Talk:Rundle Mall: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Latest revision as of 13:08, 1 July 2024

Australia: Adelaide Mid‑importance

	Australia portal Rundle Mall is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Adelaide (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Australian Roads: South Australia Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Australian Roads, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads and highways in Australian states and territories. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Australian RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject Australian RoadsTemplate:WikiProject Australian RoadsAustralia road transport

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics:
/
	South Australia

This article may or may not contain a map. Please check, then add "needs-map=" to this template accordingly.

This article needs a KML file. If it already has one, purge this page, or add |needs-kml=no to the WikiProject Australian Roads banner.

Shopping Centers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shopping Centers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of enclosed shopping malls, outdoor shopping centers, and dead malls on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Shopping CentersWikipedia:WikiProject Shopping CentersTemplate:WikiProject Shopping CentersShopping center
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Title

Should the article be "Rundle Mall" with "Rundle Mall, Adelaide" redirecting to it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.87.119.103 (talk) 09:18, 25 March 2005 (UTC)[reply]

you know, it probably should be moved to "Runle Mall". There is no need to have the page name unnecessarily longer than it should be, especially when a long page name isn't necessitated. JayKeaton 08:21, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So moved.--cj | talk 10:27, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice one =D I gotta learn how to move pages one of these days JayKeaton 14:25, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See Help:Moving a page.--cj | talk 15:14, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"High Street"?

It is well known by the locals as the "high street" in town.

From the article's introduction. A reference would be nice. I live in Adelaide, and I've never heard Rundle Mall referred to as such. So I can dispute "well known by the locals" if not the whole statement. "Well known" is a flexible phrase too.
--The Chairman 10:25, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I Agree with this also, needs reference or it should be removed Muzzamo 02:56, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mall's Balls

Probably not very relevant to the article but I found this image interesting. http://static.nme.com/images/08724_95934_pinkfloyalbumsleeve8L240708.jpg It seams the mall's balls are not as unique as I thought they were.Iiidonkeyiii (talk) 17:06, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Historic map

I just noticed, from SLSA, a high res subset of a 1881 survey of the city. Useful for a historic insight into Rundle Mall. I'm not sure if SLSA can assert copyright on this. Being published in 1881 means it should be eligible for a Public Domain license on commons, but I'm not sure. Donama (talk) 05:24, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{WikiProject Australia|class=start|importance=mid|Adelaide=yes}}
+{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1=
-{{WP AURD|state=SA|class=start|importance=low}}
+{{WikiProject Australia|importance=mid|Adelaide=yes|Adelaide-importance=low}}
+{{WikiProject Australian Roads|state=SA|class=start|importance=low|needs-rjl=no}}
+{{WikiProject Shopping Centers|importance=Mid}}
+}}
 ==Title==
-Should the article be "Rundle Mall" with "Rundle Mall, Adelaide" redirecting to it?<small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:203.87.119.103|203.87.119.103]] ([[User talk:203.87.119.103|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/203.87.119.103|contribs]]){{#if:18:48, 25 March 2005|&#32;18:48, 25 March 2005|}}.</small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
+Should the article be "Rundle Mall" with "Rundle Mall, Adelaide" redirecting to it? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/203.87.119.103|203.87.119.103]] ([[User talk:203.87.119.103#top|talk]]) 09:18, 25 March 2005 (UTC)</small>
 :you know, it probably should be moved to "Runle Mall". There is no need to have the page name unnecessarily longer than it should be, especially when a long page name isn't necessitated. [[User:JayKeaton|JayKeaton]] 08:21, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
@@ Line 22: / Line 26: @@
 Probably not very relevant to the article but I found this image interesting. http://static.nme.com/images/08724_95934_pinkfloyalbumsleeve8L240708.jpg
 It seams the mall's balls are not as unique as I thought they were.[[User:Iiidonkeyiii|Iiidonkeyiii]] ([[User talk:Iiidonkeyiii|talk]]) 17:06, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
+== Historic map ==
+I just noticed, from SLSA, [http://www.slsa.sa.gov.au/maps/map/1389/1389015/map1389015_bkmp_072.pdf a high res subset] of a [http://www.catalog.slsa.sa.gov.au/record=b1378035 1881 survey of the city]. Useful for a historic insight into Rundle Mall. I'm not sure if SLSA can assert copyright on this. Being published in 1881 means it should be eligible for a Public Domain license on commons, but I'm not sure. [[User:Donama|Donama]] ([[User talk:Donama|talk]]) 05:24, 4 December 2017 (UTC)