Slater–Condon rules: Difference between revisions
GrouchoBot (talk | contribs) m robot Adding: fr:Lois de Slater-Condon |
→Integrals of two-body operators: Redifine the notation to be consistent with other related article ("Hartree–Fock method" and "Slater determinant") |
||
(22 intermediate revisions by 19 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Within [[computational chemistry]], the ''' |
Within [[computational chemistry]], the '''Slater–Condon rules''' express integrals of one- and two-body operators over [[wavefunction]]s constructed as [[Slater determinant]]s of [[orthonormality|orthonormal]] [[molecular orbital|orbitals]] in terms of the individual orbitals. In doing so, the original integrals involving ''N''-electron wavefunctions are reduced to sums over integrals involving at most two molecular orbitals, or in other words, the original 3''N'' dimensional integral is expressed in terms of many three- and six-dimensional integrals. |
||
The rules are used in deriving the working equations for all methods of approximately solving the Schrödinger equation that employ wavefunctions constructed from Slater determinants. These include [[ |
The rules are used in deriving the working equations for all methods of approximately solving the Schrödinger equation that employ wavefunctions constructed from Slater determinants. These include [[Hartree–Fock method|Hartree–Fock theory]], where the wavefunction is a single determinant, and all those methods which use Hartree–Fock theory as a reference such as [[Møller–Plesset perturbation theory]], and [[Coupled cluster]] and [[Configuration interaction]] theories. |
||
⚫ | In 1929 [[John C. Slater]] derived expressions for diagonal matrix elements of an approximate Hamiltonian while investigating atomic spectra within a perturbative approach.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Slater|first=J. C.|year=1929|title=The Theory of Complex Spectra|journal=Phys. Rev.|volume=34|issue=10|pages=1293–1322|doi=10.1103/PhysRev.34.1293|pmid=9939750|bibcode=1929PhRv...34.1293S}}</ref> The following year [[Edward Condon]] extended the rules to non-diagonal matrix elements.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Condon|first=E. U.|year=1930|title=The Theory of Complex Spectra|journal=Phys. Rev.|volume=36|issue=7|pages=1121–1133|doi=10.1103/PhysRev.36.1121 |bibcode = 1930PhRv...36.1121C }}</ref> In 1955 [[Per-Olov Löwdin]] further generalized these results for wavefunctions constructed from non-orthonormal orbitals, leading to what are known as the '''Löwdin rules'''.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Löwdin|first=Per-Olov|year=1955|title=Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems. I. Physical Interpretations by Means of Density Matrices, Natural Spin-Orbitals, and Convergence Problems in the Method of Configurational Interaction|journal=Phys. Rev.|volume=97|issue=6|pages=1474–1489|doi=10.1103/PhysRev.97.1474|bibcode=1955PhRv...97.1474L}}</ref> |
||
The Slater-Condon rules hold only for orthonormal orbitals. Generalization to allow for non-orthogonal orbitals was done by [[Per-Olov Löwdin]], leading to what is known as the '''Löwdin rules'''. |
|||
==Mathematical background== |
|||
==Background== |
|||
In terms of an [[antisymmetrizer|antisymmetrization]] operator (<math>\mathcal{A}</math>) acting upon a product of ''N'' orthonormal [[spin-orbital]]s (with '''r''' and ''σ'' denoting spatial and spin variables), a determinantal wavefunction is ''denoted'' as |
In terms of an [[antisymmetrizer|antisymmetrization]] operator (<math>\mathcal{A}</math>) acting upon a product of ''N'' orthonormal [[spin-orbital]]s (with '''r''' and ''σ'' denoting spatial and spin variables), a determinantal wavefunction is ''denoted'' as |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:<math>|\Psi_{mn}^{pq}\rangle = \mathcal{A}(\phi_{1}(\mathbf{r}_{1}\sigma_{1})\phi_{2}(\mathbf{r}_{2}\sigma_{2})\cdots\phi_{p}(\mathbf{r}_{m}\sigma_{m})\phi_{q}(\mathbf{r}_{n}\sigma_{n})\cdots\phi_{N}(\mathbf{r}_{N}\sigma_{N})).</math> |
:<math>|\Psi_{mn}^{pq}\rangle = \mathcal{A}(\phi_{1}(\mathbf{r}_{1}\sigma_{1})\phi_{2}(\mathbf{r}_{2}\sigma_{2})\cdots\phi_{p}(\mathbf{r}_{m}\sigma_{m})\phi_{q}(\mathbf{r}_{n}\sigma_{n})\cdots\phi_{N}(\mathbf{r}_{N}\sigma_{N})).</math> |
||
For any particular one- or two-body operator, ''Ô'', the |
For any particular one- or two-body operator, ''Ô'', the Slater–Condon rules show how to simplify the following types of integrals:<ref name="piela">{{cite book|last=Piela|first= Lucjan|title=Ideas of Quantum Chemistry|publisher=Elsevier Science|location=Amsterdam|year=2006|chapter=Appendix M|isbn=0-444-52227-1}}</ref> |
||
:<math>\langle\Psi|\hat{O}|\Psi\rangle, \langle\Psi|\hat{O}|\Psi_{m}^{p}\rangle,\ \mathrm{and}\ \langle\Psi|\hat{O}|\Psi_{mn}^{pq}\rangle.</math> |
:<math> \langle\Psi|\hat{O}|\Psi\rangle, \langle\Psi|\hat{O}|\Psi_{m}^{p}\rangle,\ \mathrm{and}\ \langle\Psi|\hat{O}|\Psi_{mn}^{pq}\rangle.</math> |
||
Matrix elements for two wavefunctions differing by more than two orbitals vanish unless higher order interactions are introduced. |
Matrix elements for two wavefunctions differing by more than two orbitals vanish unless higher order interactions are introduced. |
||
⚫ | [[John C. Slater]] |
||
==Integrals of one-body operators== |
==Integrals of one-body operators== |
||
One body operators depend only upon the position or momentum of a single electron at any given instant. Examples are the [[Kinetic energy# |
One body operators depend only upon the position or momentum of a single electron at any given instant. Examples are the [[Kinetic energy#Quantum mechanical kinetic energy of rigid bodies|kinetic energy]], [[Electric dipole moment|dipole moment]], and [[Angular momentum coupling|total angular momentum]] operators. |
||
A one-body operator in an ''N''-particle system is decomposed as |
A one-body operator in an ''N''-particle system is decomposed as |
||
:<math>\hat{ |
:<math>\hat{G}_1 = \sum_{i=1}^{N}\ \hat{h}(i).</math> |
||
The |
The Slater–Condon rules for such an operator are:<ref name="piela"/><ref name="szabo">{{cite book|last=Szabo|first=Attila|author2=Ostlund, Neil S. |title=Modern Quantum Chemistry : Introduction to Advanced Electronic Structure Theory|publisher=Dover Publications|location=Mineola, New York|year=1996|chapter=Ch. 2.3.3|isbn=0-486-69186-1}}</ref> |
||
:<math> |
:<math> |
||
\begin{align} |
\begin{align} |
||
\langle\Psi|\hat{ |
\langle\Psi|\hat{G}_1|\Psi\rangle &= \sum_{i=1}^{N}\ \langle\phi_{i}|\hat{h}|\phi_{i}\rangle, \\ |
||
\langle\Psi|\hat{ |
\langle\Psi|\hat{G}_1|\Psi_{m}^{p}\rangle &= \langle\phi_{m}|\hat{h}|\phi_{p}\rangle, \\ |
||
\langle\Psi|\hat{ |
\langle\Psi|\hat{G}_1|\Psi_{mn}^{pq}\rangle &= 0. |
||
\end{align} |
\end{align} |
||
</math> |
</math> |
||
==Integrals of two-body operators== |
==Integrals of two-body operators== |
||
Line 52: | Line 49: | ||
A two-body operator in an ''N''-particle system is decomposed as |
A two-body operator in an ''N''-particle system is decomposed as |
||
:<math>\hat{G} = \sum_{i=1}^{N}\sum_{j=i}^{N}\ \hat{g}(i,j).</math> |
:<math>\hat{G}_2 = \frac 12 \sum_{i=1}^{N}\sum_{{j =1}\atop{j\neq i}}^{N}\ \hat{g}(i,j).</math> |
||
The |
The Slater–Condon rules for such an operator are:<ref name="piela"/><ref name="szabo"/> |
||
:<math> |
:<math> |
||
\begin{align} |
\begin{align} |
||
\langle\Psi|\hat{G}|\Psi\rangle &= |
\langle\Psi|\hat{G}_2|\Psi\rangle &= \frac{1}{2}\sum_{i=1}^{N}\sum_{j=1\atop{j\neq i}}^{N}\ \bigg(\langle\phi_{i}\phi_{j}|\hat{g}|\phi_{i}\phi_{j}\rangle - \langle\phi_{i}\phi_{j}|\hat{g}|\phi_{j}\phi_{i}\rangle\bigg), \\ |
||
\langle\Psi|\hat{G}|\Psi_{m}^{p}\rangle &= |
\langle\Psi|\hat{G}_2|\Psi_{m}^{p}\rangle &= \sum_{i=1}^{N}\ \bigg(\langle\phi_{m}\phi_{i}|\hat{g}|\phi_{p}\phi_{i}\rangle - \langle\phi_{m}\phi_{i}|\hat{g}|\phi_{i}\phi_{p}\rangle\bigg), \\ |
||
\langle\Psi|\hat{G}|\Psi_{mn}^{pq}\rangle &= |
\langle\Psi|\hat{G}_2|\Psi_{mn}^{pq}\rangle &= \langle\phi_{m}\phi_{n}|\hat{g}|\phi_{p}\phi_{q}\rangle - \langle\phi_{m}\phi_{n}|\hat{g}|\phi_{q}\phi_{p}\rangle, |
||
\end{align} |
\end{align} |
||
</math> |
</math> |
||
where |
where |
||
:<math>\langle\phi_{i}\phi_{j}|\hat{g}|\phi_{k}\phi_{l}\rangle = \int\mathrm{d}\mathbf{r}\int\mathrm{d}\mathbf{r}'\ \phi_{i}^{*}(\mathbf{r})\phi_{j}^{*}(\mathbf{r}')g(\mathbf{r},\mathbf{r}')\phi_{k}(\mathbf{r})\phi_{l}(\mathbf{r}').</math> |
:<math>\langle\phi_{i}\phi_{j}|\hat{g}|\phi_{k}\phi_{l}\rangle = \int\mathrm{d}\mathbf{r}\int\mathrm{d}\mathbf{r}'\ \phi_{i}^{*}(\mathbf{r})\phi_{j}^{*}(\mathbf{r}')g(\mathbf{r},\mathbf{r}')\phi_{k}(\mathbf{r})\phi_{l}(\mathbf{r}').</math> |
||
Any matrix elements of a two-body operator with wavefunctions that differ in three or more spin orbitals will vanish. |
|||
==References== |
==References== |
||
{{reflist}} |
{{reflist}} |
||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Slater-Condon rules}} |
|||
[[Category:Computational chemistry]] |
[[Category:Computational chemistry]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Quantum chemistry]] |
||
[[fr:Lois de Slater-Condon]] |
Revision as of 09:35, 2 July 2024
Within computational chemistry, the Slater–Condon rules express integrals of one- and two-body operators over wavefunctions constructed as Slater determinants of orthonormal orbitals in terms of the individual orbitals. In doing so, the original integrals involving N-electron wavefunctions are reduced to sums over integrals involving at most two molecular orbitals, or in other words, the original 3N dimensional integral is expressed in terms of many three- and six-dimensional integrals.
The rules are used in deriving the working equations for all methods of approximately solving the Schrödinger equation that employ wavefunctions constructed from Slater determinants. These include Hartree–Fock theory, where the wavefunction is a single determinant, and all those methods which use Hartree–Fock theory as a reference such as Møller–Plesset perturbation theory, and Coupled cluster and Configuration interaction theories.
In 1929 John C. Slater derived expressions for diagonal matrix elements of an approximate Hamiltonian while investigating atomic spectra within a perturbative approach.[1] The following year Edward Condon extended the rules to non-diagonal matrix elements.[2] In 1955 Per-Olov Löwdin further generalized these results for wavefunctions constructed from non-orthonormal orbitals, leading to what are known as the Löwdin rules.[3]
Mathematical background
In terms of an antisymmetrization operator () acting upon a product of N orthonormal spin-orbitals (with r and σ denoting spatial and spin variables), a determinantal wavefunction is denoted as
A wavefunction differing from this by only a single orbital (the m'th orbital) will be denoted as
and a wavefunction differing by two orbitals will be denoted as
For any particular one- or two-body operator, Ô, the Slater–Condon rules show how to simplify the following types of integrals:[4]
Matrix elements for two wavefunctions differing by more than two orbitals vanish unless higher order interactions are introduced.
Integrals of one-body operators
One body operators depend only upon the position or momentum of a single electron at any given instant. Examples are the kinetic energy, dipole moment, and total angular momentum operators.
A one-body operator in an N-particle system is decomposed as
The Slater–Condon rules for such an operator are:[4][5]
Integrals of two-body operators
Two-body operators couple two particles at any given instant. Examples being the electron-electron repulsion, magnetic dipolar coupling, and total angular momentum-squared operators.
A two-body operator in an N-particle system is decomposed as
The Slater–Condon rules for such an operator are:[4][5]
where
Any matrix elements of a two-body operator with wavefunctions that differ in three or more spin orbitals will vanish.
References
- ^ Slater, J. C. (1929). "The Theory of Complex Spectra". Phys. Rev. 34 (10): 1293–1322. Bibcode:1929PhRv...34.1293S. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.34.1293. PMID 9939750.
- ^ Condon, E. U. (1930). "The Theory of Complex Spectra". Phys. Rev. 36 (7): 1121–1133. Bibcode:1930PhRv...36.1121C. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.36.1121.
- ^ Löwdin, Per-Olov (1955). "Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems. I. Physical Interpretations by Means of Density Matrices, Natural Spin-Orbitals, and Convergence Problems in the Method of Configurational Interaction". Phys. Rev. 97 (6): 1474–1489. Bibcode:1955PhRv...97.1474L. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.97.1474.
- ^ a b c Piela, Lucjan (2006). "Appendix M". Ideas of Quantum Chemistry. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. ISBN 0-444-52227-1.
- ^ a b Szabo, Attila; Ostlund, Neil S. (1996). "Ch. 2.3.3". Modern Quantum Chemistry : Introduction to Advanced Electronic Structure Theory. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications. ISBN 0-486-69186-1.