Jump to content

Talk:Bisacodyl: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
AnomieBOT (talk | contribs)
m Tagging with {{Reliable sources for medical articles}} for WP:WPMED. Errors? User:AnomieBOT/shutoff/TalkTagger
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{talk header}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WikiProject Pharmacology|importance=Low}}
}}
{{Reliable sources for medical articles}}
{{Reliable sources for medical articles}}
{{WikiProject Pharmacology|class=start|importance=}}

== mechanism? ==
== mechanism? ==


Line 7: Line 9:


function within the body [[Special:Contributions/195.241.100.249|195.241.100.249]] ([[User talk:195.241.100.249|talk]]) 02:43, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
function within the body [[Special:Contributions/195.241.100.249|195.241.100.249]] ([[User talk:195.241.100.249|talk]]) 02:43, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

: The article has had a "Mechanism of action" (MOA) section since 19 January 2009. For years it has been toward the end of the article, following sections with pharmaceutical details. Logically it belongs closer to the beginning, so it has just been moved up to a location immediately following the intro section. [[User:Piperh|Piperh]] ([[User talk:Piperh|talk]]) 12:12, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

== Side effects / safety ==

Missing: As I write this, the words "side effects," "safety," "safe," "over-the-counter," and/or "over the counter" do not appear anywhere in the article. In the United States, it is sold over the counter cheaply at Walmart, for example, 88 cents a bottle, so it must be relatively safe? [[User:5Q5|5Q5]] ([[User talk:5Q5|talk]]) 14:20, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

:[[User:5Q5|@5Q5]] [[Special:Contributions/2600:1700:9BE0:49F0:3574:BB70:6505:749A|2600:1700:9BE0:49F0:3574:BB70:6505:749A]] ([[User talk:2600:1700:9BE0:49F0:3574:BB70:6505:749A|talk]]) 18:17, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on [[Bisacodyl]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=747586817 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070317050508/http://www.drugdigest.org:80/DD/DVH/Uses/0,3915,78|Bisacodyl,00.html to http://www.drugdigest.org/DD/DVH/Uses/0,3915,78%7CBisacodyl,00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).

{{sourcecheck|checked=true}}

Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 05:43, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

== Historical aboratificant? ==

I'm reading a book set in the early 1900s and the protagonist takes something called a "liver pill" when she finds out she's pregnant. It doesn't end up being effective. Since "liver pill" redirects here, I was wondering if anyone knows if this substance had any historical use as an [[abortificant]]. [[User:Clovermoss|<span style="color:darkorchid">Clover</span><span style="color:green">moss</span>]] [[User talk:Clovermoss|(talk)]] 01:50, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

== Brilliant for making poo ==

Took one and had the poop of the century [[Special:Contributions/46.30.183.180|46.30.183.180]] ([[User talk:46.30.183.180|talk]]) 22:35, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 12:12, 1 July 2024

mechanism?

[edit]

mechanism? Tkjazzer (talk) 06:23, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

function within the body 195.241.100.249 (talk) 02:43, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article has had a "Mechanism of action" (MOA) section since 19 January 2009. For years it has been toward the end of the article, following sections with pharmaceutical details. Logically it belongs closer to the beginning, so it has just been moved up to a location immediately following the intro section. Piperh (talk) 12:12, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Side effects / safety

[edit]

Missing: As I write this, the words "side effects," "safety," "safe," "over-the-counter," and/or "over the counter" do not appear anywhere in the article. In the United States, it is sold over the counter cheaply at Walmart, for example, 88 cents a bottle, so it must be relatively safe? 5Q5 (talk) 14:20, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@5Q5 2600:1700:9BE0:49F0:3574:BB70:6505:749A (talk) 18:17, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bisacodyl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:43, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Historical aboratificant?

[edit]

I'm reading a book set in the early 1900s and the protagonist takes something called a "liver pill" when she finds out she's pregnant. It doesn't end up being effective. Since "liver pill" redirects here, I was wondering if anyone knows if this substance had any historical use as an abortificant. Clovermoss (talk) 01:50, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant for making poo

[edit]

Took one and had the poop of the century 46.30.183.180 (talk) 22:35, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]