Presidency armies: Difference between revisions
Mediatech492 (talk | contribs) m Reverted 1 edit by 122.163.27.23 (talk) to last revision by The Anome (TW) |
ce |
||
(35 intermediate revisions by 27 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ |
{{Short description|Armies of the East India Company}} |
||
{{Infobox military unit |
{{Infobox military unit |
||
|unit_name= Presidency armies |
|unit_name= Presidency armies |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|caption= |
|caption= |
||
|dates= 1774–1895 |
|dates= 1774–1895 |
||
|country= [[India]] |
|country= [[Company Raj|India]] |
||
|allegiance = [[East India Company]] |
|allegiance = [[East India Company]] |
||
|branch= |
|branch={{plainlist| |
||
*[[Bombay Army]] |
|||
⚫ | |||
*[[Bengal Army]] |
|||
*[[Madras Army]] |
|||
}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
|garrison_label= Headquarters |
|garrison_label= Headquarters |
||
|nickname= |
|nickname= |
||
|motto=''Auspicio Regis et Senatus Angliae''<br> "By command of the King and Parliament of England" |
|motto=''Auspicio Regis et Senatus Angliae''<br> "By command of the King and Parliament of England" |
||
|patron= |
|patron= |
||
|colors= |
|colors= |
||
|colors_label= |
|colors_label= |
||
|march= |
|march= |
||
|mascot= |
|||
|mascot=[[File:Coat of arms of the East India Company.svg|40px]] |
|||
|battles={{plainlist| |
|||
|battles=[[Battle of Plassey]]<br>[[Battle of Buxar]]<br>[[Carnatic Wars]]<br>[[Anglo-Mysore Wars]]<br>[[Anglo-Maratha Wars]]<br>[[Vellore Mutiny]]<br>[[Anglo-Nepalese War]]<br>[[Anglo-Burmese wars]]<br>[[First Anglo-Afghan War]]<br>[[Anglo-Sikh wars]]<br>[[Anglo-Persian War]]<br>[[Indian Rebellion of 1857]] |
|||
* [[Battle of Plassey]] |
|||
⚫ | |||
* [[Battle of Buxar]] |
|||
⚫ | |||
* [[Carnatic Wars]] |
|||
* [[Anglo-Mysore Wars]] |
|||
* [[Anglo-Maratha Wars (disambiguation)|Anglo-Maratha Wars]] |
|||
* [[Vellore Mutiny]] |
|||
* [[Anglo-Nepalese War]] |
|||
* [[Anglo-Burmese wars]] |
|||
⚫ | |||
* [[First Anglo-Sikh War]] |
|||
* [[Second Anglo-Sikh War]] |
|||
* [[Anglo-Persian War]] |
|||
* [[Indian Rebellion of 1857]]}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
|battle_honours= |
|battle_honours= |
||
|commander1= |
|commander1= |
||
|commander1_label= |
|commander1_label= |
||
|commander2= |
|commander2= |
||
|commander2_label= |
|commander2_label= |
||
|notable_commanders={{plainlist| |
|||
|notable_commanders=[[Stringer Lawrence]]<br>[[Eyre Coote (East India Company officer)|Eyre Coote]]<br>[[Robert Clive, 1st Baron Clive|Robert Clive]]<br>[[Charles James Napier|Charles Napier]]<br>[[Charles Cornwallis, 1st Marquess Cornwallis|Charles Cornwallis]]<br>[[Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington|Arthur Wellesley]]<br>[[Sir Archibald Campbell, 1st Baronet|Archibald Campbell]]<br>[[Gerard Lake, 1st Viscount Lake|Gerard Lake]]<br>[[Sir James Outram, 1st Baronet|James Outram]]<br>[[Hugh Gough, 1st Viscount Gough|Hugh Gough]] |
|||
* [[Stringer Lawrence]] |
|||
* [[Eyre Coote (East India Company officer)|Eyre Coote]] |
|||
* [[Robert Clive, 1st Baron Clive|Robert Clive]] |
|||
* [[Charles James Napier|Charles Napier]] |
|||
* [[Charles Cornwallis, 1st Marquess Cornwallis|Charles Cornwallis]] |
|||
* [[Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington|Arthur Wellesley]] |
|||
* [[Sir Archibald Campbell, 1st Baronet|Archibald Campbell]] |
|||
* [[Gerard Lake, 1st Viscount Lake|Gerard Lake]] |
|||
* [[Sir James Outram, 1st Baronet|James Outram]] |
|||
* [[Hugh Gough, 1st Viscount Gough|Hugh Gough]]}} |
|||
<!-- Insignia --> |
<!-- Insignia --> |
||
|identification_symbol= |
|identification_symbol= |
||
Line 35: | Line 62: | ||
[[File:Chaterbengal.jpg|thumb|right|[[Subedar]] of the 21st Bengal Native Infantry (1819)]] |
[[File:Chaterbengal.jpg|thumb|right|[[Subedar]] of the 21st Bengal Native Infantry (1819)]] |
||
The '''presidency armies''' were the armies of the three [[Presidencies of British India|presidencies]] of the [[East India Company]]'s [[Company rule in India|rule]] in [[India]], later the forces of the [[the Crown|British Crown]] in India, composed primarily of Indian [[sepoys]]. The presidency armies were named after the presidencies: the [[Bengal Army]], the [[Madras Army]] and the [[Bombay Army]]. Initially, only Europeans served as commissioned or non-commissioned officers. In time, Indian Army units were garrisoned from Peshawar in the north, to Sind in the west, and to Rangoon in the east. The army was engaged in the wars to extend British control in India (the |
The '''presidency armies''' were the armies of the three [[Presidencies of British India|presidencies]] of the [[East India Company]]'s [[Company rule in India|rule]] in [[India]], later the forces of the [[the Crown|British Crown]] in [[British Raj|India]], composed primarily of Indian [[sepoys]]. The presidency armies were named after the presidencies: the [[Bengal Army]], the [[Madras Army]] and the [[Bombay Army]]. Initially, only Europeans served as commissioned or non-commissioned officers. In time, Indian Army units were garrisoned from Peshawar in the north, to Sind in the west, and to Rangoon in the east. The army was engaged in the wars to extend British control in India (the [[Anglo-Mysore Wars|Mysore]], [[Anglo-Maratha Wars (disambiguation)|Maratha]] and [[Second Anglo-Sikh War|Sikh war]]s) and beyond (the [[Anglo-Burmese wars|Burma]], [[Anglo-Afghan War|Afghan]], [[First Opium War|First]] and [[Second Opium War]]s, and the [[Expedition to Abyssinia]]). |
||
The presidency armies, like the presidencies themselves, belonged to the Company until the [[Indian Rebellion of 1857]], when the Crown took over the Company and its three armies. In 1895 the three presidency armies were merged into a united [[British Indian Army|Indian Army]]. |
The presidency armies, like the presidencies themselves, belonged to the Company until the [[Indian Rebellion of 1857]], when the Crown took over the Company and its three armies. In 1895, the three presidency armies were merged into a united [[British Indian Army|Indian Army]]. |
||
==Origin== |
==Origin== |
||
The origin of the British Indian Army and subsequently the army of independent India lies in the origins of the Presidency Armies which preceded them. The first purely Indian troops employed by the British were watchmen employed in each of the Presidencies of the [[British East India Company]] to protect their trading stations. These were all placed in 1748 under one [[Commander-in-Chief, India|Commander-in-Chief]], Major-General [[Stringer Lawrence]] who is regarded as the "Father of the Indian Army".<ref name="Invicta">{{cite book |title=India's Army |last=Jackson |first=Major Donovan |
The origin of the British Indian Army and subsequently the army of independent India lies in the origins of the Presidency Armies which preceded them. The first purely Indian troops employed by the British were watchmen employed in each of the Presidencies of the [[British East India Company]] to protect their trading stations. These were all placed in 1748 under one [[Commander-in-Chief, India|Commander-in-Chief]], Major-General [[Stringer Lawrence]] who is regarded as the "Father of the Indian Army".<ref name="Invicta">{{cite book |title=India's Army |last=Jackson |first=Major Donovan |year=1940 |publisher=Low, Marston |location=London |pages=1–8 }}</ref> |
||
From the mid-eighteenth century, the East India Company began to maintain armies at each of its three main stations, or [[Presidencies of British India]], at [[Calcutta]] (Bengal), [[Madras]] and [[Bombay]]. The Bengal Army, Madras Army, and Bombay Army were quite distinct, each with its own Regiments and cadre of European officers. All three armies contained European regiments in which both the officers and men were Europeans, as well as a larger number of |
From the mid-eighteenth century, the East India Company began to maintain armies at each of its three main stations, or [[Presidencies of British India]], at [[Calcutta]] (Bengal), [[Madras]] and [[Bombay]]. The Bengal Army, Madras Army, and Bombay Army were quite distinct, each with its own Regiments and cadre of European officers. All three armies contained European regiments in which both the officers and men were Europeans, as well as a larger number of 'Native' regiments, in which the officers were Europeans and the other ranks were Indians. They included Artillery, Cavalry and Infantry regiments, so historical sources refer to the Bengal/Madras/Bombay Artillery/Cavalry/Infantry (the latter often termed "Native Infantry" or "N.I."). From the mid-eighteenth century onwards, the Crown began to dispatch regiments of the regular [[British Army]] to India, to reinforce the Company's armies. These troops are often referred to as "H.M.'s Regiments" or "Royal regiments". |
||
From the mid-eighteenth century onwards, the Crown began to dispatch regiments of the regular [[British Army]] to India, to reinforce the Company’s armies. These troops are often referred to as ‘H.M.’s Regiments’ or ‘Royal regiments’. |
|||
By 1824, the size of the combined armies of Bengal, Madras, and Bombay was about 200,000 and had at least 170 sepoy and 16 European regiments.<ref>{{cite book|last=Wolpert|first=Stanley|title=A New History of India|year=2009|publisher=Oxford |
By 1824, the size of the combined armies of Bengal, Madras, and Bombay was about 200,000 and had at least 170 sepoy and 16 European regiments.<ref>{{cite book|last=Wolpert|first=Stanley|title=A New History of India|year=2009|publisher=Oxford University Press|location=New York|isbn=978-0-19-533756-3|edition=8th|author-link=Stanley Wolpert|page=223}}</ref> In 1844 the combined average strength of the three armies was 235,446 native and 14,584 European.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Sykes |first=W. H. |date=May 1847 |title=Vital Statistics of the East India Company's Armies in India, European and Native |journal=Journal of the Statistical Society of London |volume=10 |issue=2 |pages=120 |doi=10.2307/2337686 |jstor=2337686}}</ref> |
||
==Regimental organisation== |
==Regimental organisation== |
||
In 1757, [[Robert Clive, 1st Baron Clive|Robert Clive]] came up with the idea of [[sepoy]] battalions for the Bengal Presidency. These would be Indian soldiers, armed, dressed, and trained the same as the "[[Red coat (military uniform)|red coats]]" (British soldiers), and commanded by a nucleus of British officers. The Madras Presidency followed suit with six battalions in 1759, followed by the Bombay Presidency in 1767. Recruitment in all cases was done locally, with |
In 1757, [[Robert Clive, 1st Baron Clive|Robert Clive]] came up with the idea of [[sepoy]] battalions for the Bengal Presidency. These would be Indian soldiers, armed, dressed, and trained the same as the "[[Red coat (military uniform)|red coats]]" (British soldiers), and commanded by a nucleus of British officers. The Madras Presidency followed suit with six battalions in 1759, followed by the Bombay Presidency in 1767. Recruitment in all cases was done locally, with battalions each drawn from single castes, and from specific communities, villages, and families.<ref name="Invicta"/> Regular cavalry regiments were raised in 1784, of which only three survived the [[Indian Rebellion of 1857]]. Irregular cavalry were raised by the "[[Silladar Cavalry|silladar system]]" employed by rulers of Indian states.<ref>In the "silladar" system, the soldier provided his own horse, weapons, and military attire as prescribed, for which he received in exchange from the state a lump sum grant and maintenance grants from time to time.</ref> Irregular cavalry regiments had very few British officers. In addition, native artillery and pioneers (referred to later as Sappers and Miners) were also raised.<ref name="Invicta"/> |
||
[[File:An Officer of Col Gardiner’s irregular Cavalry.jpg|thumb|left|300px|An officer of Col Gardiner's irregular Cavalry, composed of Hindustani Mussalmans]] |
|||
Between 1796 and 1804, a regimental system on two battalion basis was introduced. The battalions were only theoretically linked together and shared no ''esprit de corps''. The number of British officers went up to 22 per battalion, which diminished the importance of native officers.<ref>{{cite book |first=Michael |last=Creese |pages=28 |title=Swords Trembling in Their Scabbards. The Changing Status of Indian Officers in the Indian Army |
Between 1796 and 1804, a regimental system on a two battalion basis was introduced. The battalions were only theoretically linked together and shared no ''esprit de corps''. The number of British officers went up to 22 per battalion, which diminished the importance of native officers.<ref>{{cite book |first=Michael |last=Creese |pages=28 |title=Swords Trembling in Their Scabbards. The Changing Status of Indian Officers in the Indian Army 1757–1947 |year=2015 |isbn=9-781909-982819}}</ref> Control by Regimental commanders was excessive and exasperating to the battalions, and the system was reverted in 1824. Thereafter, units were formed into single battalion regiments, which were numbered per their seniority of raising.<ref name="Invicta"/> |
||
==After 1857== |
==After 1857== |
||
Following the [[Indian Rebellion of 1857]] and the consequent |
Following the [[Indian Rebellion of 1857]] and the consequent takeover of power by the British government from the [[East India Company]], its European regiments were amalgamated in 1860 with the British Army, but its 'Native' regiments were not. The three separate Presidency Armies therefore continued to exist, and their European officers continued to be listed as members of the Bengal, Madras or Bombay Army rather than the [[British Army]]. However, the Presidency Armies began to be described collectively as the [[Indian Army (1895–1947)|Indian Army]]. Following the Rebellion recruitment of 'Native' Regiments switched to the [[Martial Race]] system. Another change resulting from the Indian Rebellion of 1857 was that henceforward artillery was confined to the British Army. |
||
In 1895, the separate Presidency Armies were at last abolished and a fully unified Indian Army came into being. As before, its British officers were not members of the British Army, though as young subalterns they did serve for a year with a British Army regiment as part of their training before taking up permanent commissions with their Indian Army regiment. |
In 1895, the separate Presidency Armies were at last abolished and a fully unified Indian Army came into being. As before, its British officers were not members of the British Army, though as young subalterns they did serve for a year with a British Army regiment as part of their training before taking up permanent commissions with their Indian Army regiment. |
||
Line 60: | Line 87: | ||
===Mysore wars=== |
===Mysore wars=== |
||
*[[First Anglo-Mysore War]] (1766–69) |
* [[First Anglo-Mysore War]] (1766–69) |
||
*[[Second Anglo-Mysore War]] (1780–84) |
* [[Second Anglo-Mysore War]] (1780–84) |
||
*[[Third Anglo-Mysore War]] (1789–92) |
* [[Third Anglo-Mysore War]] (1789–92) |
||
*[[Fourth Anglo-Mysore War]] (1799) |
* [[Fourth Anglo-Mysore War]] (1799) |
||
===Maratha wars=== |
===Maratha wars=== |
||
*[[First Anglo-Maratha War]] (1775–82) |
* [[First Anglo-Maratha War]] (1775–82) |
||
*[[Second Anglo-Maratha War]] (1803–05) |
* [[Second Anglo-Maratha War]] (1803–05) |
||
*[[Third Anglo-Maratha War]] (1817–18) |
* [[Third Anglo-Maratha War]] (1817–18) |
||
===Burmese wars=== |
===Burmese wars=== |
||
*[[First Anglo-Burmese War]] (1823–26) |
* [[First Anglo-Burmese War]] (1823–26) |
||
*[[Second Anglo-Burmese War]] (1852–53) |
* [[Second Anglo-Burmese War]] (1852–53) |
||
*[[Third Anglo-Burmese War]] (1885–86) |
* [[Third Anglo-Burmese War]] (1885–86) |
||
===Afghan wars=== |
===Afghan wars=== |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
*[[ |
* [[First Anglo-Afghan War]] (1839–42) |
||
* [[Second Anglo-Afghan War]] (1878–81) |
|||
⚫ | |||
===Opium wars=== |
===Opium wars=== |
||
*[[First Opium War]] (1839–43) |
* [[First Opium War]] (1839–43) |
||
*[[Second Opium War]] (1856–60) |
* [[Second Opium War]] (1856–60) |
||
===Sikh wars=== |
===Sikh wars=== |
||
*[[First Anglo-Sikh War]] (1845–46) |
* [[First Anglo-Sikh War]] (1845–46) |
||
*[[Second Anglo-Sikh War]] (1848–49) |
* [[Second Anglo-Sikh War]] (1848–49) |
||
===Abyssinia=== |
===Abyssinia=== |
||
*[[1868 Expedition to Abyssinia|Expedition to Abyssinia]] (1867–68) |
* [[1868 Expedition to Abyssinia|Expedition to Abyssinia]] (1867–68) |
||
==List of presidencies and armies== |
==List of presidencies and armies== |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
==References== |
==References== |
||
Line 101: | Line 130: | ||
==Further reading== |
==Further reading== |
||
* Barua, Pradeep. "Military developments in India, |
* Barua, Pradeep. "Military developments in India, 1750–1850", ''Journal of Military History'', (Oct 1994) 58#4 pp 599–616 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2944270 in JSTOR] |
||
* Bryant, G. J. "Asymmetric Warfare: The British Experience in Eighteenth-Century India |
* Bryant, G. J. "Asymmetric Warfare: The British Experience in Eighteenth-Century India", ''Journal of Military History'' (2004) 68#2 pp. 431–469 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/3397474 in JSTOR] |
||
* Gilbert, Arthur N. "Recruitment and Reform in the East India Company Army, |
* Gilbert, Arthur N. "Recruitment and Reform in the East India Company Army, 1760–1800", ''Journal of British Studies (1975) 15#1 pp. 89–111 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/175240 in JSTOR] |
||
* Heathcote, T. A. ''The Military in British India: The Development of British Land Forces in South Asia, 1600–1947'' (Manchester University Press, 1995) |
* Heathcote, T. A. ''The Military in British India: The Development of British Land Forces in South Asia, 1600–1947'' (Manchester University Press, 1995) |
||
* Lawford, James P. ''Britain's Army in India: From its Origins to the Conquest of Bengal'' (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1978) |
* Lawford, James P. ''Britain's Army in India: From its Origins to the Conquest of Bengal'' (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1978) |
||
* Menezes, S. L. ''Fidelity & Honour: The Indian Army from the Seventeenth to the Twenty-First Century'' (New Delhi: Viking, 1993) |
* Menezes, S. L. ''Fidelity & Honour: The Indian Army from the Seventeenth to the Twenty-First Century'' (New Delhi: Viking, 1993) |
||
* Longer, V. ''Red Coats to Olive Green: A History of the Indian Army, 1600–1947'' (Bombay: Allied, 1974) |
* Longer, V. ''Red Coats to Olive Green: A History of the Indian Army, 1600–1947'' (Bombay: Allied, 1974) |
||
* Roy, Kaushik. "The hybrid military establishment of the East India Company in South Asia: 1750–1849 |
* Roy, Kaushik. "The hybrid military establishment of the East India Company in South Asia: 1750–1849", ''Journal of Global History'', (July 2011) 6#2 00 195–218 |
||
* Roy, Kaushik. "Military Synthesis in South Asia: Armies, Warfare, and Indian Society, c. |
* Roy, Kaushik. "Military Synthesis in South Asia: Armies, Warfare, and Indian Society, c. 1740–1849", ''Journal of Military History'', (2005) 69#3 pp 651–690, [http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/journal_of_military_history/v069/69.3roy.html online] |
||
* Roy, Kaushik. ''From Hydaspes to Kargil: A History of Warfare in India from 326 BC to AD 1999'' (2004) |
* Roy, Kaushik. ''From Hydaspes to Kargil: A History of Warfare in India from 326 BC to AD 1999'' (2004) |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
[[Category:Military history of the British East India Company]] |
[[Category:Military history of the British East India Company]] |
Latest revision as of 21:03, 30 June 2024
Presidency armies | |
---|---|
Active | 1774–1895 |
Country | India |
Allegiance | East India Company |
Branch | |
Headquarters | GHQ India |
Motto(s) | Auspicio Regis et Senatus Angliae "By command of the King and Parliament of England" |
Engagements | |
Commanders | |
Notable commanders |
The presidency armies were the armies of the three presidencies of the East India Company's rule in India, later the forces of the British Crown in India, composed primarily of Indian sepoys. The presidency armies were named after the presidencies: the Bengal Army, the Madras Army and the Bombay Army. Initially, only Europeans served as commissioned or non-commissioned officers. In time, Indian Army units were garrisoned from Peshawar in the north, to Sind in the west, and to Rangoon in the east. The army was engaged in the wars to extend British control in India (the Mysore, Maratha and Sikh wars) and beyond (the Burma, Afghan, First and Second Opium Wars, and the Expedition to Abyssinia).
The presidency armies, like the presidencies themselves, belonged to the Company until the Indian Rebellion of 1857, when the Crown took over the Company and its three armies. In 1895, the three presidency armies were merged into a united Indian Army.
Origin
[edit]The origin of the British Indian Army and subsequently the army of independent India lies in the origins of the Presidency Armies which preceded them. The first purely Indian troops employed by the British were watchmen employed in each of the Presidencies of the British East India Company to protect their trading stations. These were all placed in 1748 under one Commander-in-Chief, Major-General Stringer Lawrence who is regarded as the "Father of the Indian Army".[1]
From the mid-eighteenth century, the East India Company began to maintain armies at each of its three main stations, or Presidencies of British India, at Calcutta (Bengal), Madras and Bombay. The Bengal Army, Madras Army, and Bombay Army were quite distinct, each with its own Regiments and cadre of European officers. All three armies contained European regiments in which both the officers and men were Europeans, as well as a larger number of 'Native' regiments, in which the officers were Europeans and the other ranks were Indians. They included Artillery, Cavalry and Infantry regiments, so historical sources refer to the Bengal/Madras/Bombay Artillery/Cavalry/Infantry (the latter often termed "Native Infantry" or "N.I."). From the mid-eighteenth century onwards, the Crown began to dispatch regiments of the regular British Army to India, to reinforce the Company's armies. These troops are often referred to as "H.M.'s Regiments" or "Royal regiments".
By 1824, the size of the combined armies of Bengal, Madras, and Bombay was about 200,000 and had at least 170 sepoy and 16 European regiments.[2] In 1844 the combined average strength of the three armies was 235,446 native and 14,584 European.[3]
Regimental organisation
[edit]In 1757, Robert Clive came up with the idea of sepoy battalions for the Bengal Presidency. These would be Indian soldiers, armed, dressed, and trained the same as the "red coats" (British soldiers), and commanded by a nucleus of British officers. The Madras Presidency followed suit with six battalions in 1759, followed by the Bombay Presidency in 1767. Recruitment in all cases was done locally, with battalions each drawn from single castes, and from specific communities, villages, and families.[1] Regular cavalry regiments were raised in 1784, of which only three survived the Indian Rebellion of 1857. Irregular cavalry were raised by the "silladar system" employed by rulers of Indian states.[4] Irregular cavalry regiments had very few British officers. In addition, native artillery and pioneers (referred to later as Sappers and Miners) were also raised.[1]
Between 1796 and 1804, a regimental system on a two battalion basis was introduced. The battalions were only theoretically linked together and shared no esprit de corps. The number of British officers went up to 22 per battalion, which diminished the importance of native officers.[5] Control by Regimental commanders was excessive and exasperating to the battalions, and the system was reverted in 1824. Thereafter, units were formed into single battalion regiments, which were numbered per their seniority of raising.[1]
After 1857
[edit]Following the Indian Rebellion of 1857 and the consequent takeover of power by the British government from the East India Company, its European regiments were amalgamated in 1860 with the British Army, but its 'Native' regiments were not. The three separate Presidency Armies therefore continued to exist, and their European officers continued to be listed as members of the Bengal, Madras or Bombay Army rather than the British Army. However, the Presidency Armies began to be described collectively as the Indian Army. Following the Rebellion recruitment of 'Native' Regiments switched to the Martial Race system. Another change resulting from the Indian Rebellion of 1857 was that henceforward artillery was confined to the British Army.
In 1895, the separate Presidency Armies were at last abolished and a fully unified Indian Army came into being. As before, its British officers were not members of the British Army, though as young subalterns they did serve for a year with a British Army regiment as part of their training before taking up permanent commissions with their Indian Army regiment.
Operational history of the Presidency armies
[edit]Mysore wars
[edit]- First Anglo-Mysore War (1766–69)
- Second Anglo-Mysore War (1780–84)
- Third Anglo-Mysore War (1789–92)
- Fourth Anglo-Mysore War (1799)
Maratha wars
[edit]- First Anglo-Maratha War (1775–82)
- Second Anglo-Maratha War (1803–05)
- Third Anglo-Maratha War (1817–18)
Burmese wars
[edit]- First Anglo-Burmese War (1823–26)
- Second Anglo-Burmese War (1852–53)
- Third Anglo-Burmese War (1885–86)
Afghan wars
[edit]- First Anglo-Afghan War (1839–42)
- Second Anglo-Afghan War (1878–81)
Opium wars
[edit]- First Opium War (1839–43)
- Second Opium War (1856–60)
Sikh wars
[edit]- First Anglo-Sikh War (1845–46)
- Second Anglo-Sikh War (1848–49)
Abyssinia
[edit]- Expedition to Abyssinia (1867–68)
List of presidencies and armies
[edit]- Bengal Presidency, the Bengal Army
- Bombay Presidency, the Bombay Army
- Madras Presidency, the Madras Army
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ a b c d Jackson, Major Donovan (1940). India's Army. London: Low, Marston. pp. 1–8.
- ^ Wolpert, Stanley (2009). A New History of India (8th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. p. 223. ISBN 978-0-19-533756-3.
- ^ Sykes, W. H. (May 1847). "Vital Statistics of the East India Company's Armies in India, European and Native". Journal of the Statistical Society of London. 10 (2): 120. doi:10.2307/2337686. JSTOR 2337686.
- ^ In the "silladar" system, the soldier provided his own horse, weapons, and military attire as prescribed, for which he received in exchange from the state a lump sum grant and maintenance grants from time to time.
- ^ Creese, Michael (2015). Swords Trembling in Their Scabbards. The Changing Status of Indian Officers in the Indian Army 1757–1947. p. 28. ISBN 9-781909-982819.
Further reading
[edit]- Barua, Pradeep. "Military developments in India, 1750–1850", Journal of Military History, (Oct 1994) 58#4 pp 599–616 in JSTOR
- Bryant, G. J. "Asymmetric Warfare: The British Experience in Eighteenth-Century India", Journal of Military History (2004) 68#2 pp. 431–469 in JSTOR
- Gilbert, Arthur N. "Recruitment and Reform in the East India Company Army, 1760–1800", Journal of British Studies (1975) 15#1 pp. 89–111 in JSTOR
- Heathcote, T. A. The Military in British India: The Development of British Land Forces in South Asia, 1600–1947 (Manchester University Press, 1995)
- Lawford, James P. Britain's Army in India: From its Origins to the Conquest of Bengal (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1978)
- Menezes, S. L. Fidelity & Honour: The Indian Army from the Seventeenth to the Twenty-First Century (New Delhi: Viking, 1993)
- Longer, V. Red Coats to Olive Green: A History of the Indian Army, 1600–1947 (Bombay: Allied, 1974)
- Roy, Kaushik. "The hybrid military establishment of the East India Company in South Asia: 1750–1849", Journal of Global History, (July 2011) 6#2 00 195–218
- Roy, Kaushik. "Military Synthesis in South Asia: Armies, Warfare, and Indian Society, c. 1740–1849", Journal of Military History, (2005) 69#3 pp 651–690, online
- Roy, Kaushik. From Hydaspes to Kargil: A History of Warfare in India from 326 BC to AD 1999 (2004)