponential realization which automatically provides the general solution to the ''translation functional equation'',<ref name="acz">Aczel, J. (2006), ''Lectures on Functional |
The initial flow velocity {{mvar|v}} suffices to determine the entire flow, given this exponential realization which automatically provides the general solution to the ''translation functional equation'',<ref name="acz">Aczel, J. (2006), ''Lectures on Functional Equations and Their Applications'' (Dover Books on Mathematics, 2006), Ch. 6, {{ISBN|978-0486445236}}.</ref> |
||
Equations and Their Applications'' (Dover Books on Mathematics, 2006), Ch. 6, {{ISBN|978-0486445236}}.</ref> |
|||
:<math>f_t(f_\tau (x))=f_{t+\tau} (x) ~.</math> |
:<math>f_t(f_\tau (x))=f_{t+\tau} (x) ~.</math> |
||
⚫ | |||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
Line 280: | Line 273: | ||
* [[Functional square root]] |
* [[Functional square root]] |
||
* [[Abel function]] |
* [[Abel function]] |
||
* [[Schröder's equation]] |
|||
* [[Böttcher's equation]] |
|||
* [[Infinite compositions of analytic functions]] |
* [[Infinite compositions of analytic functions]] |
||
* [[Flow (mathematics)]] |
* [[Flow (mathematics)]] |
||
Line 293: | Line 288: | ||
==References== |
==References== |
||
{{Reflist|refs= |
{{Reflist|refs= |
||
<ref name="Cajori_1929">{{cite book |author-first=Florian |author-last=Cajori |author-link=Florian Cajori |title=A History of Mathematical Notations |chapter=§472. The power of a logarithm / §473. Iterated logarithms / §533. John Herschel's notation for inverse functions / §535. Persistence of rival notations for inverse functions / §537. Powers of trigonometric functions |volume=2 |orig-year=March 1929 |publisher=[[Open court publishing company]] |location=Chicago, USA |date=1952 |edition=3rd corrected printing of 1929 issue, 2nd |pages=108, 176–179, 336, 346 |isbn=978-1-60206-714-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=bT5suOONXlgC |access-date=2016-01-18 |quote=[…] §473. ''Iterated logarithms'' […] We note here the symbolism used by [[Alfred Pringsheim|Pringsheim]] and [[Jules Molk|Molk]] in their joint ''Encyclopédie'' article: "<sup>2</sup>log<sub>''b''</sub> ''a'' = log<sub>''b''</sub> (log<sub>''b''</sub> ''a''), …, <sup>''k''+1</sup>log<sub>''b''</sub> ''a'' = log<sub>''b''</sub> (<sup>''k''</sup>log<sub>''b''</sub> ''a'')."{{citeref|Pringsheim|Molk|1907|a<!-- [10] -->}} […] §533. ''[[John Frederick William Herschel|John Herschel]]'s notation for inverse functions,'' sin<sup>−1</sup> ''x'', tan<sup>−1</sup> ''x'', etc., was published by him in the ''[[Philosophical Transactions of London]]'', for the year 1813. He says ({{citeref|Herschel|1813|p. 10|style=plain}}): "This notation cos.<sup>−1</sup> ''e'' must not be understood to signify 1/cos. ''e'', but what is usually written thus, arc (cos.=''e'')." He admits that some authors use cos.<sup>''m''</sup> ''A'' for (cos. ''A'')<sup>''m''</sup>, but he justifies his own notation by pointing out that since ''d''<sup>2</sup> ''x'', Δ<sup>3</sup> ''x'', Σ<sup>2</sup> ''x'' mean ''dd'' ''x'', ΔΔΔ ''x'', ΣΣ ''x'', we ought to write sin.<sup>2</sup> ''x'' for sin. sin. ''x'', log.<sup>3</sup> ''x'' for log. log. log. ''x''. Just as we write ''d''<sup>−''n''</sup> V=∫<sup>''n''</sup> V, we may write similarly sin.<sup>−1</sup> ''x''=arc (sin.=''x''), log.<sup>−1</sup> ''x''.=c<sup>''x''</sup>. Some years later Herschel explained that in 1813 he used ''f''<sup>''n''</sup>(''x''), ''f''<sup>−''n''</sup>(''x''), sin.<sup>−1</sup> ''x'', etc., "as he then supposed for the first time. The work of a German Analyst, [[Hans Heinrich Bürmann|Burmann]], has, however, within these few months come to his knowledge, in which the same is explained at a considerably earlier date. He[Burmann], however, does not seem to have noticed the convenience of applying this idea to the inverse functions tan<sup>−1</sup>, etc., nor does he appear at all aware of the inverse calculus of functions to which it gives rise." Herschel adds, "The symmetry of this notation and above all the new and most extensive views it opens of the nature of analytical operations seem to authorize its universal adoption."{{citeref|Herschel|1820|b<!-- [4] -->}} […] §535. ''Persistence of rival notations for inverse function.''— […] The use of Herschel's notation underwent a slight change in [[Benjamin Peirce]]'s books, to remove the chief objection to them; Peirce wrote: "cos<sup>[−1]</sup> ''x''," "log<sup>[−1]</sup> ''x''."{{citeref|Peirce|1852|c<!-- [1] -->}} […] §537. ''Powers of trigonometric functions.''—Three principal notations have been used to denote, say, the square of sin ''x'', namely, (sin ''x'')<sup>2</sup>, sin ''x''<sup>2</sup>, sin<sup>2</sup> ''x''. The prevailing notation at present is sin<sup>2</sup> ''x'', though the first is least likely to be misinterpreted. In the case of sin<sup>2</sup> ''x'' two interpretations suggest themselves; first, sin ''x'' & |
<ref name="Cajori_1929">{{cite book |author-first=Florian |author-last=Cajori |author-link=Florian Cajori |title=A History of Mathematical Notations |chapter=§472. The power of a logarithm / §473. Iterated logarithms / §533. John Herschel's notation for inverse functions / §535. Persistence of rival notations for inverse functions / §537. Powers of trigonometric functions |volume=2 |orig-year=March 1929 |publisher=[[Open court publishing company]] |location=Chicago, USA |date=1952 |edition=3rd corrected printing of 1929 issue, 2nd |pages=108, 176–179, 336, 346 |isbn=978-1-60206-714-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=bT5suOONXlgC |access-date=2016-01-18 |quote=[…] §473. ''Iterated logarithms'' […] We note here the symbolism used by [[Alfred Pringsheim|Pringsheim]] and [[Jules Molk|Molk]] in their joint ''Encyclopédie'' article: "<sup>2</sup>log<sub>''b''</sub> ''a'' = log<sub>''b''</sub> (log<sub>''b''</sub> ''a''), …, <sup>''k''+1</sup>log<sub>''b''</sub> ''a'' = log<sub>''b''</sub> (<sup>''k''</sup>log<sub>''b''</sub> ''a'')."{{citeref|Pringsheim|Molk|1907|a<!-- [10] -->}} […] §533. ''[[John Frederick William Herschel|John Herschel]]'s notation for inverse functions,'' sin<sup>−1</sup> ''x'', tan<sup>−1</sup> ''x'', etc., was published by him in the ''[[Philosophical Transactions of London]]'', for the year 1813. He says ({{citeref|Herschel|1813|p. 10|style=plain}}): "This notation cos.<sup>−1</sup> ''e'' must not be understood to signify 1/cos. ''e'', but what is usually written thus, arc (cos.=''e'')." He admits that some authors use cos.<sup>''m''</sup> ''A'' for (cos. ''A'')<sup>''m''</sup>, but he justifies his own notation by pointing out that since ''d''<sup>2</sup> ''x'', Δ<sup>3</sup> ''x'', Σ<sup>2</sup> ''x'' mean ''dd'' ''x'', ΔΔΔ ''x'', ΣΣ ''x'', we ought to write sin.<sup>2</sup> ''x'' for sin. sin. ''x'', log.<sup>3</sup> ''x'' for log. log. log. ''x''. Just as we write ''d''<sup>−''n''</sup> V=∫<sup>''n''</sup> V, we may write similarly sin.<sup>−1</sup> ''x''=arc (sin.=''x''), log.<sup>−1</sup> ''x''.=c<sup>''x''</sup>. Some years later Herschel explained that in 1813 he used ''f''<sup>''n''</sup>(''x''), ''f''<sup>−''n''</sup>(''x''), sin.<sup>−1</sup> ''x'', etc., "as he then supposed for the first time. The work of a German Analyst, [[Hans Heinrich Bürmann|Burmann]], has, however, within these few months come to his knowledge, in which the same is explained at a considerably earlier date. He[Burmann], however, does not seem to have noticed the convenience of applying this idea to the inverse functions tan<sup>−1</sup>, etc., nor does he appear at all aware of the inverse calculus of functions to which it gives rise." Herschel adds, "The symmetry of this notation and above all the new and most extensive views it opens of the nature of analytical operations seem to authorize its universal adoption."{{citeref|Herschel|1820|b<!-- [4] -->}} […] §535. ''Persistence of rival notations for inverse function.''— […] The use of Herschel's notation underwent a slight change in [[Benjamin Peirce]]'s books, to remove the chief objection to them; Peirce wrote: "cos<sup>[−1]</sup> ''x''," "log<sup>[−1]</sup> ''x''."{{citeref|Peirce|1852|c<!-- [1] -->}} […] §537. ''Powers of trigonometric functions.''—Three principal notations have been used to denote, say, the square of sin ''x'', namely, (sin ''x'')<sup>2</sup>, sin ''x''<sup>2</sup>, sin<sup>2</sup> ''x''. The prevailing notation at present is sin<sup>2</sup> ''x'', though the first is least likely to be misinterpreted. In the case of sin<sup>2</sup> ''x'' two interpretations suggest themselves; first, sin ''x'' ⋅ sin ''x''; second,{{citeref|Peano|1903|d<!-- [8] -->}} sin (sin ''x''). As functions of the last type do not ordinarily present themselves, the danger of misinterpretation is very much less than in case of log<sup>2</sup> ''x'', where log ''x'' ⋅ log ''x'' and log (log ''x'') are of frequent occurrence in analysis. […] The notation sin<sup>''n''</sup> ''x'' for (sin ''x'')<sup>''n''</sup> has been widely used and is now the prevailing one. […]}} (xviii+367+1 pages including 1 addenda page) (NB. ISBN and link for reprint of 2nd edition by Cosimo, Inc., New York, USA, 2013.)</ref> |
||
<ref name="Herschel_1813">{{cite journal |author-first=John Frederick William |author-last=Herschel |author-link=John Frederick William Herschel |title=On a Remarkable Application of Cotes's Theorem |journal=[[Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London]] |publisher=[[Royal Society of London]], printed by W. Bulmer and Co., Cleveland-Row, St. James's, sold by G. and W. Nicol, Pall-Mall |location=London |volume=103 |number=Part 1 |date=1813 |orig-year=1812-11-12 |jstor=107384 |pages=8–26 [10]|doi=10.1098/rstl.1813.0005 |s2cid=118124706 |doi-access=free }}</ref> |
<ref name="Herschel_1813">{{cite journal |author-first=John Frederick William |author-last=Herschel |author-link=John Frederick William Herschel |title=On a Remarkable Application of Cotes's Theorem |journal=[[Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London]] |publisher=[[Royal Society of London]], printed by W. Bulmer and Co., Cleveland-Row, St. James's, sold by G. and W. Nicol, Pall-Mall |location=London |volume=103 |number=Part 1 |date=1813 |orig-year=1812-11-12 |jstor=107384 |pages=8–26 [10]|doi=10.1098/rstl.1813.0005 |s2cid=118124706 |doi-access=free }}</ref> |
||
<ref name="Herschel_1820">{{cite book |author-first=John Frederick William |author-last=Herschel |author-link=John Frederick William Herschel |title=A Collection of Examples of the Applications of the Calculus of Finite Differences |chapter=Part III. Section I. Examples of the Direct Method of Differences |location=Cambridge, UK |publisher=Printed by J. Smith, sold by J. Deighton & sons |date=1820 |pages=1–13 [5–6] |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=PWcSAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA5 |access-date=2020-08-04 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200804031020/https://books.google.de/books?hl=de&id=PWcSAAAAIAAJ&jtp=5 |archive-date=2020-08-04}} [https://archive.org/details/acollectionexam00lacrgoog] (NB. Inhere, Herschel refers to his {{citeref|Herschel|1813|1813 work|style=plain}} and mentions [[Hans Heinrich Bürmann]]'s older work.)</ref> |
<ref name="Herschel_1820">{{cite book |author-first=John Frederick William |author-last=Herschel |author-link=John Frederick William Herschel |title=A Collection of Examples of the Applications of the Calculus of Finite Differences |chapter=Part III. Section I. Examples of the Direct Method of Differences |location=Cambridge, UK |publisher=Printed by J. Smith, sold by J. Deighton & sons |date=1820 |pages=1–13 [5–6] |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=PWcSAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA5 |access-date=2020-08-04 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200804031020/https://books.google.de/books?hl=de&id=PWcSAAAAIAAJ&jtp=5 |archive-date=2020-08-04}} [https://archive.org/details/acollectionexam00lacrgoog] (NB. Inhere, Herschel refers to his {{citeref|Herschel|1813|1813 work|style=plain}} and mentions [[Hans Heinrich Bürmann]]'s older work.)</ref> |
||
Line 301: | Line 296: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
==External |
==External links== |
||
* {{cite web |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362010262 |author-link=John Gill (climber) |first=John |last=Gill |title=A Primer on the Elementary Theory of Infinite Compositions of Complex Functions |publisher=Colorado State University |date=January 2017 }} |
|||
[[Category:Dynamical systems]] |
[[Category:Dynamical systems]] |
Latest revision as of 11:57, 28 June 2024
In mathematics, an iterated function is a function that is obtained by composing another function with itself two or several times. The process of repeatedly applying the same function is called iteration. In this process, starting from some initial object, the result of applying a given function is fed again into the function as input, and this process is repeated.
For example, on the image on the right:
Iterated functions are studied in computer science, fractals, dynamical systems, mathematics and renormalization group physics.
Definition
[edit]The formal definition of an iterated function on a set X follows.
Let X be a set and f: X → X be a function.
Defining f n as the n-th iterate of f, where n is a non-negative integer, by: and
where idX is the identity function on X and (f g)(x) = f (g(x)) denotes function composition. This notation has been traced to and John Frederick William Herschel in 1813.[1][2][3][4] Herschel credited Hans Heinrich Bürmann for it, but without giving a specific reference to the work of Bürmann, which remains undiscovered.[5]
Because the notation f n may refer to both iteration (composition) of the function f or exponentiation of the function f (the latter is commonly used in trigonometry), some mathematicians[citation needed] choose to use ∘ to denote the compositional meaning, writing f∘n(x) for the n-th iterate of the function f(x), as in, for example, f∘3(x) meaning f(f(f(x))). For the same purpose, f [n](x) was used by Benjamin Peirce[6][4][nb 1] whereas Alfred Pringsheim and Jules Molk suggested nf(x) instead.[7][4][nb 2]
Abelian property and iteration sequences
[edit]In general, the following identity holds for all non-negative integers m and n,
This is structurally identical to the property of exponentiation that aman = am + n.
In general, for arbitrary general (negative, non-integer, etc.) indices m and n, this relation is called the translation functional equation, cf. Schröder's equation and Abel equation. On a logarithmic scale, this reduces to the nesting property of Chebyshev polynomials, Tm(Tn(x)) = Tm n(x), since Tn(x) = cos(n arccos(x)).
The relation (f m)n(x) = (f n)m(x) = f mn(x) also holds, analogous to the property of exponentiation that (am)n = (an)m = amn.
The sequence of functions f n is called a Picard sequence,[8][9] named after Charles Émile Picard.
For a given x in X, the sequence of values fn(x) is called the orbit of x.
If f n (x) = f n+m (x) for some integer m > 0, the orbit is called a periodic orbit. The smallest such value of m for a given x is called the period of the orbit. The point x itself is called a periodic point. The cycle detection problem in computer science is the algorithmic problem of finding the first periodic point in an orbit, and the period of the orbit.
Fixed points
[edit]If x = f(x) for some x in X (that is, the period of the orbit of x is 1), then x is called a fixed point of the iterated sequence. The set of fixed points is often denoted as Fix(f). There exist a number of fixed-point theorems that guarantee the existence of fixed points in various situations, including the Banach fixed point theorem and the Brouwer fixed point theorem.
There are several techniques for convergence acceleration of the sequences produced by fixed point iteration.[10] For example, the Aitken method applied to an iterated fixed point is known as Steffensen's method, and produces quadratic convergence.
Limiting behaviour
[edit]Upon iteration, one may find that there are sets that shrink and converge towards a single point. In such a case, the point that is converged to is known as an attractive fixed point. Conversely, iteration may give the appearance of points diverging away from a single point; this would be the case for an unstable fixed point.[11]
When the points of the orbit converge to one or more limits, the set of accumulation points of the orbit is known as the limit set or the ω-limit set.
The ideas of attraction and repulsion generalize similarly; one may categorize iterates into stable sets and unstable sets, according to the behavior of small neighborhoods under iteration. Also see infinite compositions of analytic functions.
Other limiting behaviors are possible; for example, wandering points are points that move away, and never come back even close to where they started.
Invariant measure
[edit]If one considers the evolution of a density distribution, rather than that of individual point dynamics, then the limiting behavior is given by the invariant measure. It can be visualized as the behavior of a point-cloud or dust-cloud under repeated iteration. The invariant measure is an eigenstate of the Ruelle-Frobenius-Perron operator or transfer operator, corresponding to an eigenvalue of 1. Smaller eigenvalues correspond to unstable, decaying states.
In general, because repeated iteration corresponds to a shift, the transfer operator, and its adjoint, the Koopman operator can both be interpreted as shift operators action on a shift space. The theory of subshifts of finite type provides general insight into many iterated functions, especially those leading to chaos.
Fractional iterates and flows, and negative iterates
[edit]The notion f1/n must be used with care when the equation gn(x) = f(x) has multiple solutions, which is normally the case, as in Babbage's equation of the functional roots of the identity map. For example, for n = 2 and f(x) = 4x − 6, both g(x) = 6 − 2x and g(x) = 2x − 2 are solutions; so the expression f 1/2(x) does not denote a unique function, just as numbers have multiple algebraic roots. A trivial root of f can always be obtained if f's domain can be extended sufficiently, cf. picture. The roots chosen are normally the ones belonging to the orbit under study.
Fractional iteration of a function can be defined: for instance, a half iterate of a function f is a function g such that g(g(x)) = f(x).[12] This function g(x) can be written using the index notation as f 1/2(x) . Similarly, f 1/3(x) is the function defined such that f1/3(f1/3(f1/3(x))) = f(x), while f2/3(x) may be defined as equal to f 1/3(f1/3(x)), and so forth, all based on the principle, mentioned earlier, that f m ○ f n = f m + n. This idea can be generalized so that the iteration count n becomes a continuous parameter, a sort of continuous "time" of a continuous orbit.[13][14]
In such cases, one refers to the system as a flow (cf. section on conjugacy below.)
If a function is bijective (and so possesses an inverse function), then negative iterates correspond to function inverses and their compositions. For example, f −1(x) is the normal inverse of f, while f −2(x) is the inverse composed with itself, i.e. f −2(x) = f −1(f −1(x)). Fractional negative iterates are defined analogously to fractional positive ones; for example, f −1/2(x) is defined such that f −1/2(f −1/2(x)) = f −1(x), or, equivalently, such that f −1/2(f 1/2(x)) = f 0(x) = x.
Some formulas for fractional iteration
[edit]One of several methods of finding a series formula for fractional iteration, making use of a fixed point, is as follows.[15]
- First determine a fixed point for the function such that f(a) = a.
- Define f n(a) = a for all n belonging to the reals. This, in some ways, is the most natural extra condition to place upon the fractional iterates.
- Expand fn(x) around the fixed point a as a Taylor series,
- Expand out
- Substitute in for fk(a) = a, for any k,
- Make use of the geometric progression to simplify terms, There is a special case when f '(a) = 1,
This can be carried on indefinitely, although inefficiently, as the latter terms become increasingly complicated. A more systematic procedure is outlined in the following section on Conjugacy.
Example 1
[edit]For example, setting f(x) = Cx + D gives the fixed point a = D/(1 − C), so the above formula terminates to just which is trivial to check.
Example 2
[edit]Find the value of where this is done n times (and possibly the interpolated values when n is not an integer). We have f(x) = √2x. A fixed point is a = f(2) = 2.
So set x = 1 and f n (1) expanded around the fixed point value of 2 is then an infinite series, which, taking just the first three terms, is correct to the first decimal place when n is positive. Also see Tetration: f n(1) = n√2. Using the other fixed point a = f(4) = 4 causes the series to diverge.
For n = −1, the series computes the inverse function 2+ln x/ln 2.
Example 3
[edit]With the function f(x) = xb, expand around the fixed point 1 to get the series which is simply the Taylor series of x(bn ) expanded around 1.
Conjugacy
[edit]If f and g are two iterated functions, and there exists a homeomorphism h such that g = h−1 ○ f ○ h , then f and g are said to be topologically conjugate.
Clearly, topological conjugacy is preserved under iteration, as gn = h−1 ○ f n ○ h. Thus, if one can solve for one iterated function system, one also has solutions for all topologically conjugate systems. For example, the tent map is topologically conjugate to the logistic map. As a special case, taking f(x) = x + 1, one has the iteration of g(x) = h−1(h(x) + 1) as
- gn(x) = h−1(h(x) + n), for any function h.
Making the substitution x = h−1(y) = ϕ(y) yields
- g(ϕ(y)) = ϕ(y+1), a form known as the Abel equation.
Even in the absence of a strict homeomorphism, near a fixed point, here taken to be at x = 0, f(0) = 0, one may often solve[16] Schröder's equation for a function Ψ, which makes f(x) locally conjugate to a mere dilation, g(x) = f '(0) x, that is
- f(x) = Ψ−1(f '(0) Ψ(x)).
Thus, its iteration orbit, or flow, under suitable provisions (e.g., f '(0) ≠ 1), amounts to the conjugate of the orbit of the monomial,
- Ψ−1(f '(0)n Ψ(x)),
where n in this expression serves as a plain exponent: functional iteration has been reduced to multiplication! Here, however, the exponent n no longer needs be integer or positive, and is a continuous "time" of evolution for the full orbit:[17] the monoid of the Picard sequence (cf. transformation semigroup) has generalized to a full continuous group.[18]
This method (perturbative determination of the principal eigenfunction Ψ, cf. Carleman matrix) is equivalent to the algorithm of the preceding section, albeit, in practice, more powerful and systematic.
Markov chains
[edit]If the function is linear and can be described by a stochastic matrix, that is, a matrix whose rows or columns sum to one, then the iterated system is known as a Markov chain.
Examples
[edit]There are many chaotic maps. Well-known iterated functions include the Mandelbrot set and iterated function systems.
Ernst Schröder,[20] in 1870, worked out special cases of the logistic map, such as the chaotic case f(x) = 4x(1 − x), so that Ψ(x) = arcsin(√x)2, hence f n(x) = sin(2n arcsin(√x))2.
A nonchaotic case Schröder also illustrated with his method, f(x) = 2x(1 − x), yielded Ψ(x) = −1/2 ln(1 − 2x), and hence fn(x) = −1/2((1 − 2x)2n − 1).
If f is the action of a group element on a set, then the iterated function corresponds to a free group.
Most functions do not have explicit general closed-form expressions for the n-th iterate. The table below lists some[20] that do. Note that all these expressions are valid even for non-integer and negative n, as well as non-negative integer n.
(see note) |
where: |
(see note) |
where: |
(fractional linear transformation)[21] | where: |
(generic Abel equation) | |
(Chebyshev polynomial for integer m) |
Note: these two special cases of ax2 + bx + c are the only cases that have a closed-form solution. Choosing b = 2 = –a and b = 4 = –a, respectively, further reduces them to the nonchaotic and chaotic logistic cases discussed prior to the table.
Some of these examples are related among themselves by simple conjugacies.
Means of study
[edit]Iterated functions can be studied with the Artin–Mazur zeta function and with transfer operators.
In computer science
[edit]In computer science, iterated functions occur as a special case of recursive functions, which in turn anchor the study of such broad topics as lambda calculus, or narrower ones, such as the denotational semantics of computer programs.
Definitions in terms of iterated functions
[edit]Two important functionals can be defined in terms of iterated functions. These are summation:
and the equivalent product:
Functional derivative
[edit]The functional derivative of an iterated function is given by the recursive formula:
Lie's data transport equation
[edit]Iterated functions crop up in the series expansion of combined functions, such as g(f(x)).
Given the iteration velocity, or beta function (physics),
for the nth iterate of the function f, we have[22]
For example, for rigid advection, if f(x) = x + t, then v(x) = t. Consequently, g(x + t) = exp(t ∂/∂x) g(x), action by a plain shift operator.
Conversely, one may specify f(x) given an arbitrary v(x), through the generic Abel equation discussed above,
where
This is evident by noting that
For continuous iteration index t, then, now written as a subscript, this amounts to Lie's celebrated exponential realization of a continuous group,
The initial flow velocity v suffices to determine the entire flow, given this exponential realization which automatically provides the general solution to the translation functional equation,[23]
See also
[edit]- Irrational rotation
- Iterated function system
- Iterative method
- Rotation number
- Sarkovskii's theorem
- Fractional calculus
- Recurrence relation
- Schröder's equation
- Functional square root
- Abel function
- Schröder's equation
- Böttcher's equation
- Infinite compositions of analytic functions
- Flow (mathematics)
- Tetration
- Functional equation
Notes
[edit]- ^ while f (n) is taken for the nth derivative
- ^ Alfred Pringsheim's and Jules Molk's (1907) notation nf(x) to denote function compositions must not be confused with Rudolf von Bitter Rucker's (1982) notation nx, introduced by Hans Maurer (1901) and Reuben Louis Goodstein (1947) for tetration, or with David Patterson Ellerman's (1995) nx pre-superscript notation for roots.
References
[edit]- ^ Herschel, John Frederick William (1813) [1812-11-12]. "On a Remarkable Application of Cotes's Theorem". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. 103 (Part 1). London: Royal Society of London, printed by W. Bulmer and Co., Cleveland-Row, St. James's, sold by G. and W. Nicol, Pall-Mall: 8–26 [10]. doi:10.1098/rstl.1813.0005. JSTOR 107384. S2CID 118124706.
- ^ Herschel, John Frederick William (1820). "Part III. Section I. Examples of the Direct Method of Differences". A Collection of Examples of the Applications of the Calculus of Finite Differences. Cambridge, UK: Printed by J. Smith, sold by J. Deighton & sons. pp. 1–13 [5–6]. Archived from the original on 2020-08-04. Retrieved 2020-08-04. [1] (NB. Inhere, Herschel refers to his 1813 work and mentions Hans Heinrich Bürmann's older work.)
- ^ Peano, Giuseppe (1903). Formulaire mathématique (in French). Vol. IV. p. 229.
- ^ a b c Cajori, Florian (1952) [March 1929]. "§472. The power of a logarithm / §473. Iterated logarithms / §533. John Herschel's notation for inverse functions / §535. Persistence of rival notations for inverse functions / §537. Powers of trigonometric functions". A History of Mathematical Notations. Vol. 2 (3rd corrected printing of 1929 issue, 2nd ed.). Chicago, USA: Open court publishing company. pp. 108, 176–179, 336, 346. ISBN 978-1-60206-714-1. Retrieved 2016-01-18.
[…] §473. Iterated logarithms […] We note here the symbolism used by Pringsheim and Molk in their joint Encyclopédie article: "2logb a = logb (logb a), …, k+1logb a = logb (klogb a)."[a] […] §533. John Herschel's notation for inverse functions, sin−1 x, tan−1 x, etc., was published by him in the Philosophical Transactions of London, for the year 1813. He says (p. 10): "This notation cos.−1 e must not be understood to signify 1/cos. e, but what is usually written thus, arc (cos.=e)." He admits that some authors use cos.m A for (cos. A)m, but he justifies his own notation by pointing out that since d2 x, Δ3 x, Σ2 x mean dd x, ΔΔΔ x, ΣΣ x, we ought to write sin.2 x for sin. sin. x, log.3 x for log. log. log. x. Just as we write d−n V=∫n V, we may write similarly sin.−1 x=arc (sin.=x), log.−1 x.=cx. Some years later Herschel explained that in 1813 he used fn(x), f−n(x), sin.−1 x, etc., "as he then supposed for the first time. The work of a German Analyst, Burmann, has, however, within these few months come to his knowledge, in which the same is explained at a considerably earlier date. He[Burmann], however, does not seem to have noticed the convenience of applying this idea to the inverse functions tan−1, etc., nor does he appear at all aware of the inverse calculus of functions to which it gives rise." Herschel adds, "The symmetry of this notation and above all the new and most extensive views it opens of the nature of analytical operations seem to authorize its universal adoption."[b] […] §535. Persistence of rival notations for inverse function.— […] The use of Herschel's notation underwent a slight change in Benjamin Peirce's books, to remove the chief objection to them; Peirce wrote: "cos[−1] x," "log[−1] x."[c] […] §537. Powers of trigonometric functions.—Three principal notations have been used to denote, say, the square of sin x, namely, (sin x)2, sin x2, sin2 x. The prevailing notation at present is sin2 x, though the first is least likely to be misinterpreted. In the case of sin2 x two interpretations suggest themselves; first, sin x ⋅ sin x; second,[d] sin (sin x). As functions of the last type do not ordinarily present themselves, the danger of misinterpretation is very much less than in case of log2 x, where log x ⋅ log x and log (log x) are of frequent occurrence in analysis. […] The notation sinn x for (sin x)n has been widely used and is now the prevailing one. […]
(xviii+367+1 pages including 1 addenda page) (NB. ISBN and link for reprint of 2nd edition by Cosimo, Inc., New York, USA, 2013.) - ^ Gulick, Denny; Ford, Jeff (2024). Encounters with Chaos and Fractals (3rd ed.). CRC Press. p. 2. ISBN 9781003835776.
- ^ Peirce, Benjamin (1852). Curves, Functions and Forces. Vol. I (new ed.). Boston, USA. p. 203.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - ^ Pringsheim, Alfred; Molk, Jules (1907). Encyclopédie des sciences mathématiques pures et appliquées (in French). Vol. I. p. 195. Part I.
- ^ Kuczma, Marek (1968). Functional equations in a single variable. Monografie Matematyczne. Warszawa: PWN – Polish Scientific Publishers.
- ^ Kuczma, M., Choczewski B., and Ger, R. (1990). Iterative Functional Equations. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-35561-3.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Carleson, L.; Gamelin, T. D. W. (1993). Complex dynamics. Universitext: Tracts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag. ISBN 0-387-97942-5.
- ^ Istratescu, Vasile (1981). Fixed Point Theory, An Introduction, D. Reidel, Holland. ISBN 90-277-1224-7.
- ^ "Finding f such that f(f(x))=g(x) given g". MathOverflow.
- ^ Aldrovandi, R.; Freitas, L. P. (1998). "Continuous Iteration of Dynamical Maps". J. Math. Phys. 39 (10): 5324. arXiv:physics/9712026. Bibcode:1998JMP....39.5324A. doi:10.1063/1.532574. hdl:11449/65519. S2CID 119675869.
- ^ Berkolaiko, G.; Rabinovich, S.; Havlin, S. (1998). "Analysis of Carleman Representation of Analytical Recursions". J. Math. Anal. Appl. 224: 81–90. doi:10.1006/jmaa.1998.5986.
- ^ "Tetration.org".
- ^ Kimura, Tosihusa (1971). "On the Iteration of Analytic Functions", Funkcialaj Ekvacioj Archived 2012-04-26 at the Wayback Machine 14, 197-238.
- ^ Curtright, T. L.; Zachos, C. K. (2009). "Evolution Profiles and Functional Equations". Journal of Physics A. 42 (48): 485208. arXiv:0909.2424. Bibcode:2009JPhA...42V5208C. doi:10.1088/1751-8113/42/48/485208. S2CID 115173476.
- ^ For explicit instance, example 2 above amounts to just f n(x) = Ψ−1((ln 2)n Ψ(x)), for any n, not necessarily integer, where Ψ is the solution of the relevant Schröder's equation, Ψ(√2x) = ln 2 Ψ(x). This solution is also the infinite m limit of (f m(x) − 2)/(ln 2)m.
- ^ Curtright, T. L. Evolution surfaces and Schröder functional methods.
- ^ a b Schröder, Ernst (1870). "Ueber iterirte Functionen". Math. Ann. 3 (2): 296–322. doi:10.1007/BF01443992. S2CID 116998358.
- ^ Brand, Louis, "A sequence defined by a difference equation," American Mathematical Monthly 62, September 1955, 489–492. online
- ^ Berkson, E.; Porta, H. (1978). "Semigroups of analytic functions and composition operators". The Michigan Mathematical Journal. 25: 101–115. doi:10.1307/mmj/1029002009. Curtright, T. L.; Zachos, C. K. (2010). "Chaotic maps, Hamiltonian flows and holographic methods". Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical. 43 (44): 445101. arXiv:1002.0104. Bibcode:2010JPhA...43R5101C. doi:10.1088/1751-8113/43/44/445101. S2CID 115176169.
- ^ Aczel, J. (2006), Lectures on Functional Equations and Their Applications (Dover Books on Mathematics, 2006), Ch. 6, ISBN 978-0486445236.
External links
[edit]- Gill, John (January 2017). "A Primer on the Elementary Theory of Infinite Compositions of Complex Functions". Colorado State University.